T$y ' I- &*"-1P\ ;-.,. '.'V ^ *m to is ig.qffirayitjBua^ ^ pfownA lsi\V-v r.tate of Okl'thor:;*, Plaintiff in Snot, I I SHtf endant in Error* May it 2fcl4u+i'i th* court* fe respectful!;/ call the s&tSrtlBflif lfc» Ksnsrabls Court to pa^e 40 of ttMi VWMnrd in this *&**• in wMali tot state elects to try the defendant »vi the fi*0| Count of the information* This election was J»&de a£tar «fthe (Stints hadflrst elected to prosscute under th* second Couiit i»f the Infttffaatlftn* $3se record pug* J9) The First count of the information reads as follows: *How comes a* L« ^ei^n^i^tta^.diiix^ql^^Cif^ a©* sating County^ Attorney m ana for Ottawa Oswald Mite of CBELftAetta, mm gives the District tto'*ir$ oif aaid County and state, to know and be informed tfcut !fonsr 7oas* did in said Cou nty und Stats on or about the 8tht day of June* in the year of our &crdt 0n» Thousand Hint Hundred and ^renty*thrss# mid anterior to ths presentment hereof* commit ths ori^a of cmm^i\L 3XyxftCAU8tf in maimer and for asfalleve* tomtit: Said dsfendant then a»d there baing• did thsn and there on or about said day and fats* wilfully* mil awfully and feloniously orgalase and assist in organising* and knowingly become a asafrsr of an organisation society club or assemblage or persons known as Industrie workers of the <'arld9 sometimes known as ths I* #• W*9 which s^id Indus trial **>*kars of toe %rld# otherwise known as the I* I* -*i*f wsre th^m and thsrs organised for the purpose of defend.*ing9 advocating, taitchvvi* tiding and abetting arla&aal sindysalisnu sabotage, violence aivt unlawful mrthoda of terrorism as a mans of MMsusf--lishing a fthtttttfs in industrial ownarefclp and affecting political change*** It is ths contention of the defendant that If fcg ^dld then and there wilfully, imluwfully an<l f-tloniousiy srgaaisa and assist in organising «md kno\«intfly ^s^ome a «enbsr of an erganisatica Oooisty Club9 or Hsm^ablegf of pa^aotts known as t ndustrlal %rkers of the '.16rid*t he should be gi*r#n nore definite infantatlon mm to what proof he wi^i *^ AM^t than is givstt or swan suggested in this Cowit of ths iafamia1ien« «bat did he do in the way of ^Organising1*? Ms is gi^an no information lAiatswsr as to what proof will b.t ptodmced
