Capital Improvements Program 2010/13 |
Previous | 1 of 5 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
This page
All
|
Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission Capital Improvement Program Approved November 10, 2010 Three Year Capital Improvement Program FY 2011 ‐ 2013 WES STUCKY, Chairman Ardmore RICK ARMSTRONG, Vice Chairman Tulsa DAVID CONWAY, Secretary Durant TOM STEPHENSON Oklahoma City Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission JOE HARRIS Blackwell KENNETH ADAMS Bartlesville DAVE AMIS III Oklahoma City VICTOR N. BIRD Director Table of Contents Executive Summary ……………………………………………………....………………….. 1 Preface ……………………………………………………………………….…………….…… 2 CIP Project Summary ......................................................................…….………….……………... 3 ‐ 4 Oklahoma Aeronautic Commission Capital Improvement Program FY 2011 ‐ FY 2013 FY 2011 ‐ FY 2013 Capital Improvement Program ....................……………………………….. 5 ‐ 22 Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission 120 N Robinson, Ste. 1244W Oklahoma City, OK 73102 (405) 604‐6900 www.aeronautics.ok.gov The Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission (Commission) assists with the development of a statewide system of airports, encourages aeronautical safety and development, and coordinates activities with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to develop a national system of civil aviation. The Oklahoma Airport System Plan (OASP) was approved by the Commission in 1999 and is the long‐term planning document used to identify the network of airports needed to serve the state. The OASP identifies airports by functional classification, service level, and design standard. The Commission’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the planning and programming guide for State and Federal funds regarding airport development that is consistent the goals of the OASP. The CIP allows the Commission, FAA, and airport sponsors to anticipate airport needs and accommodate changes in project scope, cost, and schedule based on multi‐year planning. Inclusion of a project in the CIP is an indication to the sponsor that the project is under consideration for future funding; however, it is NOT a commitment for future funding. Justification is required for projects in the CIP and must be consistent with FAA and Commission Regulations, Policies and Procedures. Some projects listed in this document may not be implemented due of justification EXECUTIVE SUMMARY to funding restrictions or lack justification. The CIP is based on anticipated funding levels that were determined from historic state and federal allocations for airport development in the State of Oklahoma. Once the actual funding levels are established, project implementation and funding will be adjusted. The Commission welcomes your comments on this document and our CIP process. Please contact the Commission at the following address: Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission 3700 North Classen Blvd., Ste. 240 Oklahoma City, OK 73118 (405) 604‐6900 Preface Annually, the Commission prepares and adopts a three‐year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The CIP is the guide for programming federal and state funds for airport development consistent with the Oklahoma Airport System Plan (OASP). The challenge of strategic programming is the identification and sequencing of the big rock projects and the selection of smaller projects that can be funded in the same fiscal year. Big rock projects are typically very expensive and require federal state apportionment, federal discretionary, federal non‐primary entitlement, and State funding. Oklahoma Airport System Plan The goal of the OASP is to identify a system of aviation facilities that will meet national and state needs (safety, capacity and geographic access). The OASP also identifies the basic amenities for each airport classification that will enable each airport in the system to perform its system role. The OASP includes 114 publicly owned airports with 100 of these airports included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). Definition of “Big Rock Projects” A big rock project is a project that results in a significant upgrade to the capability of a system airport, is a high cost project that is needed to sustain the capability of a regional business airport, or is a new airport. Examples of big rock projects are a runway extension, construction of parallel taxiway, runway reconstruction or overlay, acquisition of land for a runway extension or runway safety area, installation of approach lighting systems, installation of a localizer or a glide slope, or other project typically requiring multi‐year and multi‐source financing such as the Bartlesville Butler Creek relocation project, the R. L. Jones Jr. storm water project and the Stillwater runway extension project. Due to cost, only two or three big rock projects can be underway at any one time. Sequencing of Big Rock Projects The sequencing of the big rock projects is critical to the continued orderly development of the Oklahoma airport system In the system. programming process, the big rock projects are selected first and other less costly projects are selected second. Obviously, some balance between big rock and less costly projects must be achieved. Project Selection Criteria Complete projects currently identified in Commission’s three‐year CIP Pavement Management Program (visual inspection converted into a numerical pavement condition) Oklahoma Airport System Plan and Commission Strategic Plan and Goals Emphasis on regional business airport development Provide standard Airport Geometry and amenities as per functional classification Provide improved approaches to allow all‐weather access Aesthetic, business friendly Airport Terminal buildings FAA National Priority System (numerical rating system) Biased towards based aircraft and operations Does not consider economic impact Does not consider geographical coverage Annual Airport Development Funding Planned State Apportionment from FAA = $4,300,000 Planned Discretionary funding from FAA = $5,000,000 Planned State Funding from State Dedicated Sources = $ 1,500,000 (reduced from $2.7 M due economic downturn) Annual Total for Programming = $10,800,000 Note: This document is based on anticipated funding levels that were determined from historic state and federal allocations for airport development in the State of Oklahoma. Once the actual funding levels are established, project implementation and funding will be adjusted. Summary FY 2011 - 2013 Airport Project Description FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Ardmore Municipal Rehabilitate airport drainage pipe system. $ 1,331,579 $ 1,331,579 C.E. Page Airport Install taxiway lights; Rehabilitate north 650 ft. portion of RW 17L. $ 1,968,421 $ 1,968,421 Claremore Municipal Remove earth obstruction runway 35 end. $ 1,273,684 $ 1,273,684 Goldsby‐ David Jay Perry Construct parallel taxiway system and reconfigure main apron. $ 1,678,947 $ 1,678,947 Grove Municipal Construct a new terminal building $ 550,000 $ 550,000 Guthrie ‐ Edmond Acquire land for future hangar development. $ 388,889 $ 388,889 Guthrie ‐ Edmond Construct and rehabilitate taxilanes, install taxiway lights and VAGIʹs $ 1,505,263 $ 1,505,263 Idabel ‐ McCurtain County Construct parallel taxiway system (phase I). $ 3,821,053 $ 3,821,053 Kingfisher Municipal Construct paved runway and connector taxiway. $ 800,000 $ 800,000 McAlester Regional Improve Runway Safety area. $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 Miami Municipal Rehabilitate runway 17/35, Extend Parallel Taxiway System $ 2,431,579 $ 2,431,579 Muskogee ‐Davis Field Construct new terminal building. $ 550,000 $ 550,000 Muskogee ‐Davis Field Overlay parallel taxiway system to runway 13/31. $ 2,547,368 $ 2,547,368 Norman ‐ Max Westheimer Reconstruct taxiway South Apron. $ 2,689,789 $ 2,689,789 Pauls Valley Municipal Construct north portion of parallel taxiway system. $ 2,663,158 $ 2,663,158 Summary FY 2011 - 2013 Airport Project Description FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Sand Springs ‐Pogue Airport Rehabilitate runway 17/35, rehabilitate taxiways and FBO apron, construct taxilane. $ 3,531,579 $ 3,531,579 Shawnee Regional Realign parallel taxiway system, rehabilitate runway 17/35, and Improve RSA. $ 3,415,789 $ 3,415,789 Stillwater Regional Reconfigure center and north sections of the parallel taxiway system. $ 3,994,737 $ 3,994,737 Tulsa ‐ Richard L. Jones Upgrade electrical airfield system and signage. $ 1,794,737 $ 1,794,737 Tulsa ‐ Richard L. Jones Widen runway 13/31 and rehabilitate taxiway ʺFʺ. $ 1,942,250 $ 1,942,250 Weatherford ‐ Thomas P. Stafford Extend runway 17 end and widen and light parallel taxiway system. $ 926,316 $ 926,316 State of Oklahoma System Planning and RAMP Program $ 510,526 $ 810,526 $ 1,010,526 $ 2,331,579 TOTAL $ 15,649,731 $ 14,039,474 $ 13,547,513 $ 43,236,718 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $2,203,737 $2,038,158 $1,935,184 $6,177,079 Federal ‐ State Apportionment $4,350,000 $4,350,000 $4,350,000 $13,050,000 Federal Discretionary $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $15,000,000 Federal Non‐Primary Entitlement $2,423,000 $1,800,000 $1,700,000 $5,923,000 Sponsors $1,322,994 $851,316 $562,329 $2,736,639 State Excise Tax Program $350,000 $350,000 Totals $15,649,731 $14,039,474 $13,547,513 $43,236,718 Summary of Funding Totals Ardmore Municipal Regional Business Airport Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to repair portions of the airport drainage system. The project consists of removing and replacing unusable drainage pipe and structures. The sink hole first appeared in April 2010, therefore a study will be conducted during F Y 2010 to determine the actual scope of the project. FY 2011: Design drainage improvements (NPE funded). FY 2012: Single phase construction of the ODO.. Project Justification The existing drainage system, which is 70+ years old, has begun to fail and has sinkholes beginning to occur continuously along the piping system. The largest of these sinkholes measures over twenty (20) feet in diameter. The existing concrete pipe has undergone some unforeseen settling and joint failure which in turn has lead to numerous sinkholes in close proximity to the taxiway safety areas. An additional safety concern is that the system crosses under active taxiway pavements. Replacement of unusable pipe, installation of new drainage inlet structures, and further grading to improve Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $121,053 $121,053 FAA State Apportionment $350,000 $350,000 FAA Discretionary $200,000 $200,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $600,000 $600,000 Sponsor $60,526 $60,526 Total $1,331,579 $1,331,579 drainage areas will improve airport drainage and reduce the possibility of damage to aircraft and surface vehicles. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Towered airport • Based Aircraft: 12 • Runway 13/31: 9,000ʹ x 150ʹ •Runway 17/35: 5,350ʹ x 75ʹ •ILS 31 end (instrument landing system) • MASLR 31 end (medium intensity approach lighting system) • Runway to be strengthened and extended FY 2008 Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Drainage Improvements = 47 • OASP Goals: Safety and Standards IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 546 467 609 620 275 180 Piston 593 387 498 610 346 298 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. C.E. Page Airport Regional Business Airport Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective is install taxiway lights, install airport signage, reconstruct approximately 640 ft. of runway at runway 17L end, remove rubber from runway 17R/35L, and rehabilitate various corner breaks and joints in runways and taxiway. Project Justification The installation of airport signage and taxiway lights will provide guidance to aircraft pilots and enhance the safer maneuvering of aircraft on the ground. The current pavement condition index (PCI) for the 640 ft. pavement section is 42 (fair). This is well below the goal of maintaning airside pavements above a PCI of 65. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: • Runway 17R/35L: 6,014ʹx 100’ • Runway 17L/35R: 3,502' x 75' Selection Criteria • P tM t42 Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $178,947 $178,947 FAA State Apportionment $300,000 $300,000 FAA Discretionary $1,100,000 $1,100,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000 Sponsor $89,474 $89,474 Total $1,968,421 $1,968,421 Pavement Management: 42 • NPS: Rehabilitate Runway 69.6 • OASP Goals: Maintain a PCI above 65 IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 180 209 221 298 209 23 Piston 185 171 179 192 196 39 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Claremore Regional Regional Business Airport Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective is to remove obstructions. The proposed project will remove the earth ridgeline that extends into and penetrates the approach surface at runway 35 end. FY 2012: Construct approved project scope of work. Project Justification An existing ridgeline south and east of runway 35 end extends into and penetrates the approach surface. The proposed project consists of earth work to remove the earth obstruction. Currently the airport has approach minima of 467 ft (ceiling height) and visibility minima not lower than 1 mile. Once this obstruction is removed, the airport will be able to develop a more desirable approach with, possibly as low as ¾ mile visibility and 300 ft ceiling height. The improved approach minimums, will increase safety and make the airport more accessible to inbound aircraft during inclement weather, i.e. when weather conditions have lowered the ceiling height and/or reduced visibility. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $115,789 $115,789 FAA State Apportionment $700,000 $700,000 FAA Discretionary $100,000 $100,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000 Sponsor $57,895 $57,895 Total $1,273,684 $1,273,684 • Based Aircraft: 51 • Runway 17/35: 5,200ʹ’x 75’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Safety = 92.5 • OASP Goals: RB approach minimums as low as ¾ mile visibility and 300 ft ceiling height. IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 125 79 94 74 279 218 Piston 270 396 367 311 360 353 . Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Goldsby - David J. Perry Airport District Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to construct a parallel taxiway system for runway 13/31. In order for the new taxiway to meet FAA standards the main apron will need to be reconfigured, main hangar with a public terminal building in it relocated, and the fuel farm relocated. FY 2011: Preliminary design study (NPE funded) FY 2012: Design only grant (NPE funded) FY 2013: . Single phase construction of the ODO. FY 2014: Update Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded). Project Justification David J. Perry airport is a small but very active airport with 46 based aircraft. Currently, aircraft must use the runway for taxing, which results in aircraft having to wait on the main apron while aircraft are taking off or on approach to the airport. Therefore, construction of a parallel taxiway system will improve the safety for the flying public. Airport Information Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $152,632 $152,632 State Apportionment $900,000 $900,000 Discretionary $0 $0 Non-Primary Entitlement $550,000 $550,000 Sponsor $76,316 $76,316 Total $1,678,947 $1,678,947 • District Airport • Based Aircraft: 46 • Runway 17/35: 3,006’ x 60’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: NA • NPS: Construct taxiway = 47 • OASP Goals: Standards IFR Operations 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 0 0 2 2 3 Piston 113 94 74 73 95 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Grove Municipal Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project is to construct a new terminal building. FY 2012: Construct terminal building. Project Justification The existing terminal building is dated and showing signs of deterioration. The typical size for a new public terminal building is 3,750 square feet. A building of this size will accommodate a public reception area, a pilot flight planning and weather briefing area, an area for pilots to rest, men’s and women’s restrooms, an airport managers office, a training/conference room available for public use and a kitchen area for serving food, but not cooking, etc. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 70 • Runway 18/36: 5,200ʹ x 75ʹ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Standards = 32 Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $275,000 $275,000 FAA State Apportionment $0 $0 FAA Discretionary $0 $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 $0 Sponsor $275,000 $275,000 Total $550,000 $550,000 • OASP Goals: An appealing terminal building is a basic amenity for a regional business airport. IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 68 87 140 180 86 85 Piston 450 351 333 320 138 93 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Guthrie - Edmond Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective is to acquire land for future hangar development and update property map of the Airport Layout Plan. FY 2011: Acquire land in accordance with FAA guidelines. Project Justification The Guthrie‐Edmond Regional Airport has approximately 60 corporations/businesses/individuals on its hangar waiting list. There is a limited amount of usable land for aviation development around the airport. This land acquisition will facilitate the future growth of this airport. The development of more hangar areas will enable the airport to become more self sufficient. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 102 • Runway 16/34: 5,001ʹ x 75ʹ Selection Criteria • P tM tN/A Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $0 FAA State Apportionment $0 FAA Discretionary $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 Sponsor $38,889 $38,889 Excise Tax Dedication $350,000 $350,000 Total $388,889 $388,889 Pavement Management: N/• NPS: Standards = 39.9 • OASP Goals: IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 142 155 180 167 142 69 Piston 317 195 266 437 531 481 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Guthrie - Edmond Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective is to construct taxilanes for hangar development, install MITLʹs on taxiways Charlie and Delta, rehabilitate taxiway Charlie and install new VAGIʹs. FY 2011: Design only grant. (NPE funded) FY 2012: Install taxiway lights, and construct taxilanes in hangar area, rehabilitate taxiways. Project Justification The Guthrie‐Edmond Regional Airport has approximately 60 corporations/businesses/individuals on its hangar waiting list. There is a limited amount of usable land for aviation development around the airport. The improvement to this land will facilitate the future growth of this airport. The development of more hangar areas will enable the airport to become increasingly self sufficient. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 102 • Runway 16/34: 5,001ʹ x 75ʹ Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $136,842 $136,842 FAA State Apportionment $700,000 $700,000 FAA Discretionary $450,000 $450,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $68,421 $68,421 Total $1,505,263 $1,505,263 Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Standards = 39.9 • OASP Goals: IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 142 155 180 167 142 69 Piston 317 195 266 437 531 481 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Idabel- McCurtain County Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objectives (ODO) of the proposed project is to construct a parallel taxiway system for runway 02/20. FY 2012: Design only grant (NPE funded). FY 2013: Construct parallel taxiway phase I of the ODO. FY 2014: Construct parallel taxiway phase II of the ODO. FY 2015: Amend Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded) Project Justification Currently, aircraft must use the runway for taxiing, which results in aircraft having to wait on the main apron while aircraft are taking off or on approach to the airport. Therefore, construction of a parallel taxiway system will improve the safety for the flying public. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 18 • Runway 02/20: 5,000’ x 75’ Selection Criteria • P tM tN/A Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $347,368 $347,368 State Apportionment $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Discretionary $1,900,000 $1,900,000 Non-Primary Entitlement $400,000 $400,000 Sponsor $173,684 $173,684 Total $3,821,053 $3,821,053 Pavement Management: N/• NPS: Construct Taxiway = 47.1 • OASP Goals: Basic amenity for an RB airport IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 576 486 427 371 88 51 Piston 184 201 193 328 117 82 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of Kingfisher Municipal District Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to construct a 2,800 ft. x 60 ft. runway with a connecting taxiway and close the pond north of runway 17 end. FY 2011: Construct approved project scope. Project Justification Currently the airport is served by a turf runway which is unusable during wet conditions. The new paved runway will provide access to the national and state air transportation system by piston powered aircraft. The role of this airports is to provide access for small businesses, suppliers of critical machinery parts, agriculture and mineral resources, medical providers both physicians and veterinarians, emergency disaster responders following storms and other natural disasters. Airport Information • District Airport • Based Aircraft: • Runway 017/35: 2,580ʹ x 375ʹ Turf Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $400,000 $400,000 FAA State Apportionment $0 $0 FAA Discretionary $0 $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 $0 Sponsor $400,000 $400,000 Total $800,000 $800,000 Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: • OASP Goals: Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. McAlester Regional Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to improve the runway safety area, improve the runway object free area east of runway 02/20, and remove an earth obstruction north of the terminal apron. The proposed project will relocate drainage structures out of the safety area, place earth embankment beyond runway 02 end to meet FAA standards, displace runway 20 end, remove earth obstruction north of the terminal apron and remove runway object free area obstructions east of runway 02/20. FY 2010: NPE funded Design only grant. FY 2011: Construct approved project scope. Project Justification It is the goal of both FAA and the Commission to improve runway safety area standards at airports especially at airports with jet traffic. In line with this goal, the proposed project will improve runway safety area at both ends of runway 02/20. The high national priority system rating (91.5) reiterates the merits of this project. This project will greatly improve the safety condition of the airport and increase the safety to the flying public. Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $100,000 $100,000 FAA State Apportionment $300,000 $300,000 FAA Discretionary $500,000 $500,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $50,000 $50,000 Total $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 41 • Runway 01/19: 5,602’ x 100’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Safety and Standards = 91.5 • OASP Goals: Improve safety areas • In‐Active Grants: N/A IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 422 497 441 495 264 112 Piston 760 688 704 908 355 196 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Miami Municipal Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed is to rehabilitate runway 17/35 and extend the parallel taxiway at runway 17 end. The project will consist of an asphalt overlay of runway 17/35 and extending the parallel taxiway system to runway 17 end. This project will require amending the Airport Layout Plan. FY 2011: Preliminary design (NPE funded) FY 2012: Design only grant (NPE funded). FY 2013: Single phase construction of the ODO.. FY 2014: Amend Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded). Project Justification The Commission’s pavement management system forecasts a PCI rating of 64 for runway 17/35 for year 2013 . Since the current PCI rating of all pavements is close to 65 (the threshold PCI value below which the pavement experiences rapid deterioration) it is more cost effective to rehabilitate the pavement in there current condition than to let them continue deteriorate to a condition that will require full depth reconstruction. Additionally, for safety and cost benefit the parallel taxiway system to runway 17/35 will be completed. Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $221,053 $221,053 State Apportionment $500,000 $500,000 Discretionary $1,300,000 $1,300,000 Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000 Sponsor $110,526 $110,526 Total $2,431,579 $2,431,579 Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 29 • Runway 17/35: 5,020’ x 100ʹ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = 67 • NPS Runway: Rehabilitate Pavement = 69.9 • NPS Taxiway: Standards = 47.1 • OASP Goals: Airside pavement > 65 and parallel taxiway. IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 216 140 199 191 79 44 Piston 358 258 185 189 78 53 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Muskogee - Davis Field Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project is to construct a new terminal building. Project Justification The existing terminal building is dated and showing signs of deterioration. The typical size for a new public terminal building is 3,750 square feet. A building of this size will accommodate a public reception area, a pilot flight planning and weather briefing area, an area for pilots to rest, men’s and women’s restrooms, an airport managers office, a training/conference room available for public use and a kitchen area for serving food, but not cooking, etc. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 59 • Runway 13/31: 7,200 x 150ʹ • Runway 04/22: 4,498ʹ x 75ʹ • Runway 18/36: 1,900ʹ x 60ʹ • MALS (medium intensity approach lighting system) Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $275,000 $275,000 FAA State Apportionment $0 FAA Discretionary $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 Sponsor $275,000 $275,000 Total $550,000 $550,000 • NPS: Standards = 32 • OASP Goals: An appealing terminal building is a basic amenity for a regional business airport. IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 534 705 712 639 200 106 Piston 642 571 413 319 196 142 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Muskogee - Davis Field Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective is to rehabilitate the parallel taxiway to runway 13/31. The project will consist of an overlay of taxiway Charlie and connecting taxiways to runway 13/31. Project Justification The pavements at Davis Field were constructed in 1956 with 10 inches of PCC. The current PCI rating for the parallel taxiway system is 47 for 2009. The current PCI rating is below 65 (the threshold PCI value below which the pavement experiences rapid deterioration). The pavement distresses observed during the visual PCI inspection include low to medium durability cracking, linear cracking, scaling, settlement, and joint seal damage. Constructing an asphalt overlay in the near term will prevent the pavement condition from deteriorating to a condition that requires a more costly rehabilitation. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 59 • Runway 13/31: 7,200 x 150ʹ • Runway 04/22: 4,498ʹ x 75ʹ • Runway 18/36: 1,900ʹ x 60ʹ Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $231,579 $231,579 FAA State Apportionment $1,400,000 $1,400,000 FAA Discretionary $500,000 $500,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000 Sponsor $115,789 $115,789 Total $2,547,368 $2,547,368 • MALS (medium intensity approach lighting system) Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = 47 • NPS: Rehabilitate Pavement = 69.9 • OASP Goals: Maintain airside pavement PCI > 65 IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 534 705 712 639 200 106 Piston 642 571 413 319 196 142 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Norman - Max Westheimer Regional Business Airport Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project is to rehabilitate the south portion of the main apron and hangar area. The project consists of the reconstruction of a portion of the main apron and repairing distressed pavements in the remaining area. FY 2010: NPE funded Design‐Only federal grant. FY 2011: Complete reconstruction of south apron. Project Justification The existing pavements are over 60 years old and in an extremely distressed condition. Most of the pavement has deteriorated to a condition that will require reconstruction. Due to the size of the paved area and cost to reconstruct pavement, the high traffic area will need to be reconstructed and the low traffic area rehabilitated to reduce foreign object debris (FOD). Airport Information • Regional Business Airport ‐ Reliever • Based Aircraft: 95 • R 17/35 5 200 100ʹ Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $244,526 $244,526 FAA State Apportionment $900,000 $900,000 FAA Discretionary $800,000 $800,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $623,000 $623,000 Sponsor $122,263 $122,263 Total $2,689,789 $2,689,789 Runway 35: 5,200 x • Runway 3/21: 4,747ʹ x 100ʹ • ILS 35 end (instrument landing system) 35 end MALS 35 end (medium intensity approach lighting system) Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: Poor Condition • NPS: Rehabilitate Apron 61.6 • OASP Goals: Basic amenity for a regional business airport. IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 1789 1619 1899 2091 1626 1333 Piston 1991 1657 1583 2338 1617 1598 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Pauls Valley Municipal Regional Business Airport Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO)of the proposed project is to construct a parallel taxiway system to the primary runway and remove pavement. FY 2012: Design only (NPE funded). FY 2013: Single phase construction of ODO. FY 2014: Amend the Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded). Project Justification Currently, aircraft must use the secondary runway for back taxing and that results in a safety and capacity concern. Therefore, a standard parallel taxiway will improve the safety of the flying public. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 32 • Runway 12/30: 3,500ʹ x 150’ 17/35: 5,000ʹ x 100ʹ Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $242,105 $242,105 FAA State Apportionment $1,500,000 $1,500,000 FAA Discretionary $500,000 $500,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000 Sponsor $121,053 $121,053 Total $2,663,158 $2,663,158 Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = NA • NPS: Construct Parallel Taxiway = 57 • OASP Goals: Parallel Taxiway at all RBʹs IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 100 152 225 262 130 55 Piston 83 70 57 84 44 43 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Sand Springs William R. Pogue Airport Regional Business Airport Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project are (a) rehabilitate runway pavements, (b) rehabilitate taxiway pavements, (c) rehabilitate apron pavements, and (d) construct taxilane. The work will consist of overlaying runway 17/35, crack seal and seal coat the parallel taxiway system and FBO apron, and construct a taxilane for corporate hangar development. FY 2011: NPE funded Design‐Only federal grant. FY 2012: Complete construction of the approved project scope. Project Justification The runway pavement was constructed in 1969, overlaid in 1984. The current PCI of the runway pavement is 63 which is categorized as Fair and is at or close to the threshold PCI rating below which pavement deteriorates more rapidly. No structural failures were observed, therefore the pavement section is concluded to be structurally adequate to support the traffic using the runway. Currently the pavement is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions (i.e. aging, oxidation, and weathering). Distresses observed include low to medium longitudinal cracking transverse cracking and patching Overlaying the pavement will Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $321,053 $290,000 FAA State Apportionment $950,000 $1,000,000 FAA Discretionary $1,800,000 $1,600,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000 Sponsor $160,526 $184,854 Total $3,531,579 $3,374,854 cracking, patching. protect the base structure and extend the life of the pavement. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 60 • Runway 17/35: 5,800 x 100 Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = 62 • NPS: Rehabilitate Pavement = 69.9 • OASP Goals: Maintain airside pavement PCI > 65 IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 57 73 95 16 0 0 Piston 220 204 166 79 0 214 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Shawnee Regional Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall development objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to rehabilitate runway 17/35, rehabilitate taxiway pavements, and reconstruct a portion of the parallel taxiway system. The work elements will include an asphalt overlay of the runway and the north 1,300 ft of the parallel taxiway system, reconstruct and realign approximately 4,300 ft of the parallel taxiway system, improve runway safety area beyond runway 17 end and along the runway, and update of the airport layout plan (ALP). Improvement to RSA beyond 17 end will require adjustment to the federal equipment. FY 2009: Design‐only grant to complete an 80% design with detailed cost estimates. FY 2010: Reconstruct and realign south 4,300 ft. of the parallel taxiway system, rehabilitate the north portion of the taxiway system, and phase I improve RSA 17end. FY 2011: Rehabilitate runway and remaining portions of the taxiway pavements and complete improvement of runway safety. FY 2012 : Update ALP will be funded as a NPE project. Project Justification The runway and parallel taxiway pavements are in extremely distressed condition. The Commission’s pavement management system estimates pavement condition index for the south 4,300’ of runway pavements at 59 and for taxiway pavement as 55. The low PCI values indicate that the pavements are experiencing accelerated deterioration. The taxiway t i t d d d th t j t ill t t d li d th ll l Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $310,526 $310,526 FAA State Apportionment $1,000,000 $1,000,000 FAA Discretionary $1,800,000 $1,800,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $155,263 $155,263 Total $3,415,789 $3,415,789 geometry is non‐standard and the current project will reconstruct and re‐aligned the parallel taxiway. Currently, there are seven (7) different pavement structures ranging in capacity from 23,000# to 30,000# that make up the runway and parallel taxiway system. This project will make all airside pavement capable of bearing aircraft loading of SW 30,000 lbs. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 70 • Runway 17/35: 5,600 x 100ʹ • ILS runway 17 end • MALSR runway 17 end Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI: RWY = 59; TWY = 55 • NPS: Rehabilitate runway pavements = 67.6 • OASP Goals: Maintain airside pavement PCI > 65 IFR Operations 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 291 331 268 289 234 166 50 Piston 265 299 254 302 313 302 342 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Stillwater Regional Regional Business Airport DESCRIPTION The Overall Development Objective (ODO) is to reconfigure the center and south section of the parallel taxiway system. The proposed project consists of constructing a standard parallel taxiway system to runway 35 end and around the main apron, reconfigure the main apron markings, and install signage. Project Justification The aircraft that have in the past operated from this airport include ‐ Airbus 319 and Airbus 321, McDonnell Douglas MD‐80, Boeing 727, Boeing 737 and Boeing 757. The sponsor has reported difficulty in aircraft movement and aircraft parking for Big‐12 sporting events. The proposed project will allow aircraft to taxi around the main apron while large air carrier aircraft and jet aircraft air park on the apron during periods of peak operation. The proposed project will eliminate the mixing of large air carrier aircraft and small aircraft on the main apron. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 79 • Control Tower 139 airport • Part 139 airport • ILS at runway 17 end • MALSR t 17 d Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $363,158 $363,158 FAA State Apportionment $1,050,000 $1,050,000 FAA Discretionary $1,800,000 $1,800,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $600,000 $600,000 Sponsor $181,579 $181,579 Total $3,994,737 $3,994,737 at runway end • Runway 17/35: 7,401’ x 100’ • Runway 04/22: 5,002ʹ x 75ʹ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: NA • NPS: Expand terminal apron = 39.0 • OASP Goals: N/A IFR Operations 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 784 889 1073 1061 1097 501 287 Piston 799 887 890 825 1413 494 339 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Tulsa - Riverside Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) is to upgrade the airfield guidance signage to current FAA Standards (Advisory Circular 150/5340‐ 18E. Electrical power lines from the electrical vault to the signs will be replaced and new regulators will be installed near the maintenance building to accommodate the current electrical demand. Relocate the electrical vault to a location . Install PAPI's on 1R/19L. Install REIL's on 1L/19R. Install "distance to go" markers on 1L/19R ‐ the control tower has requested this as a tool they can use with their procedures to expedite the flow of traffic and increase the capacity of that runway. Install computer controls for airfield lighting similar to that at TUL and replace the old pilot controlled lighting system with a new one that allows independent control of the Runway 1L/19R & Taxiway "A" (using the main frequency for the control tower) and separate control (using the second frequency used for the east runway) for Runway 1R/19L & all the taxiway lights west of 1L/19R. Relocate the airport beacon to a new location immediately adjacent to the control tower. Project Justification The existing airfield guidance signs do not comply with FAA Advisory Circular. Standardized signs will promote better situational awareness on the airfield as a means to reduce the potential for incursions. A properly designed and standardized taxiway guidance sign system is essential for the safe and efficient operation of aircraft and ground vehicles on the airport movement area. Overall safety is enhanced by a standardized system of Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $163,158 $163,158 FAA State Apportionment $450,000 $450,000 FAA Discretionary $950,000 $950,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $81,579 $81,579 Total $1,794,737 $1,794,737 signs at all airports. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport ‐ Reliever • Based Aircraft: 520 • Control Tower • ILS at runway 1L end • Runway 1L/R19: 5,102’ x 100’ • Runway 1R/19L: 4,208ʹ x 100ʹ • Runway 13/31: 2,641ʹ x 50ʹ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Rehabilitate Taxiway = • OASP Goals: Safety and Standards IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 3063 3241 3669 4441 3297 2875 Piston 4405 3798 3960 5886 7085 6768 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Tulsa - Richard L. Jones Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to widen runway 13/31 and install new runway lights and VAGI's along runway 13/31. The ODO also includes rehabilitation of Taxiway “F”. bearing capacity. FY 2013: Design and construct ODO. Project Justification The current runway width (50’) does not meet FAA standard s. Therefore, widening the runway to (60') will meet the standards for the aircraft that runway 13/31 accommodates. Widening the runway will necessitate changes to the runway edge lighting system (which is in excess of 30 years old and should be replaced with energy efficient components and replace the existing Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) lights with Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) lights. Installation of PAPI’s will replace aging VASI’s that need to be replaced before they become a maintenance and/or reliability issue. Taxiway "F" existing pavement is not adequate to support increasing use by heavier business jets being serviced in this area. Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $161,500 $161,500 FAA State Apportionment $250,000 $250,000 FAA Discretionary $1,300,000 $1,300,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $80,750 $80,750 Total $1,942,250 $1,942,250 Airport Information • Regional Business Airport ‐ Reliever • Based Aircraft: 520 • Control Tower • ILS at runway 1L end • Runway 1L/R19: 5,102’ x 100’ • Runway 1R/19L: 4,208ʹ x 100ʹ • Runway 13/31: 2,641ʹ x 50ʹ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: • NPS: • OASP Goals: Standards IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 3063 3241 3669 4441 3297 2875 Piston 4405 3798 3960 5886 7085 6768 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Weatherford - Thomas P. Stafford Regional Business Airport Project Description The first Overall Development Objective (ODO) is to extend runway 17 end at least 701 ft. The extension will require the closure or relocation of Lawter Street and reconfiguration of the city golf course (1 hole). The city is responsible for the cost to reconfigure the golf course. The second ODO is to widen the parallel taxiway 15 ft. on the west side, install medium intensity taxiway lights, and install lighted runway hold signs. Project Justification The proposed project is the first step in fulfilling an important Commission goal – i.e., to construct jet‐capable runways at all of Oklahoma’s regional business airports that meet FAA’s aviation demand criteria. The sponsor has documented aircraft demand that satisfies FAA’s aviation demand criteria for the extension. Runway 17/35 is currently 4,399 ft long. The result of the proposed 701 ft. extension project is a 5,100 ft. jet capable runway. The existing parallel taxiway does not meet FAAʹs standard separation distance. Widening the taxiway 15 ft. will shift the parallel taxiway centerline to the required 240 ft. from the runway centerline. he standard geometrics will improve the airports ability to obtain a more desirable approach. Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $84,211 $84,211 FAA State Apportionment $200,000 $200,000 FAA Discretionary $0 $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $600,000 $600,000 Sponsor $42,105 $42,105 Total $926,316 $926,316 This airport does not have taxiway edge lights. The installation of medium intensity taxiway lights and lighted runway hold signs will increase pilot awareness, safety, and improve the airportʹs ability to obtain a more desirable approach. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 46 • Runway 17/35: 4,399’ x 75’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Extend Runway = 46.5 •NPS: Standards = 47.1 • OASP Goals: Jet capable runway at aviation demand justified RB airports. IFR Operations 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 58 62 13 0 68 109 0 Piston 64 229 39 0 120 117 111 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. State System Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission Project Description The Overall Development Objective is to conduct a system planning study. The Commission’s system planning activities are categorized into 3 work elements as under: Work Element 1: Oklahoma Airport System Plan Review 1. Review functional classification of all system airports and compare available basic airport amenities at system airports with OASP Goals 2. Review the based aircraft inventory at system airports 3. Airport grant assurance compliance certification 4. Update IFR traffic count for system airports 5. Review airport design standard compliance Work Element 2: Airport Information Management Activities 1. NPIAS needs worksheet update 2. Pavement management 3. Airport safety inspections Work Element 3: Capital Planning Process 1. Airport five‐year capital improvement program update 2. Obtain early project development packets for all AIP projects 3. Commission’s three‐year capital improvement program 4. Collect sponsor self certifications Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $310,526 $610,526 $810,526 $810,526 FAA State Apportionment $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 FAA Discretionary $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 Sponsor $0 Total $510,526 $810,526 $1,010,526 $1,010,526 RAMP Program State funds for State only projects at non‐NPIAS airports and supplemental funding for NPE funded projects. This program will Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. End of Three Year CIP
Object Description
Description
Title | Capital Improvements Program 2010/13 |
OkDocs Class# | A700.3 C244i 2010/13 |
Digital Format | PDF, Adobe Reader required |
ODL electronic copy | Downloaded from agency website: www.ok.gov/.../2011.03.28%20Mod_Approved%20CIP%202011-2013.pdf |
Rights and Permissions | This Oklahoma state government publication is provided for educational purposes under U.S. copyright law. Other usage requires permission of copyright holders. |
Language | English |
Full text | Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission Capital Improvement Program Approved November 10, 2010 Three Year Capital Improvement Program FY 2011 ‐ 2013 WES STUCKY, Chairman Ardmore RICK ARMSTRONG, Vice Chairman Tulsa DAVID CONWAY, Secretary Durant TOM STEPHENSON Oklahoma City Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission JOE HARRIS Blackwell KENNETH ADAMS Bartlesville DAVE AMIS III Oklahoma City VICTOR N. BIRD Director Table of Contents Executive Summary ……………………………………………………....………………….. 1 Preface ……………………………………………………………………….…………….…… 2 CIP Project Summary ......................................................................…….………….……………... 3 ‐ 4 Oklahoma Aeronautic Commission Capital Improvement Program FY 2011 ‐ FY 2013 FY 2011 ‐ FY 2013 Capital Improvement Program ....................……………………………….. 5 ‐ 22 Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission 120 N Robinson, Ste. 1244W Oklahoma City, OK 73102 (405) 604‐6900 www.aeronautics.ok.gov The Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission (Commission) assists with the development of a statewide system of airports, encourages aeronautical safety and development, and coordinates activities with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to develop a national system of civil aviation. The Oklahoma Airport System Plan (OASP) was approved by the Commission in 1999 and is the long‐term planning document used to identify the network of airports needed to serve the state. The OASP identifies airports by functional classification, service level, and design standard. The Commission’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the planning and programming guide for State and Federal funds regarding airport development that is consistent the goals of the OASP. The CIP allows the Commission, FAA, and airport sponsors to anticipate airport needs and accommodate changes in project scope, cost, and schedule based on multi‐year planning. Inclusion of a project in the CIP is an indication to the sponsor that the project is under consideration for future funding; however, it is NOT a commitment for future funding. Justification is required for projects in the CIP and must be consistent with FAA and Commission Regulations, Policies and Procedures. Some projects listed in this document may not be implemented due of justification EXECUTIVE SUMMARY to funding restrictions or lack justification. The CIP is based on anticipated funding levels that were determined from historic state and federal allocations for airport development in the State of Oklahoma. Once the actual funding levels are established, project implementation and funding will be adjusted. The Commission welcomes your comments on this document and our CIP process. Please contact the Commission at the following address: Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission 3700 North Classen Blvd., Ste. 240 Oklahoma City, OK 73118 (405) 604‐6900 Preface Annually, the Commission prepares and adopts a three‐year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The CIP is the guide for programming federal and state funds for airport development consistent with the Oklahoma Airport System Plan (OASP). The challenge of strategic programming is the identification and sequencing of the big rock projects and the selection of smaller projects that can be funded in the same fiscal year. Big rock projects are typically very expensive and require federal state apportionment, federal discretionary, federal non‐primary entitlement, and State funding. Oklahoma Airport System Plan The goal of the OASP is to identify a system of aviation facilities that will meet national and state needs (safety, capacity and geographic access). The OASP also identifies the basic amenities for each airport classification that will enable each airport in the system to perform its system role. The OASP includes 114 publicly owned airports with 100 of these airports included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). Definition of “Big Rock Projects” A big rock project is a project that results in a significant upgrade to the capability of a system airport, is a high cost project that is needed to sustain the capability of a regional business airport, or is a new airport. Examples of big rock projects are a runway extension, construction of parallel taxiway, runway reconstruction or overlay, acquisition of land for a runway extension or runway safety area, installation of approach lighting systems, installation of a localizer or a glide slope, or other project typically requiring multi‐year and multi‐source financing such as the Bartlesville Butler Creek relocation project, the R. L. Jones Jr. storm water project and the Stillwater runway extension project. Due to cost, only two or three big rock projects can be underway at any one time. Sequencing of Big Rock Projects The sequencing of the big rock projects is critical to the continued orderly development of the Oklahoma airport system In the system. programming process, the big rock projects are selected first and other less costly projects are selected second. Obviously, some balance between big rock and less costly projects must be achieved. Project Selection Criteria Complete projects currently identified in Commission’s three‐year CIP Pavement Management Program (visual inspection converted into a numerical pavement condition) Oklahoma Airport System Plan and Commission Strategic Plan and Goals Emphasis on regional business airport development Provide standard Airport Geometry and amenities as per functional classification Provide improved approaches to allow all‐weather access Aesthetic, business friendly Airport Terminal buildings FAA National Priority System (numerical rating system) Biased towards based aircraft and operations Does not consider economic impact Does not consider geographical coverage Annual Airport Development Funding Planned State Apportionment from FAA = $4,300,000 Planned Discretionary funding from FAA = $5,000,000 Planned State Funding from State Dedicated Sources = $ 1,500,000 (reduced from $2.7 M due economic downturn) Annual Total for Programming = $10,800,000 Note: This document is based on anticipated funding levels that were determined from historic state and federal allocations for airport development in the State of Oklahoma. Once the actual funding levels are established, project implementation and funding will be adjusted. Summary FY 2011 - 2013 Airport Project Description FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Ardmore Municipal Rehabilitate airport drainage pipe system. $ 1,331,579 $ 1,331,579 C.E. Page Airport Install taxiway lights; Rehabilitate north 650 ft. portion of RW 17L. $ 1,968,421 $ 1,968,421 Claremore Municipal Remove earth obstruction runway 35 end. $ 1,273,684 $ 1,273,684 Goldsby‐ David Jay Perry Construct parallel taxiway system and reconfigure main apron. $ 1,678,947 $ 1,678,947 Grove Municipal Construct a new terminal building $ 550,000 $ 550,000 Guthrie ‐ Edmond Acquire land for future hangar development. $ 388,889 $ 388,889 Guthrie ‐ Edmond Construct and rehabilitate taxilanes, install taxiway lights and VAGIʹs $ 1,505,263 $ 1,505,263 Idabel ‐ McCurtain County Construct parallel taxiway system (phase I). $ 3,821,053 $ 3,821,053 Kingfisher Municipal Construct paved runway and connector taxiway. $ 800,000 $ 800,000 McAlester Regional Improve Runway Safety area. $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 Miami Municipal Rehabilitate runway 17/35, Extend Parallel Taxiway System $ 2,431,579 $ 2,431,579 Muskogee ‐Davis Field Construct new terminal building. $ 550,000 $ 550,000 Muskogee ‐Davis Field Overlay parallel taxiway system to runway 13/31. $ 2,547,368 $ 2,547,368 Norman ‐ Max Westheimer Reconstruct taxiway South Apron. $ 2,689,789 $ 2,689,789 Pauls Valley Municipal Construct north portion of parallel taxiway system. $ 2,663,158 $ 2,663,158 Summary FY 2011 - 2013 Airport Project Description FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Sand Springs ‐Pogue Airport Rehabilitate runway 17/35, rehabilitate taxiways and FBO apron, construct taxilane. $ 3,531,579 $ 3,531,579 Shawnee Regional Realign parallel taxiway system, rehabilitate runway 17/35, and Improve RSA. $ 3,415,789 $ 3,415,789 Stillwater Regional Reconfigure center and north sections of the parallel taxiway system. $ 3,994,737 $ 3,994,737 Tulsa ‐ Richard L. Jones Upgrade electrical airfield system and signage. $ 1,794,737 $ 1,794,737 Tulsa ‐ Richard L. Jones Widen runway 13/31 and rehabilitate taxiway ʺFʺ. $ 1,942,250 $ 1,942,250 Weatherford ‐ Thomas P. Stafford Extend runway 17 end and widen and light parallel taxiway system. $ 926,316 $ 926,316 State of Oklahoma System Planning and RAMP Program $ 510,526 $ 810,526 $ 1,010,526 $ 2,331,579 TOTAL $ 15,649,731 $ 14,039,474 $ 13,547,513 $ 43,236,718 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $2,203,737 $2,038,158 $1,935,184 $6,177,079 Federal ‐ State Apportionment $4,350,000 $4,350,000 $4,350,000 $13,050,000 Federal Discretionary $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $15,000,000 Federal Non‐Primary Entitlement $2,423,000 $1,800,000 $1,700,000 $5,923,000 Sponsors $1,322,994 $851,316 $562,329 $2,736,639 State Excise Tax Program $350,000 $350,000 Totals $15,649,731 $14,039,474 $13,547,513 $43,236,718 Summary of Funding Totals Ardmore Municipal Regional Business Airport Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to repair portions of the airport drainage system. The project consists of removing and replacing unusable drainage pipe and structures. The sink hole first appeared in April 2010, therefore a study will be conducted during F Y 2010 to determine the actual scope of the project. FY 2011: Design drainage improvements (NPE funded). FY 2012: Single phase construction of the ODO.. Project Justification The existing drainage system, which is 70+ years old, has begun to fail and has sinkholes beginning to occur continuously along the piping system. The largest of these sinkholes measures over twenty (20) feet in diameter. The existing concrete pipe has undergone some unforeseen settling and joint failure which in turn has lead to numerous sinkholes in close proximity to the taxiway safety areas. An additional safety concern is that the system crosses under active taxiway pavements. Replacement of unusable pipe, installation of new drainage inlet structures, and further grading to improve Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $121,053 $121,053 FAA State Apportionment $350,000 $350,000 FAA Discretionary $200,000 $200,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $600,000 $600,000 Sponsor $60,526 $60,526 Total $1,331,579 $1,331,579 drainage areas will improve airport drainage and reduce the possibility of damage to aircraft and surface vehicles. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Towered airport • Based Aircraft: 12 • Runway 13/31: 9,000ʹ x 150ʹ •Runway 17/35: 5,350ʹ x 75ʹ •ILS 31 end (instrument landing system) • MASLR 31 end (medium intensity approach lighting system) • Runway to be strengthened and extended FY 2008 Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Drainage Improvements = 47 • OASP Goals: Safety and Standards IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 546 467 609 620 275 180 Piston 593 387 498 610 346 298 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. C.E. Page Airport Regional Business Airport Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective is install taxiway lights, install airport signage, reconstruct approximately 640 ft. of runway at runway 17L end, remove rubber from runway 17R/35L, and rehabilitate various corner breaks and joints in runways and taxiway. Project Justification The installation of airport signage and taxiway lights will provide guidance to aircraft pilots and enhance the safer maneuvering of aircraft on the ground. The current pavement condition index (PCI) for the 640 ft. pavement section is 42 (fair). This is well below the goal of maintaning airside pavements above a PCI of 65. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: • Runway 17R/35L: 6,014ʹx 100’ • Runway 17L/35R: 3,502' x 75' Selection Criteria • P tM t42 Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $178,947 $178,947 FAA State Apportionment $300,000 $300,000 FAA Discretionary $1,100,000 $1,100,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000 Sponsor $89,474 $89,474 Total $1,968,421 $1,968,421 Pavement Management: 42 • NPS: Rehabilitate Runway 69.6 • OASP Goals: Maintain a PCI above 65 IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 180 209 221 298 209 23 Piston 185 171 179 192 196 39 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Claremore Regional Regional Business Airport Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective is to remove obstructions. The proposed project will remove the earth ridgeline that extends into and penetrates the approach surface at runway 35 end. FY 2012: Construct approved project scope of work. Project Justification An existing ridgeline south and east of runway 35 end extends into and penetrates the approach surface. The proposed project consists of earth work to remove the earth obstruction. Currently the airport has approach minima of 467 ft (ceiling height) and visibility minima not lower than 1 mile. Once this obstruction is removed, the airport will be able to develop a more desirable approach with, possibly as low as ¾ mile visibility and 300 ft ceiling height. The improved approach minimums, will increase safety and make the airport more accessible to inbound aircraft during inclement weather, i.e. when weather conditions have lowered the ceiling height and/or reduced visibility. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $115,789 $115,789 FAA State Apportionment $700,000 $700,000 FAA Discretionary $100,000 $100,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000 Sponsor $57,895 $57,895 Total $1,273,684 $1,273,684 • Based Aircraft: 51 • Runway 17/35: 5,200ʹ’x 75’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Safety = 92.5 • OASP Goals: RB approach minimums as low as ¾ mile visibility and 300 ft ceiling height. IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 125 79 94 74 279 218 Piston 270 396 367 311 360 353 . Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Goldsby - David J. Perry Airport District Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to construct a parallel taxiway system for runway 13/31. In order for the new taxiway to meet FAA standards the main apron will need to be reconfigured, main hangar with a public terminal building in it relocated, and the fuel farm relocated. FY 2011: Preliminary design study (NPE funded) FY 2012: Design only grant (NPE funded) FY 2013: . Single phase construction of the ODO. FY 2014: Update Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded). Project Justification David J. Perry airport is a small but very active airport with 46 based aircraft. Currently, aircraft must use the runway for taxing, which results in aircraft having to wait on the main apron while aircraft are taking off or on approach to the airport. Therefore, construction of a parallel taxiway system will improve the safety for the flying public. Airport Information Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $152,632 $152,632 State Apportionment $900,000 $900,000 Discretionary $0 $0 Non-Primary Entitlement $550,000 $550,000 Sponsor $76,316 $76,316 Total $1,678,947 $1,678,947 • District Airport • Based Aircraft: 46 • Runway 17/35: 3,006’ x 60’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: NA • NPS: Construct taxiway = 47 • OASP Goals: Standards IFR Operations 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 0 0 2 2 3 Piston 113 94 74 73 95 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Grove Municipal Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project is to construct a new terminal building. FY 2012: Construct terminal building. Project Justification The existing terminal building is dated and showing signs of deterioration. The typical size for a new public terminal building is 3,750 square feet. A building of this size will accommodate a public reception area, a pilot flight planning and weather briefing area, an area for pilots to rest, men’s and women’s restrooms, an airport managers office, a training/conference room available for public use and a kitchen area for serving food, but not cooking, etc. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 70 • Runway 18/36: 5,200ʹ x 75ʹ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Standards = 32 Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $275,000 $275,000 FAA State Apportionment $0 $0 FAA Discretionary $0 $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 $0 Sponsor $275,000 $275,000 Total $550,000 $550,000 • OASP Goals: An appealing terminal building is a basic amenity for a regional business airport. IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 68 87 140 180 86 85 Piston 450 351 333 320 138 93 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Guthrie - Edmond Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective is to acquire land for future hangar development and update property map of the Airport Layout Plan. FY 2011: Acquire land in accordance with FAA guidelines. Project Justification The Guthrie‐Edmond Regional Airport has approximately 60 corporations/businesses/individuals on its hangar waiting list. There is a limited amount of usable land for aviation development around the airport. This land acquisition will facilitate the future growth of this airport. The development of more hangar areas will enable the airport to become more self sufficient. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 102 • Runway 16/34: 5,001ʹ x 75ʹ Selection Criteria • P tM tN/A Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $0 FAA State Apportionment $0 FAA Discretionary $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 Sponsor $38,889 $38,889 Excise Tax Dedication $350,000 $350,000 Total $388,889 $388,889 Pavement Management: N/• NPS: Standards = 39.9 • OASP Goals: IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 142 155 180 167 142 69 Piston 317 195 266 437 531 481 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Guthrie - Edmond Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective is to construct taxilanes for hangar development, install MITLʹs on taxiways Charlie and Delta, rehabilitate taxiway Charlie and install new VAGIʹs. FY 2011: Design only grant. (NPE funded) FY 2012: Install taxiway lights, and construct taxilanes in hangar area, rehabilitate taxiways. Project Justification The Guthrie‐Edmond Regional Airport has approximately 60 corporations/businesses/individuals on its hangar waiting list. There is a limited amount of usable land for aviation development around the airport. The improvement to this land will facilitate the future growth of this airport. The development of more hangar areas will enable the airport to become increasingly self sufficient. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 102 • Runway 16/34: 5,001ʹ x 75ʹ Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $136,842 $136,842 FAA State Apportionment $700,000 $700,000 FAA Discretionary $450,000 $450,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $68,421 $68,421 Total $1,505,263 $1,505,263 Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Standards = 39.9 • OASP Goals: IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 142 155 180 167 142 69 Piston 317 195 266 437 531 481 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Idabel- McCurtain County Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objectives (ODO) of the proposed project is to construct a parallel taxiway system for runway 02/20. FY 2012: Design only grant (NPE funded). FY 2013: Construct parallel taxiway phase I of the ODO. FY 2014: Construct parallel taxiway phase II of the ODO. FY 2015: Amend Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded) Project Justification Currently, aircraft must use the runway for taxiing, which results in aircraft having to wait on the main apron while aircraft are taking off or on approach to the airport. Therefore, construction of a parallel taxiway system will improve the safety for the flying public. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 18 • Runway 02/20: 5,000’ x 75’ Selection Criteria • P tM tN/A Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $347,368 $347,368 State Apportionment $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Discretionary $1,900,000 $1,900,000 Non-Primary Entitlement $400,000 $400,000 Sponsor $173,684 $173,684 Total $3,821,053 $3,821,053 Pavement Management: N/• NPS: Construct Taxiway = 47.1 • OASP Goals: Basic amenity for an RB airport IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 576 486 427 371 88 51 Piston 184 201 193 328 117 82 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of Kingfisher Municipal District Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to construct a 2,800 ft. x 60 ft. runway with a connecting taxiway and close the pond north of runway 17 end. FY 2011: Construct approved project scope. Project Justification Currently the airport is served by a turf runway which is unusable during wet conditions. The new paved runway will provide access to the national and state air transportation system by piston powered aircraft. The role of this airports is to provide access for small businesses, suppliers of critical machinery parts, agriculture and mineral resources, medical providers both physicians and veterinarians, emergency disaster responders following storms and other natural disasters. Airport Information • District Airport • Based Aircraft: • Runway 017/35: 2,580ʹ x 375ʹ Turf Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $400,000 $400,000 FAA State Apportionment $0 $0 FAA Discretionary $0 $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 $0 Sponsor $400,000 $400,000 Total $800,000 $800,000 Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: • OASP Goals: Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. McAlester Regional Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to improve the runway safety area, improve the runway object free area east of runway 02/20, and remove an earth obstruction north of the terminal apron. The proposed project will relocate drainage structures out of the safety area, place earth embankment beyond runway 02 end to meet FAA standards, displace runway 20 end, remove earth obstruction north of the terminal apron and remove runway object free area obstructions east of runway 02/20. FY 2010: NPE funded Design only grant. FY 2011: Construct approved project scope. Project Justification It is the goal of both FAA and the Commission to improve runway safety area standards at airports especially at airports with jet traffic. In line with this goal, the proposed project will improve runway safety area at both ends of runway 02/20. The high national priority system rating (91.5) reiterates the merits of this project. This project will greatly improve the safety condition of the airport and increase the safety to the flying public. Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $100,000 $100,000 FAA State Apportionment $300,000 $300,000 FAA Discretionary $500,000 $500,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $50,000 $50,000 Total $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 41 • Runway 01/19: 5,602’ x 100’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Safety and Standards = 91.5 • OASP Goals: Improve safety areas • In‐Active Grants: N/A IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 422 497 441 495 264 112 Piston 760 688 704 908 355 196 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Miami Municipal Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed is to rehabilitate runway 17/35 and extend the parallel taxiway at runway 17 end. The project will consist of an asphalt overlay of runway 17/35 and extending the parallel taxiway system to runway 17 end. This project will require amending the Airport Layout Plan. FY 2011: Preliminary design (NPE funded) FY 2012: Design only grant (NPE funded). FY 2013: Single phase construction of the ODO.. FY 2014: Amend Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded). Project Justification The Commission’s pavement management system forecasts a PCI rating of 64 for runway 17/35 for year 2013 . Since the current PCI rating of all pavements is close to 65 (the threshold PCI value below which the pavement experiences rapid deterioration) it is more cost effective to rehabilitate the pavement in there current condition than to let them continue deteriorate to a condition that will require full depth reconstruction. Additionally, for safety and cost benefit the parallel taxiway system to runway 17/35 will be completed. Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $221,053 $221,053 State Apportionment $500,000 $500,000 Discretionary $1,300,000 $1,300,000 Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000 Sponsor $110,526 $110,526 Total $2,431,579 $2,431,579 Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 29 • Runway 17/35: 5,020’ x 100ʹ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = 67 • NPS Runway: Rehabilitate Pavement = 69.9 • NPS Taxiway: Standards = 47.1 • OASP Goals: Airside pavement > 65 and parallel taxiway. IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 216 140 199 191 79 44 Piston 358 258 185 189 78 53 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Muskogee - Davis Field Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project is to construct a new terminal building. Project Justification The existing terminal building is dated and showing signs of deterioration. The typical size for a new public terminal building is 3,750 square feet. A building of this size will accommodate a public reception area, a pilot flight planning and weather briefing area, an area for pilots to rest, men’s and women’s restrooms, an airport managers office, a training/conference room available for public use and a kitchen area for serving food, but not cooking, etc. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 59 • Runway 13/31: 7,200 x 150ʹ • Runway 04/22: 4,498ʹ x 75ʹ • Runway 18/36: 1,900ʹ x 60ʹ • MALS (medium intensity approach lighting system) Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $275,000 $275,000 FAA State Apportionment $0 FAA Discretionary $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 Sponsor $275,000 $275,000 Total $550,000 $550,000 • NPS: Standards = 32 • OASP Goals: An appealing terminal building is a basic amenity for a regional business airport. IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 534 705 712 639 200 106 Piston 642 571 413 319 196 142 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Muskogee - Davis Field Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective is to rehabilitate the parallel taxiway to runway 13/31. The project will consist of an overlay of taxiway Charlie and connecting taxiways to runway 13/31. Project Justification The pavements at Davis Field were constructed in 1956 with 10 inches of PCC. The current PCI rating for the parallel taxiway system is 47 for 2009. The current PCI rating is below 65 (the threshold PCI value below which the pavement experiences rapid deterioration). The pavement distresses observed during the visual PCI inspection include low to medium durability cracking, linear cracking, scaling, settlement, and joint seal damage. Constructing an asphalt overlay in the near term will prevent the pavement condition from deteriorating to a condition that requires a more costly rehabilitation. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 59 • Runway 13/31: 7,200 x 150ʹ • Runway 04/22: 4,498ʹ x 75ʹ • Runway 18/36: 1,900ʹ x 60ʹ Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $231,579 $231,579 FAA State Apportionment $1,400,000 $1,400,000 FAA Discretionary $500,000 $500,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000 Sponsor $115,789 $115,789 Total $2,547,368 $2,547,368 • MALS (medium intensity approach lighting system) Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = 47 • NPS: Rehabilitate Pavement = 69.9 • OASP Goals: Maintain airside pavement PCI > 65 IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 534 705 712 639 200 106 Piston 642 571 413 319 196 142 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Norman - Max Westheimer Regional Business Airport Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project is to rehabilitate the south portion of the main apron and hangar area. The project consists of the reconstruction of a portion of the main apron and repairing distressed pavements in the remaining area. FY 2010: NPE funded Design‐Only federal grant. FY 2011: Complete reconstruction of south apron. Project Justification The existing pavements are over 60 years old and in an extremely distressed condition. Most of the pavement has deteriorated to a condition that will require reconstruction. Due to the size of the paved area and cost to reconstruct pavement, the high traffic area will need to be reconstructed and the low traffic area rehabilitated to reduce foreign object debris (FOD). Airport Information • Regional Business Airport ‐ Reliever • Based Aircraft: 95 • R 17/35 5 200 100ʹ Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $244,526 $244,526 FAA State Apportionment $900,000 $900,000 FAA Discretionary $800,000 $800,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $623,000 $623,000 Sponsor $122,263 $122,263 Total $2,689,789 $2,689,789 Runway 35: 5,200 x • Runway 3/21: 4,747ʹ x 100ʹ • ILS 35 end (instrument landing system) 35 end MALS 35 end (medium intensity approach lighting system) Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: Poor Condition • NPS: Rehabilitate Apron 61.6 • OASP Goals: Basic amenity for a regional business airport. IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 1789 1619 1899 2091 1626 1333 Piston 1991 1657 1583 2338 1617 1598 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Pauls Valley Municipal Regional Business Airport Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective (ODO)of the proposed project is to construct a parallel taxiway system to the primary runway and remove pavement. FY 2012: Design only (NPE funded). FY 2013: Single phase construction of ODO. FY 2014: Amend the Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded). Project Justification Currently, aircraft must use the secondary runway for back taxing and that results in a safety and capacity concern. Therefore, a standard parallel taxiway will improve the safety of the flying public. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 32 • Runway 12/30: 3,500ʹ x 150’ 17/35: 5,000ʹ x 100ʹ Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $242,105 $242,105 FAA State Apportionment $1,500,000 $1,500,000 FAA Discretionary $500,000 $500,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000 Sponsor $121,053 $121,053 Total $2,663,158 $2,663,158 Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = NA • NPS: Construct Parallel Taxiway = 57 • OASP Goals: Parallel Taxiway at all RBʹs IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 100 152 225 262 130 55 Piston 83 70 57 84 44 43 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Sand Springs William R. Pogue Airport Regional Business Airport Proposed Project The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project are (a) rehabilitate runway pavements, (b) rehabilitate taxiway pavements, (c) rehabilitate apron pavements, and (d) construct taxilane. The work will consist of overlaying runway 17/35, crack seal and seal coat the parallel taxiway system and FBO apron, and construct a taxilane for corporate hangar development. FY 2011: NPE funded Design‐Only federal grant. FY 2012: Complete construction of the approved project scope. Project Justification The runway pavement was constructed in 1969, overlaid in 1984. The current PCI of the runway pavement is 63 which is categorized as Fair and is at or close to the threshold PCI rating below which pavement deteriorates more rapidly. No structural failures were observed, therefore the pavement section is concluded to be structurally adequate to support the traffic using the runway. Currently the pavement is exhibiting distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions (i.e. aging, oxidation, and weathering). Distresses observed include low to medium longitudinal cracking transverse cracking and patching Overlaying the pavement will Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $321,053 $290,000 FAA State Apportionment $950,000 $1,000,000 FAA Discretionary $1,800,000 $1,600,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000 Sponsor $160,526 $184,854 Total $3,531,579 $3,374,854 cracking, patching. protect the base structure and extend the life of the pavement. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 60 • Runway 17/35: 5,800 x 100 Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI = 62 • NPS: Rehabilitate Pavement = 69.9 • OASP Goals: Maintain airside pavement PCI > 65 IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 57 73 95 16 0 0 Piston 220 204 166 79 0 214 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Shawnee Regional Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall development objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to rehabilitate runway 17/35, rehabilitate taxiway pavements, and reconstruct a portion of the parallel taxiway system. The work elements will include an asphalt overlay of the runway and the north 1,300 ft of the parallel taxiway system, reconstruct and realign approximately 4,300 ft of the parallel taxiway system, improve runway safety area beyond runway 17 end and along the runway, and update of the airport layout plan (ALP). Improvement to RSA beyond 17 end will require adjustment to the federal equipment. FY 2009: Design‐only grant to complete an 80% design with detailed cost estimates. FY 2010: Reconstruct and realign south 4,300 ft. of the parallel taxiway system, rehabilitate the north portion of the taxiway system, and phase I improve RSA 17end. FY 2011: Rehabilitate runway and remaining portions of the taxiway pavements and complete improvement of runway safety. FY 2012 : Update ALP will be funded as a NPE project. Project Justification The runway and parallel taxiway pavements are in extremely distressed condition. The Commission’s pavement management system estimates pavement condition index for the south 4,300’ of runway pavements at 59 and for taxiway pavement as 55. The low PCI values indicate that the pavements are experiencing accelerated deterioration. The taxiway t i t d d d th t j t ill t t d li d th ll l Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $310,526 $310,526 FAA State Apportionment $1,000,000 $1,000,000 FAA Discretionary $1,800,000 $1,800,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $155,263 $155,263 Total $3,415,789 $3,415,789 geometry is non‐standard and the current project will reconstruct and re‐aligned the parallel taxiway. Currently, there are seven (7) different pavement structures ranging in capacity from 23,000# to 30,000# that make up the runway and parallel taxiway system. This project will make all airside pavement capable of bearing aircraft loading of SW 30,000 lbs. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 70 • Runway 17/35: 5,600 x 100ʹ • ILS runway 17 end • MALSR runway 17 end Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: PCI: RWY = 59; TWY = 55 • NPS: Rehabilitate runway pavements = 67.6 • OASP Goals: Maintain airside pavement PCI > 65 IFR Operations 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 291 331 268 289 234 166 50 Piston 265 299 254 302 313 302 342 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Stillwater Regional Regional Business Airport DESCRIPTION The Overall Development Objective (ODO) is to reconfigure the center and south section of the parallel taxiway system. The proposed project consists of constructing a standard parallel taxiway system to runway 35 end and around the main apron, reconfigure the main apron markings, and install signage. Project Justification The aircraft that have in the past operated from this airport include ‐ Airbus 319 and Airbus 321, McDonnell Douglas MD‐80, Boeing 727, Boeing 737 and Boeing 757. The sponsor has reported difficulty in aircraft movement and aircraft parking for Big‐12 sporting events. The proposed project will allow aircraft to taxi around the main apron while large air carrier aircraft and jet aircraft air park on the apron during periods of peak operation. The proposed project will eliminate the mixing of large air carrier aircraft and small aircraft on the main apron. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 79 • Control Tower 139 airport • Part 139 airport • ILS at runway 17 end • MALSR t 17 d Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $363,158 $363,158 FAA State Apportionment $1,050,000 $1,050,000 FAA Discretionary $1,800,000 $1,800,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $600,000 $600,000 Sponsor $181,579 $181,579 Total $3,994,737 $3,994,737 at runway end • Runway 17/35: 7,401’ x 100’ • Runway 04/22: 5,002ʹ x 75ʹ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: NA • NPS: Expand terminal apron = 39.0 • OASP Goals: N/A IFR Operations 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 784 889 1073 1061 1097 501 287 Piston 799 887 890 825 1413 494 339 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Tulsa - Riverside Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) is to upgrade the airfield guidance signage to current FAA Standards (Advisory Circular 150/5340‐ 18E. Electrical power lines from the electrical vault to the signs will be replaced and new regulators will be installed near the maintenance building to accommodate the current electrical demand. Relocate the electrical vault to a location . Install PAPI's on 1R/19L. Install REIL's on 1L/19R. Install "distance to go" markers on 1L/19R ‐ the control tower has requested this as a tool they can use with their procedures to expedite the flow of traffic and increase the capacity of that runway. Install computer controls for airfield lighting similar to that at TUL and replace the old pilot controlled lighting system with a new one that allows independent control of the Runway 1L/19R & Taxiway "A" (using the main frequency for the control tower) and separate control (using the second frequency used for the east runway) for Runway 1R/19L & all the taxiway lights west of 1L/19R. Relocate the airport beacon to a new location immediately adjacent to the control tower. Project Justification The existing airfield guidance signs do not comply with FAA Advisory Circular. Standardized signs will promote better situational awareness on the airfield as a means to reduce the potential for incursions. A properly designed and standardized taxiway guidance sign system is essential for the safe and efficient operation of aircraft and ground vehicles on the airport movement area. Overall safety is enhanced by a standardized system of Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $163,158 $163,158 FAA State Apportionment $450,000 $450,000 FAA Discretionary $950,000 $950,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $81,579 $81,579 Total $1,794,737 $1,794,737 signs at all airports. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport ‐ Reliever • Based Aircraft: 520 • Control Tower • ILS at runway 1L end • Runway 1L/R19: 5,102’ x 100’ • Runway 1R/19L: 4,208ʹ x 100ʹ • Runway 13/31: 2,641ʹ x 50ʹ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Rehabilitate Taxiway = • OASP Goals: Safety and Standards IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 3063 3241 3669 4441 3297 2875 Piston 4405 3798 3960 5886 7085 6768 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Tulsa - Richard L. Jones Regional Business Airport Project Description The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to widen runway 13/31 and install new runway lights and VAGI's along runway 13/31. The ODO also includes rehabilitation of Taxiway “F”. bearing capacity. FY 2013: Design and construct ODO. Project Justification The current runway width (50’) does not meet FAA standard s. Therefore, widening the runway to (60') will meet the standards for the aircraft that runway 13/31 accommodates. Widening the runway will necessitate changes to the runway edge lighting system (which is in excess of 30 years old and should be replaced with energy efficient components and replace the existing Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) lights with Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) lights. Installation of PAPI’s will replace aging VASI’s that need to be replaced before they become a maintenance and/or reliability issue. Taxiway "F" existing pavement is not adequate to support increasing use by heavier business jets being serviced in this area. Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $161,500 $161,500 FAA State Apportionment $250,000 $250,000 FAA Discretionary $1,300,000 $1,300,000 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000 Sponsor $80,750 $80,750 Total $1,942,250 $1,942,250 Airport Information • Regional Business Airport ‐ Reliever • Based Aircraft: 520 • Control Tower • ILS at runway 1L end • Runway 1L/R19: 5,102’ x 100’ • Runway 1R/19L: 4,208ʹ x 100ʹ • Runway 13/31: 2,641ʹ x 50ʹ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: • NPS: • OASP Goals: Standards IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 3063 3241 3669 4441 3297 2875 Piston 4405 3798 3960 5886 7085 6768 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. Weatherford - Thomas P. Stafford Regional Business Airport Project Description The first Overall Development Objective (ODO) is to extend runway 17 end at least 701 ft. The extension will require the closure or relocation of Lawter Street and reconfiguration of the city golf course (1 hole). The city is responsible for the cost to reconfigure the golf course. The second ODO is to widen the parallel taxiway 15 ft. on the west side, install medium intensity taxiway lights, and install lighted runway hold signs. Project Justification The proposed project is the first step in fulfilling an important Commission goal – i.e., to construct jet‐capable runways at all of Oklahoma’s regional business airports that meet FAA’s aviation demand criteria. The sponsor has documented aircraft demand that satisfies FAA’s aviation demand criteria for the extension. Runway 17/35 is currently 4,399 ft long. The result of the proposed 701 ft. extension project is a 5,100 ft. jet capable runway. The existing parallel taxiway does not meet FAAʹs standard separation distance. Widening the taxiway 15 ft. will shift the parallel taxiway centerline to the required 240 ft. from the runway centerline. he standard geometrics will improve the airports ability to obtain a more desirable approach. Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $84,211 $84,211 FAA State Apportionment $200,000 $200,000 FAA Discretionary $0 $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $600,000 $600,000 Sponsor $42,105 $42,105 Total $926,316 $926,316 This airport does not have taxiway edge lights. The installation of medium intensity taxiway lights and lighted runway hold signs will increase pilot awareness, safety, and improve the airportʹs ability to obtain a more desirable approach. Airport Information • Regional Business Airport • Based Aircraft: 46 • Runway 17/35: 4,399’ x 75’ Selection Criteria • Pavement Management: N/A • NPS: Extend Runway = 46.5 •NPS: Standards = 47.1 • OASP Goals: Jet capable runway at aviation demand justified RB airports. IFR Operations 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jet/Turbo 58 62 13 0 68 109 0 Piston 64 229 39 0 120 117 111 Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. State System Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission Project Description The Overall Development Objective is to conduct a system planning study. The Commission’s system planning activities are categorized into 3 work elements as under: Work Element 1: Oklahoma Airport System Plan Review 1. Review functional classification of all system airports and compare available basic airport amenities at system airports with OASP Goals 2. Review the based aircraft inventory at system airports 3. Airport grant assurance compliance certification 4. Update IFR traffic count for system airports 5. Review airport design standard compliance Work Element 2: Airport Information Management Activities 1. NPIAS needs worksheet update 2. Pavement management 3. Airport safety inspections Work Element 3: Capital Planning Process 1. Airport five‐year capital improvement program update 2. Obtain early project development packets for all AIP projects 3. Commission’s three‐year capital improvement program 4. Collect sponsor self certifications Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Commission $310,526 $610,526 $810,526 $810,526 FAA State Apportionment $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 FAA Discretionary $0 FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 Sponsor $0 Total $510,526 $810,526 $1,010,526 $1,010,526 RAMP Program State funds for State only projects at non‐NPIAS airports and supplemental funding for NPE funded projects. This program will Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds. End of Three Year CIP |
Date created | 2011-08-30 |
Date modified | 2011-10-28 |