Three year capital improvement program

              Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission
Capital Improvement Program
Approved November 10, 2010
Three Year Capital Improvement Program
FY 2011 ‐ 2013
WES STUCKY, Chairman
Ardmore
RICK ARMSTRONG, Vice Chairman
Tulsa
DAVID CONWAY, Secretary
Durant
TOM STEPHENSON
Oklahoma City
Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission
JOE HARRIS
Blackwell
KENNETH ADAMS
Bartlesville
DAVE AMIS III
Oklahoma City
VICTOR N. BIRD
Director
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ……………………………………………………....………………….. 1
Preface ……………………………………………………………………….…………….…… 2
CIP Project Summary ......................................................................…….………….……………... 3 ‐ 4
Oklahoma Aeronautic Commission
Capital Improvement Program
FY 2011 ‐ FY 2013
FY 2011 ‐ FY 2013 Capital Improvement Program ....................……………………………….. 5 ‐ 22
Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission
120 N Robinson, Ste. 1244W
Oklahoma City, OK 73102
(405) 604‐6900
www.aeronautics.ok.gov
The Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission (Commission) assists with the development of a statewide system
of airports, encourages aeronautical safety and development, and coordinates activities with the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) to develop a national system of civil aviation.
The Oklahoma Airport System Plan (OASP) was approved by the Commission in 1999 and is the long‐term
planning document used to identify the network of airports needed to serve the state. The OASP identifies
airports by functional classification, service level, and design standard.
The Commission’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the planning and programming guide for State
and Federal funds regarding airport development that is consistent the goals of the OASP. The CIP allows
the Commission, FAA, and airport sponsors to anticipate airport needs and accommodate changes in
project scope, cost, and schedule based on multi‐year planning. Inclusion of a project in the CIP is an
indication to the sponsor that the project is under consideration for future funding; however, it is NOT a
commitment for future funding.
Justification is required for projects in the CIP and must be consistent with FAA and Commission
Regulations, Policies and Procedures. Some projects listed in this document may not be implemented due
of justification
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
to funding restrictions or lack justification.
The CIP is based on anticipated funding levels that were determined from historic state and federal
allocations for airport development in the State of Oklahoma. Once the actual funding levels are
established, project implementation and funding will be adjusted.
The Commission welcomes your comments on this document and our CIP process. Please contact the
Commission at the following address:
Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission
3700 North Classen Blvd., Ste. 240
Oklahoma City, OK 73118
(405) 604‐6900
Preface
Annually, the Commission prepares and adopts a three‐year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The CIP is the guide for
programming federal and state funds for airport development consistent with the Oklahoma Airport System Plan (OASP). The
challenge of strategic programming is the identification and sequencing of the big rock projects and the selection of smaller
projects that can be funded in the same fiscal year. Big rock projects are typically very expensive and require federal state
apportionment, federal discretionary, federal non‐primary entitlement, and State funding.
Oklahoma Airport System Plan
The goal of the OASP is to identify a system of aviation facilities that will meet national and state needs (safety, capacity and
geographic access). The OASP also identifies the basic amenities for each airport classification that will enable each airport in the
system to perform its system role. The OASP includes 114 publicly owned airports with 100 of these airports included in the
National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS).
Definition of “Big Rock Projects”
A big rock project is a project that results in a significant upgrade to the capability of a system airport, is a high cost project that is
needed to sustain the capability of a regional business airport, or is a new airport. Examples of big rock projects are a runway
extension, construction of parallel taxiway, runway reconstruction or overlay, acquisition of land for a runway extension or
runway safety area, installation of approach lighting systems, installation of a localizer or a glide slope, or other project typically
requiring multi‐year and multi‐source financing such as the Bartlesville Butler Creek relocation project, the R. L. Jones Jr. storm
water project and the Stillwater runway extension project. Due to cost, only two or three big rock projects can be underway at
any one time.
Sequencing of Big Rock Projects
The sequencing of the big rock projects is critical to the continued orderly development of the Oklahoma airport system In the
system. programming process, the big rock projects are selected first and other less costly projects are selected second. Obviously, some
balance between big rock and less costly projects must be achieved.
Project Selection Criteria
Complete projects currently identified in Commission’s three‐year CIP
Pavement Management Program (visual inspection converted into a numerical pavement condition)
Oklahoma Airport System Plan and Commission Strategic Plan and Goals
  Emphasis on regional business airport development
  Provide standard Airport Geometry and amenities as per functional classification
  Provide improved approaches to allow all‐weather access
  Aesthetic, business friendly Airport Terminal buildings
FAA National Priority System (numerical rating system)
  Biased towards based aircraft and operations
  Does not consider economic impact
  Does not consider geographical coverage
Annual Airport Development Funding
Planned State Apportionment from FAA = $4,300,000
Planned Discretionary funding from FAA = $5,000,000
Planned State Funding from State Dedicated Sources = $ 1,500,000 (reduced from $2.7 M due economic downturn)
Annual Total for Programming = $10,800,000
Note: This document is based on anticipated funding levels that were determined from historic state and federal allocations for
airport development in the State of Oklahoma. Once the actual funding levels are established, project implementation and
funding will be adjusted.
Summary FY 2011 - 2013
Airport Project Description FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Ardmore Municipal
Rehabilitate airport
drainage pipe system.
$ 1,331,579 $ 1,331,579
C.E. Page Airport
Install taxiway lights;
Rehabilitate north 650 ft.
portion of RW 17L.
$ 1,968,421 $ 1,968,421
Claremore Municipal
Remove earth obstruction
runway 35 end.
$ 1,273,684 $ 1,273,684
Goldsby‐ David Jay
Perry
Construct parallel
taxiway system and
reconfigure main apron.
$ 1,678,947 $ 1,678,947
Grove Municipal
Construct a new terminal
building
$ 550,000 $ 550,000
Guthrie ‐ Edmond
Acquire land for future
hangar development.
$ 388,889 $ 388,889
Guthrie ‐ Edmond
Construct and
rehabilitate taxilanes,
install taxiway lights and
VAGIʹs
$ 1,505,263 $ 1,505,263
Idabel ‐ McCurtain
County
Construct parallel
taxiway system (phase I).
$ 3,821,053 $ 3,821,053
Kingfisher Municipal
Construct paved runway
and connector taxiway.
$ 800,000 $ 800,000
McAlester Regional
Improve Runway Safety
area.
$ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000
Miami Municipal
Rehabilitate runway
17/35, Extend Parallel
Taxiway System
$ 2,431,579 $ 2,431,579
Muskogee ‐Davis
Field
Construct new terminal
building.
$ 550,000 $ 550,000
Muskogee ‐Davis
Field
Overlay parallel taxiway
system to runway 13/31.
$ 2,547,368 $ 2,547,368
Norman ‐ Max
Westheimer
Reconstruct taxiway
South Apron.
$ 2,689,789 $ 2,689,789
Pauls Valley
Municipal
Construct north portion
of parallel taxiway
system.
$ 2,663,158 $ 2,663,158
Summary FY 2011 - 2013
Airport Project Description FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Sand Springs ‐Pogue
Airport
Rehabilitate runway
17/35, rehabilitate
taxiways and FBO apron,
construct taxilane.
$ 3,531,579 $ 3,531,579
Shawnee Regional
Realign parallel taxiway
system, rehabilitate
runway 17/35, and
Improve RSA.
$ 3,415,789 $ 3,415,789
Stillwater Regional
Reconfigure center and
north sections of the
parallel taxiway system.
$ 3,994,737 $ 3,994,737
Tulsa ‐ Richard L.
Jones
Upgrade electrical
airfield system and
signage.
$ 1,794,737 $ 1,794,737
Tulsa ‐ Richard L.
Jones
Widen runway 13/31 and
rehabilitate taxiway ʺFʺ.
$ 1,942,250 $ 1,942,250
Weatherford ‐
Thomas P. Stafford
Extend runway 17 end
and widen and light
parallel taxiway system.
$ 926,316 $ 926,316
State of Oklahoma
System Planning and
RAMP Program
$ 510,526 $ 810,526 $ 1,010,526 $ 2,331,579
TOTAL $ 15,649,731 $ 14,039,474 $ 13,547,513 $ 43,236,718
FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $2,203,737 $2,038,158 $1,935,184 $6,177,079
Federal ‐ State
Apportionment $4,350,000 $4,350,000 $4,350,000 $13,050,000
Federal Discretionary $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $15,000,000
Federal Non‐Primary
Entitlement $2,423,000 $1,800,000 $1,700,000 $5,923,000
Sponsors $1,322,994 $851,316 $562,329 $2,736,639
State Excise Tax Program $350,000 $350,000
Totals $15,649,731 $14,039,474 $13,547,513 $43,236,718
Summary of Funding Totals
Ardmore Municipal
Regional Business Airport
Proposed Project
The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is
to repair portions of the airport drainage system. The project consists
of removing and replacing unusable drainage pipe and structures.
The sink hole first appeared in April 2010, therefore a study will be
conducted during F Y 2010 to determine the actual scope of the
project.
FY 2011: Design drainage improvements (NPE funded).
FY 2012: Single phase construction of the ODO..
Project Justification
The existing drainage system, which is 70+ years old, has begun to
fail and has sinkholes beginning to occur continuously along the
piping system. The largest of these sinkholes measures over twenty
(20) feet in diameter. The existing concrete pipe has undergone
some unforeseen settling and joint failure which in turn has lead to
numerous sinkholes in close proximity to the taxiway safety areas.
An additional safety concern is that the system crosses under active
taxiway pavements. Replacement of unusable pipe, installation of
new drainage inlet structures, and further grading to improve
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $121,053 $121,053
FAA State Apportionment $350,000 $350,000
FAA Discretionary $200,000 $200,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $600,000 $600,000
Sponsor $60,526 $60,526
Total $1,331,579 $1,331,579
drainage areas will improve airport drainage and reduce the
possibility of damage to aircraft and surface vehicles.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Towered airport
• Based Aircraft: 12
• Runway 13/31: 9,000ʹ x 150ʹ
•Runway 17/35: 5,350ʹ x 75ʹ
•ILS 31 end (instrument landing system)
• MASLR 31 end (medium intensity approach lighting system)
• Runway to be strengthened and extended FY 2008
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: N/A
• NPS: Drainage Improvements = 47
• OASP Goals: Safety and Standards
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 546 467 609 620 275 180
Piston 593 387 498 610 346 298
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of the
sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
C.E. Page Airport
Regional Business Airport
Proposed Project
The Overall Development Objective is install taxiway lights, install
airport signage, reconstruct approximately 640 ft. of runway at
runway 17L end, remove rubber from runway 17R/35L, and
rehabilitate various corner breaks and joints in runways and
taxiway.
Project Justification
The installation of airport signage and taxiway lights will provide
guidance to aircraft pilots and enhance the safer maneuvering of
aircraft on the ground. The current pavement condition index (PCI)
for the 640 ft. pavement section is 42 (fair). This is well below the
goal of maintaning airside pavements above a PCI of 65.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft:
• Runway 17R/35L: 6,014ʹx 100’
• Runway 17L/35R: 3,502' x 75'
Selection Criteria
• P tM t42
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $178,947 $178,947
FAA State Apportionment $300,000 $300,000
FAA Discretionary $1,100,000 $1,100,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000
Sponsor $89,474 $89,474
Total $1,968,421 $1,968,421
Pavement Management: 42
• NPS: Rehabilitate Runway 69.6
• OASP Goals: Maintain a PCI above 65
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 180 209 221 298 209 23
Piston 185 171 179 192 196 39
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Claremore Regional
Regional Business Airport
Proposed Project
The Overall Development Objective is to remove obstructions. The
proposed project will remove the earth ridgeline that extends into
and penetrates the approach surface at runway 35 end.
FY 2012: Construct approved project scope of work.
Project Justification
An existing ridgeline south and east of runway 35 end extends into
and penetrates the approach surface. The proposed project consists
of earth work to remove the earth obstruction. Currently the
airport has approach minima of 467 ft (ceiling height) and visibility
minima not lower than 1 mile. Once this obstruction is removed,
the airport will be able to develop a more desirable approach with,
possibly as low as ¾ mile visibility and 300 ft ceiling height. The
improved approach minimums, will increase safety and make the
airport more accessible to inbound aircraft during inclement
weather, i.e. when weather conditions have lowered the ceiling
height and/or reduced visibility.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $115,789 $115,789
FAA State Apportionment $700,000 $700,000
FAA Discretionary $100,000 $100,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000
Sponsor $57,895 $57,895
Total $1,273,684 $1,273,684
• Based Aircraft: 51
• Runway 17/35: 5,200ʹ’x 75’
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: N/A
• NPS: Safety = 92.5
• OASP Goals: RB approach minimums as low
as ¾ mile visibility and 300 ft ceiling height.
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 125 79 94 74 279 218
Piston 270 396 367 311 360 353
.
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Goldsby - David J. Perry Airport
District Airport
Project Description
The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed
project is to construct a parallel taxiway system for runway
13/31. In order for the new taxiway to meet FAA standards
the main apron will need to be reconfigured, main hangar
with a public terminal building in it relocated, and the fuel
farm relocated.
FY 2011: Preliminary design study (NPE funded)
FY 2012: Design only grant (NPE funded)
FY 2013: . Single phase construction of the ODO.
FY 2014: Update Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded).
Project Justification
David J. Perry airport is a small but very active airport with
46 based aircraft. Currently, aircraft must use the runway
for taxing, which results in aircraft having to wait on the
main apron while aircraft are taking off or on approach to
the airport. Therefore, construction of a parallel taxiway
system will improve the safety for the flying public.
Airport Information
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $152,632 $152,632
State Apportionment $900,000 $900,000
Discretionary $0 $0
Non-Primary Entitlement $550,000 $550,000
Sponsor $76,316 $76,316
Total $1,678,947 $1,678,947
• District Airport
• Based Aircraft: 46
• Runway 17/35: 3,006’ x 60’
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: NA
• NPS: Construct taxiway = 47
• OASP Goals: Standards
IFR Operations 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 0 0 2 2 3
Piston 113 94 74 73 95
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Grove Municipal
Regional Business Airport
Project Description
The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project is to
construct a new terminal building.
FY 2012: Construct terminal building.
Project Justification
The existing terminal building is dated and showing signs of
deterioration. The typical size for a new public terminal building is
3,750 square feet. A building of this size will accommodate a public
reception area, a pilot flight planning and weather briefing area, an
area for pilots to rest, men’s and women’s restrooms, an airport
managers office, a training/conference room available for public use
and a kitchen area for serving food, but not cooking, etc.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 70
• Runway 18/36: 5,200ʹ x 75ʹ
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: N/A
• NPS: Standards = 32
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $275,000 $275,000
FAA State Apportionment $0 $0
FAA Discretionary $0 $0
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 $0
Sponsor $275,000 $275,000
Total $550,000 $550,000
• OASP Goals: An appealing terminal building is a basic amenity for
a regional business airport.
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 68 87 140 180 86 85
Piston 450 351 333 320 138 93
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Guthrie - Edmond
Regional Business Airport
Project Description
The Overall Development Objective is to acquire land for future
hangar development and update property map of the Airport Layout
Plan.
FY 2011: Acquire land in accordance with FAA guidelines.
Project Justification
The Guthrie‐Edmond Regional Airport has approximately 60
corporations/businesses/individuals on its hangar waiting list. There
is a limited amount of usable land for aviation development around
the airport. This land acquisition will facilitate the future growth of
this airport. The development of more hangar areas will enable the
airport to become more self sufficient.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 102
• Runway 16/34: 5,001ʹ x 75ʹ
Selection Criteria
• P tM tN/A
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $0
FAA State Apportionment $0
FAA Discretionary $0
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0
Sponsor $38,889 $38,889
Excise Tax Dedication $350,000 $350,000
Total $388,889 $388,889
Pavement Management: N/• NPS: Standards = 39.9
• OASP Goals:
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 142 155 180 167 142 69
Piston 317 195 266 437 531 481
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Guthrie - Edmond
Regional Business Airport
Project Description
The Overall Development Objective is to construct taxilanes for
hangar development, install MITLʹs on taxiways Charlie and Delta,
rehabilitate taxiway Charlie and install new VAGIʹs.
FY 2011: Design only grant. (NPE funded)
FY 2012: Install taxiway lights, and construct taxilanes in hangar
area, rehabilitate taxiways.
Project Justification
The Guthrie‐Edmond Regional Airport has approximately 60
corporations/businesses/individuals on its hangar waiting list. There
is a limited amount of usable land for aviation development around
the airport. The improvement to this land will facilitate the future
growth of this airport. The development of more hangar areas will
enable the airport to become increasingly self sufficient.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 102
• Runway 16/34: 5,001ʹ x 75ʹ
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $136,842 $136,842
FAA State Apportionment $700,000 $700,000
FAA Discretionary $450,000 $450,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000
Sponsor $68,421 $68,421
Total $1,505,263 $1,505,263
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: N/A
• NPS: Standards = 39.9
• OASP Goals:
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 142 155 180 167 142 69
Piston 317 195 266 437 531 481
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Idabel- McCurtain County
Regional Business Airport
Project Description
The Overall Development Objectives (ODO) of the proposed project
is to construct a parallel taxiway system for runway 02/20.
FY 2012: Design only grant (NPE funded).
FY 2013: Construct parallel taxiway phase I of the ODO.
FY 2014: Construct parallel taxiway phase II of the ODO.
FY 2015: Amend Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded)
Project Justification
Currently, aircraft must use the runway for taxiing, which results in
aircraft having to wait on the main apron while aircraft are taking off
or on approach to the airport. Therefore, construction of a parallel
taxiway system will improve the safety for the flying public.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 18
• Runway 02/20: 5,000’ x 75’
Selection Criteria
• P tM tN/A
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $347,368 $347,368
State Apportionment $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Discretionary $1,900,000 $1,900,000
Non-Primary Entitlement $400,000 $400,000
Sponsor $173,684 $173,684
Total $3,821,053 $3,821,053
Pavement Management: N/• NPS: Construct Taxiway = 47.1
• OASP Goals: Basic amenity for an RB airport
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 576 486 427 371 88 51
Piston 184 201 193 328 117 82
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
Kingfisher Municipal
District Airport
Project Description
The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is
to construct a 2,800 ft. x 60 ft. runway with a connecting taxiway and
close the pond north of runway 17 end.
FY 2011: Construct approved project scope.
Project Justification
Currently the airport is served by a turf runway which is unusable
during wet conditions. The new paved runway will provide access to
the national and state air transportation system by piston powered
aircraft. The role of this airports is to provide access for small
businesses, suppliers of critical machinery parts, agriculture and
mineral resources, medical providers both physicians and
veterinarians, emergency disaster responders following storms and
other natural disasters.
Airport Information
• District Airport
• Based Aircraft:
• Runway 017/35: 2,580ʹ x 375ʹ Turf
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $400,000 $400,000
FAA State Apportionment $0 $0
FAA Discretionary $0 $0
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0 $0
Sponsor $400,000 $400,000
Total $800,000 $800,000
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: N/A
• NPS:
• OASP Goals:
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
McAlester Regional
Regional Business Airport
Project Description
The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is
to improve the runway safety area, improve the runway object free
area east of runway 02/20, and remove an earth obstruction north of
the terminal apron. The proposed project will relocate drainage
structures out of the safety area, place earth embankment beyond
runway 02 end to meet FAA standards, displace runway 20 end,
remove earth obstruction north of the terminal apron and remove
runway object free area obstructions east of runway 02/20.
FY 2010: NPE funded Design only grant.
FY 2011: Construct approved project scope.
Project Justification
It is the goal of both FAA and the Commission to improve runway
safety area standards at airports especially at
airports with jet traffic. In line with this goal, the proposed project
will improve runway safety area at both ends of runway 02/20. The
high national priority system rating (91.5) reiterates the merits of this
project. This project will greatly improve the safety condition of the
airport and increase the safety to the flying public.
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $100,000 $100,000
FAA State Apportionment $300,000 $300,000
FAA Discretionary $500,000 $500,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000
Sponsor $50,000 $50,000
Total $1,100,000 $1,100,000
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 41
• Runway 01/19: 5,602’ x 100’
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: N/A
• NPS: Safety and Standards = 91.5
• OASP Goals: Improve safety areas
• In‐Active Grants: N/A
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 422 497 441 495 264 112
Piston 760 688 704 908 355 196
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Miami Municipal
Regional Business Airport
Project Description
The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed is to
rehabilitate runway 17/35 and extend the parallel taxiway at runway 17
end. The project will consist of an asphalt overlay of runway 17/35 and
extending the parallel taxiway system to runway 17 end. This project will
require amending the Airport Layout Plan.
FY 2011: Preliminary design (NPE funded)
FY 2012: Design only grant (NPE funded).
FY 2013: Single phase construction of the ODO..
FY 2014: Amend Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded).
Project Justification
The Commission’s pavement management system forecasts a PCI
rating of 64 for runway 17/35 for year 2013 . Since the current PCI
rating of all pavements is close to 65 (the threshold PCI value below
which the pavement experiences rapid deterioration) it is more cost
effective to rehabilitate the pavement in there current condition than
to let them continue deteriorate to a condition that will require full
depth reconstruction. Additionally, for safety and cost benefit the
parallel taxiway system to runway 17/35 will be completed.
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $221,053 $221,053
State Apportionment $500,000 $500,000
Discretionary $1,300,000 $1,300,000
Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000
Sponsor $110,526 $110,526
Total $2,431,579 $2,431,579
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 29
• Runway 17/35: 5,020’ x 100ʹ
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: PCI = 67
• NPS Runway: Rehabilitate Pavement = 69.9
• NPS Taxiway: Standards = 47.1
• OASP Goals: Airside pavement > 65 and parallel taxiway.
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 216 140 199 191 79 44
Piston 358 258 185 189 78 53
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Muskogee - Davis Field
Regional Business Airport
Project Description
The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project is to
construct a new terminal building.
Project Justification
The existing terminal building is dated and showing signs of
deterioration. The typical size for a new public terminal building is
3,750 square feet. A building of this size will accommodate a public
reception area, a pilot flight planning and weather briefing area, an
area for pilots to rest, men’s and women’s restrooms, an airport
managers office, a training/conference room available for public use
and a kitchen area for serving food, but not cooking, etc.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 59
• Runway 13/31: 7,200 x 150ʹ
• Runway 04/22: 4,498ʹ x 75ʹ
• Runway 18/36: 1,900ʹ x 60ʹ
• MALS (medium intensity approach lighting system)
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: N/A
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $275,000 $275,000
FAA State Apportionment $0
FAA Discretionary $0
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0
Sponsor $275,000 $275,000
Total $550,000 $550,000
• NPS: Standards = 32
• OASP Goals: An appealing terminal building is a basic amenity for
a regional business airport.
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 534 705 712 639 200 106
Piston 642 571 413 319 196 142
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Muskogee - Davis Field
Regional Business Airport
Project Description
The Overall Development Objective is to rehabilitate the parallel taxiway to
runway 13/31. The project will consist of an overlay of taxiway Charlie and
connecting taxiways to runway 13/31.
Project Justification
The pavements at Davis Field were constructed in 1956 with 10 inches of
PCC. The current PCI rating for the parallel taxiway system is 47 for 2009.
The current PCI rating is below 65 (the threshold PCI value below which
the pavement experiences rapid deterioration). The pavement distresses
observed during the visual PCI inspection include low to medium
durability cracking, linear cracking, scaling, settlement, and joint seal
damage. Constructing an asphalt overlay in the near term will prevent the
pavement condition from deteriorating to a condition that requires a more
costly rehabilitation.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 59
• Runway 13/31: 7,200 x 150ʹ
• Runway 04/22: 4,498ʹ x 75ʹ
• Runway 18/36: 1,900ʹ x 60ʹ
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $231,579 $231,579
FAA State Apportionment $1,400,000 $1,400,000
FAA Discretionary $500,000 $500,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000
Sponsor $115,789 $115,789
Total $2,547,368 $2,547,368
• MALS (medium intensity approach lighting system)
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: PCI = 47
• NPS: Rehabilitate Pavement = 69.9
• OASP Goals: Maintain airside pavement PCI > 65
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 534 705 712 639 200 106
Piston 642 571 413 319 196 142
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Norman - Max Westheimer
Regional Business Airport
Proposed Project
The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project is to
rehabilitate the south portion of the main apron and hangar area. The
project consists of the reconstruction of a portion of the main apron
and repairing distressed pavements in the remaining area.
FY 2010: NPE funded Design‐Only federal grant.
FY 2011: Complete reconstruction of south apron.
Project Justification
The existing pavements are over 60 years old and in an extremely
distressed condition. Most of the pavement has deteriorated to a
condition that will require reconstruction. Due to the size of the
paved area and cost to reconstruct pavement, the high traffic area
will need to be reconstructed and the low traffic area rehabilitated to
reduce foreign object debris (FOD).
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport ‐ Reliever
• Based Aircraft: 95
• R 17/35 5 200 100ʹ
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $244,526 $244,526
FAA State Apportionment $900,000 $900,000
FAA Discretionary $800,000 $800,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $623,000 $623,000
Sponsor $122,263 $122,263
Total $2,689,789 $2,689,789
Runway 35: 5,200 x • Runway 3/21: 4,747ʹ x 100ʹ
• ILS 35 end (instrument landing system) 35 end
MALS 35 end (medium intensity approach lighting system)
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: Poor Condition
• NPS: Rehabilitate Apron 61.6
• OASP Goals: Basic amenity for a regional business airport.
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 1789 1619 1899 2091 1626 1333
Piston 1991 1657 1583 2338 1617 1598
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Pauls Valley Municipal
Regional Business Airport
Proposed Project
The Overall Development Objective (ODO)of the proposed project is
to construct a parallel taxiway system to the primary runway and
remove pavement.
FY 2012: Design only (NPE funded).
FY 2013: Single phase construction of ODO.
FY 2014: Amend the Airport Layout Plan (NPE funded).
Project Justification
Currently, aircraft must use the secondary runway for back taxing
and that results in a safety and capacity concern. Therefore, a
standard parallel taxiway will improve the safety of the flying
public.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 32
• Runway 12/30: 3,500ʹ x 150’
17/35: 5,000ʹ x 100ʹ
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $242,105 $242,105
FAA State Apportionment $1,500,000 $1,500,000
FAA Discretionary $500,000 $500,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000
Sponsor $121,053 $121,053
Total $2,663,158 $2,663,158
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: PCI = NA
• NPS: Construct Parallel Taxiway = 57
• OASP Goals: Parallel Taxiway at all RBʹs
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 100 152 225 262 130 55
Piston 83 70 57 84 44 43
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Sand Springs
William R. Pogue Airport
Regional Business Airport
Proposed Project
The Overall Development Objective of the proposed project are (a)
rehabilitate runway pavements, (b) rehabilitate taxiway pavements, (c)
rehabilitate apron pavements, and (d) construct taxilane. The work will
consist of overlaying runway 17/35, crack seal and seal coat the parallel
taxiway system and FBO apron, and construct a taxilane for corporate
hangar development.
FY 2011: NPE funded Design‐Only federal grant.
FY 2012: Complete construction of the approved project scope.
Project Justification
The runway pavement was constructed in 1969, overlaid in 1984. The
current PCI of the runway pavement is 63 which is categorized as Fair and
is at or close to the threshold PCI rating below which pavement
deteriorates more rapidly. No structural failures were observed, therefore
the pavement section is concluded to be structurally adequate to support
the traffic using the runway. Currently the pavement is exhibiting
distresses due to seasonal environmental conditions (i.e. aging, oxidation,
and weathering). Distresses observed include low to medium longitudinal
cracking transverse cracking and patching Overlaying the pavement will
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $321,053 $290,000
FAA State Apportionment $950,000 $1,000,000
FAA Discretionary $1,800,000 $1,600,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $300,000 $300,000
Sponsor $160,526 $184,854
Total $3,531,579 $3,374,854
cracking, patching. protect the base structure and extend the life of the pavement.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 60
• Runway 17/35: 5,800 x 100
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: PCI = 62
• NPS: Rehabilitate Pavement = 69.9
• OASP Goals: Maintain airside pavement PCI > 65
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 57 73 95 16 0 0
Piston 220 204 166 79 0 214
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Shawnee Regional
Regional Business Airport
Project Description
The Overall development objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to rehabilitate runway
17/35, rehabilitate taxiway pavements, and reconstruct a portion of the parallel taxiway
system. The work elements will include an asphalt overlay of the runway and the north
1,300 ft of the parallel taxiway system, reconstruct and realign approximately 4,300 ft of the
parallel taxiway system, improve runway safety area beyond runway 17 end and along the
runway, and update of the airport layout plan (ALP). Improvement to RSA beyond 17 end
will require adjustment to the federal equipment.
FY 2009: Design‐only grant to complete an 80% design with detailed cost estimates.
FY 2010: Reconstruct and realign south 4,300 ft. of the parallel taxiway system, rehabilitate
the north portion of the taxiway system, and phase I improve RSA 17end.
FY 2011: Rehabilitate runway and remaining portions of the taxiway pavements and
complete improvement of runway safety.
FY 2012 : Update ALP will be funded as a NPE project.
Project Justification
The runway and parallel taxiway pavements are in extremely distressed condition. The
Commission’s pavement management system estimates pavement condition index for the
south 4,300’ of runway pavements at 59 and for taxiway pavement as 55. The low PCI values
indicate that the pavements are experiencing accelerated deterioration. The taxiway
t i t d d d th t j t ill t t d li d th ll l
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $310,526 $310,526
FAA State Apportionment $1,000,000 $1,000,000
FAA Discretionary $1,800,000 $1,800,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000
Sponsor $155,263 $155,263
Total $3,415,789 $3,415,789
geometry is non‐standard and the current project will reconstruct and re‐aligned the parallel
taxiway. Currently, there are seven (7) different pavement structures ranging in capacity
from 23,000# to 30,000# that make up the runway and parallel taxiway system. This project
will make all airside pavement capable of bearing aircraft loading of SW 30,000 lbs.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 70
• Runway 17/35: 5,600 x 100ʹ
• ILS runway 17 end
• MALSR runway 17 end
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: PCI: RWY = 59; TWY = 55
• NPS: Rehabilitate runway pavements = 67.6
• OASP Goals: Maintain airside pavement PCI > 65
IFR Operations 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 291 331 268 289 234 166 50
Piston 265 299 254 302 313 302 342
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Stillwater Regional
Regional Business Airport
DESCRIPTION
The Overall Development Objective (ODO) is to reconfigure the center and south
section of the parallel taxiway system. The proposed project consists of constructing
a standard parallel taxiway system to runway 35 end and around the main apron,
reconfigure the main apron markings, and install signage.
Project Justification
The aircraft that have in the past operated from this airport include ‐ Airbus 319 and
Airbus 321, McDonnell Douglas MD‐80, Boeing 727, Boeing 737 and Boeing 757. The
sponsor has reported difficulty in aircraft movement and aircraft parking for Big‐12
sporting events. The proposed project will allow aircraft to taxi around the main
apron while large air carrier aircraft and jet aircraft air park on the apron during
periods of peak operation. The proposed project will eliminate the mixing of large
air carrier aircraft and small aircraft on the main apron.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 79
• Control Tower 139 airport
• Part 139 airport
• ILS at runway 17 end
• MALSR t 17 d
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $363,158 $363,158
FAA State Apportionment $1,050,000 $1,050,000
FAA Discretionary $1,800,000 $1,800,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $600,000 $600,000
Sponsor $181,579 $181,579
Total $3,994,737 $3,994,737
at runway end
• Runway 17/35: 7,401’ x 100’
• Runway 04/22: 5,002ʹ x 75ʹ
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: NA
• NPS: Expand terminal apron = 39.0
• OASP Goals: N/A
IFR Operations 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 784 889 1073 1061 1097 501 287
Piston 799 887 890 825 1413 494 339
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Tulsa - Riverside
Regional Business Airport
Project Description
The Overall Development Objective (ODO) is to upgrade the airfield
guidance signage to current FAA Standards (Advisory Circular 150/5340‐
18E. Electrical power lines from the electrical vault to the signs will be
replaced and new regulators will be installed near the maintenance
building to accommodate the current electrical demand. Relocate the
electrical vault to a location . Install PAPI's on 1R/19L. Install REIL's on
1L/19R. Install "distance to go" markers on 1L/19R ‐ the control tower has
requested this as a tool they can use with their procedures to expedite the
flow of traffic and increase the capacity of that runway. Install computer
controls for airfield lighting similar to that at TUL and replace the old pilot
controlled lighting system with a new one that allows independent control
of the Runway 1L/19R & Taxiway "A" (using the main frequency for the
control tower) and separate control (using the second frequency used for
the east runway) for Runway 1R/19L & all the taxiway lights west of
1L/19R. Relocate the airport beacon to a new location immediately
adjacent to the control tower.
Project Justification
The existing airfield guidance signs do not comply with FAA Advisory
Circular. Standardized signs will promote better situational awareness on
the airfield as a means to reduce the potential for incursions. A properly
designed and standardized taxiway guidance sign system is essential for the
safe and efficient operation of aircraft and ground vehicles on the airport
movement area. Overall safety is enhanced by a standardized system of
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $163,158 $163,158
FAA State Apportionment $450,000 $450,000
FAA Discretionary $950,000 $950,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000
Sponsor $81,579 $81,579
Total $1,794,737 $1,794,737
signs at all airports.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport ‐ Reliever
• Based Aircraft: 520
• Control Tower
• ILS at runway 1L end
• Runway 1L/R19: 5,102’ x 100’
• Runway 1R/19L: 4,208ʹ x 100ʹ
• Runway 13/31: 2,641ʹ x 50ʹ
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: N/A
• NPS: Rehabilitate Taxiway =
• OASP Goals: Safety and Standards
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 3063 3241 3669 4441 3297 2875
Piston 4405 3798 3960 5886 7085 6768
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Tulsa - Richard L. Jones
Regional Business Airport
Project Description
The Overall Development Objective (ODO) of the proposed project is to
widen runway 13/31 and install new runway lights and VAGI's along
runway 13/31. The ODO also includes rehabilitation of Taxiway “F”.
bearing capacity.
FY 2013: Design and construct ODO.
Project Justification
The current runway width (50’) does not meet FAA standard s.
Therefore, widening the runway to (60') will meet the standards for
the aircraft that runway 13/31 accommodates. Widening the
runway will necessitate changes to the runway edge lighting system
(which is in excess of 30 years old and should be replaced with
energy efficient components and replace the existing Visual
Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) lights with Precision Approach Path
Indicator (PAPI) lights. Installation of PAPI’s will replace aging VASI’s
that need to be replaced before they become a maintenance and/or
reliability issue.
Taxiway "F" existing pavement is not adequate to support
increasing use by heavier business jets being serviced in this area.
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $161,500 $161,500
FAA State Apportionment $250,000 $250,000
FAA Discretionary $1,300,000 $1,300,000
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $150,000 $150,000
Sponsor $80,750 $80,750
Total $1,942,250 $1,942,250
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport ‐ Reliever
• Based Aircraft: 520
• Control Tower
• ILS at runway 1L end
• Runway 1L/R19: 5,102’ x 100’
• Runway 1R/19L: 4,208ʹ x 100ʹ
• Runway 13/31: 2,641ʹ x 50ʹ
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management:
• NPS:
• OASP Goals: Standards
IFR Operations 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 3063 3241 3669 4441 3297 2875
Piston 4405 3798 3960 5886 7085 6768
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
Weatherford - Thomas P. Stafford
Regional Business Airport
Project Description
The first Overall Development Objective (ODO) is to extend runway 17 end
at least 701 ft. The extension will require the closure or relocation of Lawter
Street and reconfiguration of the city golf course (1 hole). The city is
responsible for the cost to reconfigure the golf course. The second ODO is to
widen the parallel taxiway 15 ft. on the west side, install medium intensity
taxiway lights, and install lighted runway hold signs.
Project Justification
The proposed project is the first step in fulfilling an important Commission
goal – i.e., to construct jet‐capable runways at all of Oklahoma’s regional
business airports that meet FAA’s aviation demand criteria. The sponsor has
documented aircraft demand that satisfies FAA’s aviation demand criteria for
the extension.
Runway 17/35 is currently 4,399 ft long. The result of the proposed 701 ft.
extension project is a 5,100 ft. jet capable runway. The existing parallel
taxiway does not meet FAAʹs standard separation distance. Widening the
taxiway 15 ft. will shift the parallel taxiway centerline to the required 240 ft.
from the runway centerline. he standard geometrics will improve the airports
ability to obtain a more desirable approach.
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $84,211 $84,211
FAA State Apportionment $200,000 $200,000
FAA Discretionary $0 $0
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $600,000 $600,000
Sponsor $42,105 $42,105
Total $926,316 $926,316
This airport does not have taxiway edge lights. The installation of medium
intensity taxiway lights and lighted runway hold signs will increase pilot
awareness, safety, and improve the airportʹs ability to obtain a more desirable
approach.
Airport Information
• Regional Business Airport
• Based Aircraft: 46
• Runway 17/35: 4,399’ x 75’
Selection Criteria
• Pavement Management: N/A
• NPS: Extend Runway = 46.5
•NPS: Standards = 47.1
• OASP Goals: Jet capable runway at aviation demand justified RB airports.
IFR Operations 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Jet/Turbo 58 62 13 0 68 109 0
Piston 64 229 39 0 120 117 111
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
State System
Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission
Project Description
The Overall Development Objective is to conduct a system planning study. The Commission’s system planning activities are
categorized into 3 work elements as under:
Work Element 1: Oklahoma Airport System Plan Review
1. Review functional classification of all system airports and compare available basic airport amenities
at system airports with OASP Goals
2. Review the based aircraft inventory at system airports
3. Airport grant assurance compliance certification
4. Update IFR traffic count for system airports
5. Review airport design standard compliance
Work Element 2: Airport Information Management Activities
1. NPIAS needs worksheet update
2. Pavement management
3. Airport safety inspections
Work Element 3: Capital Planning Process
1. Airport five‐year capital improvement program update
2. Obtain early project development packets for all AIP projects
3. Commission’s three‐year capital improvement program
4. Collect sponsor self certifications
Funding FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total
Commission $310,526 $610,526 $810,526 $810,526
FAA State Apportionment $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
FAA Discretionary $0
FAA Non-Primary Entitlement $0
Sponsor $0
Total $510,526 $810,526 $1,010,526 $1,010,526
RAMP Program
State funds for State only projects at non‐NPIAS airports and supplemental funding for NPE funded projects. This program will
Federal grants require 5% matching funds while state grants require 10% matching funds. The Commission may provide half of
the sponsor's federal match on the above project. Commission funding is dependent on availability of State funds.
End of Three Year CIP