|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
|
North Central R egional Profile June 2011 Policy, Research & Economic Analysis Page 1 KayGrantNoblePayneOsagePawneeLincolnLoganCounty BorderMetropolitan Statistical AreaCounty SeatCities with population over 5,000Cities with population 2,000 - 5,000Career Technology CentersHigher EducationCSources: Cities - U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 Census www.okcommerce.gov/data Career Technology Centers - OK Dept. of Career and Technology Education www.okcareertech.orgHigher Education - OK State Regents For Higher Education www.okhighered.orgFor a detailed interactive map showing lakes, roads, rail, hospitals and more cities, go to:http://stateok.zoomprospector.com/PawneeTulsaBlackwellPonca CityTonkawaHominyPawhuskaSkiatookClevelandStillwaterCushingPerryCCMeridianTechnologyCenterPioneer TechnologyCenterOklahoma StateUniversityNorthern OklahomaCollegeChandlerGuthrieLangston UniversityNorthern OklahomaCollegeUniversity Center atPonca CityCrescentMedfordNewkirkPawneePerkinsPragueStroudPawnee NationCollegePolicy, Research & Economic Analysis NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 2 POPULATION GROWTH RATES: 1990 TO 2015 • In 2010, the population in this 8 county region totaled 280,170 people, representing 7.5% of the state’s total population • On average the region’s population has grown at an annual 0.8% rate over the last decade • In 2004, the region’s growth rate briefly dipped below zero before returning to positive territory • Between 2000 and 2010, 23 counties in Oklahoma experienced a net population decline, 3 of those counties in this region • Logan and Payne counties had the 4th and 10th highest population growth rates in the state • For more information on county level population growth since 1990, see Appendix 1 Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 3 • Growth was led by population increases in Logan and Payne counties o Logan County added 7,924 people between 2000 and 2010 o Payne County added 9,160 people during the same time period o That represented 84.2% of the region’s total population growth this past decade KayGrantNoblePayneOsagePawneeLincolnLoganKEY2000 Population (259,878 people in NC Region)2010 Population (280,170 people in NC Region)Change: 6.8%300003100032000330003400035000Change: 6.8%400004200044000460004800050000Change: -0.2%120001320014400156001680018000Change: -3.2%400004300046000490005200055000Change: -12.0%1000280046006400820010000Change: 1.3%500070009000110001300015000Change: 23.4%300003220034400366003880041000Change: 13.4%6000064000680007200076000800002000Pawnee (16,612 people)13.1%12.3%6.4%Noble 4.4% (11,411 people)Logan (33,924 people)Kay(48,080 people)Lincoln (32,080 people)Osage(44,437 people)Grant 2.0% (5,144 people)Payne(68,190 people)17.1%18.5%26.2%2010Pawnee (16,577 people)14.9%12.2%5.9%Noble 4.1% (11,561 people)Logan (41,848people)Kay(46,562 people)Lincoln (34,273 people)Osage(47,472 people)Grant 1.6% (4,527 people)Payne(77,350 people)16.9%16.6%27.6%Source: U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 CensusP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 4 AGE BY GENDER: 2010 • The presence of Oklahoma State University in Payne County moved the region’s population to a younger range o The region showed larger populations in the age groups of 15 to 19 and 20 to 24 o This distribution was not typical in the other 7 counties as they trended towards older populations, with Grant County having a median age 9.6 years higher than the state median • For more information on county level population by age group, see Appendix 2 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 5 RACIAL MIX: 2000 AND 2010 • The standard race categories used for Census purposes are white, black, American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN), Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NHOPI), or some other race • Hispanic is not considered a race but is instead an ethnicity – it is possible to be white and Hispanic, black and Hispanic, Asian and Hispanic, etc. • Between 2000 and 2010, the region became slightly more racially diverse; however, the region remained strongly white alone when compared with the rest of the state o Percent self described as white alone in 2010: Region: 79.5% OK: 72.2% • Most of the region’s increase in diversity came from growth among those self described as American Indian or Alaska Native, or those claiming more than one race • American Indians remained the largest minority in this region, representing 7.7% of the region’s total population, slightly lower than the state’s average of 8.6% • Blacks were the largest minority in Logan County representing 9.1% of the county’s total population. • ‘More than one race’ represented the largest minority in Grant and Payne counties outnumbering those claiming to be black alone, American Indian alone and Hispanic alone. • For more information on county level population by race, see Appendices 3 and 4 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 6 HISPANIC ETHNICITY: 2000 AND 2010 • The region’s Hispanic population grew, but remained below the state and national percentages • Kay County had the region’s highest Hispanic presence in 2010 with 2,992 people of that ethnicity, or 6.4% of the county’s population • Payne County had slightly fewer Hispanics than Kay County (2,990 or 3.9%) • Pawnee County had the lowest percentage of Hispanics in the region (2.0%, or 336) • Grant County had the lowest number of Hispanics in the region (158, or 3.5%) • While the region had a lower presence of Hispanics by percentage, it had a higher percentage growth rate than was shown by the US as a whole • For more information on county level population by Hispanic ethnicity, see Appendix 5 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 7 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT: 2005 - 2009 yyOnly Payne County exceeded the national estimate for the percentage of the population with a bachelor’s degree or higher at 32.5% (+/- 1.8%) yyAll eight counties exceeded the national estimate for the percentage of the population with some college education but no degree o Region: 21.8% (+/-0.7%) o US: 20.3% (+/-0.0%) yyEducational attainment for a large part of the region stopped at either a high school degree or less than a high school degree yyThe 2005-2009 American Community Survey is based on surveys collected during the full 5 year span and results are considered to be representative of the complete time period yyFor more information on county level population by educational attainment, see Appendix 6 Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.gov Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 8 PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME: 1990 TO 2009 • Per Capita Personal Income (PCPI) for the nation, state and region steadily climbed upward until 2009 when the impact of the global recession caused wages to decline o 2009 PCPI: US: $39,635 OK: $35,837 Region: $32,084 • Collectively, PCPI in the region trended below the statewide PCPI with some exceptions • Grant County exceeded the state’s PCPI in 2009 ($36,273) • While dropping below the state PCPI in 2009, Kay and Logan counties exceeded the state PCPI as recently as 2008 o 2008: Kay: $37,877 Logan: $37,009 OK: $36,911 o 2009: Kay: $35,915 Logan: $35,052 OK: $39,635 • For more information on PCPI, see Appendix 7 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2 P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 9 ESTIMATED RETAIL: 2004 TO 2010 • Retail sales figures used here are based on a summation of calendar month data as reported by the Oklahoma Tax Commission • Because those data are subject to a reporting time lag, these figures are considered estimates • Figures represent estimated sales subject to sales tax, thus sales to governments, non-profits, and other non-taxable entities are not included in these figures • Changes in retail sales could be due to: o The introduction or removal of a local sales tax o The increase or reduction of an existing sales tax o Sharp upswings or downturns in economic conditions o The opening or closing of a significant retail establishment like A big-box retailer A large shopping mall 2004-2010 Estimated Retail Sales Subject to Sales Tax For 20 Largest Communities Based on 2010 Population 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 KAY Blackwell 51,028,098 51,929,196 52,525,592 55,552,549 60,071,521 57,917,759 57,164,572 Newkirk 11,140,811 11,636,232 11,823,142 12,756,966 13,276,447 12,667,385 12,231,360 Ponca City 324,901,988 334,813,578 344,102,192 363,198,983 361,247,802 341,359,116 347,557,085 Tonkawa 17,510,731 18,026,380 19,330,638 20,456,448 20,842,422 19,486,657 22,302,955 LINCOLN Chandler 41,913,282 43,018,259 45,103,281 50,158,859 61,032,388 59,884,386 60,218,335 Prague 21,017,298 21,044,042 21,752,520 23,265,237 26,665,738 24,361,882 24,538,252 Stroud 26,934,096 29,122,709 31,849,474 32,925,183 37,404,302 36,200,442 35,908,125 LOGAN Crescent 11,018,031 11,427,631 11,507,057 12,986,258 15,105,432 13,778,008 11,592,021 Guthrie 97,698,303 102,468,482 104,180,002 116,770,165 126,265,249 127,459,605 122,400,267 Langston 1,970,164 2,282,973 1,907,263 2,038,931 2,306,777 2,100,308 2,523,178 NOBLE Perry 46,962,987 47,160,309 47,956,715 50,138,775 48,417,081 45,750,510 48,125,463 OSAGE Hominy 13,566,012 15,198,940 17,348,955 16,832,996 19,598,811 18,156,182 17,764,822 Pawhuska 26,235,625 26,924,375 28,132,359 29,777,117 31,445,396 31,459,764 31,650,757 Skiatook 52,504,603 67,320,981 77,665,656 83,737,590 87,050,836 84,061,764 90,588,726 PAWNEE Cleveland 35,666,323 37,069,960 36,253,355 39,838,023 42,238,820 39,747,184 42,067,231 Pawnee 16,762,897 16,711,586 18,322,136 18,821,869 17,869,917 17,574,563 18,412,440 PAYNE Cushing 83,647,533 91,268,386 96,624,706 105,574,318 123,986,341 114,704,701 121,727,929 Drumright 18,269,710 19,445,948 20,116,844 26,933,674 24,231,953 21,090,910 20,342,622 Perkins 17,242,661 17,343,863 20,297,113 20,988,010 22,112,511 20,426,478 22,994,116 Stillwater 529,929,974 568,054,148 592,926,803 634,285,259 664,621,031 645,947,398 649,411,533 Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.htmlP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 10 ESTIMATED RETAIL: 2004 TO 2010, Continued • Collectively, retail sales had been trending upward until 2008, peaking at $1.91 billion for the region • As the global recession spread in 2009, collective retail sales for the region dropped to $1.84 billion • Retail sales rebounded somewhat in 2010, reaching $1.87 billion within the region • The largest volume of retail sales occurred in population centers like Stillwater, Ponca City, Guthrie and Cushing o These four communities accounted for two thirds of the region’s estimated retail sales volume in 2010 • For more information on local level sales tax collections and growth, see Appendices 8 and 9 Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 11 INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT, ESTABLISHMENTS AND EARNINGS: 2010 • The following graphs use data from EMSI, which defines industry employment differently from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). BLS reports job counts only for establishments with an employer/employee relationship which excludes non-employer establishments like sole proprietorships and partnerships • EMSI includes data from both employer AND non-employer establishments • The North Central region had 5,746 establishments operating in 2010 • The region had a higher percentage of manufacturing and mining establishments than did the state or nation • Retail, construction and government combined to equal one third of all establishments in the region in 2010 Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 12 • Government was the leading employer in the region, at 21.4% of all jobs o This includes federal, state, local, and tribal governments o This also includes public education facilities o The figure is ahead of the national average of 14.0% and the state average of 17.4% Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.com Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 13 Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.com Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 14 INDUSTRY COMPETITIVENESS: 2010 • Industry Location Quotient (LQ) compares the following: 1. Changes in employment 2. For a given industry 3. During a given time period 4. In a given area, against another reference area • A score of 1.0 or higher indicates competitive advantage • The LQ chart compares industries at the 2 digit NAICS level for: o Oklahoma and the 8 county region against the nation as a whole o Based on 2010 data • The region’s LQ score for government was increased by Tribal governments headquartered in the state • Every county in the region showed a national competitive advantage in mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction, and agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting • All but two (Noble and Pawnee) showed an advantage in construction • Half had an advantage in utilities • Additional competitive advantages at the county level o Grant: Finance and insurance (1.31), transportation and warehousing (2.58), and wholesale trade (1.17) o Kay: Administrative, support, waste management and remediation services (1.10), management of companies and enterprise (1.75), and manufacturing (1.04) o Lincoln: Information (1.39) and transportation and warehousing (1.47) o Logan: Arts, entertainment and recreation (1.19), other services except public administration (1.24), and real estate and rental and leasing (1.51) o Noble: Manufacturing (2.58) o Osage: Arts, entertainment and recreation (1.02) o Pawnee: Health care and social assistance (1.04) Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 15 LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE: 1990 TO 2010 • The labor force participation rate is calculated by dividing the labor force by the total population • The measure isn’t exact (because total population includes those unable to work due to age, health, or other issues) but inputs are consistent over time, thus the measure indicates trends • The region’s labor force participation rate had been dropping since 2000, but the drop became more pronounced beginning in April 2007 • Declines were more pronounced in Lincoln: -6.2% Logan: -6.9% Payne: -7.2% • In 2010, labor force participation rates were: o US: 49.8% o OK: 46.8% o Region: 44.7% o Grant: 58.6% o Kay: 48.8% o Osage: 41.1% o Lincoln: 40.2% o Pawnee: 43.9% o Logan: 43.2% o Payne: 45.9% o Noble: 49.2% Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tables Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tablesP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 16 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 1990 TO 2010 • Over the last two decades, unemployment rates for the region have typically been near or below the state and national rates • After the onset of the recent recession, unemployment rates rose sharply • 2010 annualized unemployment rates: o US: 9.6% o OK: 7.1% o Region: 7.3% • In 2010, Grant County, with a relatively small population, had the lowest unemployment rate at 4.3% • For more information on county level unemployment rates, see Appendix 10 Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics www.bls.gov/lau/#tables Sources: US unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=ln State and County unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=laP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 17 COMMUTING PATTERNS: 2009 yyA region is a net worker exporter when the number of residents living in the region who commute out for work exceeds the number of workers who live outside the region but commute into the region for employment yyCensus data for 2009 indicates the North Central Region had a net outflow of almost 25,000 workers yyOsage County showed a net loss of over 9,000 workers. Over 7,600 Osage County residents commuted to Tulsa County for work yyLogan County had a net loss of almost 7,900 workers. Approximately that many Logan County residents commuted to Oklahoma County yyAlmost 2,000 residents of the region commuted outside the state for employment o Workers who commute just over the state line o Long haul truck drivers o Commercial pilots o Petroleum workers o Entertainers yyOver 300 Kay County residents commuted to Kansas for employment yyOver 450 Payne County residents commuted out of state yyJust over 1,600 out of state residents commuted into the state for employment, nearly 1,000 of those into Kay County yyThere were two county level exceptions to the net outflow of workers o Payne County had a net gain of just over 900 workers o Kay County had a net gain of just over 650 workers Source: US Census Bureau, LEHD Program and OnTheMap http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/ Source: US Census Bureau, LEHD Program and OnTheMap http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/ APPENDIX 1 – Population Growth Trends 1990 to 2000 2000-2010 2005-2010 Total Population 2010 Census Count Pop Change Avg. Annual Growth Pop Change Avg. Annual Growth Pop Change Avg. Annual Growth United States 308,745,538 31,957,510 1.2% 27,323,632 0.9% 12,992,387 0.9% Oklahoma 3,751,351 303,922 0.9% 300,697 0.8% 218,582 1.1% Region 280,170 18,480 0.7% 20,292 0.8% 13,371 0.8% Grant 4,527 (535) -1.0% (617) -1.2% (129) -0.5% Kay 46,562 105 0.0% (1,518) -0.3% 483 0.2% Lincoln 34,273 2,952 1.0% 2,193 0.7% 2,286 1.4% Logan 41,848 4,921 1.6% 7,924 2.1% 6,449 3.4% Noble 11,561 376 0.3% 150 0.1% 449 0.8% Osage 47,472 2,866 0.7% 3,035 0.7% 2,520 1.1% Pawnee 16,577 1,055 0.7% (35) 0.0% 107 0.1% Payne 77,350 6,740 1.1% 9,160 1.3% 1,206 0.4% Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html APPENDIX 2 – Age Groupings Total Population 2010 Census Count Age 0-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-54 Age 55-64 Age 65-84 Age 85 and over United States 308,745,538 26.9% 7.0% 41.2% 11.8% 11.3% 1.8% Oklahoma 3,751,351 27.8% 7.2% 39.8% 11.8% 11.7% 1.7% Region 280,170 27.3% 9.2% 37.4% 12.0% 12.4% 1.7% Grant 4,527 24.9% 4.0% 36.4% 13.5% 18.2% 3.0% Kay 46,562 28.2% 5.6% 36.3% 12.7% 14.6% 2.4% Lincoln 34,273 28.0% 5.0% 38.5% 13.3% 13.8% 1.5% Logan 41,848 29.4% 6.5% 38.9% 12.5% 11.2% 1.4% Noble 11,561 27.0% 4.6% 38.9% 12.7% 14.7% 2.0% Osage 47,472 26.8% 4.8% 39.1% 13.9% 14.0% 1.4% Pawnee 16,577 27.2% 4.8% 38.0% 13.8% 14.7% 1.7% Payne 77,350 26.0% 19.4% 35.2% 9.1% 9.0% 1.4% Note: Columns may not add exactly to 100.0% due to slight rounding error Source: US Census Bureau 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 3 – 2000 Census Population By Race Total Population 2000 Census Count White Alone Black Alone American Indian & Alaska Native Alone Asian Alone Other Race Alone More than One Race Oklahoma 3,450,654 76.2% 7.6% 7.9% 1.4% 2.5% 4.5% Region 259,878 81.4% 5.0% 7.4% 1.0% 4.2% 1.0% Grant 5,144 95.3% 0.1% 2.4% 0.1% 1.3% 0.7% Kay 48,080 84.2% 1.8% 7.5% 0.5% 4.0% 2.0% Lincoln 32,080 86.4% 2.5% 6.6% 0.2% 3.8% 0.5% Logan 33,924 81.6% 11.0% 2.9% 0.3% 2.9% 1.2% Noble 11,411 86.4% 1.6% 7.6% 0.3% 3.4% 0.7% Osage 44,437 67.0% 10.8% 14.4% 0.2% 6.8% 0.7% Pawnee 16,612 82.3% 0.7% 12.1% 0.2% 4.4% 0.3% Payne 68,190 84.3% 3.6% 4.6% 3.0% 3.6% 0.8% Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 4 – 2010 Census Population By Race Total Population 2010 Census Count White Alone Black Alone American Indian & Alaska Native Alone Asian Alone Other Race Alone More than One Race Oklahoma 3,751,351 72.2% 7.4% 8.6% 1.7% 4.2% 5.9% Region 280,170 79.5% 5.0% 7.7% 1.2% 5.3% 1.4% Grant 4,527 93.0% 0.8% 1.9% 0.2% 2.4% 1.7% Kay 46,562 80.2% 2.1% 9.6% 0.5% 5.0% 2.6% Lincoln 34,273 85.9% 1.8% 6.5% 0.2% 5.1% 0.6% Logan 41,848 81.0% 9.1% 3.3% 0.5% 4.1% 2.1% Noble 11,561 84.2% 1.8% 8.5% 0.4% 4.1% 1.0% Osage 47,472 66.0% 11.4% 14.4% 0.3% 7.1% 0.8% Pawnee 16,577 80.6% 0.7% 11.6% 0.3% 6.2% 0.6% Payne 77,350 81.9% 3.6% 4.7% 3.5% 5.2% 1.1% Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 5 – Population by Hispanic Ethnicity 2000 2010 Total Hispanic Not Hispanic Total Hispanic Not Hispanic Oklahoma 3,450,654 179,304 3,271,350 3,751,351 332,007 3,419,344 Region 259,878 6,410 253,468 280,170 11,150 269,020 Grant 5,144 95 5,049 4,527 158 4,369 Kay 48,080 2,045 46,035 46,562 2,992 43,570 Lincoln 32,080 483 31,597 34,273 838 33,435 Logan 33,924 987 32,937 41,848 2,170 39,678 Noble 11,411 205 11,206 11,561 300 11,261 Osage 44,437 940 43,497 47,472 1,366 46,106 Pawnee 16,612 192 16,420 16,577 336 16,241 Payne 68,190 1,463 66,727 77,350 2,990 74,360 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 6 – Estimated Educational Attainment for Population 25 and Over (2005-2009) Less than HS Diploma HS graduate, GED, or alternative Some College Associate Degree Bachelor Degree Post Bachelor Degree United States Estimate 15.4% 29.3% 20.3% 7.4% 17.4% 10.1% MOE 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Oklahoma Estimate 15.2% 32.7% 23.0% 6.7% 15.1% 7.3% MOE 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% Region Estimate 13.7% 36.8% 21.8% 6.4% 13.8% 7.5% MOE 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% Grant Estimate 9.6% 36.6% 25.1% 5.8% 16.2% 6.8% MOE 6.3% 3.4% 2.9% 1.4% 2.6% 1.7% Kay Estimate 14.5% 37.6% 20.5% 8.6% 13.1% 5.8% MOE 1.1% 1.5% 1.2% 0.8% 0.8% 0.6% Lincoln Estimate 14.8% 44.7% 22.1% 4.9% 10.0% 3.5% MOE 1.5% 1.8% 1.7% 0.7% 1.2% 0.7% Logan Estimate 15.0% 35.6% 23.7% 4.9% 14.8% 6.1% MOE 1.9% 2.1% 1.9% 0.9% 1.8% 0.9% Noble Estimate 12.2% 40.2% 22.4% 6.3% 13.7% 5.1% MOE 3.0% 3.4% 2.8% 1.4% 1.9% 1.9% Osage Estimate 12.8% 39.1% 21.9% 8.3% 11.8% 6.0% MOE 1.2% 1.5% 1.5% 1.0% 1.1% 0.9% Pawnee Estimate 18.0% 39.6% 21.2% 6.4% 10.2% 4.5% MOE 2.2% 2.6% 2.3% 1.2% 1.4% 0.9% Payne Estimate 11.7% 29.6% 21.1% 5.2% 18.1% 14.4% MOE 1.2% 1.7% 1.6% 0.8% 1.4% 1.2% Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.gov MOE= Margin of ErrorAPPENDIX 7 – Per Capita Personal Income (PCPI) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 United States $30,318 $31,145 $31,461 $32,271 $33,881 $35,424 $37,698 $39,461 $40,674 $39,635 Oklahoma $24,605 $26,218 $26,218 $26,909 $28,790 $30,469 $33,223 $34,539 $36,911 $35,837 Region $21,641 $22,899 $23,202 $23,938 $25,477 $26,499 $28,736 $30,802 $33,162 $32,084 Grant $24,605 $26,218 $26,218 $26,909 $28,790 $30,469 $33,223 $34,539 $36,911 $35,837 Kay $24,008 $24,977 $26,164 $28,381 $32,473 $29,809 $32,199 $33,742 $39,908 $36,273 Lincoln $22,906 $25,083 $25,185 $25,907 $28,390 $28,227 $31,490 $33,689 $37,877 $35,915 Logan $19,333 $21,077 $21,714 $22,074 $22,455 $24,185 $26,016 $27,882 $29,476 $29,093 Noble $22,900 $24,458 $25,805 $27,165 $29,640 $31,418 $34,679 $35,187 $37,009 $35,052 Osage $22,139 $21,823 $21,318 $23,165 $24,708 $26,222 $27,197 $29,417 $32,077 $29,956 Pawnee $21,097 $22,893 $23,505 $24,049 $25,649 $27,222 $30,260 $32,217 $34,330 $33,985 Payne $20,180 $21,503 $21,748 $22,232 $23,792 $24,534 $26,968 $28,954 $30,530 $30,012 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2 APPENDIX 8 – Retail Sales Growth Rates: Communities Within The Region Estimated Retail Growth Rates Sorted by County 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 GRANT Deer Creek 13.5% -0.1% -9.3% 26.9% -7.1% 15.4% -14.6% Lamont 1.3% 9.3% 29.7% -11.1% 17.5% -1.6% 3.4% Medford 3.3% -1.5% 5.7% 1.3% 9.2% 0.9% 22.6% Nash 2.2% 69.4% -17.4% -3.7% 4.6% 4.7% -0.1% Pond Creek 0.3% 5.9% 3.2% 2.1% 18.2% 8.7% 0.8% Renfrow 80.9% 10.1% 45.2% 5.1% 26.5% 21.1% 26.2% Wakita 4.3% -0.1% 6.3% -11.4% 17.0% -7.2% 22.3% KAY Blackwell 0.5% 1.8% 1.1% 5.8% 8.1% -3.6% -1.3% Braman 0.2% 8.7% 13.7% 13.8% 28.1% -24.9% 44.9% Kaw City -4.7% 11.2% -29.5% 11.1% 11.8% -9.2% -17.9% Newkirk 1.9% 4.4% 1.6% 7.9% 4.1% -4.6% -3.4% Ponca City 0.2% 3.1% 2.8% 5.5% -0.5% -5.5% 1.8% Tonkawa -5.4% 2.9% 7.2% 5.8% 1.9% -6.5% 14.5% LINCOLN Agra 12.5% -4.9% 7.1% 20.2% 0.4% -24.5% 20.8% Carney -5.7% 35.1% 9.7% 20.5% 5.3% -36.7% -9.0% Chandler -0.9% 2.6% 4.8% 11.2% 21.7% -1.9% 0.6% Davenport -14.4% 8.5% 8.3% 2.8% 31.2% -27.0% -13.2% Kendrick -27.5% 45.1% 23.5% 15.1% 8.9% -19.1% 18.1% Meeker -12.7% 1.9% 11.5% 10.3% -1.4% 2.9% 2.6% Prague 6.8% 0.1% 3.4% 7.0% 14.6% -8.6% 0.7% Sparks -11.5% 17.2% 30.6% 5.8% 44.8% -1.4% 18.2% Stroud 1.9% 8.1% 9.4% 3.4% 13.6% -3.2% -0.8% Tryon 43.5% 6.6% 31.3% 6.0% 14.8% 0.4% 6.5% Wellston 4.3% -2.3% 4.1% 14.7% 11.6% 2.1% -3.2% LOGAN Cashion -35.5% 21.7% 24.2% 14.6% 14.0% -18.3% 4.5% Estimated Retail Growth Rates Sorted by County 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 Cimarron City -12.7% 14.6% 49.0% 0.2% -3.3% -28.0% -47.1% Coyle 7.2% -15.4% 14.3% -16.5% -15.7% 24.8% 14.9% Crescent 2.4% 3.7% 0.7% 12.9% 16.3% -8.8% -15.9% Guthrie 1.6% 4.9% 1.7% 12.1% 8.1% 0.9% -4.0% Langston -32.8% 15.9% -16.5% 6.9% 13.1% -9.0% 20.1% Marshall 10.3% -27.9% 33.2% -16.8% 52.2% -32.4% 67.3% Meridian -11.3% 152.7% -31.5% -57.6% 17.9% 4.8% 65.2% Mulhall 23.6% -5.3% 0.2% 37.1% 50.4% 19.6% -72.6% Orlando 16.2% -6.2% 13.7% -15.1% 60.1% 76.1% -22.0% NOBLE Billings -2.6% -2.3% 4.6% 2.6% 7.7% 2.6% -3.0% Marland -1.4% -2.1% -1.2% -9.0% 58.0% -34.5% 5.9% Morrison -6.4% 10.9% -19.6% 6.2% 24.9% -14.3% 0.8% Perry 4.7% 0.4% 1.7% 4.6% -3.4% -5.5% 5.2% Red Rock 90.9% 8.0% 21.9% 10.1% 34.5% -17.2% 19.8% OSAGE Avant -9.7% -7.2% 5.7% -6.8% 11.2% -1.4% -11.1% Barnsdall 16.3% 18.4% -13.8% -5.5% 21.9% -4.4% -18.9% Burbank -12.8% 26.5% 29.3% 38.6% -18.2% 78.7% -51.6% Fairfax 10.9% -1.9% 6.4% 0.7% 12.7% -2.6% -14.3% Hominy 11.8% 12.0% 14.1% -3.0% 16.4% -7.4% -2.2% Pawhuska 0.9% 2.6% 4.5% 5.8% 5.6% 0.0% 0.6% Prue 7.7% 8.6% 7.1% 2.7% 8.2% 2.3% 5.5% Shidler -4.1% 10.1% 16.7% 20.5% -15.1% 15.3% 6.7% Skiatook 5.1% 28.2% 15.4% 7.8% 4.0% -3.4% 7.8% Webbers Falls -2.8% 5.0% 6.7% -0.6% 2.1% 8.7% -10.6% Wynona 1.0% -2.8% 3.6% -3.9% 5.9% 3.6% -12.6% PAWNEE Cleveland 0.0% 3.9% -2.2% 9.9% 6.0% -5.9% 5.8% Hallett -3.8% -0.4% 2.6% -16.9% 16.3% -10.0% -0.6% Jennings 8.9% 36.2% -8.9% 0.4% 41.7% -24.8% -10.9% Estimated Retail Growth Rates Sorted by County 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 Lone Chimney 7.3% 20.6% 10.9% 0.6% -5.5% 31.1% 9.1% Maramec 0.2% 5.0% 9.5% 57.8% -33.2% 5.6% -2.0% Pawnee 1.6% -0.3% 9.6% 2.7% -5.1% -1.7% 4.8% Ralston 16.6% -11.1% 5.5% 15.1% 13.1% -4.9% 30.2% Terlton 13.1% -30.2% 33.6% 88.2% 6.8% -2.6% 6.0% PAYNE Cushing 3.1% 9.1% 5.9% 9.3% 17.4% -7.5% 6.1% Drumright 1.4% 6.4% 3.5% 33.9% -10.0% -13.0% -3.5% Glencoe 13.6% -19.5% 6.5% 27.4% -3.2% -8.7% 0.4% Perkins 14.9% 0.6% 17.0% 3.4% 5.4% -7.6% 12.6% Ripley -1.5% -7.3% -7.6% 5.0% 4.9% -0.7% 35.1% Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.htmlAPPENDIX 9 – Estimated Retail Sales Subject to Tax Estimated Retail Sales Sorted By County 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 GRANT Deer Creek 446,787 446,121 404,470 513,439 476,928 550,346 469,738 Lamont 1,310,469 1,432,664 1,858,835 1,651,956 1,941,263 1,910,581 1,975,486 Medford 6,915,983 6,815,057 7,206,191 7,299,180 7,967,360 8,037,069 9,855,648 Nash 866,275 1,467,077 1,212,503 1,167,897 1,222,104 1,279,861 1,278,349 Pond Creek 3,429,448 3,632,153 3,747,610 3,825,572 4,522,589 4,914,197 4,953,508 Renfrow 61,775 68,018 98,738 103,797 131,319 158,972 200,631 Wakita 1,355,188 1,354,014 1,439,289 1,275,780 1,492,237 1,384,121 1,692,279 KAY Blackwell 51,028,098 51,929,196 52,525,592 55,552,549 60,071,521 57,917,759 57,164,572 Braman 1,297,106 1,409,621 1,602,647 1,823,645 2,336,514 1,753,886 2,541,285 Kaw City 1,153,104 1,281,721 903,474 1,003,936 1,121,933 1,018,754 836,054 Newkirk 11,140,811 11,636,232 11,823,142 12,756,966 13,276,447 12,667,385 12,231,360 Ponca City 324,901,988 334,813,578 344,102,192 363,198,983 361,247,802 341,359,116 347,557,085 Tonkawa 17,510,731 18,026,380 19,330,638 20,456,448 20,842,422 19,486,657 22,302,955 LINCOLN Agra 1,557,253 1,480,889 1,585,909 1,905,972 1,914,174 1,445,219 1,746,449 Carney 1,638,876 2,214,777 2,429,198 2,927,444 3,081,633 1,951,143 1,775,706 Chandler 41,913,282 43,018,259 45,103,281 50,158,859 61,032,388 59,884,386 60,218,335 Davenport 2,755,498 2,989,244 3,235,955 3,325,478 4,361,481 3,183,949 2,763,456 Kendrick 163,123 236,770 292,504 336,548 366,632 296,692 350,417 Meeker 6,318,385 6,439,733 7,180,985 7,917,053 7,806,108 8,032,412 8,244,234 Prague 21,017,298 21,044,042 21,752,520 23,265,237 26,665,738 24,361,882 24,538,252 Sparks 181,231 212,465 277,411 293,464 424,807 418,771 495,071 Stroud 26,934,096 29,122,709 31,849,474 32,925,183 37,404,302 36,200,442 35,908,125 Tryon 683,792 728,746 956,791 1,014,664 1,164,551 1,168,644 1,244,775 Wellston 5,873,817 5,737,070 5,970,897 6,849,316 7,643,725 7,802,168 7,555,689 LOGAN Cashion 1,914,883 2,330,243 2,894,774 3,318,141 3,782,131 3,091,619 3,232,020 Cimarron City 118,931 136,332 203,182 203,650 196,962 141,774 75,011 Coyle 1,197,739 1,013,448 1,158,612 967,612 815,835 1,018,296 1,170,359 Estimated Retail Sales Sorted By County 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Crescent 11,018,031 11,427,631 11,507,057 12,986,258 15,105,432 13,778,008 11,592,021 Guthrie 97,698,303 102,468,482 104,180,002 116,770,165 126,265,249 127,459,605 122,400,267 Langston 1,970,164 2,282,973 1,907,263 2,038,931 2,306,777 2,100,308 2,523,178 Marshall 679,112 489,826 652,272 542,624 825,830 558,122 933,530 Meridian 138,090 348,889 239,043 101,366 119,461 125,220 206,814 Mulhall 595,266 563,625 564,776 774,361 1,164,613 1,393,180 382,005 Orlando 716,332 671,837 764,029 649,038 1,039,154 1,829,569 1,427,153 NOBLE Billings 3,612,040 3,528,300 3,690,434 3,787,229 4,079,640 4,185,273 4,059,857 Marland 424,690 415,594 410,538 373,624 590,370 386,648 409,504 Morrison 2,837,141 3,147,108 2,531,434 2,688,533 3,358,221 2,879,224 2,903,065 Perry 46,962,987 47,160,309 47,956,715 50,138,775 48,417,081 45,750,510 48,125,463 Red Rock 753,253 813,588 991,518 1,091,860 1,468,118 1,215,553 1,456,232 OSAGE Avant 553,779 514,131 543,555 506,782 563,587 555,436 493,775 Barnsdall 6,533,051 7,737,303 6,669,983 6,300,258 7,679,131 7,339,062 5,948,802 Burbank 148,207 187,546 242,446 335,922 274,821 491,118 237,864 Fairfax 7,127,141 6,988,993 7,439,451 7,489,708 8,437,228 8,219,677 7,045,503 Hominy 13,566,012 15,198,940 17,348,955 16,832,996 19,598,811 18,156,182 17,764,822 Pawhuska 26,235,625 26,924,375 28,132,359 29,777,117 31,445,396 31,459,764 31,650,757 Prue 315,794 343,050 367,512 377,373 408,196 417,561 440,446 Shidler 1,353,964 1,490,397 1,739,615 2,096,513 1,779,102 2,050,876 2,187,592 Skiatook 52,504,603 67,320,981 77,665,656 83,737,590 87,050,836 84,061,764 90,588,726 Webbers Falls 4,921,083 5,165,290 5,509,093 5,477,716 5,593,834 6,080,533 5,433,499 Wynona 1,296,375 1,259,784 1,304,635 1,254,385 1,327,801 1,375,750 1,202,358 PAWNEE Cleveland 35,666,323 37,069,960 36,253,355 39,838,023 42,238,820 39,747,184 42,067,231 Hallett 862,013 858,475 880,822 731,646 850,745 765,308 760,597 Jennings 1,443,107 1,966,024 1,790,654 1,797,690 2,546,479 1,915,007 1,706,677 Lone Chimney 1,961,614 2,365,762 2,623,784 2,638,344 2,494,199 3,269,750 3,568,643 Maramec 169,176 177,556 194,373 306,650 204,938 216,323 211,915 Pawnee 16,762,897 16,711,586 18,322,136 18,821,869 17,869,917 17,574,563 18,412,440 Ralston 726,272 645,926 681,186 784,122 887,070 843,166 1,097,522 Estimated Retail Sales Sorted By County 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Terlton 476,757 332,769 444,682 836,695 893,182 869,624 921,850 PAYNE Cushing 83,647,533 91,268,386 96,624,706 105,574,318 123,986,341 114,704,701 121,727,929 Drumright 18,269,710 19,445,948 20,116,844 26,933,674 24,231,953 21,090,910 20,342,622 Glencoe 2,441,924 1,964,869 2,092,338 2,664,670 2,579,517 2,354,787 2,365,361 Perkins 17,242,661 17,343,863 20,297,113 20,988,010 22,112,511 20,426,478 22,994,116 Ripley 1,056,836 979,334 904,860 950,002 996,104 988,949 1,336,265 Stillwater 529,929,974 568,054,148 592,926,803 634,285,259 664,621,031 645,947,398 649,411,533 Yale 4,000,483 3,892,253 4,745,690 4,825,779 5,535,902 5,237,003 6,490,854 Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html APPENDIX 10 – Annual County Unemployment Rates 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 United States 4.0% 4.7% 5.8% 6.0% 5.5% 5.1% 4.6% 4.6% 5.8% 9.3% 9.6% Oklahoma 3.1% 3.7% 4.8% 5.6% 5.0% 4.5% 4.1% 4.1% 3.7% 6.6% 7.1% Region 3.1% 3.4% 4.6% 5.4% 4.9% 4.6% 4.1% 3.9% 3.8% 7.0% 7.3% Grant 2.5% 2.8% 3.5% 3.8% 3.6% 3.7% 3.8% 3.2% 2.5% 3.9% 4.3% Kay 4.3% 4.1% 5.8% 6.9% 6.2% 5.7% 4.9% 4.2% 3.5% 7.7% 8.7% Lincoln 3.0% 3.9% 5.0% 5.5% 5.0% 4.8% 4.2% 4.2% 3.9% 7.3% 7.2% Logan 2.5% 2.9% 3.5% 4.4% 4.0% 3.9% 3.8% 3.8% 3.6% 5.9% 6.4% Noble 2.3% 3.9% 4.6% 4.4% 4.0% 3.9% 3.6% 3.4% 3.2% 8.0% 6.3% Osage 3.2% 3.4% 5.2% 6.3% 5.4% 4.8% 4.3% 4.2% 4.1% 7.8% 8.5% Pawnee 3.7% 4.0% 5.7% 6.9% 5.9% 5.0% 4.3% 4.5% 4.4% 8.9% 9.8% Payne 2.5% 2.8% 3.5% 4.2% 4.0% 4.0% 3.7% 3.7% 3.9% 6.3% 6.3% Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS and CPS http://www.bls.gov/lau/#tables
Click tabs to swap between content that is broken into logical sections.
Okla State Agency |
Commerce, Oklahoma Department of |
Okla Agency Code | '160' |
Title | North central regional profile |
Authors | Oklahoma. Department of Commerce. Policy, Research & Economic Analysis. |
Publisher | Oklahoma Department of Commerce |
Publication Date | 2011-06 |
Publication type | Statistics |
Subject |
Oklahoma--Economic conditions. Oklahoma--Population. |
Purpose | compilation of demographic information covering Grant, Kay, Lincoln, Logan, Noble, Osage, Pawnee, and Payne counties |
Contents | Population Growth Rates: 1990 to 2015; Age by Gender: 2010; Racial Mix: 2000 and 2010; Hispanic Ethnicity: 2000 and 2010; Educational Attainment: 2005-2009; Per Capita Personal Income: 1990 to 2009; Estimated Retail: 2004 to 2010; Industry Employment, Establishments and Earnings: 2010; Industry Competitiveness: 2010; Labor Force Participation Rate: 1990 to 2010; Unemployment Rate: 1990 to 2010; Commuting Patterns: 2009; Appendix 1- Population Growth Trends; Appendix 2 - Age Groupings; Appendix 3 - 2000 Census Population By Race; Appendix 4 - 2010 Census Population By Race; Appendix 5 - Population by Hispanic Ethnicity; Appendix 6 - Estimated Educational Attainment for Population 25 and Over (2005-2009); Appendix 7 - Per Capita Personal Income (PCPI); Appendix 8 - Retail Sales Growth Rates: Communities Within The Region; Appendix 9 - Estimated Retail Sales Subject to Tax; Appendix 10 - Annual County Unemployment Rates |
OkDocs Class# | C3935.3 R336nc 2011 |
Digital Format | PDF, Adobe Reader required |
ODL electronic copy | Downloaded from agency website: http://www.okcommerce.gov/Data-And-Research/Downloads/Regional-Profiles/Keynote-North-Central-Regional-Profile |
Rights and Permissions | This Oklahoma state government publication is provided for educational purposes under U.S. copyright law. Other usage requires permission of copyright holders. |
Language | English |
Full text | North Central R egional Profile June 2011 Policy, Research & Economic Analysis Page 1 KayGrantNoblePayneOsagePawneeLincolnLoganCounty BorderMetropolitan Statistical AreaCounty SeatCities with population over 5,000Cities with population 2,000 - 5,000Career Technology CentersHigher EducationCSources: Cities - U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 Census www.okcommerce.gov/data Career Technology Centers - OK Dept. of Career and Technology Education www.okcareertech.orgHigher Education - OK State Regents For Higher Education www.okhighered.orgFor a detailed interactive map showing lakes, roads, rail, hospitals and more cities, go to:http://stateok.zoomprospector.com/PawneeTulsaBlackwellPonca CityTonkawaHominyPawhuskaSkiatookClevelandStillwaterCushingPerryCCMeridianTechnologyCenterPioneer TechnologyCenterOklahoma StateUniversityNorthern OklahomaCollegeChandlerGuthrieLangston UniversityNorthern OklahomaCollegeUniversity Center atPonca CityCrescentMedfordNewkirkPawneePerkinsPragueStroudPawnee NationCollegePolicy, Research & Economic Analysis NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 2 POPULATION GROWTH RATES: 1990 TO 2015 • In 2010, the population in this 8 county region totaled 280,170 people, representing 7.5% of the state’s total population • On average the region’s population has grown at an annual 0.8% rate over the last decade • In 2004, the region’s growth rate briefly dipped below zero before returning to positive territory • Between 2000 and 2010, 23 counties in Oklahoma experienced a net population decline, 3 of those counties in this region • Logan and Payne counties had the 4th and 10th highest population growth rates in the state • For more information on county level population growth since 1990, see Appendix 1 Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 3 • Growth was led by population increases in Logan and Payne counties o Logan County added 7,924 people between 2000 and 2010 o Payne County added 9,160 people during the same time period o That represented 84.2% of the region’s total population growth this past decade KayGrantNoblePayneOsagePawneeLincolnLoganKEY2000 Population (259,878 people in NC Region)2010 Population (280,170 people in NC Region)Change: 6.8%300003100032000330003400035000Change: 6.8%400004200044000460004800050000Change: -0.2%120001320014400156001680018000Change: -3.2%400004300046000490005200055000Change: -12.0%1000280046006400820010000Change: 1.3%500070009000110001300015000Change: 23.4%300003220034400366003880041000Change: 13.4%6000064000680007200076000800002000Pawnee (16,612 people)13.1%12.3%6.4%Noble 4.4% (11,411 people)Logan (33,924 people)Kay(48,080 people)Lincoln (32,080 people)Osage(44,437 people)Grant 2.0% (5,144 people)Payne(68,190 people)17.1%18.5%26.2%2010Pawnee (16,577 people)14.9%12.2%5.9%Noble 4.1% (11,561 people)Logan (41,848people)Kay(46,562 people)Lincoln (34,273 people)Osage(47,472 people)Grant 1.6% (4,527 people)Payne(77,350 people)16.9%16.6%27.6%Source: U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 CensusP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 4 AGE BY GENDER: 2010 • The presence of Oklahoma State University in Payne County moved the region’s population to a younger range o The region showed larger populations in the age groups of 15 to 19 and 20 to 24 o This distribution was not typical in the other 7 counties as they trended towards older populations, with Grant County having a median age 9.6 years higher than the state median • For more information on county level population by age group, see Appendix 2 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 5 RACIAL MIX: 2000 AND 2010 • The standard race categories used for Census purposes are white, black, American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN), Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NHOPI), or some other race • Hispanic is not considered a race but is instead an ethnicity – it is possible to be white and Hispanic, black and Hispanic, Asian and Hispanic, etc. • Between 2000 and 2010, the region became slightly more racially diverse; however, the region remained strongly white alone when compared with the rest of the state o Percent self described as white alone in 2010: Region: 79.5% OK: 72.2% • Most of the region’s increase in diversity came from growth among those self described as American Indian or Alaska Native, or those claiming more than one race • American Indians remained the largest minority in this region, representing 7.7% of the region’s total population, slightly lower than the state’s average of 8.6% • Blacks were the largest minority in Logan County representing 9.1% of the county’s total population. • ‘More than one race’ represented the largest minority in Grant and Payne counties outnumbering those claiming to be black alone, American Indian alone and Hispanic alone. • For more information on county level population by race, see Appendices 3 and 4 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 6 HISPANIC ETHNICITY: 2000 AND 2010 • The region’s Hispanic population grew, but remained below the state and national percentages • Kay County had the region’s highest Hispanic presence in 2010 with 2,992 people of that ethnicity, or 6.4% of the county’s population • Payne County had slightly fewer Hispanics than Kay County (2,990 or 3.9%) • Pawnee County had the lowest percentage of Hispanics in the region (2.0%, or 336) • Grant County had the lowest number of Hispanics in the region (158, or 3.5%) • While the region had a lower presence of Hispanics by percentage, it had a higher percentage growth rate than was shown by the US as a whole • For more information on county level population by Hispanic ethnicity, see Appendix 5 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 7 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT: 2005 - 2009 yyOnly Payne County exceeded the national estimate for the percentage of the population with a bachelor’s degree or higher at 32.5% (+/- 1.8%) yyAll eight counties exceeded the national estimate for the percentage of the population with some college education but no degree o Region: 21.8% (+/-0.7%) o US: 20.3% (+/-0.0%) yyEducational attainment for a large part of the region stopped at either a high school degree or less than a high school degree yyThe 2005-2009 American Community Survey is based on surveys collected during the full 5 year span and results are considered to be representative of the complete time period yyFor more information on county level population by educational attainment, see Appendix 6 Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.gov Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 8 PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME: 1990 TO 2009 • Per Capita Personal Income (PCPI) for the nation, state and region steadily climbed upward until 2009 when the impact of the global recession caused wages to decline o 2009 PCPI: US: $39,635 OK: $35,837 Region: $32,084 • Collectively, PCPI in the region trended below the statewide PCPI with some exceptions • Grant County exceeded the state’s PCPI in 2009 ($36,273) • While dropping below the state PCPI in 2009, Kay and Logan counties exceeded the state PCPI as recently as 2008 o 2008: Kay: $37,877 Logan: $37,009 OK: $36,911 o 2009: Kay: $35,915 Logan: $35,052 OK: $39,635 • For more information on PCPI, see Appendix 7 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2 P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 9 ESTIMATED RETAIL: 2004 TO 2010 • Retail sales figures used here are based on a summation of calendar month data as reported by the Oklahoma Tax Commission • Because those data are subject to a reporting time lag, these figures are considered estimates • Figures represent estimated sales subject to sales tax, thus sales to governments, non-profits, and other non-taxable entities are not included in these figures • Changes in retail sales could be due to: o The introduction or removal of a local sales tax o The increase or reduction of an existing sales tax o Sharp upswings or downturns in economic conditions o The opening or closing of a significant retail establishment like A big-box retailer A large shopping mall 2004-2010 Estimated Retail Sales Subject to Sales Tax For 20 Largest Communities Based on 2010 Population 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 KAY Blackwell 51,028,098 51,929,196 52,525,592 55,552,549 60,071,521 57,917,759 57,164,572 Newkirk 11,140,811 11,636,232 11,823,142 12,756,966 13,276,447 12,667,385 12,231,360 Ponca City 324,901,988 334,813,578 344,102,192 363,198,983 361,247,802 341,359,116 347,557,085 Tonkawa 17,510,731 18,026,380 19,330,638 20,456,448 20,842,422 19,486,657 22,302,955 LINCOLN Chandler 41,913,282 43,018,259 45,103,281 50,158,859 61,032,388 59,884,386 60,218,335 Prague 21,017,298 21,044,042 21,752,520 23,265,237 26,665,738 24,361,882 24,538,252 Stroud 26,934,096 29,122,709 31,849,474 32,925,183 37,404,302 36,200,442 35,908,125 LOGAN Crescent 11,018,031 11,427,631 11,507,057 12,986,258 15,105,432 13,778,008 11,592,021 Guthrie 97,698,303 102,468,482 104,180,002 116,770,165 126,265,249 127,459,605 122,400,267 Langston 1,970,164 2,282,973 1,907,263 2,038,931 2,306,777 2,100,308 2,523,178 NOBLE Perry 46,962,987 47,160,309 47,956,715 50,138,775 48,417,081 45,750,510 48,125,463 OSAGE Hominy 13,566,012 15,198,940 17,348,955 16,832,996 19,598,811 18,156,182 17,764,822 Pawhuska 26,235,625 26,924,375 28,132,359 29,777,117 31,445,396 31,459,764 31,650,757 Skiatook 52,504,603 67,320,981 77,665,656 83,737,590 87,050,836 84,061,764 90,588,726 PAWNEE Cleveland 35,666,323 37,069,960 36,253,355 39,838,023 42,238,820 39,747,184 42,067,231 Pawnee 16,762,897 16,711,586 18,322,136 18,821,869 17,869,917 17,574,563 18,412,440 PAYNE Cushing 83,647,533 91,268,386 96,624,706 105,574,318 123,986,341 114,704,701 121,727,929 Drumright 18,269,710 19,445,948 20,116,844 26,933,674 24,231,953 21,090,910 20,342,622 Perkins 17,242,661 17,343,863 20,297,113 20,988,010 22,112,511 20,426,478 22,994,116 Stillwater 529,929,974 568,054,148 592,926,803 634,285,259 664,621,031 645,947,398 649,411,533 Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.htmlP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 10 ESTIMATED RETAIL: 2004 TO 2010, Continued • Collectively, retail sales had been trending upward until 2008, peaking at $1.91 billion for the region • As the global recession spread in 2009, collective retail sales for the region dropped to $1.84 billion • Retail sales rebounded somewhat in 2010, reaching $1.87 billion within the region • The largest volume of retail sales occurred in population centers like Stillwater, Ponca City, Guthrie and Cushing o These four communities accounted for two thirds of the region’s estimated retail sales volume in 2010 • For more information on local level sales tax collections and growth, see Appendices 8 and 9 Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 11 INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT, ESTABLISHMENTS AND EARNINGS: 2010 • The following graphs use data from EMSI, which defines industry employment differently from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). BLS reports job counts only for establishments with an employer/employee relationship which excludes non-employer establishments like sole proprietorships and partnerships • EMSI includes data from both employer AND non-employer establishments • The North Central region had 5,746 establishments operating in 2010 • The region had a higher percentage of manufacturing and mining establishments than did the state or nation • Retail, construction and government combined to equal one third of all establishments in the region in 2010 Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 12 • Government was the leading employer in the region, at 21.4% of all jobs o This includes federal, state, local, and tribal governments o This also includes public education facilities o The figure is ahead of the national average of 14.0% and the state average of 17.4% Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.com Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 13 Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.com Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 14 INDUSTRY COMPETITIVENESS: 2010 • Industry Location Quotient (LQ) compares the following: 1. Changes in employment 2. For a given industry 3. During a given time period 4. In a given area, against another reference area • A score of 1.0 or higher indicates competitive advantage • The LQ chart compares industries at the 2 digit NAICS level for: o Oklahoma and the 8 county region against the nation as a whole o Based on 2010 data • The region’s LQ score for government was increased by Tribal governments headquartered in the state • Every county in the region showed a national competitive advantage in mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction, and agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting • All but two (Noble and Pawnee) showed an advantage in construction • Half had an advantage in utilities • Additional competitive advantages at the county level o Grant: Finance and insurance (1.31), transportation and warehousing (2.58), and wholesale trade (1.17) o Kay: Administrative, support, waste management and remediation services (1.10), management of companies and enterprise (1.75), and manufacturing (1.04) o Lincoln: Information (1.39) and transportation and warehousing (1.47) o Logan: Arts, entertainment and recreation (1.19), other services except public administration (1.24), and real estate and rental and leasing (1.51) o Noble: Manufacturing (2.58) o Osage: Arts, entertainment and recreation (1.02) o Pawnee: Health care and social assistance (1.04) Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 15 LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE: 1990 TO 2010 • The labor force participation rate is calculated by dividing the labor force by the total population • The measure isn’t exact (because total population includes those unable to work due to age, health, or other issues) but inputs are consistent over time, thus the measure indicates trends • The region’s labor force participation rate had been dropping since 2000, but the drop became more pronounced beginning in April 2007 • Declines were more pronounced in Lincoln: -6.2% Logan: -6.9% Payne: -7.2% • In 2010, labor force participation rates were: o US: 49.8% o OK: 46.8% o Region: 44.7% o Grant: 58.6% o Kay: 48.8% o Osage: 41.1% o Lincoln: 40.2% o Pawnee: 43.9% o Logan: 43.2% o Payne: 45.9% o Noble: 49.2% Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tables Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tablesP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 16 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 1990 TO 2010 • Over the last two decades, unemployment rates for the region have typically been near or below the state and national rates • After the onset of the recent recession, unemployment rates rose sharply • 2010 annualized unemployment rates: o US: 9.6% o OK: 7.1% o Region: 7.3% • In 2010, Grant County, with a relatively small population, had the lowest unemployment rate at 4.3% • For more information on county level unemployment rates, see Appendix 10 Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics www.bls.gov/lau/#tables Sources: US unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=ln State and County unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=laP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PROFILE Page 17 COMMUTING PATTERNS: 2009 yyA region is a net worker exporter when the number of residents living in the region who commute out for work exceeds the number of workers who live outside the region but commute into the region for employment yyCensus data for 2009 indicates the North Central Region had a net outflow of almost 25,000 workers yyOsage County showed a net loss of over 9,000 workers. Over 7,600 Osage County residents commuted to Tulsa County for work yyLogan County had a net loss of almost 7,900 workers. Approximately that many Logan County residents commuted to Oklahoma County yyAlmost 2,000 residents of the region commuted outside the state for employment o Workers who commute just over the state line o Long haul truck drivers o Commercial pilots o Petroleum workers o Entertainers yyOver 300 Kay County residents commuted to Kansas for employment yyOver 450 Payne County residents commuted out of state yyJust over 1,600 out of state residents commuted into the state for employment, nearly 1,000 of those into Kay County yyThere were two county level exceptions to the net outflow of workers o Payne County had a net gain of just over 900 workers o Kay County had a net gain of just over 650 workers Source: US Census Bureau, LEHD Program and OnTheMap http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/ Source: US Census Bureau, LEHD Program and OnTheMap http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/ APPENDIX 1 – Population Growth Trends 1990 to 2000 2000-2010 2005-2010 Total Population 2010 Census Count Pop Change Avg. Annual Growth Pop Change Avg. Annual Growth Pop Change Avg. Annual Growth United States 308,745,538 31,957,510 1.2% 27,323,632 0.9% 12,992,387 0.9% Oklahoma 3,751,351 303,922 0.9% 300,697 0.8% 218,582 1.1% Region 280,170 18,480 0.7% 20,292 0.8% 13,371 0.8% Grant 4,527 (535) -1.0% (617) -1.2% (129) -0.5% Kay 46,562 105 0.0% (1,518) -0.3% 483 0.2% Lincoln 34,273 2,952 1.0% 2,193 0.7% 2,286 1.4% Logan 41,848 4,921 1.6% 7,924 2.1% 6,449 3.4% Noble 11,561 376 0.3% 150 0.1% 449 0.8% Osage 47,472 2,866 0.7% 3,035 0.7% 2,520 1.1% Pawnee 16,577 1,055 0.7% (35) 0.0% 107 0.1% Payne 77,350 6,740 1.1% 9,160 1.3% 1,206 0.4% Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html APPENDIX 2 – Age Groupings Total Population 2010 Census Count Age 0-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-54 Age 55-64 Age 65-84 Age 85 and over United States 308,745,538 26.9% 7.0% 41.2% 11.8% 11.3% 1.8% Oklahoma 3,751,351 27.8% 7.2% 39.8% 11.8% 11.7% 1.7% Region 280,170 27.3% 9.2% 37.4% 12.0% 12.4% 1.7% Grant 4,527 24.9% 4.0% 36.4% 13.5% 18.2% 3.0% Kay 46,562 28.2% 5.6% 36.3% 12.7% 14.6% 2.4% Lincoln 34,273 28.0% 5.0% 38.5% 13.3% 13.8% 1.5% Logan 41,848 29.4% 6.5% 38.9% 12.5% 11.2% 1.4% Noble 11,561 27.0% 4.6% 38.9% 12.7% 14.7% 2.0% Osage 47,472 26.8% 4.8% 39.1% 13.9% 14.0% 1.4% Pawnee 16,577 27.2% 4.8% 38.0% 13.8% 14.7% 1.7% Payne 77,350 26.0% 19.4% 35.2% 9.1% 9.0% 1.4% Note: Columns may not add exactly to 100.0% due to slight rounding error Source: US Census Bureau 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 3 – 2000 Census Population By Race Total Population 2000 Census Count White Alone Black Alone American Indian & Alaska Native Alone Asian Alone Other Race Alone More than One Race Oklahoma 3,450,654 76.2% 7.6% 7.9% 1.4% 2.5% 4.5% Region 259,878 81.4% 5.0% 7.4% 1.0% 4.2% 1.0% Grant 5,144 95.3% 0.1% 2.4% 0.1% 1.3% 0.7% Kay 48,080 84.2% 1.8% 7.5% 0.5% 4.0% 2.0% Lincoln 32,080 86.4% 2.5% 6.6% 0.2% 3.8% 0.5% Logan 33,924 81.6% 11.0% 2.9% 0.3% 2.9% 1.2% Noble 11,411 86.4% 1.6% 7.6% 0.3% 3.4% 0.7% Osage 44,437 67.0% 10.8% 14.4% 0.2% 6.8% 0.7% Pawnee 16,612 82.3% 0.7% 12.1% 0.2% 4.4% 0.3% Payne 68,190 84.3% 3.6% 4.6% 3.0% 3.6% 0.8% Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 4 – 2010 Census Population By Race Total Population 2010 Census Count White Alone Black Alone American Indian & Alaska Native Alone Asian Alone Other Race Alone More than One Race Oklahoma 3,751,351 72.2% 7.4% 8.6% 1.7% 4.2% 5.9% Region 280,170 79.5% 5.0% 7.7% 1.2% 5.3% 1.4% Grant 4,527 93.0% 0.8% 1.9% 0.2% 2.4% 1.7% Kay 46,562 80.2% 2.1% 9.6% 0.5% 5.0% 2.6% Lincoln 34,273 85.9% 1.8% 6.5% 0.2% 5.1% 0.6% Logan 41,848 81.0% 9.1% 3.3% 0.5% 4.1% 2.1% Noble 11,561 84.2% 1.8% 8.5% 0.4% 4.1% 1.0% Osage 47,472 66.0% 11.4% 14.4% 0.3% 7.1% 0.8% Pawnee 16,577 80.6% 0.7% 11.6% 0.3% 6.2% 0.6% Payne 77,350 81.9% 3.6% 4.7% 3.5% 5.2% 1.1% Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 5 – Population by Hispanic Ethnicity 2000 2010 Total Hispanic Not Hispanic Total Hispanic Not Hispanic Oklahoma 3,450,654 179,304 3,271,350 3,751,351 332,007 3,419,344 Region 259,878 6,410 253,468 280,170 11,150 269,020 Grant 5,144 95 5,049 4,527 158 4,369 Kay 48,080 2,045 46,035 46,562 2,992 43,570 Lincoln 32,080 483 31,597 34,273 838 33,435 Logan 33,924 987 32,937 41,848 2,170 39,678 Noble 11,411 205 11,206 11,561 300 11,261 Osage 44,437 940 43,497 47,472 1,366 46,106 Pawnee 16,612 192 16,420 16,577 336 16,241 Payne 68,190 1,463 66,727 77,350 2,990 74,360 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 6 – Estimated Educational Attainment for Population 25 and Over (2005-2009) Less than HS Diploma HS graduate, GED, or alternative Some College Associate Degree Bachelor Degree Post Bachelor Degree United States Estimate 15.4% 29.3% 20.3% 7.4% 17.4% 10.1% MOE 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Oklahoma Estimate 15.2% 32.7% 23.0% 6.7% 15.1% 7.3% MOE 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% Region Estimate 13.7% 36.8% 21.8% 6.4% 13.8% 7.5% MOE 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% Grant Estimate 9.6% 36.6% 25.1% 5.8% 16.2% 6.8% MOE 6.3% 3.4% 2.9% 1.4% 2.6% 1.7% Kay Estimate 14.5% 37.6% 20.5% 8.6% 13.1% 5.8% MOE 1.1% 1.5% 1.2% 0.8% 0.8% 0.6% Lincoln Estimate 14.8% 44.7% 22.1% 4.9% 10.0% 3.5% MOE 1.5% 1.8% 1.7% 0.7% 1.2% 0.7% Logan Estimate 15.0% 35.6% 23.7% 4.9% 14.8% 6.1% MOE 1.9% 2.1% 1.9% 0.9% 1.8% 0.9% Noble Estimate 12.2% 40.2% 22.4% 6.3% 13.7% 5.1% MOE 3.0% 3.4% 2.8% 1.4% 1.9% 1.9% Osage Estimate 12.8% 39.1% 21.9% 8.3% 11.8% 6.0% MOE 1.2% 1.5% 1.5% 1.0% 1.1% 0.9% Pawnee Estimate 18.0% 39.6% 21.2% 6.4% 10.2% 4.5% MOE 2.2% 2.6% 2.3% 1.2% 1.4% 0.9% Payne Estimate 11.7% 29.6% 21.1% 5.2% 18.1% 14.4% MOE 1.2% 1.7% 1.6% 0.8% 1.4% 1.2% Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.gov MOE= Margin of ErrorAPPENDIX 7 – Per Capita Personal Income (PCPI) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 United States $30,318 $31,145 $31,461 $32,271 $33,881 $35,424 $37,698 $39,461 $40,674 $39,635 Oklahoma $24,605 $26,218 $26,218 $26,909 $28,790 $30,469 $33,223 $34,539 $36,911 $35,837 Region $21,641 $22,899 $23,202 $23,938 $25,477 $26,499 $28,736 $30,802 $33,162 $32,084 Grant $24,605 $26,218 $26,218 $26,909 $28,790 $30,469 $33,223 $34,539 $36,911 $35,837 Kay $24,008 $24,977 $26,164 $28,381 $32,473 $29,809 $32,199 $33,742 $39,908 $36,273 Lincoln $22,906 $25,083 $25,185 $25,907 $28,390 $28,227 $31,490 $33,689 $37,877 $35,915 Logan $19,333 $21,077 $21,714 $22,074 $22,455 $24,185 $26,016 $27,882 $29,476 $29,093 Noble $22,900 $24,458 $25,805 $27,165 $29,640 $31,418 $34,679 $35,187 $37,009 $35,052 Osage $22,139 $21,823 $21,318 $23,165 $24,708 $26,222 $27,197 $29,417 $32,077 $29,956 Pawnee $21,097 $22,893 $23,505 $24,049 $25,649 $27,222 $30,260 $32,217 $34,330 $33,985 Payne $20,180 $21,503 $21,748 $22,232 $23,792 $24,534 $26,968 $28,954 $30,530 $30,012 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2 APPENDIX 8 – Retail Sales Growth Rates: Communities Within The Region Estimated Retail Growth Rates Sorted by County 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 GRANT Deer Creek 13.5% -0.1% -9.3% 26.9% -7.1% 15.4% -14.6% Lamont 1.3% 9.3% 29.7% -11.1% 17.5% -1.6% 3.4% Medford 3.3% -1.5% 5.7% 1.3% 9.2% 0.9% 22.6% Nash 2.2% 69.4% -17.4% -3.7% 4.6% 4.7% -0.1% Pond Creek 0.3% 5.9% 3.2% 2.1% 18.2% 8.7% 0.8% Renfrow 80.9% 10.1% 45.2% 5.1% 26.5% 21.1% 26.2% Wakita 4.3% -0.1% 6.3% -11.4% 17.0% -7.2% 22.3% KAY Blackwell 0.5% 1.8% 1.1% 5.8% 8.1% -3.6% -1.3% Braman 0.2% 8.7% 13.7% 13.8% 28.1% -24.9% 44.9% Kaw City -4.7% 11.2% -29.5% 11.1% 11.8% -9.2% -17.9% Newkirk 1.9% 4.4% 1.6% 7.9% 4.1% -4.6% -3.4% Ponca City 0.2% 3.1% 2.8% 5.5% -0.5% -5.5% 1.8% Tonkawa -5.4% 2.9% 7.2% 5.8% 1.9% -6.5% 14.5% LINCOLN Agra 12.5% -4.9% 7.1% 20.2% 0.4% -24.5% 20.8% Carney -5.7% 35.1% 9.7% 20.5% 5.3% -36.7% -9.0% Chandler -0.9% 2.6% 4.8% 11.2% 21.7% -1.9% 0.6% Davenport -14.4% 8.5% 8.3% 2.8% 31.2% -27.0% -13.2% Kendrick -27.5% 45.1% 23.5% 15.1% 8.9% -19.1% 18.1% Meeker -12.7% 1.9% 11.5% 10.3% -1.4% 2.9% 2.6% Prague 6.8% 0.1% 3.4% 7.0% 14.6% -8.6% 0.7% Sparks -11.5% 17.2% 30.6% 5.8% 44.8% -1.4% 18.2% Stroud 1.9% 8.1% 9.4% 3.4% 13.6% -3.2% -0.8% Tryon 43.5% 6.6% 31.3% 6.0% 14.8% 0.4% 6.5% Wellston 4.3% -2.3% 4.1% 14.7% 11.6% 2.1% -3.2% LOGAN Cashion -35.5% 21.7% 24.2% 14.6% 14.0% -18.3% 4.5% Estimated Retail Growth Rates Sorted by County 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 Cimarron City -12.7% 14.6% 49.0% 0.2% -3.3% -28.0% -47.1% Coyle 7.2% -15.4% 14.3% -16.5% -15.7% 24.8% 14.9% Crescent 2.4% 3.7% 0.7% 12.9% 16.3% -8.8% -15.9% Guthrie 1.6% 4.9% 1.7% 12.1% 8.1% 0.9% -4.0% Langston -32.8% 15.9% -16.5% 6.9% 13.1% -9.0% 20.1% Marshall 10.3% -27.9% 33.2% -16.8% 52.2% -32.4% 67.3% Meridian -11.3% 152.7% -31.5% -57.6% 17.9% 4.8% 65.2% Mulhall 23.6% -5.3% 0.2% 37.1% 50.4% 19.6% -72.6% Orlando 16.2% -6.2% 13.7% -15.1% 60.1% 76.1% -22.0% NOBLE Billings -2.6% -2.3% 4.6% 2.6% 7.7% 2.6% -3.0% Marland -1.4% -2.1% -1.2% -9.0% 58.0% -34.5% 5.9% Morrison -6.4% 10.9% -19.6% 6.2% 24.9% -14.3% 0.8% Perry 4.7% 0.4% 1.7% 4.6% -3.4% -5.5% 5.2% Red Rock 90.9% 8.0% 21.9% 10.1% 34.5% -17.2% 19.8% OSAGE Avant -9.7% -7.2% 5.7% -6.8% 11.2% -1.4% -11.1% Barnsdall 16.3% 18.4% -13.8% -5.5% 21.9% -4.4% -18.9% Burbank -12.8% 26.5% 29.3% 38.6% -18.2% 78.7% -51.6% Fairfax 10.9% -1.9% 6.4% 0.7% 12.7% -2.6% -14.3% Hominy 11.8% 12.0% 14.1% -3.0% 16.4% -7.4% -2.2% Pawhuska 0.9% 2.6% 4.5% 5.8% 5.6% 0.0% 0.6% Prue 7.7% 8.6% 7.1% 2.7% 8.2% 2.3% 5.5% Shidler -4.1% 10.1% 16.7% 20.5% -15.1% 15.3% 6.7% Skiatook 5.1% 28.2% 15.4% 7.8% 4.0% -3.4% 7.8% Webbers Falls -2.8% 5.0% 6.7% -0.6% 2.1% 8.7% -10.6% Wynona 1.0% -2.8% 3.6% -3.9% 5.9% 3.6% -12.6% PAWNEE Cleveland 0.0% 3.9% -2.2% 9.9% 6.0% -5.9% 5.8% Hallett -3.8% -0.4% 2.6% -16.9% 16.3% -10.0% -0.6% Jennings 8.9% 36.2% -8.9% 0.4% 41.7% -24.8% -10.9% Estimated Retail Growth Rates Sorted by County 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 Lone Chimney 7.3% 20.6% 10.9% 0.6% -5.5% 31.1% 9.1% Maramec 0.2% 5.0% 9.5% 57.8% -33.2% 5.6% -2.0% Pawnee 1.6% -0.3% 9.6% 2.7% -5.1% -1.7% 4.8% Ralston 16.6% -11.1% 5.5% 15.1% 13.1% -4.9% 30.2% Terlton 13.1% -30.2% 33.6% 88.2% 6.8% -2.6% 6.0% PAYNE Cushing 3.1% 9.1% 5.9% 9.3% 17.4% -7.5% 6.1% Drumright 1.4% 6.4% 3.5% 33.9% -10.0% -13.0% -3.5% Glencoe 13.6% -19.5% 6.5% 27.4% -3.2% -8.7% 0.4% Perkins 14.9% 0.6% 17.0% 3.4% 5.4% -7.6% 12.6% Ripley -1.5% -7.3% -7.6% 5.0% 4.9% -0.7% 35.1% Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.htmlAPPENDIX 9 – Estimated Retail Sales Subject to Tax Estimated Retail Sales Sorted By County 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 GRANT Deer Creek 446,787 446,121 404,470 513,439 476,928 550,346 469,738 Lamont 1,310,469 1,432,664 1,858,835 1,651,956 1,941,263 1,910,581 1,975,486 Medford 6,915,983 6,815,057 7,206,191 7,299,180 7,967,360 8,037,069 9,855,648 Nash 866,275 1,467,077 1,212,503 1,167,897 1,222,104 1,279,861 1,278,349 Pond Creek 3,429,448 3,632,153 3,747,610 3,825,572 4,522,589 4,914,197 4,953,508 Renfrow 61,775 68,018 98,738 103,797 131,319 158,972 200,631 Wakita 1,355,188 1,354,014 1,439,289 1,275,780 1,492,237 1,384,121 1,692,279 KAY Blackwell 51,028,098 51,929,196 52,525,592 55,552,549 60,071,521 57,917,759 57,164,572 Braman 1,297,106 1,409,621 1,602,647 1,823,645 2,336,514 1,753,886 2,541,285 Kaw City 1,153,104 1,281,721 903,474 1,003,936 1,121,933 1,018,754 836,054 Newkirk 11,140,811 11,636,232 11,823,142 12,756,966 13,276,447 12,667,385 12,231,360 Ponca City 324,901,988 334,813,578 344,102,192 363,198,983 361,247,802 341,359,116 347,557,085 Tonkawa 17,510,731 18,026,380 19,330,638 20,456,448 20,842,422 19,486,657 22,302,955 LINCOLN Agra 1,557,253 1,480,889 1,585,909 1,905,972 1,914,174 1,445,219 1,746,449 Carney 1,638,876 2,214,777 2,429,198 2,927,444 3,081,633 1,951,143 1,775,706 Chandler 41,913,282 43,018,259 45,103,281 50,158,859 61,032,388 59,884,386 60,218,335 Davenport 2,755,498 2,989,244 3,235,955 3,325,478 4,361,481 3,183,949 2,763,456 Kendrick 163,123 236,770 292,504 336,548 366,632 296,692 350,417 Meeker 6,318,385 6,439,733 7,180,985 7,917,053 7,806,108 8,032,412 8,244,234 Prague 21,017,298 21,044,042 21,752,520 23,265,237 26,665,738 24,361,882 24,538,252 Sparks 181,231 212,465 277,411 293,464 424,807 418,771 495,071 Stroud 26,934,096 29,122,709 31,849,474 32,925,183 37,404,302 36,200,442 35,908,125 Tryon 683,792 728,746 956,791 1,014,664 1,164,551 1,168,644 1,244,775 Wellston 5,873,817 5,737,070 5,970,897 6,849,316 7,643,725 7,802,168 7,555,689 LOGAN Cashion 1,914,883 2,330,243 2,894,774 3,318,141 3,782,131 3,091,619 3,232,020 Cimarron City 118,931 136,332 203,182 203,650 196,962 141,774 75,011 Coyle 1,197,739 1,013,448 1,158,612 967,612 815,835 1,018,296 1,170,359 Estimated Retail Sales Sorted By County 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Crescent 11,018,031 11,427,631 11,507,057 12,986,258 15,105,432 13,778,008 11,592,021 Guthrie 97,698,303 102,468,482 104,180,002 116,770,165 126,265,249 127,459,605 122,400,267 Langston 1,970,164 2,282,973 1,907,263 2,038,931 2,306,777 2,100,308 2,523,178 Marshall 679,112 489,826 652,272 542,624 825,830 558,122 933,530 Meridian 138,090 348,889 239,043 101,366 119,461 125,220 206,814 Mulhall 595,266 563,625 564,776 774,361 1,164,613 1,393,180 382,005 Orlando 716,332 671,837 764,029 649,038 1,039,154 1,829,569 1,427,153 NOBLE Billings 3,612,040 3,528,300 3,690,434 3,787,229 4,079,640 4,185,273 4,059,857 Marland 424,690 415,594 410,538 373,624 590,370 386,648 409,504 Morrison 2,837,141 3,147,108 2,531,434 2,688,533 3,358,221 2,879,224 2,903,065 Perry 46,962,987 47,160,309 47,956,715 50,138,775 48,417,081 45,750,510 48,125,463 Red Rock 753,253 813,588 991,518 1,091,860 1,468,118 1,215,553 1,456,232 OSAGE Avant 553,779 514,131 543,555 506,782 563,587 555,436 493,775 Barnsdall 6,533,051 7,737,303 6,669,983 6,300,258 7,679,131 7,339,062 5,948,802 Burbank 148,207 187,546 242,446 335,922 274,821 491,118 237,864 Fairfax 7,127,141 6,988,993 7,439,451 7,489,708 8,437,228 8,219,677 7,045,503 Hominy 13,566,012 15,198,940 17,348,955 16,832,996 19,598,811 18,156,182 17,764,822 Pawhuska 26,235,625 26,924,375 28,132,359 29,777,117 31,445,396 31,459,764 31,650,757 Prue 315,794 343,050 367,512 377,373 408,196 417,561 440,446 Shidler 1,353,964 1,490,397 1,739,615 2,096,513 1,779,102 2,050,876 2,187,592 Skiatook 52,504,603 67,320,981 77,665,656 83,737,590 87,050,836 84,061,764 90,588,726 Webbers Falls 4,921,083 5,165,290 5,509,093 5,477,716 5,593,834 6,080,533 5,433,499 Wynona 1,296,375 1,259,784 1,304,635 1,254,385 1,327,801 1,375,750 1,202,358 PAWNEE Cleveland 35,666,323 37,069,960 36,253,355 39,838,023 42,238,820 39,747,184 42,067,231 Hallett 862,013 858,475 880,822 731,646 850,745 765,308 760,597 Jennings 1,443,107 1,966,024 1,790,654 1,797,690 2,546,479 1,915,007 1,706,677 Lone Chimney 1,961,614 2,365,762 2,623,784 2,638,344 2,494,199 3,269,750 3,568,643 Maramec 169,176 177,556 194,373 306,650 204,938 216,323 211,915 Pawnee 16,762,897 16,711,586 18,322,136 18,821,869 17,869,917 17,574,563 18,412,440 Ralston 726,272 645,926 681,186 784,122 887,070 843,166 1,097,522 Estimated Retail Sales Sorted By County 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Terlton 476,757 332,769 444,682 836,695 893,182 869,624 921,850 PAYNE Cushing 83,647,533 91,268,386 96,624,706 105,574,318 123,986,341 114,704,701 121,727,929 Drumright 18,269,710 19,445,948 20,116,844 26,933,674 24,231,953 21,090,910 20,342,622 Glencoe 2,441,924 1,964,869 2,092,338 2,664,670 2,579,517 2,354,787 2,365,361 Perkins 17,242,661 17,343,863 20,297,113 20,988,010 22,112,511 20,426,478 22,994,116 Ripley 1,056,836 979,334 904,860 950,002 996,104 988,949 1,336,265 Stillwater 529,929,974 568,054,148 592,926,803 634,285,259 664,621,031 645,947,398 649,411,533 Yale 4,000,483 3,892,253 4,745,690 4,825,779 5,535,902 5,237,003 6,490,854 Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html APPENDIX 10 – Annual County Unemployment Rates 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 United States 4.0% 4.7% 5.8% 6.0% 5.5% 5.1% 4.6% 4.6% 5.8% 9.3% 9.6% Oklahoma 3.1% 3.7% 4.8% 5.6% 5.0% 4.5% 4.1% 4.1% 3.7% 6.6% 7.1% Region 3.1% 3.4% 4.6% 5.4% 4.9% 4.6% 4.1% 3.9% 3.8% 7.0% 7.3% Grant 2.5% 2.8% 3.5% 3.8% 3.6% 3.7% 3.8% 3.2% 2.5% 3.9% 4.3% Kay 4.3% 4.1% 5.8% 6.9% 6.2% 5.7% 4.9% 4.2% 3.5% 7.7% 8.7% Lincoln 3.0% 3.9% 5.0% 5.5% 5.0% 4.8% 4.2% 4.2% 3.9% 7.3% 7.2% Logan 2.5% 2.9% 3.5% 4.4% 4.0% 3.9% 3.8% 3.8% 3.6% 5.9% 6.4% Noble 2.3% 3.9% 4.6% 4.4% 4.0% 3.9% 3.6% 3.4% 3.2% 8.0% 6.3% Osage 3.2% 3.4% 5.2% 6.3% 5.4% 4.8% 4.3% 4.2% 4.1% 7.8% 8.5% Pawnee 3.7% 4.0% 5.7% 6.9% 5.9% 5.0% 4.3% 4.5% 4.4% 8.9% 9.8% Payne 2.5% 2.8% 3.5% 4.2% 4.0% 4.0% 3.7% 3.7% 3.9% 6.3% 6.3% Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS and CPS http://www.bls.gov/lau/#tables |
Date created | 2011-09-09 |
Date modified | 2013-02-01 |
OCLC number | 819810616 |
|
|
|
A |
|
C |
|
D |
|
F |
|
I |
|
L |
|
O |
|
R |
|
S |
|
T |
|
|
|