Ten year business plan for prison capacity expansion : toward corrections in the 21st century.

              C 5700.3 T289y 1997 c.1
Oklahoma Department of
Corrections 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 A 1 5 3 076 9 4 399
Ten Year Business Plan for Prison
Capacity Expansion
Toward corrections in the 21st century
James L. Saffle, Interim Director
February 18,1997
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPAnTY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18.1997
Table of Contents
Preface 1
Executive Summary 2
Assessment of Agency Environment 5
Mission, Goals, and Objectives 11
Service Description. . . ..... ... .. 12
Implementation Plan 14
Organization and Management Plan 19
Finance Plan 20
Assumptions 27
Appendix A: Department of Corrections Facilities 28
Appendix B: Proposed Facility Conversions and Expansions 30
Appendix C: Ratio of Correctional Officer Staff to Inmates 31
Appendix D: Design Schematics 34
Appendix E: Infrastructure Cost 37
Appendix F: Cumulative Cost Summary 42
Bibliography 44
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRlSON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Preface
This planning document has been prepared to guide state policy makers in charting the future of prison
operations in Oklahoma. It presents options for expanding and improving institutional corrections. A basic
assumption underlying forecasts of the inmate growth presented herein is that Oklahoma' s sentencing system
will not change significantly over the next ten years. For example, this plan does not address the impact of
Truth in Sentencing on corrections. Also, it is assumed that penalties for felonies will not be changed.
This report should be viewed as representing a flexible planning process, not a master plan. That is, it is
intended to be revised and updated as circumstances change. For example, a trend reflected in the inmate
population projection is that back-end, inmate release programs will no longer be administered by the
department If the decision is made to use one or more of these programs in the future, a revised plan will
have to be issued.
The information presented in this report is also intended to provide a benchmark for comparing the costs of
implementing alternative sentencing systems. The Truth in Sentencing Policy Advisory Commission, with
the assistance of the corrections department is evaluating the impact of their proposed structured sentencing
system. The information in this plan will be useful in preparing the fiscal impact of the proposed legislation.
This report is not intended to be a comprehensive planning document for the entirety of correctional
operations. Rather. its focus is on the growth of tile inmate population and the adequacy of correctional
institutions. Other plans will be submitted to address:
• probation and parole operations and community corrections
• offender programs, including medical services
• information systems
• Oklahoma State Industries
• human resources
These topics, and perhaps additional ones, together will provide a road map for tile Oklahoma Department of
Corrections as it enters the 21st century.
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN 't'EAR BUSThTESSPLAN FOR PRlSON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Executive Summary
The Oklahoma Department of Corrections is responsible for incarcerating felons sentenced to a term of
confinement. The agency's mission is to protect the public. employees. and offenders. In order to carry out its
purpose and to achieve its mission. the department has developed a ten year capacity expansion plan to guide
the state in planning for the future. This plan. if implemented, will ensure the safety of lives and property:
promote the safe and efficient use of state resources: provide departmental employees a secure. healthy
working environment and provide inmates humane confinement based upon professional standards.
By the end of fiscal year 2007. the total inmate population is expected to reach 25,396. There are currently
16.070 state and halfway house beds available to house over 19.000 inmates. The department therefore, has
had to use contract medium security beds in Texas and Oklahoma. Many state prison facilities were not
originally designed to house adult felons. and it has been 17 years since a medium security prison has been
built in Oklahoma. Consequently. Oklahoma has one of the highest ratios of non-secure to secure beds in the
country.
The department has been able to manage the inmate population over the last year only because of the
availability of contract beds in Texas and Oklahoma. In Oklahoma communities looking for the economic
benefits prisons provide have. on their own, with little state oversight and support developed prison facilities.
There has been no comprehensive. state wide planning effort.
The plan provides for the acquisition of over 8,500 prison beds by the end of fiscal year 2007. Three facilities
will be upgraded in security and seven facilities will have housing units added to them. Other facilities will be
able to hold more inmates if staff are added and fiscal plant improvements are made. The department
recommends the construction of three prison facilities for male inmates. with a capacity of 2.250 beds each.
and one 1.100 bed prison for female inmates. This plan does not specify whether these facilities will be built
and run by the state or private vendors.
The plan provides for placing inmates in the two contract prisons currently operating and the additional three
prisons expected to begin operating in fiscal year 1998 or 1999. Inmates are to be brought back from Texas as
space in Oklahoma becomes available. The plan provides for the use of 5.857 contract beds by the end of
fiscal year 2000. since no state facilities are currently under construction. Construction of three of the four
prisons will have to begin in fiscal year 1998 so they will be operational in fiscal year 2001. The fourth prison
will need to be operational in fiscal year 2006, but only 1,300 beds will be needed. It is proposed that the
facility be built in stages. with additional housing units being constructed as needed.
Capacity planning must also recognize the need to maintain current facilities. This being the case. the plan
addresses improvements in security. life safety codes, roofing, water and wastewater, general facility repairs
and improvements. These recommendations are consistent with the department's long range capital outlay
request submitted to the state' s Long Range Capital Planning Commission.
A year by year summary of the plan is as follows:
Fiscal year 1997
In fiscal year 1997. the department will request funds to convert the Dick COlmer Correctional Center and the
Oklahoma State Reformatory to maximum security and the John Lilley Correctional Center to low medium
security (i.e.. dormitory housing and a secure perimeter). Funds will be requested to add 437 medium security
2
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRlSON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
and 974 minimum security beds to existing facilities for males. and to add 200 minimum security beds to
existing facilities for females.
TIle department will also request authorization and funding for procurement of three prisons. two with 2.250
beds each for males and one with 1,100 beds for females.
A total of 3.549 male inmates and 587 female inmates will have to be placed in contract beds.
Fiscal year 1998
In fiscal year 1998. the Dick Conner Correctional Center will be converted to maximum security. adding
1.000 maximum security beds and eliminating 1.000 medium security beds. Space at the Oklahoma State
Reformatory will be converted as needed to maximum security, for a total of 612 beds. By the end of the fiscal
year. Dick Conner will house 1.000 maximum security inmates and the reformatory will house 242 maximum
security inmates. Physical plant conversions at these facilities will continue through fiscal year 2001.
The department will begin the site selection and procurement process for three prisons: 4.500 beds for male
inmates (two prisons) and L 100 beds for female inmates.
Contract facilities will house a total of 4.136 male inmates and 694 female inmates.
Work will begin on the infrastructure projects at current facilities and will continue through the end of fiscal
year 2007.
If master roster increases are funded as previously requested, the following expansions will be implemented:
Oklahoma State Penitentiary. 77 maximum security beds: James Crabtree Correctional Center. 42 minimum
security beds: John Lilley Correctional Center. 60 minimum security beds: William S. Key Correctional
Center. 35 minimum security beds: and Ouachita Correctional Center. 14 minimum security beds. The Bill
Johnson Correctional Center can hold an additional 130 inmates if staff are added and improvements made.
Fiscal years 1999 and 2000
By the end of fiscal year 1999. contract facilities will house 4.670 male inmates and 752 female inmates.
These numbers will increase by the end of fiscal year 2000 to 5,062 and 794 respectively.
Fiscal years 2001 through 2007
In fiscal year 2001. new housing units for male inmates will be opened. for a total of 974 minimum security
beds and 400 medium security beds. New housing units will be opened for females, for a total of 200
minimum security beds:
Bill Johnson 150 Minimum
Northeast Oklahoma 224 Minimum
Joseph Harp 200 Minimum
Joseph Harp 200 Medium
Jackie Brannon 200 Minimum
Lexington 200 Medium
John Lilley 200 Minimum
Eddie Warrior (females) 200 Minimum
TOTAL 1574
3
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIO S
TEN YEAR BUSll\TESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXP.A.NSION
FEBRUARY 18.1997
TIle John Lilley Correctional Center conversion to low medium security will be completed. adding 640
medium security beds and eliminating the same number of minimum security beds. The Dick Conner
Correctional Center and the Oklahoma State Reformatory conversion projects will be completed.
Two 2.250 bed facilities for males and one LIOO bed facility for females will become operational. At the end
of the year. the facilities for males will hold 3.731 medium security and 335 minimum security inmates. TIle
facility for females will hold 12 maximum security and 723 medium security inmates.
These three prisons will handle growth through fiscal year 2002. Authorization for a third prison for men will
be requested in this year.
In fiscal year 2003.420 medium and minimum security beds will have to be leased for males. This number
will increase to 844 by the end of fiscal year 2005.
In fiscal year 2006. 1.250 beds of the 2.250 bed prison for males will be operational. Over 1.200 beds will be
full at this time. By the end of 2007. another 250 bed housing unit will open. and the facility will house nearly
1.500 inmates. The women's prison will house 850 inmates.
Cost
The construction and start up cost to build new housing units and upgrade three facilities is $52.3 million.
TIle increased cost to operate new and upgraded beds will be $4.4 million in fiscal year 1998. and will increase
yearly. reaching a total of$30.6 million in fiscal year 2007.
The cumulative cost of contracts through fiscal year 2007 will be $324.3 million. Monitoring costs will be
$1. I million per year through fiscal year 2000. with a one time start up cost of $181.950.
Construction costs for the four new prisons will total $290 million. Start up costs will total $7.8 million. The
cost to increase the size of the department's Construction and Maintenance Unit to provide the necessary
construction management functions is $6.7 million.
In fiscal year 2001. the cost to operate these prisons will be $32.9 million. The cost will increase each year.
reaching $92.2 million in fiscal year 2007.
To upgrade the department's current facilities in accordance with the long range capital improvement
program will cost a total of$43.7 million.
The cost for increasing the count at current facilities is $11.4 million per year to fund staff and supplies.
TIle cumulative cost of the recommended expansions through fiscal year 2007 is $1.5 billion.
4
OKLAHOMA DEPARThlENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Assessment of Agency Environment
Inmate population projection
For at least the last 45 years the Oklahoma prison population growth has followed the same trend as the
nation, as the following chart shows:
GROWTH OF NAIIONAL AND SlAlIWIDE INMAIE POPULATIONS
END OF YEARCOUNTS FROM 1950 rnROUGH 1995
UNITED S IArES
10~K .---------------------------------------------------------------~ • OKLP.HO.F>JlA
OK
5JlOK . -.---.--------
1965 = 210,895
20K
:10K
50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
OK
95
SOURCE: BUIUAU or JUSTICESYAllSlIa
Nationally. prison populations are expected to continue to increase through the first part of the next century
(Donziger. 1996: Irwin and Austin. 1997: Klofas and Stojkovis. 1995). Likewise. Oklahoma's prison
population is expected to increase. The following chart presents the total inmate system population from the
end offiscal year 1986 through the end of fiscal year 2007:
5
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
ENDING FISCALYEARINMAlI. POPULAll0N
18,000 _.-----_._._--_._--_._ .._------_._-_ .._-_._-_._---_ ..---
14,000
8,000
10,000
16,000
11,000
4,000
o
1957 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
1986 1988 19~0 1~~2 19~4 1~96 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
SOURCE: RESEARC.I-l a..:SVALUAIION
Capacity Expansions
To handle the growth. the department has requested additional prisons be built. Since fiscal year 1995. the
department has also requested funding for contract prison beds. Only one new prison has been built during
this time. a 300 bed minimum security facility in Alva. The last medium security prison. Dick Conner
Correctional Center. was built in 1979. Last year. the legislature funded over 900 contract medium security
beds. A law authorizing the department to solicit the building and operation of contract prisons. enacted in
1980 (Title 57. Section 561). has never been used for that purpose.
Capacity has also been expanded by acquiring facilities from other state agencies and municipalities and by
using contract halfway houses for low security inmates. These expansions did not keep pace with the growth.
so the department transferred inmates to probation and parole supervision through various programs. The
number of inmates in the community reached an end of month high of 2.601 in February 1994. The number
is now declining because public objection to early release programs led to the decision to place no more
inmates on them. Within two years no inmates will be supervised in the community.
Inmate Classification System
The department has recently revised the inmate classification system. The new system gives more weight to
criminal history and is expected to classify a higher percentage of inmates to medium security than the current
6
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPAl'lSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
system Although it has just been implemented February 15. 1997. its impact on security level distribution has
been projected. TIle table on the next page shows the distribution of the inmate count (exclusive of the 750
inmates assigned to county jails. out to court. on escape status. etc.) by the end of each fiscal year through 2007
and the munber of prison beds that will have to be buill acquired. or leased. The "beds available" numbers in
the table include the current authorized count of the department's facilities plus 658 halfway house beds (427
for men: 231 for women) and 148 residential program beds (141 for men: 7 for women). TIle authorized
count was presented to the Board of Corrections at their special meeting in November 1996 and revised at the
special meeting held Februaryl S, 1997. Over 9.800 new beds will be needed by the end of fiscal year 2007.
Prisons
As mentioned earlier. the department has built only one new prison in the last 17 years. Appendix A presents
a listing of the facilities. the date each was opened. and the previous use if not originally designed as a prison.
Many of these facilities are inefficient from a staffing perspective. That is. they require more staff than a well
designed facility because of the need to establish more posts. A post that must be staffed 24 hours a day. seven
days a week. by one correctional officer. requires five full time staff to cover all shifts when leave and training
days are factored in. Since construction costs are quickly surpassed by operating costs. it makes sense to
evaluate which of these facilities should be replaced. at their current site. with state of the art institutions.
Generally. the more inmates a facility holds the more efficiently it operates. using the measure cost per inmate
per day. Several facilities have the potential to be expanded. The department is. therefore. proposing that
housing units be added to them A listing of these facilities. the units to be added. and the cost is presented in
Appendix B.
The following chart compares Oklahoma's ratio of low to high security beds to surrounding states and tile
national average. Oklahoma' s ratio of low to high security beds is tile second worst in the nation.
SELECTED DISlRIBlITIONOF BEDSPACI. BY SECURITY LEVll
(A II fisur e s ar e p er c.en.tag e s)
100 I-llGH SECURITY LOW SECURITY 100
75
---.-.----------------- 50
75
'87
25 - 25
o 0 OK USA NM AR CO I<EG TX OK USA NM AR CO I<EG TX
SOURCE: ODOC.CLASSIFIc.ATION SYSlEM RUORT
7
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Bed Space Needs Projections
End of fiscal year MALE INMATES MALE FEMALE inmates
Max Recp Med Min Com* TOTAL Max Recp Med Min Com*
Security level dist: 12.39% 2.00% 39.54% 33.68% 12.39% 100.00% 4.44% 3.00% 38.50% 38.50% 15.56%
Beds available: 1,238 280 4,465 5,837 2,659 14,479 112 40 129 752 558
FY 1997 Inmates 2,174 351 6,937 5,908 2,174 17,543 81 55 702 702 284 1,823 19,366
Beds needed 936 71 2,472 71 (485) 3,064 (31) 15 573 (50) (274) 232 3,296
FY 1998 Inmates 2,312 373 7,380 6,286 2,312 18,664 91 61 787 787 318 2,045 20,709 21,459
Beds needed 1,074 93 2,915 449 (347) 4,185 (21 ) 21 658 35 (240) 454 4,639
00 FY 1999 Inmates 2,388 385 7,621 6,491 2,388 19,273 94 63 814 814 329 2,114 21,387 22,137
Beds needed 1,150 105 3,156 654 (271 ) 4,794 (18) 23 685 62 (229) 523 5,317
FY 2000 Inmates 2,443 394 7,798 6,642 2,443 19,721 96 65 833 833 337 2,164 21,885 22,635
Beds needed 1,205 114 3,333 805 (216) 5,242 (16) 25 704 81 (221 ) 573 5,815
FY 2001 Inmates 2,497 403 7,968 6,787 2,497 20,152 98 66 852 852 344 2,213 22,365 23,115
Beds needed 1,259 123 3,503 950 (162) 5,673 (14) 26 723 100 (214) 622 6,295
FY 2002 Inmates 2,552 412 8,145 6,938 2,552 20,600 100 68 871 871 352 2,263 22,863 23,613
Beds needed 1,314 132 3,680 1,101 (107) 6,121 (12) 28 742 119 (206) 672 6,793
FY 2003 Inmates 2,618 423 8,353 7,115 2,618 21,126 103 70 894 894 361 2,322 23,448 24,198
Beds needed 1,380 143 3,888 1,278 (41) 6,647 (9) 30 765 142 (197) 731 7,378
FY 2004 Inmates 2,640 426 8,424 7,175 2,640 21,305 104 70 902 902 364 2,342 23,647 24,397
Beds needed 1,402 146 3,959 1,338 (19) 6,826 (8) 30 773 150 (194) 751 7,577
FY 2005 Inmates 2,678 432 8,545 7,278 2,678 21,611 106 71 915 915 370 2,376 23,987 24,737
Beds needed 1,440 152 4,080 1,441 19 7,132 (6) 31 786 163 (188) 785 7,917
FY 2006 Inmates 2,725 440 8,695 7,406 2,725 21,990 107 73 931 931 376 2,419 24,409 25,159
Beds needed 1,487 160 4,230 1,569 66 7,511 (5) 33 802 179 (182) 828 8,339
FY 2007 Inmates 2,751 444 8,779 7,478 2,751 22,203 108 73 941 941 380 2,443 24,646 25,396
Beds needed 1,513 164 4,314 1,641 92 7,724 (4) 33 812 189 (178) 852 8,576
*NOTE: Community beds available include halfway houses (427 male; 231 female) and residential programs (141 male; 7 female).
yearly beds neeeded.xls 2/17/97
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPA.NSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
A very important aspect of the department's environment is the availability to contract for low and high
security prison beds. The department has been contracting for many years with vendors that operate halfway
houses. Last year the department was appropriated funds for contracting with prisons operated by the private
sector in Texas and Oklahoma. These contracts are exclusively for medium security housing. As inmates
have been placed in these facilities the low to high security bed ratio has improved.
The Private Sector
Private prisons operating in Oklahoma are really partnerships between the public and private sectors.
Communities have typically used industrial authorities-governmental entities--to procure prison facilities.
Private companies are then given contracts to operate them. Corrections Corporation of America, which
operates the Great Plains Correctional Facility at Hinton and the Davis Correctional Facility at Holdenville.
also built the latter facility. This company is also building a facility in Cushing under the auspices of their
industrial authority.
The department has recently negotiated per diem rates for the contract facilities in Oklahoma and Texas at
which inmates are housed. The weighted average per diem rate 'will be $42.57, ranging from a low of $39.00
to a high of $47.25. This average is 2.92 percent above the current rate. In this plan. the assumed rate over
the ten year period is $45.00. Note that these rates do not include state administrative costs.
Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis
Strengths
Oklahoma's corrections department operates very efficiently. as measured by the cost per inmate per day.
With one of the lowest correctional officer to inmate ratios in the country, the department spends relatively less
than other states on the costliest part of its operations, staff salaries and benefits.
Another strength is the potential for capacity expansion of current facilities. Expanding current facilities is
attractive because greater economies of scale can be achieved. and it is cheaper to add beds to existing facilities
than to build new prisons.
Although the burgeoning of contract facilities in the state, without any central planning, is discussed as a
weakness below. the resulting availability of medium security space is certainly a strength. The state has been
deficient in planning for the growth in the inmate population, so it is very fortunate that local communities
have had the foresight to perceive the economic benefits correctional facilities bring to them. The state law
that requires the department to authorize the operation of these facilities can certainly be regarded as a
strength.
Weaknesses
Despite legislation which allows the department to issue requests for proposals for entities to build and operate
correctional facilities under contract with the department the state has not used this power to coordinate
expansion of state correctional operations. In fact no long range correctional planning has occurred. This is a
serious weakness that must be addressed. which this plan is attempting to do.
9
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMEl\,lT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18.1997
The facilities that have been built by local industrial authorities have been influenced by departmental design
considerations: however. the department has had no significant role in their construction. This may prove to
be a serious problem if at some point in the future the state wishes to purchase one or more of them.
The age of most of Oklahoma's prisons and the original design of many of them is a major weakness.
Economies of scale. however. can be improved at several facilities by adding housing units to them.
The proportion of low to high security beds is too high. The ratio can be improved through the acquisition of
additional maximum and medium security beds.
A strength discussed above was efficiency of operations. Oklahoma correctional facilities operate efficiently
because of relatively low staffing levels. It is not uncommon for a medimn security facility housing over 1,100
inmates to have less than 15 correctional officers on duty during the midnight shift. The Jess Dunn
Correctional Center. the largest unfenced minimum security facility in the country. houses more than 850
inmates in open bay dormitories. Frequently fewer than 12 staff are on duty through the night. (See "Ratio of
Correctional Officer Staff to Inmates" in Appendix C.) Although such staffing patterns may be efficient. they
do not support effective operations. Staffing levels are not sufficient to supervise inmates in productive work
activities. creating a serious work supervision problem.
10
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIO, ·S
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRlSON CAPACITY EXPANSIOl'\
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Mission, Goals, and Objectives
Mission
The mission of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections is to protect the public. the employees. and the
offenders. Among the published department goals are the following:
Goals
Protect the public
• ensure the safety of lives and property
• use all state resources efficiently and effectively
Protect the employees
• offer a secure. healthy working environment
Protect the offenders
• offer humane levels of confinement based upon professional standards
Objectives
This business plan proposes several objectives in support of the above goals:
1. Acquire new bed space sufficient to meet the demands of inmate population growth.
2. Expand selected facilities.
3. Increase the ratio of high to low security beds .
4. Eliminate contracts with out of state facilities.
If these goals are achieved, Oklahomans should benefit in several ways. AIl Oklahomans will benefit from
improved public safety. The increased prison capacity will enable the state to incapacitate dangerous offenders
for longer periods of time. Taxpayers will benefit from the increased efficiency of correctional operations as
facilities are expanded. There will be fewer inmate lawsuits due to conditions of confinement. and federal
court intervention will be less likely. Oklahomans who work in prisons will benefit from improved
-especially safer- working conditions.
11
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRlSON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Service Description
To the extent that the department's inmate population projection is expected to be accurate. the need for
additional prison capacity is justified. The following chart compares projected to actual end of fiscal year total
system counts.
Inmate Population Projections Versus Actual Counts
iili~S_'I~ 1990 12,003 12,091 (88)
1991 12,938 13,059 (121)
1992 14,471 14,426 45
1993 16,104 16,148 (44)
1994 17,443 16,705 738
1995 17,606 17,983 (377)
1996 18,874 19,586 (712)
Oct '89
Jul '90
Jul '91
Nov'92
Nov'92
Jul '94
Jul '95
The projection assumes receptions will increase at a decreasing rate until they flatten out. In the past
projections have usually been too low because receptions have continued to increase. In the one case where the
projection was significantly too high. receptions actually decreased from one year to the next, It is risky
projecting as far as ten years into the future. but based on past experience. the projection is more likely to be
too low than too high.
By the end of fiscal year 2007. more than 8.500 additional prison beds must be available. This number could
be reduced if certain offenders could be effectively punished in the community. The number could increase if
the state decides to build additional beds to reduce crowding at current facilities.
Maximum security needs for males will be addressed by converting the Dick Conner Correctional Center and
the Oklahoma State Reformatory to maximum security facilities and by adding 77 beds to the Oklahoma State
Penitentiary. One-thousand beds at Dick Conner will be converted as soon as possible in fiscal year 1998.
while the 612 beds at the reformatory will be converted as needed through fiscal year 2007.
Medium security needs for males will be addressed by converting the John Lilley Correctional Center to
medium security. adding medium security housing units to the Joseph Harp Correctional Center (200 beds)
and the Lexington Assessment and Reception Center (200 beds). and the construction of three 2.250 bed
prisons. (See Appendix D.) With additions to staff and a small one-time expenditure, existing housing units
at the James Crabtree Correctional Center can be expanded to hold an additional 37 inmates.
Minimum security needs for males will be addressed by adding minimum security housing units to the Bill
Johnson Correctional Center (150 beds). the Northeast Oklahoma Correctional Center (224 beds), the Joseph
Harp Correctional Center (200 beds). the Jackie Brannon Correctional Center (200 beds), and the John Lilley
Correctional Center (200 beds). The total number of minimum security beds added to existing facilities will
be 974. Two of the three new 2.250 bed facilities will each house 250 minimum security inmates, and the
12
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
third new 2.250 bed prison will house nearly 1,000 minimum security inmates. In addition. another 281
minimum security beds can be obtained by increasing the count at Oklahoma State Reformatory (42 beds). Bill
Johnson Correctional Center (130 beds). John Lilley Correctional Center (60 beds). William S. Key
Correctional Center (35 beds). and Ouachita Correctional Center (14 beds). These expansions will require
added staff and expenditures on physical plant improvements
A new LIOO bed facility for female offenders will handle all growth through 2007. It will include space for
maximum. medium. and minimum security inmates. (See Appendix D. page 36.)
This plan assumes that all medium security contract beds available in Oklahoma among the five facilities that
are operating and are expected to open. will be used. The four new facilities may be state built and operated or
leased from another governmental entity and either operated by a private correctional company or the state. In
any case. the plan provides for contracting for beds to handle growth while prisons are being constructed.
As noted previously. Oklahoma has a disproportionate number of low security beds compared to high security
beds. 55 to 45. If this plan is implemented, this ratio will be reversed, bringing the department more in line
with other state correctional systems.
An important measurable outcome of plan implementation will be this ratio. Over time. the ratio should
decrease until the proper mix ofbeds is obtained.
Current facilities need to be improved. in accordance with the department's long range capital outlay plan. to
ensure safe and secure conditions of confinement. Security systems. life safety codes. roofing. water and
wastewater. and general facility repairs and improvements are all addressed in this plan.
13
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSIO,
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Implementation Plan
The implementation plan assumes that medium security contract beds available in Oklahoma will be used. In
addition to the two facilities currently in operation. at least three more are ex-pected to open over the next two
to three years. The plan assumes that no new facilities other than these will be available before fiscal year
2001. A year by year sununary of the plan is as follows:
Fiscal year 1997
In fiscal year 1997. the department will request funds to convert the Dick Conner Correctional Center and the
Oklahoma State Reformatory to maximum security and the John Lilley Correctional Center to low medium
security (i.e.. dormitory housing and a secure perimeter). Funds will be requested to add 400 medium security
and 974 minimum security beds to existing facilities for males. and to add 200 minimum security beds to
existing facilities for females.
The department will also request authorization and funding for procurement of three prisons. two with 2.250
beds for males and one with 1.100 beds for females.
A total of3.549 male inmates and 587 female inmates will have to be placed in contract beds.
Fiscal year 1998
The budget request for fiscal year 1998 contains a recommendation that correctional officer positions receive
full funding. If this is tile case. inmates can be added to existing facilities. without adding housing units. as
follows: Oklahoma State Penitentiary. 77 maximum security beds: James Crabtree Correctional Center. 42
minimum security beds: John Lilley Correctional Center. 60 minimum security beds: William S. Key
Correctional Center. 35 minimum security beds: and Ouachita Correctional Center. 14 minimum security
beds. The Bill Johnson Correctional Center can hold an additional 130 beds if staff are added and facility
improvements made.
The Dick Conner Correctional Center will be converted to maximum security. adding LOOO maximum
security beds and eliminating LOOO medium security beds. Space at the Oklahoma State Reformatory will be
converted as needed to maximum security for a total of612 beds. By the end of the fiscal year. Dick Conner
will house LOOO maximum security inmates. and tile reformatory will house 90 maximum security inmates.
Physical plant conversions at these facilities will continue through fiscal year 2001.
The department w:illbegin the site selection and procurement process for three prisons: 4.500 beds for male
inmates (two prisons) and L 100 beds for female inmates.
Contract facilities will house a total of 4,136 male inmates and 694 female inmates.
Work will begin on the infrastructure projects at current facilities and will continue through the end of fiscal
year 2007.
Fiscal year 1999
Contract beds will house 4.670 male inmates and 752 female inmates.
14
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PL.AN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPAl'1SI01
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Fiscal year 2000
Contract facilities will house 5.457 males and 794 females.
Fiscal year 2001
In fiscal year 2001. new housing units for male inmates will be opened. for a total of 974 minimum security
beds and 400 medium security beds. New housing units will be opened for females. for a total of 200
minimum security beds
l~y~y:_·,:·_t~Y~?!J:~~n~~.~.~~~~~;:~r.~
Bill Johnson 150 Minimum
Northeast Oklahoma 224 Minimum
Joseph Harp 200 Minimum
Joseph Harp 200 Medium
Jackie Brannon 200 Minimum
Lexington 200 Medium
John Lilley 200 Minimum
Eddie Warrior (females) 200 Minimum
TOTAL 1574
The John Lilley Correctional Center conversion to low medium security will be completed. adding 640
medium security beds and eliminating the same number of minimum security beds. The Dick Conner
Correctional Center and the Oklahoma State Reformatory conversion projects will be completed.
Two 2.250 bed facilities for males and one LIOO bed facility for females will become operational. At the end
of the year. the facilities for males will hold 3.731 medium security and 335 minimum security inmates. The
facility for females will hold 12 maximum security and 723 medium security inmates.
The table on the following two pages shows the distribution of inmates in the four new facilities and the
number of inmates requiring contract beds. by security level. from the end of fiscal year 2001 to the end of
fiscal year 2007. The small numbers in the unshaded portions of the table present the need for beds in each
security level.
Fiscal year 2002
An additional 2.250 bed prison for males unit will be requested.
Fiscal year 2003
Contract beds will hold 257 medium and 163 minimum security male inmates. An additional 250 bed
housing unit for the third men' s prison will be requested.
Fiscal year 2004
Contract beds will house 353 medium and 223 minimum security male inmates.
15
Oklahoma Department of Corrections Planned Facilities, 2001 - 2007 2117/97
Facilities for males A facility for females
Max Med Min Com Total 2001 Max Med Min* Total
Need--> 3,731 335 4066 Need--> 12 723 -100 635
Facility-> 1 2 3 Com. Total Facility- 1
MAX - MAX 12
MED 2,000 1,731 3,731 MED 723
MIN 167 168 335 MIN -
COM - COM
Total 2,167 1,899 4,066 Total 735
Max Med Min Com Total 2002 Max Med Min* Total
Need--> 3,972 486 4,458 Need--> 16 742 (81 ) 677
Facility--> 1 2 3 Com. Total Facility- 1
MAX - MAX 16
MED 2,000 1,972 3,972 MED 742
MIN 250 236 486 MIN -
COM - COM
Total 2,250 2,208 4,458 Total 758
Max Med Min Com Total 2003 Max Med Min* Total
Need--> - 4,257 663 4,920 Need--> 21 765 (58) 728
Facility--> 1 2 3 Com. Total Facility- 1
MAX - (contract) - MAX 21
MED 2,000 2,000 257 4,257 MED 810
MIN 250 250 163 663 MIN -
COM - COM
Total 2,250 2,250 420 4,920 Total 831
Max Med Min Com Total 2004 Max Med Min* Total
Need--> - 4,353 723 5,076 Need--> 22 773 (50) 745
Facility--> 1 2 3 Com. Total Facility- 1
MAX - (contract) - MAX 22
MED 2,000 2,000 353 4,353 MED 812
MIN 250 250 223 723 MIN -
COM - COM
Total 2,250 2250 576 5,076 Total 834
1Oyrplan.xls
Oklahoma Department of Corrections Planned Facilities, 2001 - 2007 2/17/97
Facilities for males, continued A facility for females, continued
Max Med Min Com Total 2005 Max Med Min* Total
Need--> - 4,518 826 19 5,363 Need--> 25 786 (37) 774
Facility-> 1 2 3 Com. Total Facility- 1
MAX - (contract) (contract) - MAX 25
MED 2,000 2,000 518 4,518 MED 786
MIN 250 250 326 826 MIN -
COM 19 19 COM
Total 2,250 2,250 844 19 5363 Total 811
Max Med Min Com Total 2006 Max Med Min Total
Need--> - 4,723 954 66 5,743 Need--> 28 802 (21) 809
Facility--> 1 2 3"'* Com. Total Facility- 1
MAX - - MAX 28
MED 2,000 2,000 723 4,723 MED 802
MIN 250 250 454 954 MIN -
COM 66 66 COM
Total 2,250 2,250 1,177 66 5,743 Total 830
Max Med Min Com Total 2007 Max Med Min Total
Need--> - 4,837 1,026 92 5,955 Need--> 29 812 (11) 830
Facility-> 1 2 3** Com. Total Facility- 1
MAX - - MAX 29
MED 2,000 2,000 837 4,837 MED 812
MIN 250 250 526 1,026 MIN -
COM 92 92 COM
Total 2250 2,250 1,363 92 5,955 Total 841
*Excess miniumum security beds at other facilties does not reduce the total need at the new facility for higher security beds.
**In fiscal year 2006 1,250 beds of a 2,250 bed facility open. In FY 2007, 250 beds are added. Thereafter, housing units are added as needed.
10yrplan.xls
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18, 1997
Fiscal year 2005
Contracts will increase to 518 medium, 326 minimum. and 19 community security beds for males.
Fiscal year 2006
The third prison for men will open with a capacity of 1.250 beds. The security level distribution in this facility
will be 723 medium. 454 minimum. and 66 community.
Fiscal year 2007
TIle third men's prison will have a capacity of 1.500 as new 250 bed housing unit opens. The security level
distribution will be 837 medium. 526 minimum. and 92 community.
18
OKLAHOMA DEP ARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRlSON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Organization and Management Plan
Procurement
State law provides for the department to issue requests for proposals for prison facilities to be built and
operated by the private sector or other governmental entities. This option should be considered if the state
decides to house large numbers of inmates in contract facilities. The competition will help keep prices down.
and the state will have more control over the type of facilities that are built.
Due to the urgency of the prison overcrowding problem. prison site selection must begin immediately Sites
can be selected by the legislature or through an objective. factor based process. Funds must be appropriated as
soon as possible for the design phase of the building project. Architects can be selected at the same time sites
are being selected. To further minimize project completion time. the state should approve the design concepts
developed by the department. Construction funds need only be appropriated after site adapted architectural
drawings and plans are developed. Cost estimates will therefore be more accurate.
Contract Management
The department has established a unit for overseeing the various contracts with vendors for housing inmates.
As the number of inmates in contract beds has grown. the size of this unit has increased. The department is
requesting 29 additional staff and operating funds to handle over 4.800 inmates in contract beds by the end of
fiscal year 1998. and growing to nearly 5.900 in fiscal year 2000. The number of staff will have to be adjusted
depending upon the number of contract beds used by the department in fiscal year 2001 and beyond.
Construction Management
This plan includes substantial construction requirements. Three facilities are to be upgraded in security
classification. and seven facilities are to have housing units added to them. and four new facilities will be
constructed. Other facilities will have infrastructure improvements to allow more inmates to be housed in
them. Extensive infrastructure improvements are planned at all facilities. In order to properly manage and
oversee the construction projects. resources will have to be added to the departmental and regional
construction and maintenance crews.
19
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENt OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PL.A..,"FlOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPA.NSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Finance Plan
The department is not proposing any particular finance plan. The new construction can be funded by
appropriations. bonds. or a combination of both. Facilities can be constructed and owned by the state. or
constructed by the private sector or other governmental entity and space leased to the department. Both
approaches could be used.
Regardless of the methods of financing or procurement. the costs will not vary much. Although it is reported
that the private sector can operate prisons cheaper than the state can., when all factors are considered in
Oklahoma the costs are about the same. This is because Oklahoma prisons operate more efficiently than
nearly any other state. The reason for this is that staffing is comparatively very low. The new prisons
proposed in this plan are large. and will have considerable economies of scale. They can be designed for low
staff to inmate ratios. keeping costs down while not sacrificing safety.
This being the case. operating costs for the new facilities have been calculated using current costs per inmate
at each security level The conceptual designs for the new facilities have not been completed. so staffing
patterns have not yet been developed. For the purposes ofiong range planning. these averages should prove to
be sufficiently accurate estimates of operating costs.
There are several cost components that must be included in the plan:
• Construction of housing units added to current facilities
• Start up costs for these units
• Cost to operate housing units added to current facilities
• Cost to upgrade the security of facilities
• Increased costs to operate facilities upgraded in security
• Construction costs of the new prisons
• Start up costs for the new prisons
• Cost to operate the new prisons
• Cost to contract for prison space
• Contract monitoring costs
• Current facility infrastructure improvement costs
• Construction oversight costs
• Cost to increase the count at current facilities
20
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Tables on pages 22 and 23 present the cost to construct additional housing units for current facilities and to
upgrade the security of two facilities. as well as start up costs. A total of $50.700,000 will be required for
construction. and start up costs will total $1,637.000.
Details on the placement of inmates in expanded current facilities are presented in the chart on page 24. The
details on the cost to operate new housing units and the increased cost to operate upgraded facilities are
presented in the table on page 25. Costs of operating additional beds and converted beds are added together.
To these totals must be subtracted out the savings due to not operating the lower security beds that were
upgraded. which is why the table has some negative numbers. The increased cost in fiscal year 1998 is
$4,440.064. By the fiscal year 2007 this cost will be $30.647.228.
Four new prisons will be built three for men. with a capacity of 2.250 beds each. and one for women. with a
capacity of 1.100 beds. Construction costs will total $290.000.000 while start up costs will total $6.796,000.
Cumulative operating costs through fiscal year 2007 will be $520.696.813. (See details on page 26.)
The cost to contract for prison beds is presented in the following table below. Monitoring costs will be
$U44,050 per year with a one time start up cost of$181.950
1998 4,830 4,190 68,818,609
1999 5,422 5,126 84,198,320
2000 5,857 5,639 92,628,685
2001 2,928 48,099,343
2002
2003 419 210 3,445,065
2004 576 498 8,177,317
2005 863 719 11,816,051
2006 431 7,083,799
2007
324,267,188
Detailed information on infrastructure costs is presented in Appendix E. The total cost for these
improvements will be $43.7 million.
Current facility counts have been increased this fiscal year to handle the inmate population growth. The
number of inmates currently funded at state run facilities is 14.381. The count is now 15.264. If this increase
remains permanent the budget needs to be increased by $1 U80.236.
The cost to increase construction management resources to oversee all of the planned projects is $1.396.000
per year for four years plus start up costs of$181.959.
The cumulative cost for the entire year period is $1.47 billion. of which $394 million is start up or one time
cost The chart in Appendix F presents details.
21
Estimated Construction Cost
Est Project Construction
Construction Amount by
Cost Security Level
MALE INMATES
MAX
Convert DCCC to 1,000 bed MAX 1,500,000
Conversion of OSR to 612 bed MAX 1,500,000
Total 3,000,000
MED
JHCC add 200 MED beds 6,000,000
LARC add 200 MED beds 7,000,000
Convert JLCC to 640 MED beds 14,000,000
Total 27,000,000
MIN
BJCC add 150 MIN beds 1,700,000
NOCC add 224 MIN beds 2,000,000
JHCC add 200 MIN beds 4,000,000
JBCC add 200 MIN beds 5,000,000
JLCC add 200 MIN beds 4,000,000
Total 16,700,000
FEMALE INMATES
MIN
EWCC add 200 MIN beds 4,000,000
Total 4,000,000
Grand Total 50,700,000
BED2007J.WK4 22
02/14/97 03:57 PM
Calculation of Start-Up Costs
MALE INMATES
MAX
Convert DCCC to 1,000 bed MAX 0
Conversion of OSR to 601 bed MAX 0
Total 0
MED
JHCC add 200 MED beds 208,000
LARC add 200 MED beds 208,000
Convert JLCC to 601 MED beds 0
Total 416,000
MIN
BJCC add 150 MIN beds 156,000
NOCC add 224 MIN beds 233,000
JHCC add 200 MIN beds 208,000
N JBCC add 200 MIN beds 208,000
w JLCC add 200 MIN beds 208,000
Total 1,013,000
FEMALE INMATES
MIN
EWCC add 200 MIN beds 208,000
Total 208,000
Grand Total 1,637,000
Detail of Start-Up Costs Per 200 Inmates
Food and Supply Inventory 43,000
Vehicles 45,000
Staff Furniture and Equipment 8,000
Kitchen Utensils and Furniture 6,000
Telephone Equipment 5,000
Inmate Furniture and Equipment 100,000
Medical Supplies and Materials 1,000
Total 208,000
BED2007J.WK4 02/14/9703:06 PM
Placement of Increase In Inmate Population
bYi-LJ=Y98-'I---'F;=;:_y7.;_~:-;:-9_-_----'[-=--=-FY~-;-;;0~0~--=:'=FY-=~0-;-L---,-,MArc;-=L=,EF",1~~~-=--2;o--_'--'---'iT--- --,------,F---,-y--_,,--0T--,--,4-~i_~s-~--~,-F_Y_r~0-,---3 ~~-~~~T--FY.O; - j
Beds Needed - In Excess of FY96 Level
Maximum
Medium
Minimum
Community
Net Total
Beds Added-
Maximum
Medium
Minimum
Community
Total
Additional Bed
Maximum
Medium
Minimum
Community
Total
OK Private Pilson beds 3,190
1,007 1,167 1,255 1,319 -- 1,364 1,446 1,517 1,548 1,592 1,647 -f.6ff
2,472 2,915 3,156 3,333 3,503 3,680 3,888 3,959 -- 4,080 4,230 4,314
---071 -_... 449 654 805 950 1,101 1,278 1,338 1,441 1,569 1,641
0 0 0 -- 0 0 (41 (19 19 ---~ ----~
3,550 4,531 5,065 5!457,--_ 5,817 6,227 6,642 6,826 7,132 7,512 7,724
Existing Facilities
1,167 1,255 1,319 1,382 1,446 1,523 1,548
1,592 -mr -- "'! -- (1,053 (1,141 (1,205 (228 @ --- (369 (361 (438 ____~ __..@23
281 281 281 615 ----- 615 615 615 61-5-f----I---615 615
0 395 395 395 1,769 1,769 1,769 -1 ,802 f-- 1,769 - 1,769 1,769
s Needed After Exoandin Exlstinq Facilities
~- -,--------'-,,-
1,007 0 0 0 (18 - 0 -----u~ a 0 ---------0 ---0-
2,472 3,968 4,297 4,538 3,731 3,972 --4,320 4,518 4.723 4,837
71 168 373 524 335 486 663 723 --- 826 1---~54 1,026
0 a 0 0 0 a - 141 --- (19 --"19 66 -----gf
3,550 4,136 4,670 5,062 4,048 4,458 4,873 --- 5,024 5,363 5,743
--~ 3,680 3,680 3,680 3,680 3,680 3,680 3,680 3,680 3,680
FEMALE INMATES - ~
1_-'--FY-'---'9o:..7_"--'--FY:.:9:-:8_J----'F'-=-Y:c::.::E9".Y'----O9-;O;-;;:0-----,---cF~Y-;-;;071-=rI-"--=;Fr~-Y-;~;;;0L~2£- :{QCL...:£.'!'()? LEYQC]- FYQ.7:=J
Beds Needed'
Maximum
Medium
Minimum
Community
Total
Beds Added-
Maximum
Medium
Minimum
Community
Total
Additional Bed
Maximum
Medium
Minimum
Community
Total
OK Private Prison beds
0 0----- 5 9
-
12 16 21 22 25 28 29
588 658 685 704 723 742 765 773 786 802 -~JJ 0 35 62 81 100 119 142 150 163 179 189
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
588 693 752 794 835 877 928 945 974 1,009- ~30
ExistinQ Facilities 200 200 200 --:~,----:::=:~
a 0 0 O_}OO 200 - 200
s Needed After ExoandinQ Existin9.£.a~~s --
0 a 5 9 12 16 --21 ----22' ----'25 28 29
588 658 685 704 723
-
742 765 773 786 802 812
O_~ 62 81 (100 (81 (58 (50 (371 (21 (11 a a 0 0 0 .__ . 0 a a a 0- ---0
588
-
693 752 794 635 677 728 745 774 --------aog ----830
500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
FY98 Male Convert DCCC to 1,000 bed MAX effective 07/01/97
Begin conversion of OSR to 612 bed MAX as needed
FYOl Female EWCC add 200 MIN beds
FYOl Male BJCC add 150 MIN beds
NOCC add 224 MIN beds
JHCC add 200 MIN beds
JBCC add 200 MIN beds
JHCC add 200 MED beds
LARC add 200 MED beds
Convert JLCC to 640 MED beds
JLCC add 200 MIN beds
FY 98 Male expansions, no additional units added
asp add 77 MAX
JCCC add 37 medium
OSR add 42 minimum
BJCC add 130 minimum
JLCC add 35 minimum
OCC add 14 minimum
CLlFFWK4
Cost Computation for Operating Expanded DOC Facilities
------
rate/day r------- ------ DOC INMATES ;~w=J FY97 1 FY98 _~ FY99 1 FYOO FY01 1 FY02 1 FY03-- ~Y04 FY05 FY06
Beds Used - Ex anded Facilities -----
47.58 Maximum - Males
Inmates Full Year 1,007 1,167 1,255 1,319 1,382 1,446 1,523 1,548 1,592 1,647
Cost 17,488,267 20,266,939 21,795,209 22,906,677 24,000,779 25,112,248 26,449,484 26,883,652 27,647,786 28,602,955
Inmates 1/2 Year 160 88 64 63 64 77 25 44 55 30
Cost 764,135 555,734 547,051 555,734 668,618 217,084 382,067 477,584 260,501
Inmates at Year End 1,167 1,255 1,319 1,382 1,446 1,523 1,548 1,592 1,647 1,677
Full Year Cost 17,488,267 21,031,074 22,350,943 23,453,728 24,556,513 25,780,866 26,666,~?~ 27,265,719 28,125,370_. 28,863,456
35.50 Medium - Males
Inmates Full Year (1,007) (1,007) (1,141) (1,205) (228) (292) (369) (361) (438) (493
Cost (13,048,203) (13,048,203) (14,784,508) (15,613,788) (2,954,310) (3,783,590) (4,781,318) (4,677,658) (5,675,385) (6,388,048
Inmates 1/2 Year (134) (64) 977 (64) (77) 8 (77) (55) (30
Cost (868,153) (414,640) 6,329,739 (414,640) (498,864) 51,830 (498,864) (356,331) (194,363
Inmates at Year End (1,007) (1,141) (1,205) (228) (292) (369) (361) (438) (493) (523
Full Year Cost (13,048,203) (13,916,356) (15,199,148) (9,284,049) (3,368,950) (4,282,454) (4,729,488) (5,176,522) (6,031,716) (6,582,411
37.27 Minimum - Males
Inmates Full Year 615 615 615 615 615 615
I
Cost 8,366,183 8,366,183 8,366,183 8,366,183 8,366,183 8,366,183
Inmates 1/2 Year 615 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cost 4,183,092 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~I Inmates at Year End 0 0 0 615 615 615 615 615 615 615
Full Year Cost 0 0 0 4,183,092 8,366,183 8,366,183 8,366,183 8,366,183 _~,366,183 8,366,183
4,440,0641 7,114,7181 7,151,7951 18,352,7711 29,553,7461 29,864,595-,- 30,303,2~'¥'.ii2380 1 30,459,837] 3q,~J 218,343,397
rate/day [---F-Y97- I DOC INMATES [~~~-L.~F_Y"~9~8_L-_F~Y~9~9_~~FY~0~0~~.~F~Y~0~1_LI~F~Y~0~2_=r~~_-~~FY~0~~~~-'-~F~Y~04~~FY~~FY06 FY07
.-_.......:::B~ed~s'-'U:;;s:.:e:.::d--~E::..:Jxpc..::a:::,n:.::de::.:d=--F:....:a:..:c-"'ili.:.:.tie:.:s'-------- . . _
Medium - Females
Inmates Full Year
Cost
Inmates 1/2 Year
Cost
Inmates at Year End
Full Year Cost
Total Male Inmate
34.28 Minimum - Females
Inmates Full Year
Cost
Inmates 1/2 Year
Cost
Inmates at Year End
Full Year Cost
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
200 200 200 200 200 200
2,502,440 2,502,440 2,502,440 2,502,440 2,502,440 2,502,440
200 0 0 0 0 0 0
1,251,220 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
0 0 0 1,251,220 2,502,440 2,502,440 2,502,440 2,502,440 2,502,440 2,502,440
01 01 01 1,251,2201 2,502,4401 2,502,4401 2,502,4401 2,502,4401 2,502,4401 2,502,4401
4,440,0641 7,114,7181 7,151,7951 19,603,991 1 32,056,1861 32,367,0351 32,805,7031 32,957,820 1 32,962,2771 33,149,6681
02/18/97 09:32 AM
Total Female Inmate
Grand Total
CLlFFWK4
Oklahoma Department of Corrections Planned Facilities, 2001 - 2007 2/11/97
Cost to operate new prisons
MALES 2001 FEMALES
~ Phase in Cost Per diem ~ Phase in Cost
Max - - - $ 44.69 12 6 97,871
Med 3,731 1,866 25,486,368 $ 37.43 723 362 4,938,795
Min 335 168 2,411,874 $ 39.45
Com - - - $ 39.45 --
Total 4,066 2,033 27,898,242 735 368 5,036,666
Max - - - 2002 16 14 228,366
Med 3,972 3,852 52,619,000 742 733 10,007,378
Min 486 411 5,910,892
Com -- --
Total 4,458 4,262 58,529,893 758 747 10,235,744
Max - - - 2003 32 24 391,484
Med 4,257 4,115 56,212,093 810 776 10,601,673
Min 663 575 8,272,369
Com -- --
Total 4,920 4,689 64,484,462 842 800 10,993,158
Max - - - 2004 22 27 440,420
Med 4,353 4,305 58,814,695 812 811 11,079,841
Min 723 693 9,978,680
Com -- --
Total 5,076 4,998 68,793,375 834 838 11,520,261
Max - - - 2005 25 24 383,328
Med 4,518 4,436 60,597,579 786 799 10,915,898
Min 826 775 11,152,219
Com 19 10 136,793 --
Total 5,363 5,220 71,886,591 811 823 11,299,227
Max - - - 2006 28 27 432,264
Med 4,723 4,621 63,125,040 802 794 10,847,588
Min 954 890 12,815,333
Com 66 43 611,968
Total 5,743 5,553 76,552,341 830 821 11,279,852
Max - - - 2007 29 29 464,888
Med 4,837 4,780 65,304,121 812 807 11,025,194
Min 1,026 990 14,255,258
Com 92 79 1,137,541 --
Total 5,955 5,849 80,696,919 841 836 11,490,081
Total 448,841,823 71,854,990
Males + females 520,696,813
1Oyrplan .xls 26
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PL."..!'!FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Assumptions
The following is a listing of the assumptions ex"pressedor implied throughout this plan.
• The prison population forecast is accurate (which itself entails several assumptions about the sentencing
system, future legislation. and so on).
• The expected impact of the new classification system is accurate.
• Community placement programs will not be reinstated.
• Current facilities will continue to operate at their authorized count levels.
• At least three new contract medium security prisons will open in Oklahoma over the next two years and
will serve Oklahoma exclusively.
• The two contract prisons currently in operation in Oklahoma will serve Oklahoma exclusively.
• The contract per diem rate for a medium security prison bed will remain an average of $45 throughout the
planning period.
• Fiscal year 1997 constant dollars are used for the cost projections.
• Construction cost estimates, as follows, are accurate: the cost per bed for new 1.000 bed facilities is
$50,000 for maximum security, $40.000 for medium security, and $30,000 for minimum security. The
cost for a 2.250 bed facility is $36.400 per bed.
27
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Appendix A: Department of Corrections Facilities
28
N
\.0
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FACILITIES
ACQUIRED FROM OTHER SOURCE
FACILITY DATE OPENED
DATE ACQUIRED PREVIOUS USE
03-33/08-44/08-56 Sub-prison of OSP/hospital/honor farm
Mack Alford Correctional Center ................................................... 1933 ......................................................................................
07-73 Correctional center
Mabel Bassett Correctional Center 01-74 1973 Department of Health
Jackie Brannon Correctional Center 07-85 1926 Original DOC
Dick Conner Correctional Center 08-79 1979 Original DOC
James Crabtree Correctional Center 07-82 1982 State boys school
Jess Dunn Correctional Center 05-80 1980 Juvenile facility
Joseph Harp Correctional Center 09-78 1978 Original DOC
Bill Johnson Correctional Center 09-95 1995 Original DOC
William Key Correctional Center 12-88 1988 Department of Mental Health
Lexington Assessment and Reception Center 11-71 1971 Original DOC
John Lilley Correctional Center 08-83 1983 Juvenile facility
11-61 Honor farm
Howard McLeod Correctional Center ................................................... 1961 ......................................................................................
05-78 Correctional center
Northeast Oklahoma Correctional Center 12-94 1994 Department of Mental Health
Oklahoma State Penitentiary 09-08 1908 Original DOC
Oklahoma State Reformatory 04-10 1910 Original DOC
Ouachita Correctional Center 12-69 1969 Job Corps Center
Eddie Warrior Correctional Center 12-88 1988 Juvenile facility
Kate Barnard Community Corrections Center 06-77 1977 Motel
Enid Community Corrections Center 01-74 1974 Apartments
Lawton Community Corrections Center 04-73 1973 Warehouse
Muskogee Community Corrections Center 02-74 1974 Motel
Oklahoma City Community Corrections Center 10-70 1970 Motel
Tulsa Community Corrections Center 03-77 1976 School
Clara Waters Community Corrections Center 03-78 1978 Motel
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRlSON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Appendix B: Proposed Facility Conversions and Expansions
Male Inmates
MAXIMUM SECURITY
Dick Conner Conversion to 1,000 bed maximum security facility.
Add security fencing and electronics.
OSR
MEDIUM SECURITY
Joseph Harp
Lexington A&R
John Lilley
Conversion to 601 bed maximum security facility.
Add security fencing and electronics.
200 bed medium security unit will be possible
because of the new kitchen and dining facility
and the irrigation system and lagoon improvements.
200 bed medium security housing unit will be possible
with facility improvements for water tower and water lines
that are needed.
Conversion to a 601 bed medium security facility.
Add central control, security, fencinq of additional areas
and replace fencing with double row.
MINIMUM SECURITY
Bill Johnson Add 150 minimum security beds. Site adapt existing
design.
Northeast Okla.
Joseph Harp
Jackie Brannon
John Lilley
Female Inmates
MEDIUM SECURITY
Eddie Warrior
Add 224 minimum security beds. Site adapt existing
design.
Add 200 minimum security beds. Site adapt existing
design.
With the repairs of the lagoon system a 200 bed minimum
facility could be constructed because of the new capacity of
the kitchen and dining facility.
Add 200 minimum security beds. The lagoon modifications
and new kitchen are in the completion stages. Site adapt
existing design.
200 bed minimum unit will be possible with the completion
of lagoon improvements and the new dining and kitchen
facility.
30
1,500,000
1,500,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
14,000,000
1,700,000
2,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
4,000,000
OKLAHOMA DEP ARTlvlENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPA1"lSION
FEBRUARY 18.1997
I
Appendix C: Ratio of Correctional Officer Staff to Inmates
31
Ratio of Correctional Officer Staff to Inmates
September 18, 1996
><>. .....••.•......•.•.•......•..>. . .:.......•••••. ......./. ..<<<<<<<<<<<<</e Penitentiary 68 26
51 1:26
1:60 1:12
Mabel Bassett Correctional Center 9
13 1562
.·•..i.•:. .SPha.·•l.~.:••·f•..t.•.·..·..i··,~·:E,r#~i.*g..:•..•.:•.•..:.•..•.•:••..••!.•·.•.s..•~...•h••...·f.•.b•·•t.•...•·i.••.•t...:.g.•.·.1••..·..•l••...m••• · ••.••.."..X••} .Shift U' .• \
1:25
1:39 1:44 1:58
Lexington Assessment and Reception Center 39
8 6 348
1:31 1:61 1:71
FACILITY
"Medium
Day ....EveriirigNighti .1>3Y .... . .•••'.•.E•...S..••·.•·..hY•l.•·.i;.nf.··f.•·.D.g•.•c•..•t•••.·.•..•·....•..:•.!..•...S••...•~••..•,•·.•b.••h••~..•·.tg•t•.·••..l•:.•:·.••.,f•.•.·•••••••...•.•..
·····Shif:t.Sbift· ",······Shift ·Inrllat~~Shift·' ...• •••:••
Oklahoma State Reformatory 28
20 17 1212
1:32 1:45 1:60
Dick Conner Correctional Center 16
20 15 901
1:73 1:59 1:98
Joseph Harp Correctional Center 32
20 12 1174
1:30 1:50 1:68
Mack Alford Correctional Center 29
19 14 955
1:26 1:40 1:43
James Crabtree Correctional Center 22
18 767
1:34 1:44 1:54
..
FACILI'TY: ..................•.......
. . ..
Minimurn.»:
Howard McLeod Correctional Center 11
19
17 14 754
1:52 1:58 1:58
William S. Key Correctional Center 10
10 IO 575
1:52 1:47 1:52
Jess Dunn Correctional Center 39
11 IO 519
1:22 1:85 1:85
Ouachita Correctional Center 11
IO 847
1:48 1:48 1:66
Eddie Warrior Correctional Center 9
IO
11 8 524
1:60 1:68 1:60
John Lilley Correctional Center 20
8 9 543
1:30 1:59 1:74
Jackie Brannon Correctional Center 14
10 8 595
1:40 1:51 1:63
Northeast Oklahoma Correctional Center 9
9 563
1:29 1:29 1:26
Bill Johnson Correctional Center
I· FACILITY
Community Corrections Centers and Work
·•··C. enters
9
11
9 10 264
1:34
.. •Day
.Shift
, ...
Evening ··.Night ······Day
Shift .Shift Inmates. Shift
..
8 7 304 1:38 1:43
··Evening .:.·Nighi .•.....•
Shift· •..·.·....Shift
, .
Clara Waters Communtiy Corrections Center
..
Kate Barnard Community Corrections Center
2
3
2 2 210 1:105
1:52
1:105
1:78
1:105
1:78
Oklahoma City Community Corrections Center 2
2 2 156
1:105 1:105 1:105
District I Community Corrections Center
Tulsa Community Corrections Center
4
5
2 2 210
1:23
1:40
1:30
1:50.5
1:46
1:101
Enid Community Corrections Center 4
3 2 91
1:27 1:53 1:53
Lawton Community Correctons Center
Beaver Community Work Center
3
2
2 202
1:44
1:23
1:66
1:23
1:66
1:45
Savre Community Work Center 2
4
2 2 106
2 2 132
2 45
32
1:51 1:51
Ratio of Correctional Officer Staff to Inmates
September 18,1996
...'i.... III. iillrllrlil'lll.l!!ill',llili·!i,lllilil •I••• ·.i•·•iI•·•.i•··•.·•··:··j./<;.!!·II
. .
2
: :.. '\'::".:" /...... ....:.
(c" ,'.:'" :.":""~: "' .."<, •..,, '." .:, ••, :'" .'::" ..
< '..,....• -. ..•.,•.•.:.:.••.••..•.•..:•.•••••••
> .". .'..» ./ )<) i>
Earl A. Davis Work Center 2 2 1:41
1:52
Idabel Community Work Center
82 1:41 1:41
1:80
Altus Community Work Center 2 1:90
80 1:80 1:80
Ardmore Community Work Center 2 1:100
90 1:90 1:45
Frederick Community Work Center 2 2 2 1:14
100 1:50 1:100
Healdton Community Work Center 2 1:37
27 1:14 1:14
Hobart Community Work Center 2 2 1:58
37 1:19 1:37
Hollis Communtiy Work Center 3 2 1:18
58 1:29 1:29
Mangum Community Work Center 2 2 1:57
36 1:36 1:12
Marshall County Community Work Center o 1:48
57 1:29 1:29
Walters City Communtiy Work Center 2 2 1:43
48 1:48 1:48
Waurika Community Work Center 2 1:80
85 1:43 1:85
TotalslRatios 415 277 222 14,390 1:65
80 1:80 1:40
Staff refers to the number of correctional officers and chief of security that were on post 9-18-96. Those employees that were not on post were
not counted. Information was provided by each facility.
33
1:35
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSIO
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Appendix D: Design Schematics
34
W
IJl
W)(/ . . , ,,]
=.1t$:~-. ~
H,U.l.T-I-t -."$(LRV1C(S
~
ADMINISTRATION
SUPPORT
MEDIUM SECURITY HOUSING
SEGREGATION HOUSING
INDUSTRIES
f Ok.O'1f1C 5C.u.t ~ • .J;;J..J I T
,.!!:':' "
lit
. II
Ih
If '!I II,II
~
~~
<11<1
P('O).ol No.
nl. No, -Pot.1 0~.-0"••-.,..:
C'",c".d,
Prino/pOI:
Oro..,"', No.
C-01
W
0'1
PERIMETER ROAD
/ '
c<{ ooc
I'l
US
f-lU
1: oc III
II.
( 1 COCK .,
"--
""'T Y">RO '''''N!2!ll UHJ' r ••/to rn;JICl;Ol I=E i~
POTENTIAL I POST OFC tJ I ::: 1----------- GERIATRIC J 11M PROP' FROCt. = '1 . : ~~~L~:orCAL . A~~~:5. I-+- ~
I OFC'S. IKI :: I I SEC'JRITY =- I OFTIONAL OFFICES 1-'- .:: EXERCISE I .::
I YARP 61TE I 6ALL Y PORTS ~ ~
: 1 CENTRAL CONTROL ::
I I SALL Y PORTa =±:::: ___________ I t 11M SEARCH -
'10' TOWER . 11M V1SITINCt AREA
~-------------'----~------------~~----~--~~~UTOOOW uxrr YAltJ) (f'el<CHll 15ITINC.Jj NON-cO~n ACT
!r-"~"'f l '-'--'11~ ~Y[SITINe.
____ .--.-.~ ! ffi Q
»>: • CHAPEL I' I u, G!
_Nfl c=:= J_ .
INNATE HOUSINCt UNIT INNATE tAW LIB. , Iffi lli. I . I- f-exeRCISE
YARO i 1 ~ ~
,i.i.~,!! nUl, na0u':, Ii
o«Q
G!
Ilo:
ll.I
f-
Ul r:
~III
1L
FLAM.
STOR.
PERIMETER F::'NCE RE5TR. HOUSIHCt UNIT
I Ii ill i I I i II Ii
FUTURE
INDUSTRIAL
AREA
~T
lOW
~IJ
UZ
UlUl
1Il"-
.r=
I
i
!
I'l
W
f-
III 1:
ii
III
11.
SALLY
PORT
SALLY
PORT POTENTIAL
A t R CENTER
SITE
SECURE FE1tCE
['f-i
ii
"AVED
AREA
l i~ FIRE ACCESS ROAD
INHg;:~t.~~:;'G INNATE HOUSING UNIT )~~j:
~ ~
U0l 0
% « f-
UI Q Z
u, [)! :::J -,
I'l III (J §
ll.I III Z
\'"
r 0
i ;z;
f- Ul Ii) ••
10 U :::J !:
r: U 0 ~
iit -c J: .. .I ..
11I 10 ,f 0-
IL UJ f- t: ~ ~ iL « .i-.l I:
3 ,
OFTIONAL
HOUSING
DESIC.~
FIRE. ACCESS ROAD
..J
FERIMETE;;!' ROAD
1000 BED PRISON CONCEPT
WAREHOUSE
cae\(
e~MAnn.
~~
~~
r GARAGE
:
...
GENERAL NOTE!;:
-~"m~?.d~x.
~~ ICLJ(~
. ~~CO~JI&~~'{,~
-~~~1T~~ ~~u:w,. ••.
OnlOtG
III
Uz; «!!:
f-
Z
ill
·/WJ =r=r=r=;
AI-~~ .
OKLAHOMA DEP ARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TE YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Appendix E: Infrastructure Costs
37
LONG-RANGE CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION
SUMMARY BY AGENCY
Fiscal Year 1998 (July 1, 1997 - June 30, 1998)
aSF FaRM BR-94 (Part 3)
ILRCPq AGENCY# 1131-OklahomaDepartmentof Corrections(Page 1 of 4)PSDI;RALi>OTHpR? •.·.:••:•:.•A.•..·..:•.••S·••...••.T•.·p....::••..•.A.•:•.•·:•..•.•R.:.•·:·.••..•.••R..•O.•x...:..E..•.•:••.p.:.•••:••.:•_••.••.•:•:•.:•.•·•.:..•.•.•.•..•.......T•9•.!A.•b.U•.•
USE, & NAME .·..:.:.•.F.•...(.•.•.:•o.•..:U.·.•·.••.•·.O•.•N.•..•..••......•..•...•.•.• O.· •....I ONLY I PRIORITY NAMEOF PROJECT ...• \' \ I PROJiO; D•.·•S...s...•,·..•)·•..•.••.:•:.•.••.•.••..••..•.·.•.:.••.:.•.••·:.•.·.•..F•.·,.•....T.•·.O•:.••P•••o•t•..:.••J•.o.D•..:.s•,.•s•)..•.•..::.•.:•..•.•.•:.:.•...•.•'...·•.•..(•••.l•.••l..•O. @n..·'.i.bPoRoO'~JEjjC!T'
! iSECURITY:
"
11LARC Fence
.: 2 asp Automatic Smoke Alarm System
:1
: J"I 3 Iocc Security Control Building
. 4 asp Emergency Kitchen Power
5 asp Administration building Generator
.:. 6 acc Emergency Power System
II
7 JBCC Emergency Generators
8 JHCC Razor Wire Project
L 9 JCCC High Mast Lighting
10 !DCCC Technological Improvements
11 DCCC Cell Intercoms
12 JDCC Emergency Generators
13 DCCC Industrial Grade Sallyport
141DCCC X-Ray Machine/East Gate Bldg
15 MBCC Communications System
16 MBCC SallyportlLock & Key
17 MBCC Emergency Generator/Kitchen
18 MACC Fence Alarm/High Mast Lighting
19 tosa Razor Wire Project
20 'osr Electronic Surveillance System
21 locc Electronic Surveillance System
221JBCC Electronic Surveillance System
23 HMCC Electronic Surveillance System
24 MACC Electronic Surveillance System
25 MACC Control Points 2&3 Sec. System
29 MACC Removal of Boiler Smoke Stack
26 MBCC Centralize Fire Alarm System
27 LARC Remote TV Monitoring System
28 JHCC Armory Building Construction
29 !aSR Cert Building & Armory
ISUB-TOTAL SECURITY
I
I
LIFE SAFETY CODE:
30 DCCC Kitchen & Dining
311WKCC Food Warehouse
32 iasp Kitchen Expansion
33 occ Kitchen/Dining
34 CWCCC Kitchen
35 ECCC Flood Plain Relocation
36 JBCC Unit "B" Retaining Wall
371JBCC SteamlWater Line Replacement
381
1
'JDCCElectrical Systems Upgrade
39 LARC Garage/Fire Station
40 IJDCC Units C&D Sprinkler System
411asR Minimum Security Kitchen
42 asp G&I Units Electrical Service
43 TCCC Food Service Renovations
44 SUB-TOTAL LIFE SAFETY CODE
j
.. 111
i I I
I : ; I :---,..--...JL---..L,---~--",.----=- .C•':';T:;:-;O;::.:•:-.T..:-;:-;-:"A.,:-7-->~L~c.;-:-:,S,-:.-.:. ,1-----+----+------+-----1
...
.
131-0516
131-0370
131-0376 il
1131-026911
! 131-0378 I
131-0266
131-0379
1
131-0457
131-8022
131-0371
131-0476
131-0460 I
.131-0480
131-0475
131-0487
131-0483
131-8030
131-0517
131-0518
131-0519
131-0520
131-0521
131-0522
1131-0523
i 131-0524
131-0525
131-0526
131-0527
131-0271
131-0106
131-0327
131-0485
131-0492
131-0202
131-0528
131-0428
131-0439
131-0440
131-9017
131-0400
131-0459
131-0529
131-0530
131-0531
38
40 40
65 65
340 340
55 55
35 35
381 381
160 160
100 100
75 75
375 375
35 35
165 165
80 80
340 340
30 30
50 50
, 40i 40
2801 280
50 50
150 150
40 40
40 40
40 40
75 75
27 27
3 3
150 150
30 30
115 115
75 75
3,441 3,441
2,500 2,500
800 800
1,733 1,733
1,540 1,540
1,000 1,000
935 935
125 125
88 88
179 179
334 334
176 176
2,500 2,500
40 40
52 52
12,002 12,002
LONG-RANGE CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION
SUMMARY BY AGENCY
Fiscal Year 1998 (July 1,1997 - June 30,1998)
OSF FORM BR-94 (Part 3)
Iii ROOFING: . . I
i 45 EWCC Roof Repairs 131-0300
ii' 46 !DCCC Roof Repairs 131-0302
47 iJHCC Roof Repairs 131-0334
I
48 iJBCC Unit "B" Roof Repairs 131-0336
49 OCC Roof Repairs 131-0337
,I 50 TCCC Roof Repairs 131-0045
,I 51 OSR Facility Roof Repairs 131-9006
II 52 MACC Roof Renovation 131-0148
53 MCCC Roof Replacement 131-0488
54 OSP I Unit & Attached Bldgs Roof 131-0532
55 JDCC Roofs Bldgs 400,500,504,700 131-0533
56 BJCC Outside Support Bldg Roof 131-0534
571KBCCC Roofs 131-0535
58 DOC Headquarters Roof Replacement 131-0536
SUB-TOTAL ROOFING
.
... .
.'
-.
...
.
.
WATER & WASTEWATER:
59 iLARC Water Tower & Water Lines
60 iDCCC Infrastructure Support Expansion
61 IDCCC Wtr Tower Lift Station
62 MACC Water Plant Lagoon
63 IJBCC Water Diversion from Sewage
64!EWCC Water/Fuel Storage Tank
65 CWCCC Sewer Line
6610SR Sewer System Upgrade
67 OSR Water System Repairs
68 WKCC Water Treatment Plant Upgrade
69 OSP Sewer System Renovation
70 WKCC Lift Station
7110SR Hot Water Upgrade
72iLARC Install Chlorination System
731MACC Upgrade Sewer System
741MACC Upgrade Water Line System
I 75 :OSR Lagoon Upgrade
76 iDCCC Water Softener
77 !JCCC Water Tower Resurface
78 iJCCC Sewer Lagoon
79 JCCC Water Wells/Filtering Plant
80 MBCC Hook Up Sanitary Sewer to City
81 OCC Sludge MgmtiFuel Storage
SUB-TOTAL WATER & WASTEWATER
FACILITY REPAIR:
82 OSP Waterproof "F" Cellhouse
83 OSP Cell Lights A,C,F, 3 & 4
84 JBCC Replace/Repair Electrical Wiring
85 OSP Modernize Elevator
86 OSP Kitchen Dumbwaiter
87 OSP Electrical East Cellhouse
88 OSP ADA Compliance
89 JHCC ADA Compliance
90 JBCC Unit "A" Renovation
91 LARC Closed Medical Records
92 WKCC Hill Building Renovation
.,..•,•,...,.. ..>\» ,,.',.••,•.•'•,.•,..
131-0537
131-0493
131-0346
131-0347
131-0345
131-0409 1
131-0410
131-0445
131-0449
131-0342
131-8012
131-0538
131-0539
131-0540
131-0541
131-0542
131-0543
131-0544
131-0545
131-0546
131-0547
131-0548
131-0549
131-0085
131-0360
131-0355
131-0394
131-0152
131-0352
131-0412
1
131-0361
131-0211
131-0550
131-0413
39
863
800
138
138
110
132
329
88
30
43
721
30
30
195
3,647
863
800
138
138
110
132
329
88
30
43
721
30
30
195
3,647
825
1,947
605
100
215
61
28
154
1,320
987
83
28
28
65
54
21
33
28
28
275
88
100
41
7,114
176
68
57
33
55
182
110
39
64
250
117
825
1,947
605
100
215
61
28
154
1,320
987
83
28
28
65
54
21
33
28
28
275
88
100
41
7,114
176
68
57
33
55
182
110
39
64
250
117
LONG-RANGE CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION
SUMMARYBYAGENCY
Fiscal Year 1998 (July 1, 1997- June 30, 1998)
OSF FORMBR-94 (Part 3)
I~~~~ ~~~~.# 131- Oklahoma Department of Corrections (Paqe 3 of 4) .:••:•.•·..•..·F...••·..·..•:F.•.E• : :u.D:��.• :•.•.N.
E
.•:.~:•..•.:. :.·.:::.S.:.: .•.·: •.L•:.:.•......¥U~8~?•.i.•k.••~•.•.:..•A·~.~••.3..:•0....E:.·.·..•p..l•...•·:•:•:.:•:•·•.:•.:•.:•.:•.:•.:•.•.P..:•..:•.•:..•...:•..:.:•....•.·.•.:..•·o....·...·:•·.:.~·•:.o.S~.•.:..•o(•A...::••·:.s•...E·...c L)· ••... :•·. :.•.T.:••:.:•..:.:..·:•.:•.•:•.:•.:.•.:•.:•.•...••• ·6Ni.i.;lP~IOR•I:•~N•AMEOFI3R()~EGT:·::··:·.{H·.·.•·•:.•::<..:\..':.•:.:•:•:•/...••:..:•••••.:•.•:•..•·..•.·.•/•PROJ;·.#••:••:)•:((jOO!S)/ i:·<··{ilO(J~•l·••·••••"•)icooo's}( .
I .' .: '. ! 93 WKCC RHU Renovation 131-0414 51 51
. ·......•.•.••... 1 94 TCCC Windows/AD~~oundation 131-0317 538 538
I
> ..:..:•••.:. :: ~~ ~~~C~s~p~:n~::,aclhty ~;~:~~;~ 1~~ 1~~
••••••.J! 97 .LARCWindow Replacement 131-0362 370 370
! '111 981JBCCWindow Replacement 131-0354 39 39
I
i • 99 DCCC Chiller Replacement 131-0417 275 275
100iJBCC Unit "B" Heat & Air 131-0421 220 220 I:i' 101'TCCCHeat&Air 131-02471 171 171
t I 102 JHCC Fence Footing : 131-0399 44 44
I
I Ii 103 JBCC Road Renovation 131-0061 121 121
I
104 EWCCRoad Resurfacing 131-0426 46 46
Ii I 105 OSR MSU Utilities Renovation 131-0155 84 84
I
I: 106WKCC Day BuildingHVAC Retrofit 131-0499 275 275
107 CWCCC Electrical Upgrade 131-0267 35 35
108 OSR Unit Floor Repairs 131-0462 77 77
I 109 OSRAdministration Building Renovation 131-0025 250 250
; 110 OSR Heat & Air Replacement 131-0453 550 550
! 111 MACC Renovate UpperAdministration Bldg. 131-0246 28 28
I
i. 112 LARC HeatingWater & Drainage System 131-0472 75 75
113 LARC Overhaul Chiller Unit 131-0062 30 30
114!LARCA&RHsgCoolingTower&AlCUnits 131-0116 40 40
I, 115 MACCDocks/Sidewalks/Perim.Rd. Parking 131-0136 175 175
Ii 116 LARC Sink/Stool ReplacementA & R 131-0488 220 220
117 MACCMSUAdditional Shower Units 131-0497 40 40
I
': 118 JHCC Replace Cell Windows 131-0458 505 505
119 OSR: GP Visiting RoomlYardlWest Sallyport 131-0137 50 50
I 120 LARC Resurface Perimeter Roads/Parking 131-0168 225 225
I ..' .,'. 121 CWCCWalk-in Strg/Barn Renov.lCurbing 131-0250 40 40
i·:·:····· 122 JBCC CCU Renovation 131-0455 45 45
I 123 JHCC Enlarge Plumbing Panels 131-0452 150 150
III 124 DCCC PlumbingChase Security/StormDrain 131-0500 265 265
125 EWCCDorm Renovation 131-0501 39 39 I,. 126 TCCC Off-Street Parking 131-0507 60 60
i 127 EWCCDorm Windows 131-0502 50 50
128 MBCCSecurity Glass Replacement 131-0495 50 50
129 KBCCCDining Room/Sidewalks 131-0469 30 30
130 DCCC Fire Hydrant System Improvement 131-0474 225 225
131 JLCC Window Replacement 131-0468 75 75
132 JCCC Staff Bldg.& School Heat/Air 131-0358 30 30
133 JCCC Walk-in Freezers 131-0463 28 28
134 JCCC Armory ExpansionlTrainingArea 131-0464 65 65
135 JCCC Laundry equipment 131-8031 45 45
136 JCCC Renovate/ExpandParking Lot 131-0437 70 70
137 MACCADA Compliance 131-0551 75 75
138 LARC RTMU Duct Clean/Reg Replace 131-0552 35 35
139 LARCWarehouse 131-0553 40 40
140 MACC New Steam Boiler 131-0554 50 50
141 WKCC Plumbing Retrofit 131-0555 400 400
142 JCCC Replace Unit 1,2,3Windows/Doors 131-0556 92 92
143 MBCC RenovateRHU 131-0557 45 45
144 JHCC New PBXTelephone System 131-0558 200 200
SUB-TOTAL FACILITY REPAIR 8,031 8,031
40
LONG-RANGE CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION
SUMMARY BY AGENCY
Fiscal Year 1998 (July 1, 1997 - June 30,1998)
OSF FORM BR-94 (Part 3)
131-OklahomaDepartmentof Corrections(Page4 of 4)
43,747
Asbestos Removal 131-0576 100 100
Asbestos Removal 131-0386 I 28 28
SteamlWater Piping/Heating Equip 131-0388 I 120 120
148 Removellnstall Underground Tanks 131-0389 35 35
149 LARC Replace Underground Tanks 131-0427 165 165
150 DCCC Upgrade Underground Tanks 131-0481 100 100
151 MACC Underground Tanks/Garage Bldg 131-0577 130 130
ASBESTOS/CAUSTICS 678 678
Medical Building Construction 131-0139 432 432
Food Warehouse 131-0043 1,600 1,600
Food Warehouse 131-0438 320 320
Indoor Training Facility 131-0489 310 310
156 Laundry Building Construction 131-0146 400 400
157 EWCC Construct Visiting Room 131-0357 108 108
158 Visiting/Central Control 131-0365 230 230
159 Inmate Service Building 131-0051 225 225
160 Gym/Recreation Center 131-0402 180 180
161 Education Building Construction 131-0393 270 270
162 Greenhouse Re-build 131-0479 67 67
163 LARC Maintenance Storage Warehouse 131-0471 145 145
164 Staff multi-purpose building 131-0444 40 40
165 Wellness Center 131-0486 50 50
166 Lighting - Equine Area 131-0446 55 55
167 Minimum Security Rec. Room 131-0454 45 45
168 RHU Construction 131-0064 127 127
169 DCCC Upgrade Housing Unit Gates 131-0503 40 40
170 DCCC Vo-Tech Trade Building 131-0478 410 410
171 MBCC Air Conditioned Gym 131-0071 35 35
172 DCCC Energy Modifications 131-0491 180 180
173 Replace Telephone System 131-0559 70 70
174 Construct New Admin. Bldg 131-0560 210 210
175 NOCC Programs Building 131-0561 750 750
176 LARC Canteen 131-0562 48 48
177 Food Warehouse Building 131-0563 360 360
178 MACC Construct New Warehouse 131-0564 132 132
179 MCCC Land Acquisition 131-0565 320 320
180 Vo-Tech Building 131-0566 216 216
181 MACC Expand Visitation Building 131-0567 90 90
182 BJCC Physical FitnesslTraining Building 131-0568 200 200
183 MBCC Multi-Progams Building 131-0569 250 250
184 MBCC Computer Networking I.D. 131-0570 25 25
185 LARC RTMU Visiting Rm/Canteen 131-0571 210 210
186 LARC Progr. Bldg/Substance Abuse 131-0572 59 59
187 OCC Hobby Craft Bldg 131-0573 130 130
188 OCC Educational Building 131-0574 360 360
189 OCC Inmate Visiting Room 131-0575 135 135
SUB-TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE 8,834 8,834
43,747
41
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18.1997
Appendix F: Cumulative Cost Summary
42
Oklahoma Department of Corrections Planned Facilities, 2001 - 2007
Cumulative cost summary
Expanded facilities (no additional housing units)
Operating
Contracting
Per diem
Monitoring
324,267,188
1,144,050
New prisons
Operating 520,696,813
Expanded/ /upgraded facilities
Operating 218,343,397
Expand/upgrade current facilities
Increased count, current facilities
Operating 11,400,000
Construction and Maintenance increase
Operating 5,586,000
Infrastructure
1,081,437,448
GRAND TOTAL 1,474,843,522
43
(15 fte for
4 years)
Construction
Start up
Start up
Construction
Start up
Construction
Start up
2/11/97
344,124
181,950
6,796,000
290,000,000
1,637,000
50,700,000
1,114,050
43,747,000
393,406,074
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TEN YEAR BUSINESS PLAN FOR PRISON CAPACITY EXPANSION
FEBRUARY 18. 1997
Bibliography
List of References Cited
Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. (1982. December). Prisoners 1925-81 (BJS Publication No.
NCJ-85861). Washington. DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. (1982-95. December). Prisoners J 982-95 (BJS Publication
Nos. NCJ-87933 [82]. 92949 [83]. 97118 [84]. 101384 [85]. 104864 [86]. 110331 [87]. 116315 [88].
122716 [89]. 129198 [90]. 134729 [91], 141874 [92]. 147036 [93]. 151654 [94], 161132 [95]).
Washington. DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Cunningham. D., & Chown. W. (1995. February 15). Oklahoma Department of Corrections
classification system report. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Department of Corrections.
Donziger. S. R (Ed.). (1996). The real war on crime. New York: Harper Perennial.
Irwin. L & Austin. 1. (1997). It's about time: America's imprisonment binge. Belmont. CA:
Wadsworth Publishing Co.
Klofas. L & Stojkovic. S. (1995). Crime andjustice in the year 2010. Belmont. CA: Wadsworth
Publishing Co.
Oklahoma Department of Corrections. (1995. August 30). Oklahoma Department of Corrections
end of calendar year total system population from 1926 through 1995. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma
Department of Corrections.
Oklahoma Department of Corrections. (1997. February). Facility Capacity. Oklahoma City:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections.
Oklahoma Prison Overcrowding Emergency Act. Ok. Stat. Title 57. § 571 (West Supp. 1996).
Private Prison Contractors. Ok. Stat. Title 57. § 561 (West Supp, 1996)
Suggested Reading
Chown, W. (1996. July). Oklahoma prison population projection model. Oklahoma City:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections.
Camp, G. M., & Camp. C. G. (1994). The corrections yearbook 1994. South Salem. NY:
Criminal Justice Institute.
Camp. G. M.. & Camp, C. G. (1995). The corrections yearbook 1995. South Salem, NY:
Criminal Justice Institute.
Oklahoma Department of Corrections. (1995). Oklahoma Department of Corrections. 1995 annual
report. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Department of Corrections.
44