Facility capacity

              C 5700.3 F141e 1997 e.1
Oklahoma
Department of Corrections
Facility Capacity
February 1997
Facility Capacity
February 1997
Acknowledgments
The team that developed this reports recommendations through discussions with the various
regional directors, wardens, and superintendents was:
Dennis Cotner, Administrator, Health Services
Vincent Knight, General Counsel
Al Milligan, Administrator, Construction and Maintenance
Linda Parrish, Administrative Assistant, Staff and Operations
J'me Scruggs, Deputy Director, Administrative Services
Arnold Waggoner, Administrator, Programs
The following employees of the Department of Corrections participated III compiling and
developing the format for presentation:
Lloyd Basinger, Assistant Regional Director, Southeastern Region
R. Michael Cody, Assistant Regional Director, Southwestern Region
Steve Hargett, Warden, Lexington Assessment and Reception Center
Dan Hix, Administrative Assistant, Northwestern Region
David C. Miller, Chief of Staff and Operations
Al Milligan, Administrator, Construction and Maintenance
Cliff Sandel, Deputy Director, Support Services
Marty Sirmons, Deputy Warden, Dick Conner Correctional Center
and the employees of the facilities and Construction and Maintenance Division of the
Department of Corrections that supplied data on the various facilities.
The original Inmate Capacity Survey was presented to the Oklahoma Board of Corrections in
January 1995. This revision and update is presented on November 18, 1996
Contents
Page
Purpose 4
Methodology 5
Male Facility Capacity Data 7
Female Facility Capacity Data 12
Male Facility Design Data 15
Female Facility Design Data 20
Abbreviation and Term Definitions 22
Expansion Resources for Current Bed Additions .25
Resources for Further Bed Additions 34
Appendix A: O. S. 61 § 209 38
Appendix B: Department of Central Services, Subchapter 5:
Minimum Codes for State Construction, Section 580:20-5-2 .41
Appendix C: Life Safety Code, Sections 4-1.5 and 15-1.7 .44
Appendix D: OP-040101, Facility Security Standards 46
Appendix E: Current Capitol Outlay Request 55
Purpose
The purpose of this facility capacity survey is to provide a single document that will define the
capacity of each inmate housing unit operated by the Oklahoma Department of Corrections. The
Board of Corrections approves the capacity of the department operated facilities usmg
established standards and recommendations by departmental staff.
The rule of measurement to determine the occupant load of a correctional institution with
available means of egress is 120 gross square feet of gross area for the building per occupant for
maximum and medium security facilities. In minimum and community security facilities the rule
of measurement is 70 to 75 square feet of gross floor area per occupant. Total occupancy in this
study is the highest number of employees on duty routinely at one time in the housing unit plus
the number of inmates assigned to be housed on the unit.
The director of the department is required by statute to accept inmates into the custody of the
department that may exceed the established Board of Corrections capacity for particular housing
units and facilities. The director, in consultation with the regional director and warden or
superintendent responsible for the facility and other staff, will determine the number of inmates
assigned to a housing unit and facility. The Director will recommend that the Board of
Corrections adopt a particular authorized count. This authorized count is subject to the review
and approval by those state agencies responsible for particular code enforcement.
This study will be updated whenever additional housing units operated by the department are
added, housing units are modified or remodeled that would increase or decrease the occupant
load of a housing unit, or the Director finds it necessary to modify the authorized count of a
housing unit.
Methodology
1. The Construction and Maintenance Division sent to each institution and community
corrections center housing surveys and computerized floor plans with a control date for
completion of November 1994.
2. The floor plans were used to calculate actual field dimensions. These dimensions were used
to establish gross floor area of sleeping areas that are operated by the Department of
Corrections.
3. The data collected were used to determine, in addition to gross floor area, the highest number
of employees assigned and present on each housing unit. This number subtracted from the
occupant load provided the inmate capacity.
4. The data were reviewed and updated in September and October 1996. The facilities
designated as community work centers were added to the survey as well as the institutions
added since the original survey, the Bill Johnson Correctional Center at Alva and the
Northeast Oklahoma Correctional Center at Vinita. The current employee load of each
housing unit was also reviewed and updated.
5. In November 1996 a decision was made to modify the 120 square feet of gross floor space to
70 square feet of gross floor space for minimum and community security facilities. A multi-discipline
committee that met with each regional director, warden and superintendent during
December 1996 and January 1997 reviewed the data. The results of that review are included
in this report.
Facility
Capacity
Male Facilities Authorized
Square % of
Square
Security Occupant Rated
Facility Unit Name Square Feet Foot Staff Inmates Count Feet per
Level Capacity Inmate
Measure
Capacity
Occupant
Altus CWC Com/CWC 8,750 70 125 2 123 95 78% 90
Altus CWC Total 8,750 125 2 123 95
Ardmore CWC Com/CWC 5,760 70 82 2 80 100 124% 56
Ardmore CWC Total 5,760 82 2 80 100
Beaver CWC Com/CWC 2,900 70 41 7 34 45 126% 56
Beaver CWC Total 2,900 41 7 34 45
BJCC RHU Med 1,729 120 14 1 13 10 76% 157
BJCC I Min 20,000 70 286 9 277 150 56% 126
BJCC II Min 20,000 70 286 9 277 170 63% 112
BJCC Total 41,729 586 19 567 330
CWCCC 5 Com/CCC 2,652 70 38 0 38 42 111% 63
CWCCC 6 Com/CCC 2,652 70 38 0 38 43 113% 62
CWCCC 7 Com/CCC 2,652 70 38 0 38 44 116% 60
CWCCC 8 Com/CCC 1,440 70 21 0 21 24 117% 60
CWCCC 9 Com/CCC 1,440 70 21 0 21 24 117% 60
CWCCC 10 Com/CCC 1,440 70 21 0 21 24 117% 60
CWCCC II Com/CCC 347 70 5 0 5 5 101% 69
CWCCC RHU Med 284 120 2 I I 8 380% 32
CWCCCTotal 12,907 183 1 182 214
DCCC MSUIRHU Med 840 120 7 0 7 12 171% 70
DCCC A&C Med 17,258 120 144 2 142 160 113% 107
DCCC D&F Med 17,258 120 144 2 142 160 113% 107
DCCC O&J Med 17,258 120 144 2 142 160 113% 107
DCCC K&M Med 17,258 120 144 2 142 160 113% 107
DCCC N&O Med 17,258 120 144 2 142 160 113% 107
DCCC V&W Med 17,258 120 144 2 142 160 113% 107
DCCC Medical Med 2,592 120 22 2 20 9 51% 236
DCCC RHU Med 1,590 120 13 I 12 18 143% 84
DCCC S&O Med 1,224 120 10 I 9 13 137% 87
DCCC MSU Min 23,601 70 337 7 330 248 76% 93
DCCC Total 133,395 1,252 23 1,229 1,260
DICCC Com/CCC 5,533 70 79 0 79 86 109% 64
DICCC RHU Med 80 120 I 0 1 2 300% 40
DI CCCTotal 5,613 80 0 80 88
Male Facilities Authorized
Square
% of
Square
Security Occupant Rated
Facility Unit Name
Level
Square Feet Foot
Capacity
Staff Inmates Count
Inmate
Feet per
Measure
Capacity
Occupant
Earl Davis CWC Com/CWC 4,368 70 62 4 58 84 141% 50
Earl Davis CWC Total 4,368 62 4 58 84
ECCC Com/CCC 4,756 70 68 0 68 105 155% 45
ECCC Total 4,756 68 0 68 105
Elk City CWC Com/CWC 5,775 70 83 7 76 86 113% 62
Elk City CWC Total 5,775 83 7 76 86
Frederick CWC Com/CWC 4,284 70 61 2 59 100 167% 42
Frederick CWC Total 4,284 61 2 59 100
Healdton CWC Com/CWC 1,800 70 26 2 24 40 163% 43
Healdton CWC Total 1,800 26 2 24 40
HMCC Phoenix Min 17,457 70 249 8 241 202 84% 83
HMCC OdysseyCosmos Min 21,472 70 307 16 291 416 141% 50
HMCCTotal 38,929 556 24 532 618
Hobart CWC Com/CWC 5,390 70 77 2 75 60 81% 87
Hobart CWC Total 5,390 77 2 75 60
Idabel CWC Com/CWC 3,552 70 51 4 47 80 166% 42
Idabel CWC Total 3,552 51 4 47 80
JBCC CCU Com/CCC 11,000 70 157 7 150 200 132% 53
JBCC A Min 7,901 70 113 4 109 133 121% 58
JBCC B Min 12,998 70 186 5 181 272 149% 47
JBCC Total 31,899 456 16 440 605
JCCC 1 Med 3,530 120 29 3 26 42 153% 78
JCCC 2 Med 7,060 120 59 4 55 86 153% 78
JCCC 3 Med 7,060 120 59 6 53 85 155% 78
JCCC 4 Med 16,848 120 140 8 132 188 140% 86
JCCC 6 Med 25,273 120 211 8 203 163 81% 148
JCCC RHU Med 460 120 4 1 3 10 287% 42
JCCC 5 Mill 16,848 70 241 8 233 226 97% 72
JCCC Total 77,079 743 38 705 800
JDCC RHU D-East Med 669 120 6 1 5 12 233% 51
JDCC RHU D-West Med 105 . 120 I I (0) 8 1029% 12
JDCC A Min 11,058 70 158 5 153 237 153% 46
JDCC B Min 10,175 70 145 5 140 172 122% 57
Male Facilities Authorized
Square
% of
Square
Facility Unit Name
Security
Square Feet Foot
Occupant
Staff Inmates Count
Rated
Feet per
Level Capacity Inmate
Measure
Capacity
Occupant
JDCC C Min 12,992 70 186 6 180 192 107% 66
JDCC D-East Min 10,702 70 153 6 147 127 87% 80
JDCC D-West Min 11,687 70 167 7 160 126 80% 88
JDCC Total 57,388 815 31 784 874
JHCC A Med 17,258 120 144 3 141 160 113% 106
JHCC B Med 17,258 120 144 3 141 160 113% 106
JHCC C Med 17,258 120 144 J 141 160 113% 106
JHCC D Med 17,258 120 144 3 141 160 113% 106
JHCC E Med 17,258 120 144 3 141 160 113% 106
JHCC MHU Med 17,258 120 144 3 141 110 79% 153
JHCC RHU Med 2,574 120 21 2 19 26 131% 92
JHCC Total 106,122 884 20 864 936
JLCC RHU Med 862 120 7 1 6 8 125% 96
JLCC Paris Min 16,848 70 241 6 235 200 86% 82
JLCC Monte Carlo Min 16,848 70 241 6 235 200 86% 82
JLCC London Min 27,347 70 391 6 385 232 61% 115
JLCC Total 61,905 879 19 860 640
LARC RTMU/RHU Med 420 120 4 I 3 12 371% 32
LARC 6 Med 17,122 120 143 3 140 164 117% 103
LARC 6/RHU Med 335 120 3 1 2 10 394% 30
LARC 5 Med 17,258 120 144 3 141 160 113% 106
LARC 4 Med 17,258 120 144 3 141 160 113% 106
LARC 3 Med 17,258 120 144 3 141 160 113% 106
LARC Medical Med 2,184 120 18 1 17 10 60% 199
LARC RTMU Min 22,156 70 317 4 313 276 88% 179
LARC A&Rl Recp 20,370 120 170 10 160 120 77% 157
LARC A&RII Recp 27,160 120 226 8 218 160 74% 162
LARC Total 141,521 1,311 37 1,274 1,232
LCCC Com/CCC 6,434 70 92 2 90 144 159% 44
LCCC Total 6,434 92 2 90 144
MACC A Med 29,572 120 246 8 238 200 84% 142
MACC B Med 29,572 120 246 8 238 200 84% 142
MACC C Med 13,237 120 110 10 100 139 135% 89
MACC 5 Min 3,946 70 56 6 50 62 121% 58
Male Facilities Authorized
Square
% of
Square
Security Occupant Rated
Facility Unit Name
Level
Square Feet Foot
Capacity
Staff Inmates Count
Inmate
Feet per
Measure
Capacity
Occupant
MACC 1-5 Min 17,457 70 249 3 246 216 88% 80
MACCTotal 93,784 909 35 874 817
Madill CWC Com/CWC 1,260 70 18 2 16 48 278% 25
Madill CWC Total 1,260 18 2 16 48
MangumCWC Com/CWC 8,991 70 128 2 126 60 48% 145
Mangum CWC Total 8,991 128 2 126 60
NaCC RHU Med 800 120 7 1 6 8 135% 89
NaCC 4 Min 19,766 70 282 16 266 148 58% 121
NaCC 8 Min 19,200 70 274 11 263 224 86% 82
NaCC 10 Min 13,816 70 197 3 194 72 38% 184
NOCC Total 53,582 761 31 730 452
acc 1 Min 17,457 70 249 8 241 198 83% 85
acc 2 Min 17,457 70 249 7 242 212 88% 80
acc 3 Min 22,576 70 323 8 315 236 76% 93
OCC Total 57,490 821 23 798 646
aKCCCC 200 Com/CCC 7,055 70 101 14 87 90 103% 68
aKCCCC 300 Com/CCC 6,668 70 95 0 95 113 119% 59
aKCCCC RHU Med 400 120 3 1 2 8 270% 44
OKCCCC Total 14,123 199 15 184 211
asp A Max 31,864 120 266 10 256 224 88% 136
asp C Max 31,864 120 266 10 256 224 88% 136
asp 0 Max 10,667 120 89 6 83 78 94% 127
asp E Max 10,667 120 89 6 83 80 97% 124
asp F Max 42,028 120 350 24 326 307 95% 127
asp H Max 62,856 120 524 21 503 310 63% 190
asp IHCC Max 938 120 8 2 6 10 154% 78
asp IHCC Max 1,350 120 11 2 9 8 89% 135
asp G Med 12,881 120 107 4 103 50 50% 239
asp I Med 7,129 120 59 7 52 90 163% 73
asp THMU Min 6,126 70 88 5 83 69 85% 83
OSP Total 218,370 1,856 97 1,759 1,450
aSR A Med 13,547 120 113 7 106 132 123% 97
aSR B Med 13,547 120 113 8 105 160 149% 81
aSR C Med 13,547 120 113 6 107 160 147% 82
Male Facilities Authorized
Square
% of
Square
Facility Unit Name
Security
Square Feet Foot
Occupant
Staff Inmates Count
Rated
Feet per
Level Capacity Inmate
Measure
Capacity
Occupant
OSR D Med 13,547 120 113 7 106 160 148% 81
OSR MSU Min 12,926 70 185 8 177 182 103% 68
OSR Total 67,114 636 36 600 794
Sayre CWC Com/CWC 3,857 70 55 7 48 60 122% 58
Sayre CWC Total 3,857 55 7 48 60
TCCC Com/CCC 5,028 70 72 0 72 100 139% 50
TCCC RHU Med 252 120 2 0 2 6 286% 42
TCCC Total 5,280 74 0 74 106
Walters CWC Com/CWC 5,407 70 77 2 75 85 113% 62
Walters CWC Total 5,407 77 2 75 85
WaurikaCWC Com/CWC 3,270 70 47 2 45 80 176% 40
Waurika CWC Total 3,270 47 2 45 80
WKCC RHU Med 1,914 120 16 4 12 14 113% 106
WKCC RlD Min 20,821 70 297 21 276 190 71% 99
WKCC General Population Min 11,737 70 168 9 159 155 98% 72
WKCC Key to Life Min 14,904 70 213 8 205 170 84% 84
WKCC Honor Dorm Min 3,196 70 46 0 46 40 88% 80
WKCCTotal 52,572 740 42 698 569
Grand Total 1,347,356 14,835 556 14,279 13,914
Female Facilities Authorized
Square
% of
Square
Security Square Occupant Rated
Facility Unit Name
Level Feet
Foot
Capacity
Staff Inmates Count
Inmate
Feet per
Measure
Capacity
Inmate
LARC A&RI Recp 6,790 120 57 3 54 40 76% 158
LARC Total 6,790 57 3 54 40
MBCC Administration Min 5,820 70 83 6 77 92 118% 59
MBCC East Max 9,548 120 80 6 74 84 113% 106
MBCC South Med 12,791 120 107 6 101 129 127% 95
MBCC RHU Max 3,243 120 27 1 26 32 122% 98
MBCCTotal 31,402 296 19 277 337
EWCC Regimented Min 6,858 70 98 6 92 75 83% 85
EWCC 2 Min 6,092 70 87 1 86 50 59% 119
EWCC 3 Min 6,858 70 98 4 94 106 112% 62
EWCC 4 Min 6,858 70 98 3 95 106 111% 63
EWCC 5 Min 6,858 70 98 3 95 106 111% 63
EWCC 6 Min 6,858 70 98 3 95 106 111% 63
EWCC 7 Min 6,858 70 98 3 95 106 Ill% 63
EWCC RHU Med 766 120 6 I 5 5 94% 128
EWCCTotal 48,006 681 24 657 660
KBCCC Com/CCC 11,585 70 166 I 165 162 98% 71
KBCCC RHU Med 230 120 2 1 I 4 46
K HI'I Total 1l,H15 167 2 165 166
TCCC GP Com/CCC 6,497 70 93 0 93 108 116% 60
TCCC RHU Med 252 120 2 0 2 6 286% 42
TCCC Total 6,749 95 0 95 114
Hollis CWC Com/CWC 2,773 70 40 2 38 40 106% 66
Hollis CWC Total 2,773 40 2 38 40
Grand Total 107,535 1,336 50 1,286 1,357 105% 76
Square
% of
Square Feet Foot OCcacpuapcaitnyt Rated Square
Staff Inmates Count Inmate Feet per
Measure
Capacity Inmate
Agency Grand Total 1,454,891 16,171 606 15,565 I 15,271 I 98%1 921
Facility
Design
Male Facilities Type of Housing Authorized
General % of
Security Population Medical Medical Rated
Square
Facility Unit Name
Level Secure
Rooms Dormitory RHU
Ward Cells
Count
Inmate
Feet per
Cells Capacity
Occupant
Altus CWC Com/CWC 2 95 78% 90
Altus CWC Total 0 0 2 0 0 0 95
ArdmoreCWC Com/CWC 2 100 124% 56
Ardmore CWC Total 0 0 2 0 0 0 100
Beaver CWC Com/CWC I 45 126% 56
Beaver CWC Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 45
BlCC RHU Med 6 10 76% 157
BlCC I Min 2 150 56% 126
BlCC II Min 2 170 63% 112
BJCC Total 0 0 4 6 0 0 330
CWCCC 5 Com/CCC 8 42 111% 63
CWCCC 6 Com/CCC 8 43 113% 62
CWCCC 7 Com/CCC 8 44 116% 60
CWCCC 8 Com/CCC 4 24 117% 60
CWCCC 9 Com/CCC 4 24 117% 60
CWCCC 10 Com/CCC 4 24 117% 60
CWCCC II Com/CCC 1 5 101% 69
CWCCC RHU Med 1 8 380% 32
CWCCCTotal 0 36 1 1 0 0 214
DCCC MSUIRHU Med 6 12 171% 70
DCCC A&C Med 80 160 113% 107
DCCC D&F Med 80 160 113% 107
DCCC G&l Med 80 160 113% 107
DCCC K&M Med 80 160 113% 107
DCCC N&O Med 80 160 113% 107
DCCC V&W Med 80 160 113% 107
DCCC Medical Med 9 9 51% 236
DCCC RHU Med 10 18 143% 84
DCCC S&O Med 8 13 137% 87
DCCC MSU Min 80 248 76% 93
DCCC Total 480 80 0 24 0 9 1,260
DICCC Com/CCC 20 I 86 109% 64
DICCC RHU Med 1 2 300% 40
DI CCC Total 0 20 1 1 0 0 88
Male Facilities Type of Housing Authorized
General % of
Square
Security Population Medical Medical Rated
Facility Unit Name
Level Secure
Rooms Dormitory RHU
Ward Cells
Count
Inmate
Feet per
Cells Capacity
Occupant
Earl Davis CWC Com/CWC 2 84 141% 50
Earl Davis CWC Total 0 0 2 0 0 0 84
ECCC Com/CCC 1 9 105 155% 45
ECCC Total 0 1 9 0 0 0 105
Elk City CWC Com/CWC 2 1 86 113% 62
Elk City CWC Total 0 2 1 0 0 0 86
Frederick CWC Com/CWC 7 100 167% 42
Frederick CWC Total 0 0 7 0 0 0 100
Healdton CWC Com/CWC 1 40 163% 43
Healdton CWC Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 40
HMCC Phoenix Min 83 5 202 84% 83
HMCC OdysseyCosmos Min 2 416 141% 50
HMCCTotal 0 83 2 5 0 0 618
Hobart CWC Com/CWC 2 60 81% 87
Hobart CWC Total 0 0 2 0 0 0 60
Idabel CWC Com/CWC I 80 166% 42
Idabel CWC Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 80
JBCC CCU Com/CCC 4 200 132% 53
JBCC A Min 3 133 121% 58
JBCC B Min 3 272 149% 47
JBCC Total 0 0 10 0 0 0 605
JCCC 1 Med 1 42 153% 78
JCCC 2 Med 2 86 153% 78
JCCC 3 Med 2 85 155% 78
JCCC 4 Med 2 188 140% 86
JCCC 6 Med 84 163 81% 148
JCCC RHU Med 6 10 287% 42
JCCC 5 Min 2 226 97% 72
JCCC Total 84 0 9 6 0 0 800
JDCC RHU D-East Med 6 12 233% 51
JDCC RHU D-West Med 3 8 1029% 12
JDCC A Min 3 237 153% 46
JDCC B Min 2 172 122% 57
Male Facilities Type of Housing Authorized
General % of
Security Population Medical Medical Rated Square
Facility Unit Name
Level Secure
Rooms Dormitory RHU
Ward Cells
Count
Inmate
Feet per
Cells Capacity
Occupant
JDCC C Min 4 192 107% 66
JDCC D-East Min 6 127 87% 80
JDCC D-West Min I 126 80% 88
JDCC Total 0 0 16 9 0 0 874
JHCC A Med 80 160 113% 106
JHCC B Med 80 160 113% 106
JHCC C Med 80 160 113% 106
JHCC 0 Med 80 160 113% 106
JHCC E Med 80 160 113% 106
JHCC MHU Med 80 110 79% 153
JHCC RHU Med 13 26 131% 92
JHCC Total 480 0 0 13 0 0 936
JLCC RHU Med 4 8 125% 96
JLCC Paris Min 2 200 86% 82
JLCC Monte Carlo Min 2 200 86% 82
JLCC London Min 6 232 61% 115
JLCC Total 0 0 10 4 0 0 640
LARC RTMU/RHU Med 6 12 371% 32
LARC 6 Med 82 164 117% 103
LARC 6/RHU Med 5 10 394% 30
LARC 5 Med 80 160 113% 106
LARC 4 Med 80 160 113% 106
LARC 3 Med 80 160 113% 106
LARC Medical Med I 4 10 60% 199
LARC RTMU Min 86 276 88% 79
LARC A&RI Recp 60 120 77% 157
LARC A&R II Recp 80 160 74% 162
LARC Total 380 168 0 11 I 4 1,232
LCCC ComlCCC 22 I 144 159% 44
LCCC Total 0 0 22 I 0 0 144
MACC A Med 100 200 84% 142
MACC B Med 100 200 84% 142
MACC C Med 27 45 139 135% 89
MACC 5 Min 25 62 121% 58
Male Facilities Type of Housing Authorized
General % of
Square
Security Population Medical Medical Rated
Facility Unit Name
Level Secure
Rooms Dormitory RHU
Ward Cells
Count
Inmate
Feet per
Cells Capacity
Occupant
MACC 1-5 Min 88 216 88% 80
MACC Total 227 113 0 45 0 0 817
Madill CWC Com/CWC I 48 278% 25
Madill CWC Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 48
MangumCWC Com/CWC 13 2 60 48% 145
Mangum CWC Total 0 13 2 0 0 0 60
NaCC RHU Med 4 8 135% 89
NaCC 4 Min 74 148 58% 121
NaCC 8 Min 4 224 86% 82
Nacc 10 Min 36 72 38% 184
NOCC Total 74 36 4 4 0 0 452
acc I Min 81 5 198 83% 85
acc 2 Min 88 212 88% 80
acc 3 Min 84 6 236 76% 93
OCC Total 0 253 0 11 0 0 646
aKCCCC 200 Com/CCC 20 90 103% 68
aKCCCC 300 Com/CCC 24 113 119% 59
aKCCCC RHU Med 2 8 270% 44
OKCCCC Total 0 44 0 2 0 0 211
asp A Max 112 224 88% 136
asp C Max 112 224 88% 136
asp D Max 40 78 94% 127
asp E Max 40 80 97% 124
asp F Max 192 307 95% 127
asp H Max 200 310 63% 190
asp IHCC Max I 10 154% 78
asp IHCC Max 7 8 89% 135
asp G Med 25 25 50 50% 239
asp I Med I 90 163% 73
asp THMU Min 23 69 85% 83
OSP Total 721 23 1 25 1 7 1,450
aSR A Med 48 16 4 132 123% 97
aSR B Med 80 160 149% 81
aSR C Med 80 160 147% 82
Male Facilities Type of Housing Authorized
General % of
Square
Security Population Medical Medical Rated
Facility Unit Name
Level Secure
Rooms Dormitory RHU
Ward Cells
Count
Inmate
Feet per
Cells Capacity
Occupant
OSR D Med 80 160 148% 81
OSR MSU Min 91 182 103% 68
OSR Total 288 91 0 16 0 4 794
Sayre CWC Com/CWC 14 2 60 122% 58
Sayre CWC Total 0 14 2 0 0 0 60
TCCC Com/CCC 7 100 139% 50
TCCC RHU Med I 6 286% 42
TCCC Total 0 0 7 1 0 0 106
Walters CWC Corn/CWC I 85 113% 62
Walters CWC Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 85
WaurikaCWC Com/CWC 4 80 176% 40
Waurika CWC Total 0 0 4 0 0 0 80
WKCC RHU Med 6 14 113% 106
WKCC RID Min 3 190 71% 99
WKCC General Population Min 3 155 98% 72
WKCC Key to Life Min 3 170 84% 84
WKCC Honor Dorm Min 1 40 88% 80
WKCC Total 0 0 10 6 0 0 569
Grand Total 2734 977 135 191 2 24 13,914
Female Facilities Type of Housing Authorized
General %of
Security Population Medical Medical Rated
Square
Facility Unit Name Rooms Dormitory RHU Count Feet per
Level Secure Ward Cells Inmate
Cells Capacity
Inmate
LARC A&RI Recp 20 40 76% 158
LARC Total 20 0 0 0 0 0 40
MBCC Administration Min 1 92 118% 59
MBCC East Max 42 84 113% 106
MBCC South Med 65 129 127% 95
MBCC RHU Max 23 32 122% 98
MBCCTotal 107 0 1 23 0 0 337
EWCC Regimented Min 1 75 83% 85
EWCC 2 Min 1 50 59% 119
EWCC 3 Min 1 106 112% 62
EWCC 4 Min 1 106 111% 63
EWCC 5 Min 1 106 111% 63
EWCC 6 Min 1 106 111% 63
EWCC 7 Min 1 106 111% 63
EWCC RHU Med 2 5 94% 128
EWCCTotal 0 0 7 2 0 0 660
KBCCC Com/CCC 34 162 98% 71
KBCCC RHU Med 1 4 46
KHII Total U J4 U 1 U U 166
TCCC GP Com/CCC 5 108 116% 60
TCCC RHU Med 1 6 286% 42
TCCC Total 0 0 5 1 0 0 114
Hollis CWC Com/CWC 1 40 106% 66
Hollis CWC Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 40
Grand Total 127 34 14 27 0 0 1,357 105% 76
General %of
Population Medical Medical Rated
Square
Rooms Dormitory RHU Count Feet per
Secure Ward Cells Inmate
Cells Capacity
Inmate
Agency Grand Total I 2,861 1 1,011 1 149 I 218 1 21 2411 15,271 I 98%1 921
Abbreviation and Term Definitions
BJCC
Com
Corn/CCC
Corn/CWC
CR
CWCCC
DCCC
Dormitory
ECCC
EWCC
General
Population
HMCC
JBCC
JCCC
JDCC
JDMSU
JHCC
Charles E. "Bill" Johnson Correctional Center, Alva.
Community Security. See Appendix D, OP-040101, Facility Security
Standards, section 1I.E and lII.E. for a description of security requirements.
Community security at a community corrections center.
Community security at a community work center.
Central Region.
Clara Waters Community Corrections Center, Oklahoma City.
R. B. "Dick" Conner Correctional Center.
A housing area that houses more than four inmates with only minimal
obstructions or walls.
Enid Community Corrections Center, Enid.
Dr. Eddie Warrior Correctional Center, Taft
The area inmates are housed that allows the freedom of movement
that is dictated by the requirements of that security level.
Howard McLeod Correctional Center, Farris.
Jackie Brannon Correctional Center, McAlester.
James Crabtree Correctional Center, Helena.
Jess Dunn Correctional Center, Taft.
John Dahl Minimum Security Unit, R. B. "Dick" Conner Correctional
Center, Hominy.
Joseph Harp Correctional Center, Lexington.
JLCC
KBCCC
LARC
LCCC
MACC
Max
MBCC
MCCC
Med
MHU
Min
NER
NOCC
NWR
OCC
OKCCCC
OSP
OSR
Recp
RHU
Rooms
John Lilley Correctional Center, Boley.
Kate Barnard Community Corrections Center, Oklahoma City.
Lexington Assessment and Reception Center, Lexington.
Lawton Community Corrections Center, Lawton.
Mack Alford Correctional Center, Stringtown.
Maximum security. See Appendix D, OP-040101, Facility Security
Standards, section ILA. and IILA. for a description of security requirements.
Mabel Bassett Correctional Center, Oklahoma City.
Muskogee Community Corrections Center, Muskogee.
Medium security. See Appendix D, OP-040101, Facility Security
Standards, section II.B. and III.B. for a description of security requirements.
Mental Health Unit.
Minimum Security. See Appendix D, OP-040101, Facility Security
Standards, section ILD. and IILD. for a description of security requirements.
Northeastern Region.
Northeast Oklahoma Correctional Center, Vinita.
Northwestern Region.
Ouachita Correctional Center, Hodgen.
Oklahoma City Community Corrections Center, Oklahoma City.
Oklahoma State Penitentiary, McAlester.
Oklahoma State Reformatory, Granite.
Reception.
Restrictive housing unit.
A non-secure housing area that may house one to four inmates.
RTMU Rex Thompson Minimum Unit, Lexington Assessment and Reception
Center, Lexington.
Secure Cell A housing area that has secure doors, windows, walls and ceilings. Door
locks are controlled by Department employees by means of a key and/or a
electronic switch. The area is designed normally to hold one or two inmates and
mayor may not have a sink and commode on the interior of the area.
SER Southeastern Region.
SWR Southwestern Region.
TCCC Tulsa Community Corrections Center, Tulsa
EXPANSION RESOURCES FOR CURRENT BED ADDITIONS
The following staffing needs are based on the assumption that the master roster is funded at
FY98 budget levels. In addition, capitol outlay items also need to be met.
POSITION FTE
Support Staff Laundry Supervisor 1
Correctional Trades Supervisor 2
Correctional Food Service Supervisor 3
Medical Staff Dentist 1
Dental Assistant 1
Program Staff Teacher 2*
POSITION FTE
Support Staff Correctional Food Service Supervisor 2
Correctional Trade Supervisor 2
Canteen Staff 2
Warehouse Worker II 1
Program Staff Correctional Casemanager 1
Correctional Counselor 1
Support Staff Canteen Staff
POSITION FTE
1
POSITION FTE
Support Staff Correctional Food Service Supervisor 2
Medical Staff Dentist .3
Dental Assistant .3
Medical Records Technician
.,..),
Program Staff Psychological Assistant .3
POSITION FTE
Support Staff Correctional Food Service Supervisor 2
Medical Staff Dentist .3
Dental Assistant .3
Medical Records Technician .3
Program Staff Psychological Assistant
..,.),
POSITION FTE
Support Staff Postal Clerk 1
Warehouse Worker II 1
Correctional Records Officer 1
Correctional Trades Supervisor
Medical Staff Physician Assistant 1
Medical Records Technician 1
Program Staff Psychological Assistant 1
Teacher 2*
POSITION FTE
Medical Staff Health Services Administrator 1
Physician .5
Senior LPN 1
Dentist .5
Dental Assistant .5
POSITION FTE
Support Staff Administrator Officer I-Procedures 1
Secretary I 1
Correctional Trades Supervisor 2
Medical Staff Senior LPN 1
Program Staff Psychological Assistant 1
Teacher 2
Medical Staff Physician
POSITION FTE
Senior LPN
.5
.5
POSFfI ON FTE
Support Staff Correctional Trades Supervisor 1
Correctional Food Service Supervisor 1
Warehouse Worker II
Personnel Assistant 1
Medical staff RN III 1
for work centers Physician .5
Dentist .5
Dental Assistant .5
Medical Records Technician 1
Administrative Assistant 1
Program Staff Psychologist 1
Chaplain 1
POSITON FTE
Support Staff Correctional Food Service Supervisor 1
Medical Staff Senior LPN 1
Physician .5
Dentist .5
Dental Assistant .5
Medical Records Technician 1
Program Staff Psychological Assistant 1
POSITION FTE
Support Staff Correctional Food Service Supervisor 1
Program Staff Correctional Case Manager 1
POSITION FTE
Support Staff Correctional Food Service Supervisor 1
Correctional Trade Supervisor 1
Medical Staff Senior LPN 1
Program Staff Teacher 3
POSITION FTE
Support Staff Correctional Food Service Supervisor 1
Support Staff Correctional Trade Supervisor 1
Correctional Food Service Supervisor 2
Postal Supervisor 1
Warehouse Worker II 1
Typist Clerk III 2
Personnel Assistant 1
Warehouse Supervisor 1
Program Staff Correctional Case Manager 2
Teacher 2
Support Staff Laundry Supervisor 1
Postal Clerk 1
Canteen staff 1
Medical Staff Senior LPN 1
Support Staff Correctional Trade Supervisor 1
Medical Staff Senior LPN 1
Program Staff Correctional Counselor 1
Correctional Casemanager 1