|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
|
Northwest Regional Profi le June 2 0 11 P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s Page 1 Texas Beaver Harper Woods Dewey Ellis Woodward Blaine Major Grant Garfield Kingfisher Alfalfa Roger Mills Custer Beckham Canadian Cimarron County Border County Seat Metropolitan Statistical Area Cities with population over 5,000 Cities with population 3,000 - 5,000 Career Technology Centers Higher Education C Guymon Alva Enid Kingfisher Oklahoma City Watonga Clinton Weatherford Woodward Elk City Sayre C C C C Fairview C C Omega C Sources: Cities with population over 3,000 - U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 Census http://www.okcommerce.gov/data Career Technology Centers - OK Dept. of Career and Technology Education http://www.okcareertech.org Higher Education - OK State Regents For Higher Education http://www.okhighered.org For a detailed interactive map showing lakes, roads, rail, hospitals and more cities, go to: http://stateok.zoomprospector.com/ Goodwell OK Panhandle State University Northern OK College Northwestern OK State University Northwestern OK State University Northwestern OK State University High Plains Tech Ctr. Northwest Tech Ctr. Autry Tech Ctr. Northwest Tech Ctr. Chisholm Trail Tech Ctr. Western Tech Ctr. Western Tech Ctr. Mustang Yukon El Reno Piedmont C Canadian Valley Tech Ctr. Redlands Community College Boise City Beaver Buffalo Arnett Cheyenne Arapaho Taloga Cherokee Medford Policy, Research & Economic Analysis NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 2TexasBeaverHarperWoodsDeweyWoodwardEllisBlaineMajorGrantGarfieldKingfisherAlfalfaRogerMillsCusterBeckhamCanadianCimarronKEY200 Population (308,650 people in NW Region)2010 Population (344,385 people in NW Region)Change: -21.4%10002000300040005000Source: U.S. Census Bureau - 2000 Census and 2010 CensusChange: 6.1%10002000300040005000Change: 3.5%10002000300040005000Change: 1.9%10002000300040005000Change: -12.0%10002000300040005000Change: 1.4%10002000300040005000Change: -3.8%20003000400050006000Change: -7.6%20003000400050006000Change: -0.2%50006000700080009000Change: 11.7%22000240002600028000300001800019000200002100022000Change: 5.1%Change: -0.3%1000011000120001300014000Change: 8.0%1200013000140001500016000Change: 31.8%8200091000100000109000118000Change: 2.7%18000190002000021000220001700018000190002000021000Change: 8.6%Change: -2.3%600070008000900010000Change: 4.8%5300055000570005900061000 POPULATION GROWTH RATES: 1990 TO 2010 • In 2010, the population in this 18 county region totaled 344,385 people, representing 9.2% of the state’s total population • The region’s population has grown at an average annual 1.8% rate over the last 5 years but growth has not been uniform • Canadian and Beckham counties showed 3.5% annual growth rates between 2005 and 2010 while Alfalfa, Blaine, Cimarron and Grant counties all showed net population declines • Overall, the region is forecast to experience increasing population growth over the next five years, led primarily by growth in Canadian CountyP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 3 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census and 2010 Census • Between 2000 and 2010, 23 counties in Oklahoma had negative population growth rates; 7 of those counties were in this region • Over the full decade, Canadian County had the highest average annual population growth rate (2.8%) in the state • For more information on county level population growth since 1990, see Appendix 1 • Numeric growth was led by population increases in Canadian, Beckham and Garfield counties o Canadian County added 27,844 people between 2000 and 2010 o Beckham County added 2,320 people during the same time period o Garfield County added 2,767 people o The growth in these three counties represents 92% of the region’s growth during the past decade Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 4 AGE BY GENDER: 2010 • Some notable differences stand out when 2010 population data for the region is compared against the state as a whole • The region showed a higher presence among males aged 25 to 59 • There was a higher presence of children aged 0 to 4 • There was a lower presence of females aged 15 to 69 • Texas and Custer counties both show a young median age • The median age for 11 counties in the region exceeds the US median age • For more information on county level population by age group, see Appendix 2 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 5 RACIAL MIX: 2000 AND 2010 • The standard race categories used for Census purposes are white, black, American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN), Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NHOPI), or some other race • Hispanic is not considered a race but is instead an ethnicity – it is possible to be white and Hispanic, black and Hispanic, Asian and Hispanic, etc. • Between 2000 and 2010, the region became slightly more racially diverse than it was in 2000 • The region remains less diverse than the state as a whole: 83.6% of the region was white alone in 2010, while 72.2% of the state’s population fit that category • Over 90% of the population of Ellis, Grant and Major counties were categorized as “white alone” • Much of the region’s net population growth was accounted for by increases among those reporting to be some other race alone or more than one race alone • Some other race alone represented the largest minority by race in 11 of the region’s 18 counties (5.3% of the region as a whole) • American Indians were the largest minority by race in 5 counties (3.7% of the region’s population) • Blacks were the largest minority group by race in 2 counties (2.4% for the region) • For more information on county level population by race, see Appendices 3 and 4 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 6 HISPANIC ETHNICITY: 2000 AND 2010 • The region’s percentage of Hispanics grew closer to the national percentage moving from a 5.9% difference in 2000 to a 4.8% difference in 2010 • Half of the region’s 18 counties had Hispanic percentages in double digits, with four exceeding 20%: Beaver (20.1%), Blaine (24.1%), Cimarron (20.8%) and Texas (42.0%) • Grant County had the region’s lowest Hispanic presence by number and percentage (3.5%, or 158 people) • Between 2000 and 2010, the Hispanic growth rate for all but two counties in the region exceeded the national Hispanic growth rate • For more information on county level population by Hispanic ethnicity, see Appendix 5 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 7 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT: 2005-2009 • Woods County, home to North Western Oklahoma State University, was the only county that exceeded the national estimate for the percentage of the population with a bachelor’s degree or higher at 28.2% (+/- 3.5%) • 13 of the 18 counties met or exceeded the national estimate for the percentage of the population with some college education but no degree o Region: 24.2% (+/-0.6%) o OK: 23.0% (+/-0.2%) o US: 20.3% (+/-0.0%) • Almost half of adults in the region have a high school diploma or less education • The 2005-2009 American Community Survey is based on surveys collected during the full 5 year span and results are considered to be representative of the complete time period • For more information on county level population by educational attainment, see Appendix 6 Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.gov Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 8 PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME: 1990 TO 2009 • Per Capita Personal Income (PCPI) for the nation, state and region steadily climbed upward until 2009 when the impact of the global recession caused wages to decline o 2009 PCPI: US: $39,635 OK: $35,837 Region: $33,640 • Collectively, the region’s PCPI has been below state and national figures • Since 2000, Harper County is the only county in the region to exceed the state PCPI, last doing so in 2005 • In 2009, no counties matched the national PCPI, and only 4 counties exceeded the state’s PCPI: o OK: $35,837 o Canadian: $36,325 o Garfield: $36,772 o Grant: $36,273 o Kingfisher: $35,924 • For more information on PCPI, see Appendix 7 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2 P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 9 ESTIMATED RETAIL SUBJECT TO SALES TAX: 2004-2010 2004-2010 Estimated Retail Subject to Sales Tax For 20 Largest Communities Based on 2010 Population (In Thousands of Dollars) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 BEAVER Beaver 12,178 13,550 16,964 15,558 15,550 13,515 16,043 BECKHAM Elk City 195,678 218,947 251,434 271,652 309,137 253,945 274,442 Sayre 27,174 27,240 33,577 43,286 39,000 33,966 35,782 BLAINE Watonga 29,763 31,416 31,154 31,731 33,297 33,395 31,004 CANADIAN El Reno 142,103 149,651 160,868 168,469 183,692 179,763 194,348 Mustang 135,266 144,899 154,642 164,897 182,567 187,182 186,476 Piedmont 20,067 21,604 24,315 23,897 28,307 28,085 29,359 Union City 2,524 3,258 3,810 3,918 3,020 3,077 3,481 Yukon 296,393 320,755 329,651 348,386 371,032 386,186 391,651 CUSTER Clinton 100,092 107,391 111,932 122,953 134,421 125,063 124,152 Weatherford 131,423 138,121 140,832 158,895 165,946 161,744 173,888 GARFIELD Enid 567,494 600,554 625,709 665,316 724,749 687,785 686,234 KINGFISHER Hennessey 18,110 20,055 22,497 22,054 26,832 22,171 23,098 Kingfisher 55,965 68,874 61,951 77,428 78,093 77,006 77,723 Piedmont 20,067 21,604 24,315 23,897 28,307 28,085 29,359 MAJOR Fairview 27,141 28,735 31,829 36,179 39,172 36,173 34,362 TEXAS Guymon 115,890 113,616 123,059 130,411 144,616 137,658 136,778 Hooker 7,101 7,018 6,901 7,554 8,474 10,030 9,920 WOODS Alva 59,805 62,835 62,063 70,553 79,769 75,674 74,263 WOODWARD Woodward 218,137 236,648 277,345 294,833 312,385 263,347 277,538 Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 10 • Retail sales figures used here are based on a summation of calendar month data as reported by the Oklahoma Tax Commission • Because those data are subject to a reporting time lag, these figures are considered estimates • Figures represent estimated sales subject to sales tax, thus sales to governments, non-profits, and other non-taxable entities are not included in these figures • Changes in retail sales could be due to: o The introduction or removal of a local sales tax o The increase or reduction of an existing sales tax o Sharp upswings or downturns in economic conditions o The opening or closing of a significant retail establishment such as A big-box retailer A large shopping mall • Collectively, retail sales trended upward until 2008, peaking at $3.24 billion for the region • As the global recession spread in 2009, collective retail sales for the region dropped to $3.06 billion • Retail sales rebounded somewhat in 2010, reaching $3.15 billion within the region • In 2010, the largest volume of estimated retail sales occurred in Enid, Yukon, Woodward and Elk City. These four communities accounted for just over half of the region’s estimated retail sales volume in 2010 • For more information on local level sales tax collections and growth, see Appendices 8 and 9 Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 11 INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT, ESTABLISHMENTS, AND EARNINGS: 2010 • The following graphs use data from EMSI, which defines industry employment differently from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). BLS reports job counts only for establishments with an employer/employee relationship which excludes non-employer establishments like sole proprietorships and partnerships • EMSI includes data from both employer AND non-employer establishments • The Northwest region had 10,088 establishments operating in 2010 Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 12 • The region had a higher percentage of mining, quarrying and oil and gas establishments; government; transportation & warehousing; construction; agriculture; retail trade; and utilities establishments than did the state or nation • Retail, construction and government combined to equal just under one third of all establishments in the region in 2010 • As a percentage, jobs in agriculture and mining are more prevalent in the region than is the case statewide or nationally • Government jobs include federal, state, local and Tribal employment • In 2010, Canadian County was home for 23.8% of all jobs in the region Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.com Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 13 Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.com Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 14 • Industry Location Quotient (LQ) compares the following: 1. Changes in employment 2. For a given industry 3. During a given time period 4. In a given area, against another reference area • A score of 1.0 or higher indicates competitive advantage • The LQ chart compares industries at the 2 digit NAICS level for: o Oklahoma and the 18 county region against the nation as a whole o Based on 2010 data • Every county in the region showed a national competitive advantage in: o Mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction o Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting • Many had an advantage in: o Utilities (all but Blaine, Cimarron, Dewey, Ellis, Grant, Roger Mills and Woods) Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 15 Additional Competitive Advantages At The County Level County Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation & Warehousing Information Finance & Insurance Real Estate and Leasing Management of Companies Administrative Support Health Care & Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Accommodation and Food Services Other Services Alfalfa X Beaver X Beckham X X X X Blaine X X Canadian X X X X X X Cimarron X X X X Custer X X X X Dewey X X Ellis X Garfield X X Grant X X X X Harper X Kingfisher X X Major X Roger Mills X Texas X X X X X Woods X Woodward X X X Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 16 LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE: 1990 TO 2010 • The labor force participation rate is calculated by dividing the non-farm labor force by the total population • The measure isn’t exact (because total population includes those unable to work due to age, health, or other issues while the labor force count doesn’t include farm labor) but inputs are consistent over time, thus the measure indicates trends • The region’s non-farm labor force participation rate had been trending upwards, but dropped off in 2009 and again in 2010 • All but 4 counties in the region exceed the labor force participation rate for the state and nation • Between 2000 and 2009, 5 counties in the region experienced a double digit increase in their labor force participation rates (Beaver: 12.4%, Beckham: 13.3%, Dewey: 13.9%, Ellis: 10.6%, and Grant 11.8%) • Between 2000 and 2009, an across the board drop in participation occurred as 15 of 18 counties showed a decline in their labor force participation rates and those with an increase only grew marginally Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tables Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tables Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tablesP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 17 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 1990 TO 2010 • Over the last two decades, unemployment rates for the region have been below the state and national rates • After the onset of the recent recession, unemployment rates rose sharply • 2010 annualized unemployment rates: o US: 9.6% o OK: 7.1% o Region: 5.4% • Between 2008 and 2010, Blaine County had the largest increase in the unemployment rate for the region, climbing by 4.2 percentage points • Blaine County is the only county in the region with an April 2011 unemployment rate that exceeds the state rate • For more information on county level unemployment rates, see Appendix 10 Sources: US unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=ln State and County unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=la Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics www.bls.gov/lau/#tables P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 18 COMMUTING PATTERNS: 2009 • A region is a net worker exporter when the number of residents living in the region who commute out for work exceeds the number of workers who live outside the region but commute into the region for employment • Census data for 2009 indicates the region had a net outflow of over 27,000 workers • Canadian County had the largest net outflow (net outflow of over 22,200 workers) followed by Blaine (net outflow of over 1,400 workers) • 4 counties showed a net inflow of workers: o Beckham: net inflow of over 700 – over 450 from outside the region o Custer: net inflow of over 1,500 – almost 1,300 from outside the region o Garfield: net inflow of over 300 – over 1,000 coming from inside the region offset by another almost 700 leaving the region o Texas: net inflow of almost 900 – all from outside the region • Almost 6,200 residents of the region commuted outside the state for employment o Workers who commute just over the state line o Long haul truck drivers o Commercial pilots o Petroleum workers o Entertainers • Over 1,000 residents of Texas and Beaver counties commuted to Seward County, KS for employment • Just over 4,200 out of state residents commuted into the region for employment • Over 500 residents of Seward County, KS commute into Texas County for work Source: US Census Bureau, LEHD Program and OnTheMap http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/ Source: US Census Bureau, LEHD Program and OnTheMap http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/ APPENDIX 1 – Population Growth Trends 1990 to 2000 2000-2010 2005-2010 Total Population: 2010 Census Count Pop Change Avg. Annual Growth Pop Change Avg. Annual Growth Pop Change Avg. Annual Growth United States 309,050,816 31,292,600 1.3% 27,626,216 1.0% 13,432,362 0.9% Oklahoma 3,751,351 303,922 1.0% 300,697 0.9% 218,582 1.2% Region 344,385 15,216 0.5% 35,735 1.1% 31,509 1.8% Alfalfa 5,642 (272) -0.4% (463) -0.8% (14) 0.0% Beaver 5,636 (126) -0.2% (221) -0.3% 233 0.9% Beckham 22,119 1,013 0.5% 2,320 1.2% 3,489 3.5% Blaine 11,943 567 0.6% (33) 0.1% (805) -1.3% Canadian 115,541 13,028 1.6% 27,844 2.8% 18,394 3.5% Cimarron 2,475 (138) -0.4% (673) -2.4% (233) -1.8% Custer 27,469 (649) -0.2% 1,327 0.5% 1,968 1.5% Dewey 4,810 (797) -1.5% 67 0.2% 412 1.9% Ellis 4,151 (396) -0.9% 76 0.2% 281 1.4% Garfield 60,580 1,164 0.2% 2,767 0.5% 3,640 1.3% Grant 4,527 (535) -1.0% (617) -1.2% (129) -0.5% Harper 3,685 (489) -1.3% 123 0.4% 384 2.3% Kingfisher 15,034 760 0.6% 1,108 0.8% 958 1.3% Major 7,527 (458) -0.6% (18) 0.0% 356 1.0% Roger Mills 3,647 (680) -1.8% 211 0.6% 386 2.3% Texas 20,640 3,680 2.1% 533 0.3% 619 0.6% Woods 8,878 6 0.1% (211) -0.2% 338 0.8% Woodward 20,081 (462) -0.2% 1,595 0.8% 1,232 1.3% Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html APPENDIX 2 - Age Groupings Total Population 2010 Census Count Age 0-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-54 Age 55-64 Age 65-84 Age 85 and over United States 309,050,816 26.9% 7.0% 41.2% 11.8% 11.3% 1.8% Oklahoma 3,751,351 27.8% 7.2% 39.8% 11.8% 11.7% 1.7% Region 344,385 27.9% 6.6% 40.4% 11.5% 11.8% 1.8% Alfalfa 5,642 19.4% 3.9% 43.2% 13.2% 17.6% 2.7% Beaver 5,636 28.4% 4.4% 37.9% 13.8% 13.5% 2.0% Beckham 22,119 26.7% 7.2% 42.5% 10.8% 10.9% 1.8% Blaine 11,943 23.7% 7.0% 44.0% 11.0% 12.5% 2.0% Canadian 115,541 29.3% 5.4% 43.0% 11.4% 9.7% 1.2% Cimarron 2,475 27.3% 4.1% 32.4% 14.7% 18.1% 3.2% Custer 27,469 28.1% 12.7% 35.4% 10.4% 11.2% 2.2% Dewey 4,810 27.3% 3.6% 36.5% 12.7% 17.0% 2.9% Ellis 4,151 26.7% 3.3% 35.5% 15.5% 16.0% 3.0% Garfield 60,580 27.2% 6.5% 39.2% 11.8% 13.2% 2.3% Grant 4,527 24.9% 4.0% 36.4% 13.5% 18.2% 3.0% Harper 3,685 27.6% 4.1% 37.5% 12.2% 16.0% 2.7% Kingfisher 15,034 29.1% 5.0% 39.2% 11.7% 13.1% 2.0% Major 7,527 25.4% 4.8% 37.1% 13.4% 16.9% 2.4% Roger Mills 3,647 27.3% 4.4% 37.0% 13.6% 15.6% 2.2% Texas 20,640 32.3% 8.6% 39.2% 9.9% 9.0% 1.2% Woods 8,878 23.8% 13.7% 34.4% 11.0% 14.5% 2.8% Woodward 20,081 26.5% 6.3% 42.1% 10.9% 12.6% 1.6% Note: Columns may not add exactly to 100.0% due to slight rounding error Source: US Census Bureau 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 3 – 2000 Census Population By Race Total Population 2000 Census Count White Alone Black Alone American Indian & Alaska Native Alone Asian Alone Other Race Alone More Than One Race Oklahoma 3,450,654 76.2% 7.6% 7.9% 1.4% 2.5% 4.5% Region 308,650 87.1% 2.4% 3.3% 1.1% 2.5% 3.5% Alfalfa 6,105 89.4% 4.2% 2.7% 0.1% 2.1% 1.4% Beaver 5,857 92.7% 0.3% 1.2% 0.1% 1.9% 3.8% Beckham 19,799 87.1% 5.5% 2.6% 0.4% 2.2% 2.3% Blaine 11,976 76.3% 6.7% 8.7% 0.7% 4.0% 3.7% Canadian 87,697 87.0% 2.2% 4.3% 2.4% 2.7% 1.4% Cimarron 3,148 85.8% 0.6% 1.0% 0.2% 2.5% 9.9% Custer 26,142 81.4% 2.9% 5.8% 0.9% 3.2% 5.8% Dewey 4,743 92.2% 0.1% 4.6% 0.1% 2.3% 0.7% Ellis 4,075 96.3% 0.0% 1.2% 0.1% 1.6% 0.7% Garfield 57,813 88.7% 3.3% 2.1% 0.8% 2.6% 2.5% Grant 5,144 95.3% 0.1% 2.4% 0.1% 1.3% 0.7% Harper 3,562 95.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.1% 0.7% 2.4% Kingfisher 13,926 88.1% 1.6% 3.0% 0.2% 2.7% 4.4% Major 7,545 95.0% 0.2% 0.9% 0.1% 1.4% 2.4% Roger Mills 3,436 91.8% 0.3% 5.5% 0.1% 1.9% 0.5% Texas 20,107 76.7% 0.7% 1.2% 0.6% 2.6% 18.2% Woods 9,089 93.4% 2.4% 1.6% 0.5% 1.5% 0.6% Woodward 18,486 92.2% 1.1% 2.1% 0.5% 1.6% 2.5% Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 4 – 2010 Census Population By Race Total Population 2010 Census Count White Alone Black Alone American Indian & Alaska Native Alone Asian Alone Other Race Alone More Than One Race Oklahoma 3,751,351 72.2% 7.4% 8.6% 1.7% 4.2% 5.9% Region 344,385 83.6% 2.4% 3.7% 1.5% 3.5% 5.3% Alfalfa 5,642 89.4% 4.1% 2.9% 0.2% 2.1% 1.3% Beaver 5,636 82.8% 0.8% 1.1% 0.1% 3.1% 12.2% Beckham 22,119 85.0% 4.0% 2.8% 0.8% 2.8% 4.6% Blaine 11,943 79.7% 2.6% 8.0% 0.2% 3.8% 5.7% Canadian 115,541 83.1% 2.5% 4.8% 3.0% 4.1% 2.4% Cimarron 2,475 84.7% 0.2% 0.8% 0.3% 1.8% 12.1% Custer 27,469 78.1% 3.0% 6.3% 1.0% 3.9% 7.6% Dewey 4,810 89.1% 0.3% 5.8% 0.7% 3.2% 1.0% Ellis 4,151 94.4% 0.3% 1.6% 0.2% 1.6% 1.9% Garfield 60,580 83.9% 3.0% 2.3% 1.0% 3.5% 6.4% Grant 4,527 93.0% 0.8% 1.9% 0.2% 2.4% 1.7% Harper 3,685 87.4% 0.1% 0.8% 0.2% 2.3% 9.4% Kingfisher 15,034 84.5% 1.1% 3.1% 0.3% 3.2% 7.8% Major 7,527 91.0% 0.4% 2.0% 0.3% 2.5% 3.8% Roger Mills 3,647 89.8% 0.4% 5.8% 0.3% 2.3% 1.3% Texas 20,640 75.7% 1.6% 1.3% 1.6% 2.8% 17.0% Woods 8,878 88.4% 3.3% 2.4% 0.9% 2.7% 2.3% Woodward 20,081 86.7% 1.6% 2.8% 0.6% 2.6% 5.7% Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 5 – Population by Hispanic Ethnicity 2000 2010 Total Hispanic Not Hispanic Total Hispanic Not Hispanic United States 281,421,906 35,305,818 246,116,088 308,745,538 50,477,594 258,267,944 Oklahoma 3,450,654 179,304 3,271,350 3,751,351 332,007 3,419,344 Region 308,650 20,301 288,349 344,385 39,590 304,795 Alfalfa 6,105 177 5,928 5,642 224 5,418 Beaver 5,857 630 5,227 5,636 1,135 4,501 Beckham 19,799 1,079 18,720 22,119 2,619 19,500 Blaine 11,976 793 11,183 11,943 2,873 9,070 Canadian 87,697 3,386 84,311 115,541 7,794 107,747 Cimarron 3,148 485 2,663 2,475 514 1,961 Custer 26,142 2,361 23,781 27,469 3,830 23,639 Dewey 4,743 127 4,616 4,810 231 4,579 Ellis 4,075 106 3,969 4,151 251 3,900 Garfield 57,813 2,387 55,426 60,580 5,353 55,227 Grant 5,144 95 5,049 4,527 158 4,369 Harper 3,562 201 3,361 3,685 645 3,040 Kingfisher 13,926 961 12,965 15,034 2,022 13,012 Major 7,545 303 7,242 7,527 565 6,962 Roger Mills 3,436 91 3,345 3,647 165 3,482 Texas 20,107 6,003 14,104 20,640 8,659 11,981 Woods 9,089 220 8,869 8,878 424 8,454 Woodward 18,486 896 17,590 20,081 2,128 17,953 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 6 – Estimated Educational Attainment for Population 25 and Over (2005-2009) Less than HS Diploma HS graduate, GED, or alternative Some College Associate Degree Bachelor Degree Post Bachelor Degree United States Estimate 15.4% 29.3% 20.3% 7.4% 17.4% 10.1% MOE 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Oklahoma Estimate 15.2% 32.7% 23.0% 6.7% 15.1% 7.3% MOE 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% Region Estimate 14.7% 33.9% 24.2% 6.3% 14.8% 6.1% MOE 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% Alfalfa Estimate 16.9% 38.5% 24.3% 3.3% 11.6% 5.4% MOE 4.9% 3.0% 2.9% 1.2% 1.8% 3.9% Beaver Estimate 14.8% 38.0% 22.6% 5.4% 14.0% 5.2% MOE 3.9% 3.2% 3.0% 1.4% 1.8% 3.3% Beckham Estimate 18.6% 37.1% 20.6% 7.6% 10.9% 5.2% MOE 3.2% 3.2% 2.6% 1.5% 2.0% 1.7% Blaine Estimate 18.3% 39.5% 19.3% 6.9% 11.2% 5.0% MOE 2.7% 2.9% 2.4% 1.6% 1.9% 1.8% Canadian Estimate 9.7% 30.3% 27.6% 8.1% 17.6% 6.7% MOE 0.8% 1.2% 1.3% 0.7% 0.8% 0.5% Cimarron Estimate 20.9% 36.7% 19.6% 7.0% 13.6% 2.2% MOE 4.4% 4.5% 3.6% 2.6% 2.8% 1.0% Custer Estimate 17.3% 29.2% 25.7% 5.0% 13.5% 9.2% MOE 2.2% 2.3% 2.6% 1.1% 1.8% 1.5% Dewey Estimate 17.8% 45.2% 17.6% 4.2% 12.4% 2.8% MOE 4.8% 4.6% 2.8% 1.4% 2.4% 5.9% Less than HS Diploma HS graduate, GED, or alternative Some College Associate Degree Bachelor Degree Post Bachelor Degree Ellis Estimate 13.2% 37.4% 23.9% 2.8% 15.4% 7.3% MOE 4.6% 3.3% 3.1% 0.9% 2.5% 1.8% Garfield Estimate 14.1% 35.8% 21.9% 6.7% 15.1% 6.4% MOE 1.3% 1.5% 1.6% 0.9% 1.2% 0.8% Grant Estimate 9.6% 36.6% 25.1% 5.8% 16.2% 6.8% MOE 6.3% 3.4% 2.9% 1.4% 2.6% 1.7% Harper Estimate 17.2% 39.9% 19.7% 2.7% 15.4% 5.2% MOE 8.4% 4.1% 3.9% 1.3% 3.8% 8.0% Kingfisher Estimate 17.2% 35.2% 24.3% 7.1% 10.5% 5.8% MOE 2.7% 2.7% 2.8% 1.6% 1.8% 1.2% Major Estimate 14.6% 44.1% 23.5% 2.6% 10.9% 4.3% MOE 3.2% 3.2% 3.0% 0.9% 1.9% 1.2% Roger Mills Estimate 12.2% 37.7% 27.1% 5.1% 11.1% 6.8% MOE 7.2% 3.5% 3.7% 1.8% 1.9% 1.7% Texas Estimate 29.0% 28.8% 20.2% 4.0% 14.0% 4.0% MOE 3.3% 2.7% 2.1% 1.2% 1.7% 0.9% Woods Estimate 11.5% 34.3% 23.3% 2.7% 19.3% 9.0% MOE 3.7% 3.5% 3.1% 1.1% 2.8% 2.0% Woodward Estimate 19.3% 35.9% 24.9% 3.4% 12.5% 4.0% MOE 2.6% 2.4% 2.2% 1.2% 1.6% 1.3% Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.gov MOE= Margin of ErrorAPPENDIX 7 – Per Capita Personal Income (PCPI) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 United States $30,318 $31,145 $31,461 $32,271 $33,881 $35,424 $37,698 $39,461 $40,674 $39,635 Oklahoma $24,605 $26,218 $26,218 $26,909 $28,790 $30,469 $33,223 $34,539 $36,911 $35,837 Region $23,533 $24,641 $24,726 $26,112 $27,512 $28,924 $31,166 $32,743 $35,383 $33,640 Alfalfa $21,257 $22,070 $21,117 $23,719 $23,210 $23,022 $23,426 $24,359 $28,597 $25,074 Beaver $24,380 $26,313 $24,599 $26,149 $26,429 $28,690 $27,794 $30,317 $34,705 $32,774 Beckham $18,417 $20,166 $20,329 $22,099 $24,938 $26,866 $29,317 $31,046 $32,999 $31,084 Blaine $17,852 $18,094 $18,807 $20,384 $18,658 $20,101 $21,436 $21,310 $23,428 $22,134 Canadian $25,564 $26,432 $26,815 $27,628 $29,153 $30,676 $32,983 $34,646 $36,838 $36,325 Cimarron $22,056 $22,972 $24,251 $26,158 $26,340 $28,403 $26,247 $29,331 $35,834 $30,942 Custer $20,919 $22,166 $22,089 $23,276 $24,809 $26,385 $28,440 $30,195 $32,899 $31,350 Dewey $21,598 $23,252 $24,785 $27,572 $27,408 $28,611 $28,914 $31,583 $36,253 $31,790 Ellis $22,241 $25,102 $24,454 $26,585 $28,062 $29,387 $30,698 $31,887 $34,881 $30,318 Garfield $24,330 $25,229 $26,082 $27,558 $29,556 $30,509 $33,942 $36,060 $38,351 $36,772 Grant $24,008 $24,977 $26,164 $28,381 $32,473 $29,809 $32,199 $33,742 $39,908 $36,273 Harper $28,861 $32,493 $32,349 $34,647 $32,581 $35,556 $34,496 $33,050 $36,064 $33,917 Kingfisher $23,939 $25,558 $26,755 $27,928 $28,835 $31,230 $34,036 $35,823 $39,610 $35,924 Major $22,025 $23,137 $23,364 $25,500 $26,678 $28,070 $30,167 $30,937 $34,250 $31,295 Roger Mills $21,142 $23,089 $23,585 $24,336 $26,226 $27,312 $29,344 $34,277 $37,182 $34,739 Texas $29,259 $29,044 $24,952 $26,267 $27,196 $28,438 $29,169 $28,683 $30,170 $28,108 Woods $21,042 $22,404 $22,369 $25,711 $25,651 $24,932 $27,249 $28,762 $32,630 $30,208 Woodward $20,247 $22,396 $21,943 $22,934 $25,466 $28,266 $31,281 $33,148 $36,810 $32,383 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2APPENDIX 8 - Retail Sales Growth Rates: Communities Within The Region 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 Alfalfa County Aline 5.8% -14.4% -6.4% 27.0% 11.5% 0.9% -28.8% Burlington 8.8% 8.5% -4.3% 9.8% 15.3% -4.4% 39.0% Byron 19.3% -31.3% 8.9% 52.7% 31.8% -2.1% 57.5% Carmen 0.7% 7.9% 11.6% 4.0% 12.7% 3.9% -7.7% Cherokee 2.0% 0.1% 5.4% 4.9% 45.8% -13.6% -3.0% Goltry -10.4% 20.3% 0.6% 1.8% 40.8% -54.2% 110.5% Helena 1.4% -2.2% 15.7% 8.5% 33.4% 12.3% -12.4% Jet -10.1% 1.9% 27.7% -10.9% 31.1% -4.3% 7.8% Beaver County Beaver 0.4% 11.3% 25.2% -8.3% -0.1% -13.1% 18.7% Forgan -11.3% 2.9% 86.3% 22.7% -0.8% -18.2% -2.6% Knowles 53.9% -43.6% -21.2% -5.4% -46.1% 47.9% -8.4% Beckham County Carter 33.0% -17.2% -1.0% 91.4% -11.6% -16.0% -3.1% Elk City 14.5% 11.9% 14.8% 8.0% 13.8% -17.9% 8.1% Erick 8.9% -9.5% 15.5% 21.3% 0.4% -12.7% 6.9% Sayre -3.2% 0.2% 23.3% 28.9% -9.9% -12.9% 5.3% Blaine County Canton 0.9% -9.2% 15.4% -3.3% 19.5% 12.5% -7.2% Geary 4.3% -2.9% 1.2% 11.3% -6.4% 13.7% 6.7% Greenfield -31.2% 38.9% 7.9% 28.9% 194.2% 65.8% -83.2% Hitchcock 31.9% -1.3% -14.5% 39.8% 14.6% -3.5% 4.7% Hydro -2.8% 2.9% 22.7% 4.1% 7.4% 0.7% 7.8% Longdale 9.9% -12.0% 13.5% 15.7% 23.1% 1.2% -11.3% Okeene 9.1% 4.9% 4.0% 8.7% 3.1% 1.4% -6.5% Watonga -0.5% 5.6% -0.8% 1.8% 4.9% 0.3% -7.2% Watts 11.0% -7.2% -3.5% 13.7% 30.6% -5.9% 14.8% Canadian County Calumet 3.9% -13.8% 3.3% 8.6% 24.7% 66.4% 26.1% El Reno 5.6% 5.3% 7.5% 4.7% 9.0% -2.1% 8.1% Geary 4.3% -2.9% 1.2% 11.3% -6.4% 13.7% 6.7% 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 Mustang 24.9% 7.1% 6.7% 6.6% 10.7% 2.5% -0.4% Okarche 13.4% 10.9% -11.8% 31.3% 3.5% 3.7% 54.8% Piedmont 26.6% 7.7% 12.5% -1.7% 18.5% -0.8% 4.5% Union City 23.9% 29.1% 16.9% 2.8% -22.9% 1.9% 13.1% Yukon 4.9% 8.2% 2.8% 5.7% 6.5% 4.1% 1.4% Cimarron County Boise City 2.2% 2.2% 13.7% -13.2% 4.9% -2.5% 13.7% Keyes 4.1% -0.1% 9.2% -42.7% 23.2% -7.9% -23.4% Custer County Arapaho 19.0% -4.5% 2.7% 16.9% 40.7% -48.6% -18.6% Butler 17.4% 5.9% -5.4% 8.1% 138.6% -34.5% -19.3% Clinton 8.9% 7.3% 4.2% 9.8% 9.3% -7.0% -0.7% Custer City 10.9% 15.1% -14.6% 24.3% 2.4% -4.0% 15.7% Hammon -10.0% -7.8% -3.1% -1.1% 58.2% -55.7% 43.4% Thomas -4.5% 15.5% -3.2% 12.9% 15.4% -13.7% 10.8% Weatherford 7.4% 5.1% 2.0% 12.8% 4.4% -2.5% 7.5% Dewey County Camargo 15.4% -21.1% -5.5% 146.5% -39.1% 16.1% 62.2% Leedey 8.8% 16.8% 3.9% 6.3% -3.1% 3.8% 10.4% Seiling 5.0% -4.6% 3.7% 12.9% 19.6% -7.0% 16.9% Taloga 6.0% -3.2% 32.2% -29.9% -0.1% -17.7% 183.0% Vici 5.5% 1.3% 5.2% 19.4% 9.2% -3.3% 16.4% Ellis County Arnett 5.0% -0.8% 6.5% 40.0% 27.0% -15.1% 37.2% Fargo 9.7% -18.1% -11.7% 34.9% 108.2% -16.1% -30.0% Gage 3.8% -10.2% 41.0% 0.5% 10.8% -2.1% 15.9% Shattuck 5.7% 8.4% 9.1% 18.0% 9.8% -8.1% 16.6% Garfield County Covington 1.8% -13.8% 1.6% 9.2% 1.7% -4.2% 7.7% Douglas 8.5% 68.2% -14.8% 3.8% 36.9% -22.3% 2.0% Drummond 7.5% 34.1% 5.4% -9.1% 130.3% -0.9% -47.7% Enid 4.5% 5.8% 4.2% 6.3% 8.9% -5.1% -0.2% Fairmont 35.1% -6.3% 15.4% -4.5% 13.9% 2.6% -10.5% Garber 31.4% -20.9% -3.1% 9.2% 2.3% 8.8% -1.7% 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 Hillsdale 67.7% 185.0% -44.7% 8.3% 30.6% -5.9% 0.4% Hunter 1.5% 0.8% -2.2% 15.0% 33.4% 15.7% -15.5% Kremlin 16.1% -22.8% 32.9% 28.4% 7.0% -5.2% 3.2% Lahoma -2.1% -1.1% 1.2% 3.7% 9.3% 23.8% -26.0% North Enid 14.5% 5.6% 18.6% -4.8% 12.2% -4.0% -4.8% Waukomis 1.0% 7.5% 20.3% -2.9% 24.4% -8.4% -8.1% Grant County Deer Creek 13.5% -0.1% -9.3% 26.9% -7.1% 15.4% -14.6% Lamont 1.3% 9.3% 29.7% -11.1% 17.5% -1.6% 3.4% Medford 3.3% -1.5% 5.7% 1.3% 9.2% 0.9% 22.6% Nash 2.2% 69.4% -17.4% -3.7% 4.6% 4.7% -0.1% Pond Creek 0.3% 5.9% 3.2% 2.1% 18.2% 8.7% 0.8% Renfrow 80.9% 10.1% 45.2% 5.1% 26.5% 21.1% 26.2% Wakita 4.3% -0.1% 6.3% -11.4% 17.0% -7.2% 22.3% Harper County Buffalo 4.1% -5.5% 18.4% 7.9% 22.7% -5.6% 7.6% Laverne 1.6% 5.5% 7.8% 7.7% 6.1% 2.7% 9.7% May 77.0% -42.3% 0.5% 134.1% 7.1% 0.9% -22.5% Kingfisher County Cashion -35.5% 21.7% 24.2% 14.6% 14.0% -18.3% 4.5% Dover 7.8% -0.1% 16.0% 4.0% -1.9% 6.5% -5.3% Hennessey 1.9% 10.7% 12.2% -2.0% 21.7% -17.4% 4.2% Kingfisher 6.4% 23.1% -10.1% 25.0% 0.9% -1.4% 0.9% Loyal 3.9% 7.0% 6.4% -7.3% -14.5% 14.2% -1.0% Okarche 13.4% 10.9% -11.8% 31.3% 3.5% 3.7% 54.8% Piedmont 26.6% 7.7% 12.5% -1.7% 18.5% -0.8% 4.5% Major County Ames 37.1% -8.5% 21.4% 16.8% 4.5% -19.3% 8.4% Cleo Springs -2.7% 6.1% 17.8% -4.0% 13.4% 6.0% -5.7% Fairview 2.6% 5.9% 10.8% 13.7% 8.3% -7.7% -5.0% Meno -4.9% 8.1% 2.1% 7.4% 8.5% -5.8% 0.5% Ringwood 10.9% 14.6% 1.0% 15.2% 2.1% -21.4% -7.8% Roger Mills County Cheyenne 2.1% 8.3% 9.8% -8.3% -23.1% -35.3% 36.3% 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 Hammon -10.0% -7.8% -3.1% -1.1% 58.2% -55.7% 43.4% Reydon 2.2% -0.5% 21.6% -31.5% 6.5% 61.8% 14.8% Texas County Goodwell -1.8% -8.3% 10.3% -10.3% -3.3% 7.3% 2.8% Guymon 6.9% -2.0% 8.3% 6.0% 10.9% -4.8% -0.6% Hardesty 6.4% 14.1% 10.4% -8.5% 22.6% -21.1% 8.5% Hooker -6.4% -1.2% -1.7% 9.5% 12.2% 18.4% -1.1% Texhoma -6.6% 6.3% 0.4% -16.6% 6.2% 0.4% 11.3% Tyrone -22.3% -9.5% 8.7% 11.2% -10.3% -27.4% -4.9% Woods County Alva 2.4% 5.1% -1.2% 13.7% 13.1% -5.1% -1.9% Freedom 11.0% 21.8% 35.9% 52.2% 77.6% -41.0% -32.8% Waynoka 6.7% 10.8% 8.0% 14.7% 7.0% -12.1% -4.3% Woodward County Fort Supply 5.5% 12.3% 8.2% 8.6% 21.3% -14.3% -16.9% Mooreland -1.1% 5.4% 32.1% 9.5% 10.9% -13.6% -9.2% Woodward 8.5% 8.5% 17.2% 6.3% 6.0% -15.7% 5.4% APPENDIX 9 – Estimated Retail Sales Subject to Tax 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Alfalfa County Aline 703,833 602,279 563,816 715,871 797,877 805,361 573,669 Burlington 743,492 806,624 772,119 847,554 976,835 933,962 1,297,956 Byron 97,078 66,741 72,710 111,042 146,348 143,225 225,637 Carmen 1,290,792 1,392,728 1,554,856 1,616,993 1,823,122 1,894,650 1,748,308 Cherokee 10,680,726 10,694,757 11,271,026 11,827,181 17,247,914 14,896,725 14,456,945 Goltry 525,220 631,902 635,855 647,021 911,090 417,525 879,026 Helena 2,532,807 2,477,479 2,867,495 3,112,058 4,150,366 4,662,661 4,083,360 Jet 941,954 959,604 1,225,232 1,091,188 1,430,286 1,368,267 1,474,515 Beaver County Beaver 12,177,603 13,549,799 16,963,949 15,557,823 15,549,718 13,515,404 16,043,284 Forgan 1,045,391 1,075,232 2,003,217 2,458,282 2,438,117 1,993,650 1,941,924 Knowles 172,932 97,459 76,774 72,645 39,184 57,952 53,094 Beckham County Carter 1,009,112 835,567 827,283 1,583,209 1,399,444 1,175,025 1,138,822 Elk City 195,677,772 218,946,775 251,434,278 271,651,517 309,136,966 253,944,662 274,441,983 Erick 6,630,305 5,997,552 6,925,989 8,401,047 8,438,511 7,370,969 7,883,027 Sayre 27,174,336 27,240,464 33,576,994 43,285,780 39,000,340 33,965,547 35,782,348 Blaine County Canton 5,180,436 4,704,239 5,427,730 5,246,031 6,268,659 7,054,111 6,545,415 Geary 11,431,317 11,103,614 11,240,276 12,505,888 11,700,041 13,305,573 14,198,533 Greenfield 190,334 264,332 285,182 367,462 1,081,239 1,792,684 300,723 Hitchcock 236,541 233,392 199,536 278,995 319,865 308,624 323,174 Hydro 3,756,367 3,866,518 4,745,053 4,938,098 5,301,943 5,338,847 5,753,268 Longdale 1,272,706 1,119,492 1,270,374 1,469,355 1,809,238 1,831,200 1,624,820 Okeene 7,220,121 7,570,968 7,875,500 8,559,024 8,825,034 8,952,218 8,374,413 Watonga 29,763,111 31,415,720 31,154,224 31,730,515 33,296,866 33,395,088 31,003,790 Watts 746,795 692,697 668,468 760,306 992,945 934,125 1,072,546 Canadian County Calumet 3,210,359 2,767,117 2,857,994 3,102,798 3,867,962 6,434,366 8,114,999 El Reno 142,103,030 149,650,833 160,867,718 168,469,349 183,691,609 179,762,812 194,348,305 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Geary 11,431,317 11,103,614 11,240,276 12,505,888 11,700,041 13,305,573 14,198,533 Mustang 135,266,224 144,899,063 154,641,721 164,896,884 182,566,630 187,181,701 186,476,039 Okarche 9,489,077 10,527,751 9,287,327 12,194,378 12,624,674 13,087,902 20,255,050 Piedmont 20,067,280 21,603,834 24,315,011 23,897,319 28,307,096 28,085,341 29,359,335 Union City 2,524,490 3,258,406 3,810,336 3,918,088 3,020,215 3,077,141 3,480,830 Yukon 296,392,778 320,755,090 329,651,270 348,386,189 371,031,993 386,185,752 391,650,984 Cimarron County Boise City 10,613,313 10,841,848 12,330,987 10,700,757 11,224,555 10,941,213 12,444,385 Keyes 1,227,268 1,226,079 1,338,972 767,135 945,166 870,187 666,871 Custer County Arapaho 3,488,906 3,330,493 3,421,979 3,999,384 5,625,169 2,892,219 2,354,517 Butler 1,769,348 1,873,120 1,771,304 1,914,986 4,569,034 2,994,794 2,416,858 Clinton 100,091,926 107,391,285 111,931,715 122,952,776 134,421,083 125,062,602 124,151,861 Custer City 1,339,453 1,541,578 1,317,018 1,636,996 1,676,767 1,608,991 1,861,727 Hammon 3,716,114 3,425,382 3,318,031 3,280,721 5,189,058 2,297,827 3,294,615 Thomas 5,568,777 6,430,659 6,221,842 7,026,554 8,110,810 6,999,524 7,752,187 Weatherford 131,423,235 138,120,977 140,832,040 158,894,565 165,945,524 161,743,831 173,888,333 Dewey County Camargo 648,726 512,068 483,794 1,192,374 725,683 842,666 1,366,410 Leedey 2,877,564 3,362,114 3,494,187 3,714,783 3,599,829 3,738,020 4,127,846 Seiling 9,083,775 8,664,367 8,987,964 10,149,143 12,137,793 11,284,479 13,193,190 Taloga 2,166,305 2,097,690 2,773,068 1,943,893 1,941,175 1,598,538 4,524,661 Vici 3,943,024 3,994,150 4,200,151 5,014,801 5,474,093 5,295,622 6,166,388 Ellis County Arnett 3,462,629 3,433,771 3,656,888 5,121,036 6,503,176 5,524,098 7,578,392 Fargo 930,025 761,833 672,637 907,151 1,888,869 1,584,564 1,109,520 Gage 1,554,701 1,395,909 1,968,492 1,978,189 2,191,966 2,145,472 2,487,141 Shattuck 10,270,726 11,134,332 12,146,184 14,338,541 15,750,426 14,482,247 16,886,459 Garfield County Covington 1,808,266 1,558,634 1,583,408 1,729,056 1,757,798 1,684,241 1,813,679 Douglas 111,630 187,739 160,005 166,098 227,313 176,612 180,108 Drummond 730,160 979,495 1,031,909 937,927 2,159,680 2,139,377 1,118,239 Enid 567,494,250 600,554,052 625,708,742 665,315,507 724,748,602 687,784,666 686,233,544 Fairmont 356,679 334,290 385,844 368,519 419,603 430,332 385,032 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Garber 3,795,759 3,001,912 2,907,703 3,175,344 3,247,273 3,532,391 3,470,876 Hillsdale 121,085 345,037 190,847 206,780 270,063 254,194 255,191 Hunter 337,572 340,427 332,895 382,890 510,779 590,917 499,098 Kremlin 1,025,008 791,178 1,051,802 1,350,782 1,444,793 1,369,480 1,413,819 Lahoma 2,355,300 2,330,121 2,357,644 2,445,845 2,673,901 3,311,296 2,448,896 North Enid 2,241,526 2,365,933 2,805,392 2,669,673 2,995,870 2,876,540 2,739,110 Waukomis 2,930,614 3,150,628 3,789,338 3,681,265 4,578,220 4,192,300 3,851,799 Grant County Deer Creek 446,787 446,121 404,470 513,439 476,928 550,346 469,738 Lamont 1,310,469 1,432,664 1,858,835 1,651,956 1,941,263 1,910,581 1,975,486 Medford 6,915,983 6,815,057 7,206,191 7,299,180 7,967,360 8,037,069 9,855,648 Nash 866,275 1,467,077 1,212,503 1,167,897 1,222,104 1,279,861 1,278,349 Pond Creek 3,429,448 3,632,153 3,747,610 3,825,572 4,522,589 4,914,197 4,953,508 Renfrow 61,775 68,018 98,738 103,797 131,319 158,972 200,631 Wakita 1,355,188 1,354,014 1,439,289 1,275,780 1,492,237 1,384,121 1,692,279 Harper County Buffalo 5,917,194 5,591,769 6,622,830 7,146,243 8,766,641 8,278,346 8,910,486 Laverne 8,395,773 8,854,917 9,545,244 10,275,696 10,903,926 11,199,683 12,287,424 May 223,075 128,638 129,322 302,742 324,199 327,055 253,582 Kingfisher County Cashion 1,914,883 2,330,243 2,894,774 3,318,141 3,782,131 3,091,619 3,232,020 Dover 1,839,943 1,838,382 2,131,662 2,217,731 2,174,698 2,316,560 2,193,956 Hennessey 18,109,577 20,055,124 22,496,862 22,054,021 26,832,124 22,170,778 23,098,066 Kingfisher 55,965,382 68,873,898 61,951,271 77,428,146 78,092,687 77,006,482 77,722,663 Loyal 333,545 356,840 379,567 351,741 300,802 343,424 339,978 Okarche 9,489,077 10,527,751 9,287,327 12,194,378 12,624,674 13,087,902 20,255,050 Piedmont 20,067,280 21,603,834 24,315,011 23,897,319 28,307,096 28,085,341 29,359,335 Major County Ames 1,504,888 1,376,828 1,671,847 1,952,531 2,039,966 1,645,298 1,782,870 Cleo Springs 1,288,615 1,366,967 1,609,644 1,545,825 1,753,197 1,858,765 1,753,311 Fairview 27,140,956 28,734,738 31,828,586 36,178,912 39,171,762 36,173,365 34,361,891 Meno 1,390,430 1,503,246 1,534,374 1,648,467 1,788,029 1,685,102 1,693,653 Ringwood 4,140,032 4,743,114 4,788,840 5,518,420 5,635,806 4,428,014 4,081,667 Roger Mills 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 County Cheyenne 16,380,430 17,739,051 19,470,629 17,853,356 13,721,112 8,884,219 12,105,501 Hammon 3,716,114 3,425,382 3,318,031 3,280,721 5,189,058 2,297,827 3,294,615 Reydon 802,478 798,851 971,293 665,532 709,038 1,147,089 1,316,552 Texas County Goodwell 2,494,395 2,287,717 2,522,316 2,262,854 2,188,786 2,348,037 2,413,164 Guymon 115,890,099 113,616,186 123,058,550 130,411,073 144,615,869 137,657,646 136,778,305 Hardesty 410,879 468,617 517,192 473,439 580,342 458,174 497,086 Hooker 7,100,965 7,018,113 6,900,946 7,554,384 8,473,709 10,029,559 9,920,218 Texhoma 4,905,438 5,214,799 5,235,757 4,364,519 4,634,601 4,654,811 5,181,661 Tyrone 1,636,370 1,480,888 1,609,202 1,789,608 1,605,684 1,165,965 1,108,504 Woods County Alva 59,805,452 62,834,588 62,062,797 70,552,933 79,769,323 75,673,724 74,263,280 Freedom 869,481 1,058,815 1,438,661 2,189,375 3,889,011 2,293,185 1,541,867 Waynoka 8,016,435 8,885,803 9,600,806 11,009,684 11,781,629 10,350,748 9,910,423 Woodward County Fort Supply 893,793 1,003,704 1,085,583 1,178,859 1,429,966 1,225,818 1,019,012 Mooreland 4,821,186 5,079,595 6,707,809 7,344,207 8,146,967 7,040,864 6,394,514 Woodward 218,136,677 236,648,341 277,345,368 294,833,223 312,384,642 263,347,489 277,537,582 Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html APPENDIX 10 – Annual County Unemployment Rates 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 United States 4.0% 4.7% 5.8% 6.0% 5.5% 5.1% 4.6% 4.6% 5.8% 9.3% 9.6% Oklahoma 3.1% 3.7% 4.8% 5.6% 5.0% 4.5% 4.1% 4.1% 3.7% 6.6% 7.1% Region 2.6% 3.0% 4.0% 4.4% 3.8% 3.6% 3.3% 3.2% 2.8% 5.2% 5.4% Alfalfa 3.0% 3.0% 3.6% 4.1% 3.9% 4.4% 4.3% 4.4% 3.1% 5.0% 5.6% Beaver 2.4% 2.6% 3.5% 3.9% 3.5% 3.3% 2.7% 2.6% 2.0% 3.6% 3.6% Beckham 3.2% 3.2% 4.3% 3.8% 3.3% 3.1% 2.7% 2.4% 2.3% 6.1% 5.3% Blaine 2.9% 4.4% 4.8% 5.0% 4.7% 4.9% 4.3% 4.2% 3.6% 5.8% 7.8% Canadian 2.4% 3.1% 4.3% 4.8% 4.1% 3.7% 3.5% 3.8% 3.4% 5.8% 5.9% Cimarron 2.2% 2.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.1% 3.5% 3.4% 3.8% 3.0% 3.9% 4.1% Custer 2.5% 3.1% 3.5% 3.7% 3.3% 3.2% 3.1% 3.0% 2.6% 4.8% 5.0% Dewey 2.7% 2.8% 3.8% 3.7% 3.2% 3.4% 3.1% 3.0% 2.4% 4.5% 4.3% Ellis 2.7% 2.7% 3.5% 3.0% 2.8% 3.0% 2.8% 2.4% 2.2% 4.7% 4.5% Garfield 2.8% 3.1% 3.6% 4.2% 3.7% 3.6% 3.1% 2.9% 2.5% 4.5% 4.9% Grant 2.5% 2.8% 3.5% 3.8% 3.6% 3.7% 3.8% 3.2% 2.5% 3.9% 4.3% Harper 2.1% 2.9% 3.4% 3.7% 3.1% 3.0% 3.2% 2.8% 2.2% 4.1% 4.2% Kingfisher 2.2% 2.4% 3.3% 3.4% 3.3% 3.3% 2.8% 2.6% 2.3% 4.6% 4.9% Major 2.4% 2.8% 3.4% 3.6% 3.3% 3.3% 2.9% 2.8% 2.3% 4.6% 4.7% Roger Mills 2.5% 2.4% 3.3% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.7% 2.7% 2.3% 4.7% 4.2% Texas 2.6% 2.7% 3.4% 3.6% 3.4% 3.7% 3.4% 3.1% 2.7% 5.4% 5.8% Woods 2.5% 2.7% 8.3% 9.7% 7.2% 6.9% 5.7% 5.9% 2.8% 4.4% 4.4% Woodward 3.0% 2.9% 4.2% 4.5% 3.7% 3.4% 2.7% 2.6% 2.2% 6.4% 6.0% Sources: US unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=ln State and County unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=la
Click tabs to swap between content that is broken into logical sections.
Okla State Agency |
Commerce, Oklahoma Department of |
Okla Agency Code | '160' |
Title | Northwest regional profile |
Authors | Oklahoma. Department of Commerce. Policy, Research & Economic Analysis. |
Publisher | Oklahoma Department of Commerce |
Publication Date | 2011-06 |
Publication type | Statistics |
Subject |
Oklahoma--Economic conditions. Oklahoma--Population. |
Purpose | compilation of demographic information for Alfalfa, Beaver, Beckham, Blaine, Canadian, Cimarron, Custer, Dewey, Ellis, Garfield, Grant, Harper, Kingfisher, Major, Roger Mills, Texas, Woods, and Woodward counties |
Contents | Population Growth Rates: 1990 to 2015; Age by Gender: 2010; Racial Mix: 2000 and 2010; Hispanic Ethnicity: 2000 and 2010; Educational Attainment: 2005-2009; Per Capita Personal Income: 1990 to 2009; Estimated Retail: 2004 to 2010; Industry Employment, Establishments and Earnings: 2010; Industry Competitiveness: 2010; Labor Force Participation Rate: 1990 to 2010; Unemployment Rate: 1990 to 2010; Commuting Patterns: 2009; Appendix 1- Population Growth Trends; Appendix 2 - Age Groupings; Appendix 3 - 2000 Census Population By Race; Appendix 4 - 2010 Census Population By Race; Appendix 5 - Population by Hispanic Ethnicity; Appendix 6 - Estimated Educational Attainment for Population 25 and Over (2005-2009); Appendix 7 - Per Capita Personal Income (PCPI); Appendix 8 - Retail Sales Growth Rates: Communities Within The Region; Appendix 9 - Estimated Retail Sales Subject to Tax; Appendix 10 - Annual County Unemployment Rates |
OkDocs Class# | C3935.3 R336nw 2011 |
Digital Format | PDF, Adobe Reader required |
ODL electronic copy | Downloaded from agency website: http://www.okcommerce.gov/Data-And-Research/Downloads/Regional-Profiles/Keynote-Northwest-Regional-Profile |
Rights and Permissions | This Oklahoma state government publication is provided for educational purposes under U.S. copyright law. Other usage requires permission of copyright holders. |
Language | English |
Full text | Northwest Regional Profi le June 2 0 11 P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s Page 1 Texas Beaver Harper Woods Dewey Ellis Woodward Blaine Major Grant Garfield Kingfisher Alfalfa Roger Mills Custer Beckham Canadian Cimarron County Border County Seat Metropolitan Statistical Area Cities with population over 5,000 Cities with population 3,000 - 5,000 Career Technology Centers Higher Education C Guymon Alva Enid Kingfisher Oklahoma City Watonga Clinton Weatherford Woodward Elk City Sayre C C C C Fairview C C Omega C Sources: Cities with population over 3,000 - U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 Census http://www.okcommerce.gov/data Career Technology Centers - OK Dept. of Career and Technology Education http://www.okcareertech.org Higher Education - OK State Regents For Higher Education http://www.okhighered.org For a detailed interactive map showing lakes, roads, rail, hospitals and more cities, go to: http://stateok.zoomprospector.com/ Goodwell OK Panhandle State University Northern OK College Northwestern OK State University Northwestern OK State University Northwestern OK State University High Plains Tech Ctr. Northwest Tech Ctr. Autry Tech Ctr. Northwest Tech Ctr. Chisholm Trail Tech Ctr. Western Tech Ctr. Western Tech Ctr. Mustang Yukon El Reno Piedmont C Canadian Valley Tech Ctr. Redlands Community College Boise City Beaver Buffalo Arnett Cheyenne Arapaho Taloga Cherokee Medford Policy, Research & Economic Analysis NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 2TexasBeaverHarperWoodsDeweyWoodwardEllisBlaineMajorGrantGarfieldKingfisherAlfalfaRogerMillsCusterBeckhamCanadianCimarronKEY200 Population (308,650 people in NW Region)2010 Population (344,385 people in NW Region)Change: -21.4%10002000300040005000Source: U.S. Census Bureau - 2000 Census and 2010 CensusChange: 6.1%10002000300040005000Change: 3.5%10002000300040005000Change: 1.9%10002000300040005000Change: -12.0%10002000300040005000Change: 1.4%10002000300040005000Change: -3.8%20003000400050006000Change: -7.6%20003000400050006000Change: -0.2%50006000700080009000Change: 11.7%22000240002600028000300001800019000200002100022000Change: 5.1%Change: -0.3%1000011000120001300014000Change: 8.0%1200013000140001500016000Change: 31.8%8200091000100000109000118000Change: 2.7%18000190002000021000220001700018000190002000021000Change: 8.6%Change: -2.3%600070008000900010000Change: 4.8%5300055000570005900061000 POPULATION GROWTH RATES: 1990 TO 2010 • In 2010, the population in this 18 county region totaled 344,385 people, representing 9.2% of the state’s total population • The region’s population has grown at an average annual 1.8% rate over the last 5 years but growth has not been uniform • Canadian and Beckham counties showed 3.5% annual growth rates between 2005 and 2010 while Alfalfa, Blaine, Cimarron and Grant counties all showed net population declines • Overall, the region is forecast to experience increasing population growth over the next five years, led primarily by growth in Canadian CountyP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 3 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census and 2010 Census • Between 2000 and 2010, 23 counties in Oklahoma had negative population growth rates; 7 of those counties were in this region • Over the full decade, Canadian County had the highest average annual population growth rate (2.8%) in the state • For more information on county level population growth since 1990, see Appendix 1 • Numeric growth was led by population increases in Canadian, Beckham and Garfield counties o Canadian County added 27,844 people between 2000 and 2010 o Beckham County added 2,320 people during the same time period o Garfield County added 2,767 people o The growth in these three counties represents 92% of the region’s growth during the past decade Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 4 AGE BY GENDER: 2010 • Some notable differences stand out when 2010 population data for the region is compared against the state as a whole • The region showed a higher presence among males aged 25 to 59 • There was a higher presence of children aged 0 to 4 • There was a lower presence of females aged 15 to 69 • Texas and Custer counties both show a young median age • The median age for 11 counties in the region exceeds the US median age • For more information on county level population by age group, see Appendix 2 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 5 RACIAL MIX: 2000 AND 2010 • The standard race categories used for Census purposes are white, black, American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN), Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NHOPI), or some other race • Hispanic is not considered a race but is instead an ethnicity – it is possible to be white and Hispanic, black and Hispanic, Asian and Hispanic, etc. • Between 2000 and 2010, the region became slightly more racially diverse than it was in 2000 • The region remains less diverse than the state as a whole: 83.6% of the region was white alone in 2010, while 72.2% of the state’s population fit that category • Over 90% of the population of Ellis, Grant and Major counties were categorized as “white alone” • Much of the region’s net population growth was accounted for by increases among those reporting to be some other race alone or more than one race alone • Some other race alone represented the largest minority by race in 11 of the region’s 18 counties (5.3% of the region as a whole) • American Indians were the largest minority by race in 5 counties (3.7% of the region’s population) • Blacks were the largest minority group by race in 2 counties (2.4% for the region) • For more information on county level population by race, see Appendices 3 and 4 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 6 HISPANIC ETHNICITY: 2000 AND 2010 • The region’s percentage of Hispanics grew closer to the national percentage moving from a 5.9% difference in 2000 to a 4.8% difference in 2010 • Half of the region’s 18 counties had Hispanic percentages in double digits, with four exceeding 20%: Beaver (20.1%), Blaine (24.1%), Cimarron (20.8%) and Texas (42.0%) • Grant County had the region’s lowest Hispanic presence by number and percentage (3.5%, or 158 people) • Between 2000 and 2010, the Hispanic growth rate for all but two counties in the region exceeded the national Hispanic growth rate • For more information on county level population by Hispanic ethnicity, see Appendix 5 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 7 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT: 2005-2009 • Woods County, home to North Western Oklahoma State University, was the only county that exceeded the national estimate for the percentage of the population with a bachelor’s degree or higher at 28.2% (+/- 3.5%) • 13 of the 18 counties met or exceeded the national estimate for the percentage of the population with some college education but no degree o Region: 24.2% (+/-0.6%) o OK: 23.0% (+/-0.2%) o US: 20.3% (+/-0.0%) • Almost half of adults in the region have a high school diploma or less education • The 2005-2009 American Community Survey is based on surveys collected during the full 5 year span and results are considered to be representative of the complete time period • For more information on county level population by educational attainment, see Appendix 6 Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.gov Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 8 PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME: 1990 TO 2009 • Per Capita Personal Income (PCPI) for the nation, state and region steadily climbed upward until 2009 when the impact of the global recession caused wages to decline o 2009 PCPI: US: $39,635 OK: $35,837 Region: $33,640 • Collectively, the region’s PCPI has been below state and national figures • Since 2000, Harper County is the only county in the region to exceed the state PCPI, last doing so in 2005 • In 2009, no counties matched the national PCPI, and only 4 counties exceeded the state’s PCPI: o OK: $35,837 o Canadian: $36,325 o Garfield: $36,772 o Grant: $36,273 o Kingfisher: $35,924 • For more information on PCPI, see Appendix 7 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2 P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 9 ESTIMATED RETAIL SUBJECT TO SALES TAX: 2004-2010 2004-2010 Estimated Retail Subject to Sales Tax For 20 Largest Communities Based on 2010 Population (In Thousands of Dollars) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 BEAVER Beaver 12,178 13,550 16,964 15,558 15,550 13,515 16,043 BECKHAM Elk City 195,678 218,947 251,434 271,652 309,137 253,945 274,442 Sayre 27,174 27,240 33,577 43,286 39,000 33,966 35,782 BLAINE Watonga 29,763 31,416 31,154 31,731 33,297 33,395 31,004 CANADIAN El Reno 142,103 149,651 160,868 168,469 183,692 179,763 194,348 Mustang 135,266 144,899 154,642 164,897 182,567 187,182 186,476 Piedmont 20,067 21,604 24,315 23,897 28,307 28,085 29,359 Union City 2,524 3,258 3,810 3,918 3,020 3,077 3,481 Yukon 296,393 320,755 329,651 348,386 371,032 386,186 391,651 CUSTER Clinton 100,092 107,391 111,932 122,953 134,421 125,063 124,152 Weatherford 131,423 138,121 140,832 158,895 165,946 161,744 173,888 GARFIELD Enid 567,494 600,554 625,709 665,316 724,749 687,785 686,234 KINGFISHER Hennessey 18,110 20,055 22,497 22,054 26,832 22,171 23,098 Kingfisher 55,965 68,874 61,951 77,428 78,093 77,006 77,723 Piedmont 20,067 21,604 24,315 23,897 28,307 28,085 29,359 MAJOR Fairview 27,141 28,735 31,829 36,179 39,172 36,173 34,362 TEXAS Guymon 115,890 113,616 123,059 130,411 144,616 137,658 136,778 Hooker 7,101 7,018 6,901 7,554 8,474 10,030 9,920 WOODS Alva 59,805 62,835 62,063 70,553 79,769 75,674 74,263 WOODWARD Woodward 218,137 236,648 277,345 294,833 312,385 263,347 277,538 Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 10 • Retail sales figures used here are based on a summation of calendar month data as reported by the Oklahoma Tax Commission • Because those data are subject to a reporting time lag, these figures are considered estimates • Figures represent estimated sales subject to sales tax, thus sales to governments, non-profits, and other non-taxable entities are not included in these figures • Changes in retail sales could be due to: o The introduction or removal of a local sales tax o The increase or reduction of an existing sales tax o Sharp upswings or downturns in economic conditions o The opening or closing of a significant retail establishment such as A big-box retailer A large shopping mall • Collectively, retail sales trended upward until 2008, peaking at $3.24 billion for the region • As the global recession spread in 2009, collective retail sales for the region dropped to $3.06 billion • Retail sales rebounded somewhat in 2010, reaching $3.15 billion within the region • In 2010, the largest volume of estimated retail sales occurred in Enid, Yukon, Woodward and Elk City. These four communities accounted for just over half of the region’s estimated retail sales volume in 2010 • For more information on local level sales tax collections and growth, see Appendices 8 and 9 Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 11 INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT, ESTABLISHMENTS, AND EARNINGS: 2010 • The following graphs use data from EMSI, which defines industry employment differently from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). BLS reports job counts only for establishments with an employer/employee relationship which excludes non-employer establishments like sole proprietorships and partnerships • EMSI includes data from both employer AND non-employer establishments • The Northwest region had 10,088 establishments operating in 2010 Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 12 • The region had a higher percentage of mining, quarrying and oil and gas establishments; government; transportation & warehousing; construction; agriculture; retail trade; and utilities establishments than did the state or nation • Retail, construction and government combined to equal just under one third of all establishments in the region in 2010 • As a percentage, jobs in agriculture and mining are more prevalent in the region than is the case statewide or nationally • Government jobs include federal, state, local and Tribal employment • In 2010, Canadian County was home for 23.8% of all jobs in the region Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.com Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 13 Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.com Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 14 • Industry Location Quotient (LQ) compares the following: 1. Changes in employment 2. For a given industry 3. During a given time period 4. In a given area, against another reference area • A score of 1.0 or higher indicates competitive advantage • The LQ chart compares industries at the 2 digit NAICS level for: o Oklahoma and the 18 county region against the nation as a whole o Based on 2010 data • Every county in the region showed a national competitive advantage in: o Mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction o Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting • Many had an advantage in: o Utilities (all but Blaine, Cimarron, Dewey, Ellis, Grant, Roger Mills and Woods) Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 15 Additional Competitive Advantages At The County Level County Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation & Warehousing Information Finance & Insurance Real Estate and Leasing Management of Companies Administrative Support Health Care & Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Accommodation and Food Services Other Services Alfalfa X Beaver X Beckham X X X X Blaine X X Canadian X X X X X X Cimarron X X X X Custer X X X X Dewey X X Ellis X Garfield X X Grant X X X X Harper X Kingfisher X X Major X Roger Mills X Texas X X X X X Woods X Woodward X X X Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 16 LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE: 1990 TO 2010 • The labor force participation rate is calculated by dividing the non-farm labor force by the total population • The measure isn’t exact (because total population includes those unable to work due to age, health, or other issues while the labor force count doesn’t include farm labor) but inputs are consistent over time, thus the measure indicates trends • The region’s non-farm labor force participation rate had been trending upwards, but dropped off in 2009 and again in 2010 • All but 4 counties in the region exceed the labor force participation rate for the state and nation • Between 2000 and 2009, 5 counties in the region experienced a double digit increase in their labor force participation rates (Beaver: 12.4%, Beckham: 13.3%, Dewey: 13.9%, Ellis: 10.6%, and Grant 11.8%) • Between 2000 and 2009, an across the board drop in participation occurred as 15 of 18 counties showed a decline in their labor force participation rates and those with an increase only grew marginally Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tables Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tables Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tablesP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 17 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 1990 TO 2010 • Over the last two decades, unemployment rates for the region have been below the state and national rates • After the onset of the recent recession, unemployment rates rose sharply • 2010 annualized unemployment rates: o US: 9.6% o OK: 7.1% o Region: 5.4% • Between 2008 and 2010, Blaine County had the largest increase in the unemployment rate for the region, climbing by 4.2 percentage points • Blaine County is the only county in the region with an April 2011 unemployment rate that exceeds the state rate • For more information on county level unemployment rates, see Appendix 10 Sources: US unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=ln State and County unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=la Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics www.bls.gov/lau/#tables P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE Page 18 COMMUTING PATTERNS: 2009 • A region is a net worker exporter when the number of residents living in the region who commute out for work exceeds the number of workers who live outside the region but commute into the region for employment • Census data for 2009 indicates the region had a net outflow of over 27,000 workers • Canadian County had the largest net outflow (net outflow of over 22,200 workers) followed by Blaine (net outflow of over 1,400 workers) • 4 counties showed a net inflow of workers: o Beckham: net inflow of over 700 – over 450 from outside the region o Custer: net inflow of over 1,500 – almost 1,300 from outside the region o Garfield: net inflow of over 300 – over 1,000 coming from inside the region offset by another almost 700 leaving the region o Texas: net inflow of almost 900 – all from outside the region • Almost 6,200 residents of the region commuted outside the state for employment o Workers who commute just over the state line o Long haul truck drivers o Commercial pilots o Petroleum workers o Entertainers • Over 1,000 residents of Texas and Beaver counties commuted to Seward County, KS for employment • Just over 4,200 out of state residents commuted into the region for employment • Over 500 residents of Seward County, KS commute into Texas County for work Source: US Census Bureau, LEHD Program and OnTheMap http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/ Source: US Census Bureau, LEHD Program and OnTheMap http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/ APPENDIX 1 – Population Growth Trends 1990 to 2000 2000-2010 2005-2010 Total Population: 2010 Census Count Pop Change Avg. Annual Growth Pop Change Avg. Annual Growth Pop Change Avg. Annual Growth United States 309,050,816 31,292,600 1.3% 27,626,216 1.0% 13,432,362 0.9% Oklahoma 3,751,351 303,922 1.0% 300,697 0.9% 218,582 1.2% Region 344,385 15,216 0.5% 35,735 1.1% 31,509 1.8% Alfalfa 5,642 (272) -0.4% (463) -0.8% (14) 0.0% Beaver 5,636 (126) -0.2% (221) -0.3% 233 0.9% Beckham 22,119 1,013 0.5% 2,320 1.2% 3,489 3.5% Blaine 11,943 567 0.6% (33) 0.1% (805) -1.3% Canadian 115,541 13,028 1.6% 27,844 2.8% 18,394 3.5% Cimarron 2,475 (138) -0.4% (673) -2.4% (233) -1.8% Custer 27,469 (649) -0.2% 1,327 0.5% 1,968 1.5% Dewey 4,810 (797) -1.5% 67 0.2% 412 1.9% Ellis 4,151 (396) -0.9% 76 0.2% 281 1.4% Garfield 60,580 1,164 0.2% 2,767 0.5% 3,640 1.3% Grant 4,527 (535) -1.0% (617) -1.2% (129) -0.5% Harper 3,685 (489) -1.3% 123 0.4% 384 2.3% Kingfisher 15,034 760 0.6% 1,108 0.8% 958 1.3% Major 7,527 (458) -0.6% (18) 0.0% 356 1.0% Roger Mills 3,647 (680) -1.8% 211 0.6% 386 2.3% Texas 20,640 3,680 2.1% 533 0.3% 619 0.6% Woods 8,878 6 0.1% (211) -0.2% 338 0.8% Woodward 20,081 (462) -0.2% 1,595 0.8% 1,232 1.3% Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html APPENDIX 2 - Age Groupings Total Population 2010 Census Count Age 0-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-54 Age 55-64 Age 65-84 Age 85 and over United States 309,050,816 26.9% 7.0% 41.2% 11.8% 11.3% 1.8% Oklahoma 3,751,351 27.8% 7.2% 39.8% 11.8% 11.7% 1.7% Region 344,385 27.9% 6.6% 40.4% 11.5% 11.8% 1.8% Alfalfa 5,642 19.4% 3.9% 43.2% 13.2% 17.6% 2.7% Beaver 5,636 28.4% 4.4% 37.9% 13.8% 13.5% 2.0% Beckham 22,119 26.7% 7.2% 42.5% 10.8% 10.9% 1.8% Blaine 11,943 23.7% 7.0% 44.0% 11.0% 12.5% 2.0% Canadian 115,541 29.3% 5.4% 43.0% 11.4% 9.7% 1.2% Cimarron 2,475 27.3% 4.1% 32.4% 14.7% 18.1% 3.2% Custer 27,469 28.1% 12.7% 35.4% 10.4% 11.2% 2.2% Dewey 4,810 27.3% 3.6% 36.5% 12.7% 17.0% 2.9% Ellis 4,151 26.7% 3.3% 35.5% 15.5% 16.0% 3.0% Garfield 60,580 27.2% 6.5% 39.2% 11.8% 13.2% 2.3% Grant 4,527 24.9% 4.0% 36.4% 13.5% 18.2% 3.0% Harper 3,685 27.6% 4.1% 37.5% 12.2% 16.0% 2.7% Kingfisher 15,034 29.1% 5.0% 39.2% 11.7% 13.1% 2.0% Major 7,527 25.4% 4.8% 37.1% 13.4% 16.9% 2.4% Roger Mills 3,647 27.3% 4.4% 37.0% 13.6% 15.6% 2.2% Texas 20,640 32.3% 8.6% 39.2% 9.9% 9.0% 1.2% Woods 8,878 23.8% 13.7% 34.4% 11.0% 14.5% 2.8% Woodward 20,081 26.5% 6.3% 42.1% 10.9% 12.6% 1.6% Note: Columns may not add exactly to 100.0% due to slight rounding error Source: US Census Bureau 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 3 – 2000 Census Population By Race Total Population 2000 Census Count White Alone Black Alone American Indian & Alaska Native Alone Asian Alone Other Race Alone More Than One Race Oklahoma 3,450,654 76.2% 7.6% 7.9% 1.4% 2.5% 4.5% Region 308,650 87.1% 2.4% 3.3% 1.1% 2.5% 3.5% Alfalfa 6,105 89.4% 4.2% 2.7% 0.1% 2.1% 1.4% Beaver 5,857 92.7% 0.3% 1.2% 0.1% 1.9% 3.8% Beckham 19,799 87.1% 5.5% 2.6% 0.4% 2.2% 2.3% Blaine 11,976 76.3% 6.7% 8.7% 0.7% 4.0% 3.7% Canadian 87,697 87.0% 2.2% 4.3% 2.4% 2.7% 1.4% Cimarron 3,148 85.8% 0.6% 1.0% 0.2% 2.5% 9.9% Custer 26,142 81.4% 2.9% 5.8% 0.9% 3.2% 5.8% Dewey 4,743 92.2% 0.1% 4.6% 0.1% 2.3% 0.7% Ellis 4,075 96.3% 0.0% 1.2% 0.1% 1.6% 0.7% Garfield 57,813 88.7% 3.3% 2.1% 0.8% 2.6% 2.5% Grant 5,144 95.3% 0.1% 2.4% 0.1% 1.3% 0.7% Harper 3,562 95.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.1% 0.7% 2.4% Kingfisher 13,926 88.1% 1.6% 3.0% 0.2% 2.7% 4.4% Major 7,545 95.0% 0.2% 0.9% 0.1% 1.4% 2.4% Roger Mills 3,436 91.8% 0.3% 5.5% 0.1% 1.9% 0.5% Texas 20,107 76.7% 0.7% 1.2% 0.6% 2.6% 18.2% Woods 9,089 93.4% 2.4% 1.6% 0.5% 1.5% 0.6% Woodward 18,486 92.2% 1.1% 2.1% 0.5% 1.6% 2.5% Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 4 – 2010 Census Population By Race Total Population 2010 Census Count White Alone Black Alone American Indian & Alaska Native Alone Asian Alone Other Race Alone More Than One Race Oklahoma 3,751,351 72.2% 7.4% 8.6% 1.7% 4.2% 5.9% Region 344,385 83.6% 2.4% 3.7% 1.5% 3.5% 5.3% Alfalfa 5,642 89.4% 4.1% 2.9% 0.2% 2.1% 1.3% Beaver 5,636 82.8% 0.8% 1.1% 0.1% 3.1% 12.2% Beckham 22,119 85.0% 4.0% 2.8% 0.8% 2.8% 4.6% Blaine 11,943 79.7% 2.6% 8.0% 0.2% 3.8% 5.7% Canadian 115,541 83.1% 2.5% 4.8% 3.0% 4.1% 2.4% Cimarron 2,475 84.7% 0.2% 0.8% 0.3% 1.8% 12.1% Custer 27,469 78.1% 3.0% 6.3% 1.0% 3.9% 7.6% Dewey 4,810 89.1% 0.3% 5.8% 0.7% 3.2% 1.0% Ellis 4,151 94.4% 0.3% 1.6% 0.2% 1.6% 1.9% Garfield 60,580 83.9% 3.0% 2.3% 1.0% 3.5% 6.4% Grant 4,527 93.0% 0.8% 1.9% 0.2% 2.4% 1.7% Harper 3,685 87.4% 0.1% 0.8% 0.2% 2.3% 9.4% Kingfisher 15,034 84.5% 1.1% 3.1% 0.3% 3.2% 7.8% Major 7,527 91.0% 0.4% 2.0% 0.3% 2.5% 3.8% Roger Mills 3,647 89.8% 0.4% 5.8% 0.3% 2.3% 1.3% Texas 20,640 75.7% 1.6% 1.3% 1.6% 2.8% 17.0% Woods 8,878 88.4% 3.3% 2.4% 0.9% 2.7% 2.3% Woodward 20,081 86.7% 1.6% 2.8% 0.6% 2.6% 5.7% Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 5 – Population by Hispanic Ethnicity 2000 2010 Total Hispanic Not Hispanic Total Hispanic Not Hispanic United States 281,421,906 35,305,818 246,116,088 308,745,538 50,477,594 258,267,944 Oklahoma 3,450,654 179,304 3,271,350 3,751,351 332,007 3,419,344 Region 308,650 20,301 288,349 344,385 39,590 304,795 Alfalfa 6,105 177 5,928 5,642 224 5,418 Beaver 5,857 630 5,227 5,636 1,135 4,501 Beckham 19,799 1,079 18,720 22,119 2,619 19,500 Blaine 11,976 793 11,183 11,943 2,873 9,070 Canadian 87,697 3,386 84,311 115,541 7,794 107,747 Cimarron 3,148 485 2,663 2,475 514 1,961 Custer 26,142 2,361 23,781 27,469 3,830 23,639 Dewey 4,743 127 4,616 4,810 231 4,579 Ellis 4,075 106 3,969 4,151 251 3,900 Garfield 57,813 2,387 55,426 60,580 5,353 55,227 Grant 5,144 95 5,049 4,527 158 4,369 Harper 3,562 201 3,361 3,685 645 3,040 Kingfisher 13,926 961 12,965 15,034 2,022 13,012 Major 7,545 303 7,242 7,527 565 6,962 Roger Mills 3,436 91 3,345 3,647 165 3,482 Texas 20,107 6,003 14,104 20,640 8,659 11,981 Woods 9,089 220 8,869 8,878 424 8,454 Woodward 18,486 896 17,590 20,081 2,128 17,953 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 6 – Estimated Educational Attainment for Population 25 and Over (2005-2009) Less than HS Diploma HS graduate, GED, or alternative Some College Associate Degree Bachelor Degree Post Bachelor Degree United States Estimate 15.4% 29.3% 20.3% 7.4% 17.4% 10.1% MOE 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Oklahoma Estimate 15.2% 32.7% 23.0% 6.7% 15.1% 7.3% MOE 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% Region Estimate 14.7% 33.9% 24.2% 6.3% 14.8% 6.1% MOE 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% Alfalfa Estimate 16.9% 38.5% 24.3% 3.3% 11.6% 5.4% MOE 4.9% 3.0% 2.9% 1.2% 1.8% 3.9% Beaver Estimate 14.8% 38.0% 22.6% 5.4% 14.0% 5.2% MOE 3.9% 3.2% 3.0% 1.4% 1.8% 3.3% Beckham Estimate 18.6% 37.1% 20.6% 7.6% 10.9% 5.2% MOE 3.2% 3.2% 2.6% 1.5% 2.0% 1.7% Blaine Estimate 18.3% 39.5% 19.3% 6.9% 11.2% 5.0% MOE 2.7% 2.9% 2.4% 1.6% 1.9% 1.8% Canadian Estimate 9.7% 30.3% 27.6% 8.1% 17.6% 6.7% MOE 0.8% 1.2% 1.3% 0.7% 0.8% 0.5% Cimarron Estimate 20.9% 36.7% 19.6% 7.0% 13.6% 2.2% MOE 4.4% 4.5% 3.6% 2.6% 2.8% 1.0% Custer Estimate 17.3% 29.2% 25.7% 5.0% 13.5% 9.2% MOE 2.2% 2.3% 2.6% 1.1% 1.8% 1.5% Dewey Estimate 17.8% 45.2% 17.6% 4.2% 12.4% 2.8% MOE 4.8% 4.6% 2.8% 1.4% 2.4% 5.9% Less than HS Diploma HS graduate, GED, or alternative Some College Associate Degree Bachelor Degree Post Bachelor Degree Ellis Estimate 13.2% 37.4% 23.9% 2.8% 15.4% 7.3% MOE 4.6% 3.3% 3.1% 0.9% 2.5% 1.8% Garfield Estimate 14.1% 35.8% 21.9% 6.7% 15.1% 6.4% MOE 1.3% 1.5% 1.6% 0.9% 1.2% 0.8% Grant Estimate 9.6% 36.6% 25.1% 5.8% 16.2% 6.8% MOE 6.3% 3.4% 2.9% 1.4% 2.6% 1.7% Harper Estimate 17.2% 39.9% 19.7% 2.7% 15.4% 5.2% MOE 8.4% 4.1% 3.9% 1.3% 3.8% 8.0% Kingfisher Estimate 17.2% 35.2% 24.3% 7.1% 10.5% 5.8% MOE 2.7% 2.7% 2.8% 1.6% 1.8% 1.2% Major Estimate 14.6% 44.1% 23.5% 2.6% 10.9% 4.3% MOE 3.2% 3.2% 3.0% 0.9% 1.9% 1.2% Roger Mills Estimate 12.2% 37.7% 27.1% 5.1% 11.1% 6.8% MOE 7.2% 3.5% 3.7% 1.8% 1.9% 1.7% Texas Estimate 29.0% 28.8% 20.2% 4.0% 14.0% 4.0% MOE 3.3% 2.7% 2.1% 1.2% 1.7% 0.9% Woods Estimate 11.5% 34.3% 23.3% 2.7% 19.3% 9.0% MOE 3.7% 3.5% 3.1% 1.1% 2.8% 2.0% Woodward Estimate 19.3% 35.9% 24.9% 3.4% 12.5% 4.0% MOE 2.6% 2.4% 2.2% 1.2% 1.6% 1.3% Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.gov MOE= Margin of ErrorAPPENDIX 7 – Per Capita Personal Income (PCPI) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 United States $30,318 $31,145 $31,461 $32,271 $33,881 $35,424 $37,698 $39,461 $40,674 $39,635 Oklahoma $24,605 $26,218 $26,218 $26,909 $28,790 $30,469 $33,223 $34,539 $36,911 $35,837 Region $23,533 $24,641 $24,726 $26,112 $27,512 $28,924 $31,166 $32,743 $35,383 $33,640 Alfalfa $21,257 $22,070 $21,117 $23,719 $23,210 $23,022 $23,426 $24,359 $28,597 $25,074 Beaver $24,380 $26,313 $24,599 $26,149 $26,429 $28,690 $27,794 $30,317 $34,705 $32,774 Beckham $18,417 $20,166 $20,329 $22,099 $24,938 $26,866 $29,317 $31,046 $32,999 $31,084 Blaine $17,852 $18,094 $18,807 $20,384 $18,658 $20,101 $21,436 $21,310 $23,428 $22,134 Canadian $25,564 $26,432 $26,815 $27,628 $29,153 $30,676 $32,983 $34,646 $36,838 $36,325 Cimarron $22,056 $22,972 $24,251 $26,158 $26,340 $28,403 $26,247 $29,331 $35,834 $30,942 Custer $20,919 $22,166 $22,089 $23,276 $24,809 $26,385 $28,440 $30,195 $32,899 $31,350 Dewey $21,598 $23,252 $24,785 $27,572 $27,408 $28,611 $28,914 $31,583 $36,253 $31,790 Ellis $22,241 $25,102 $24,454 $26,585 $28,062 $29,387 $30,698 $31,887 $34,881 $30,318 Garfield $24,330 $25,229 $26,082 $27,558 $29,556 $30,509 $33,942 $36,060 $38,351 $36,772 Grant $24,008 $24,977 $26,164 $28,381 $32,473 $29,809 $32,199 $33,742 $39,908 $36,273 Harper $28,861 $32,493 $32,349 $34,647 $32,581 $35,556 $34,496 $33,050 $36,064 $33,917 Kingfisher $23,939 $25,558 $26,755 $27,928 $28,835 $31,230 $34,036 $35,823 $39,610 $35,924 Major $22,025 $23,137 $23,364 $25,500 $26,678 $28,070 $30,167 $30,937 $34,250 $31,295 Roger Mills $21,142 $23,089 $23,585 $24,336 $26,226 $27,312 $29,344 $34,277 $37,182 $34,739 Texas $29,259 $29,044 $24,952 $26,267 $27,196 $28,438 $29,169 $28,683 $30,170 $28,108 Woods $21,042 $22,404 $22,369 $25,711 $25,651 $24,932 $27,249 $28,762 $32,630 $30,208 Woodward $20,247 $22,396 $21,943 $22,934 $25,466 $28,266 $31,281 $33,148 $36,810 $32,383 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2APPENDIX 8 - Retail Sales Growth Rates: Communities Within The Region 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 Alfalfa County Aline 5.8% -14.4% -6.4% 27.0% 11.5% 0.9% -28.8% Burlington 8.8% 8.5% -4.3% 9.8% 15.3% -4.4% 39.0% Byron 19.3% -31.3% 8.9% 52.7% 31.8% -2.1% 57.5% Carmen 0.7% 7.9% 11.6% 4.0% 12.7% 3.9% -7.7% Cherokee 2.0% 0.1% 5.4% 4.9% 45.8% -13.6% -3.0% Goltry -10.4% 20.3% 0.6% 1.8% 40.8% -54.2% 110.5% Helena 1.4% -2.2% 15.7% 8.5% 33.4% 12.3% -12.4% Jet -10.1% 1.9% 27.7% -10.9% 31.1% -4.3% 7.8% Beaver County Beaver 0.4% 11.3% 25.2% -8.3% -0.1% -13.1% 18.7% Forgan -11.3% 2.9% 86.3% 22.7% -0.8% -18.2% -2.6% Knowles 53.9% -43.6% -21.2% -5.4% -46.1% 47.9% -8.4% Beckham County Carter 33.0% -17.2% -1.0% 91.4% -11.6% -16.0% -3.1% Elk City 14.5% 11.9% 14.8% 8.0% 13.8% -17.9% 8.1% Erick 8.9% -9.5% 15.5% 21.3% 0.4% -12.7% 6.9% Sayre -3.2% 0.2% 23.3% 28.9% -9.9% -12.9% 5.3% Blaine County Canton 0.9% -9.2% 15.4% -3.3% 19.5% 12.5% -7.2% Geary 4.3% -2.9% 1.2% 11.3% -6.4% 13.7% 6.7% Greenfield -31.2% 38.9% 7.9% 28.9% 194.2% 65.8% -83.2% Hitchcock 31.9% -1.3% -14.5% 39.8% 14.6% -3.5% 4.7% Hydro -2.8% 2.9% 22.7% 4.1% 7.4% 0.7% 7.8% Longdale 9.9% -12.0% 13.5% 15.7% 23.1% 1.2% -11.3% Okeene 9.1% 4.9% 4.0% 8.7% 3.1% 1.4% -6.5% Watonga -0.5% 5.6% -0.8% 1.8% 4.9% 0.3% -7.2% Watts 11.0% -7.2% -3.5% 13.7% 30.6% -5.9% 14.8% Canadian County Calumet 3.9% -13.8% 3.3% 8.6% 24.7% 66.4% 26.1% El Reno 5.6% 5.3% 7.5% 4.7% 9.0% -2.1% 8.1% Geary 4.3% -2.9% 1.2% 11.3% -6.4% 13.7% 6.7% 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 Mustang 24.9% 7.1% 6.7% 6.6% 10.7% 2.5% -0.4% Okarche 13.4% 10.9% -11.8% 31.3% 3.5% 3.7% 54.8% Piedmont 26.6% 7.7% 12.5% -1.7% 18.5% -0.8% 4.5% Union City 23.9% 29.1% 16.9% 2.8% -22.9% 1.9% 13.1% Yukon 4.9% 8.2% 2.8% 5.7% 6.5% 4.1% 1.4% Cimarron County Boise City 2.2% 2.2% 13.7% -13.2% 4.9% -2.5% 13.7% Keyes 4.1% -0.1% 9.2% -42.7% 23.2% -7.9% -23.4% Custer County Arapaho 19.0% -4.5% 2.7% 16.9% 40.7% -48.6% -18.6% Butler 17.4% 5.9% -5.4% 8.1% 138.6% -34.5% -19.3% Clinton 8.9% 7.3% 4.2% 9.8% 9.3% -7.0% -0.7% Custer City 10.9% 15.1% -14.6% 24.3% 2.4% -4.0% 15.7% Hammon -10.0% -7.8% -3.1% -1.1% 58.2% -55.7% 43.4% Thomas -4.5% 15.5% -3.2% 12.9% 15.4% -13.7% 10.8% Weatherford 7.4% 5.1% 2.0% 12.8% 4.4% -2.5% 7.5% Dewey County Camargo 15.4% -21.1% -5.5% 146.5% -39.1% 16.1% 62.2% Leedey 8.8% 16.8% 3.9% 6.3% -3.1% 3.8% 10.4% Seiling 5.0% -4.6% 3.7% 12.9% 19.6% -7.0% 16.9% Taloga 6.0% -3.2% 32.2% -29.9% -0.1% -17.7% 183.0% Vici 5.5% 1.3% 5.2% 19.4% 9.2% -3.3% 16.4% Ellis County Arnett 5.0% -0.8% 6.5% 40.0% 27.0% -15.1% 37.2% Fargo 9.7% -18.1% -11.7% 34.9% 108.2% -16.1% -30.0% Gage 3.8% -10.2% 41.0% 0.5% 10.8% -2.1% 15.9% Shattuck 5.7% 8.4% 9.1% 18.0% 9.8% -8.1% 16.6% Garfield County Covington 1.8% -13.8% 1.6% 9.2% 1.7% -4.2% 7.7% Douglas 8.5% 68.2% -14.8% 3.8% 36.9% -22.3% 2.0% Drummond 7.5% 34.1% 5.4% -9.1% 130.3% -0.9% -47.7% Enid 4.5% 5.8% 4.2% 6.3% 8.9% -5.1% -0.2% Fairmont 35.1% -6.3% 15.4% -4.5% 13.9% 2.6% -10.5% Garber 31.4% -20.9% -3.1% 9.2% 2.3% 8.8% -1.7% 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 Hillsdale 67.7% 185.0% -44.7% 8.3% 30.6% -5.9% 0.4% Hunter 1.5% 0.8% -2.2% 15.0% 33.4% 15.7% -15.5% Kremlin 16.1% -22.8% 32.9% 28.4% 7.0% -5.2% 3.2% Lahoma -2.1% -1.1% 1.2% 3.7% 9.3% 23.8% -26.0% North Enid 14.5% 5.6% 18.6% -4.8% 12.2% -4.0% -4.8% Waukomis 1.0% 7.5% 20.3% -2.9% 24.4% -8.4% -8.1% Grant County Deer Creek 13.5% -0.1% -9.3% 26.9% -7.1% 15.4% -14.6% Lamont 1.3% 9.3% 29.7% -11.1% 17.5% -1.6% 3.4% Medford 3.3% -1.5% 5.7% 1.3% 9.2% 0.9% 22.6% Nash 2.2% 69.4% -17.4% -3.7% 4.6% 4.7% -0.1% Pond Creek 0.3% 5.9% 3.2% 2.1% 18.2% 8.7% 0.8% Renfrow 80.9% 10.1% 45.2% 5.1% 26.5% 21.1% 26.2% Wakita 4.3% -0.1% 6.3% -11.4% 17.0% -7.2% 22.3% Harper County Buffalo 4.1% -5.5% 18.4% 7.9% 22.7% -5.6% 7.6% Laverne 1.6% 5.5% 7.8% 7.7% 6.1% 2.7% 9.7% May 77.0% -42.3% 0.5% 134.1% 7.1% 0.9% -22.5% Kingfisher County Cashion -35.5% 21.7% 24.2% 14.6% 14.0% -18.3% 4.5% Dover 7.8% -0.1% 16.0% 4.0% -1.9% 6.5% -5.3% Hennessey 1.9% 10.7% 12.2% -2.0% 21.7% -17.4% 4.2% Kingfisher 6.4% 23.1% -10.1% 25.0% 0.9% -1.4% 0.9% Loyal 3.9% 7.0% 6.4% -7.3% -14.5% 14.2% -1.0% Okarche 13.4% 10.9% -11.8% 31.3% 3.5% 3.7% 54.8% Piedmont 26.6% 7.7% 12.5% -1.7% 18.5% -0.8% 4.5% Major County Ames 37.1% -8.5% 21.4% 16.8% 4.5% -19.3% 8.4% Cleo Springs -2.7% 6.1% 17.8% -4.0% 13.4% 6.0% -5.7% Fairview 2.6% 5.9% 10.8% 13.7% 8.3% -7.7% -5.0% Meno -4.9% 8.1% 2.1% 7.4% 8.5% -5.8% 0.5% Ringwood 10.9% 14.6% 1.0% 15.2% 2.1% -21.4% -7.8% Roger Mills County Cheyenne 2.1% 8.3% 9.8% -8.3% -23.1% -35.3% 36.3% 2003 to 2004 2004 to 2005 2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 Hammon -10.0% -7.8% -3.1% -1.1% 58.2% -55.7% 43.4% Reydon 2.2% -0.5% 21.6% -31.5% 6.5% 61.8% 14.8% Texas County Goodwell -1.8% -8.3% 10.3% -10.3% -3.3% 7.3% 2.8% Guymon 6.9% -2.0% 8.3% 6.0% 10.9% -4.8% -0.6% Hardesty 6.4% 14.1% 10.4% -8.5% 22.6% -21.1% 8.5% Hooker -6.4% -1.2% -1.7% 9.5% 12.2% 18.4% -1.1% Texhoma -6.6% 6.3% 0.4% -16.6% 6.2% 0.4% 11.3% Tyrone -22.3% -9.5% 8.7% 11.2% -10.3% -27.4% -4.9% Woods County Alva 2.4% 5.1% -1.2% 13.7% 13.1% -5.1% -1.9% Freedom 11.0% 21.8% 35.9% 52.2% 77.6% -41.0% -32.8% Waynoka 6.7% 10.8% 8.0% 14.7% 7.0% -12.1% -4.3% Woodward County Fort Supply 5.5% 12.3% 8.2% 8.6% 21.3% -14.3% -16.9% Mooreland -1.1% 5.4% 32.1% 9.5% 10.9% -13.6% -9.2% Woodward 8.5% 8.5% 17.2% 6.3% 6.0% -15.7% 5.4% APPENDIX 9 – Estimated Retail Sales Subject to Tax 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Alfalfa County Aline 703,833 602,279 563,816 715,871 797,877 805,361 573,669 Burlington 743,492 806,624 772,119 847,554 976,835 933,962 1,297,956 Byron 97,078 66,741 72,710 111,042 146,348 143,225 225,637 Carmen 1,290,792 1,392,728 1,554,856 1,616,993 1,823,122 1,894,650 1,748,308 Cherokee 10,680,726 10,694,757 11,271,026 11,827,181 17,247,914 14,896,725 14,456,945 Goltry 525,220 631,902 635,855 647,021 911,090 417,525 879,026 Helena 2,532,807 2,477,479 2,867,495 3,112,058 4,150,366 4,662,661 4,083,360 Jet 941,954 959,604 1,225,232 1,091,188 1,430,286 1,368,267 1,474,515 Beaver County Beaver 12,177,603 13,549,799 16,963,949 15,557,823 15,549,718 13,515,404 16,043,284 Forgan 1,045,391 1,075,232 2,003,217 2,458,282 2,438,117 1,993,650 1,941,924 Knowles 172,932 97,459 76,774 72,645 39,184 57,952 53,094 Beckham County Carter 1,009,112 835,567 827,283 1,583,209 1,399,444 1,175,025 1,138,822 Elk City 195,677,772 218,946,775 251,434,278 271,651,517 309,136,966 253,944,662 274,441,983 Erick 6,630,305 5,997,552 6,925,989 8,401,047 8,438,511 7,370,969 7,883,027 Sayre 27,174,336 27,240,464 33,576,994 43,285,780 39,000,340 33,965,547 35,782,348 Blaine County Canton 5,180,436 4,704,239 5,427,730 5,246,031 6,268,659 7,054,111 6,545,415 Geary 11,431,317 11,103,614 11,240,276 12,505,888 11,700,041 13,305,573 14,198,533 Greenfield 190,334 264,332 285,182 367,462 1,081,239 1,792,684 300,723 Hitchcock 236,541 233,392 199,536 278,995 319,865 308,624 323,174 Hydro 3,756,367 3,866,518 4,745,053 4,938,098 5,301,943 5,338,847 5,753,268 Longdale 1,272,706 1,119,492 1,270,374 1,469,355 1,809,238 1,831,200 1,624,820 Okeene 7,220,121 7,570,968 7,875,500 8,559,024 8,825,034 8,952,218 8,374,413 Watonga 29,763,111 31,415,720 31,154,224 31,730,515 33,296,866 33,395,088 31,003,790 Watts 746,795 692,697 668,468 760,306 992,945 934,125 1,072,546 Canadian County Calumet 3,210,359 2,767,117 2,857,994 3,102,798 3,867,962 6,434,366 8,114,999 El Reno 142,103,030 149,650,833 160,867,718 168,469,349 183,691,609 179,762,812 194,348,305 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Geary 11,431,317 11,103,614 11,240,276 12,505,888 11,700,041 13,305,573 14,198,533 Mustang 135,266,224 144,899,063 154,641,721 164,896,884 182,566,630 187,181,701 186,476,039 Okarche 9,489,077 10,527,751 9,287,327 12,194,378 12,624,674 13,087,902 20,255,050 Piedmont 20,067,280 21,603,834 24,315,011 23,897,319 28,307,096 28,085,341 29,359,335 Union City 2,524,490 3,258,406 3,810,336 3,918,088 3,020,215 3,077,141 3,480,830 Yukon 296,392,778 320,755,090 329,651,270 348,386,189 371,031,993 386,185,752 391,650,984 Cimarron County Boise City 10,613,313 10,841,848 12,330,987 10,700,757 11,224,555 10,941,213 12,444,385 Keyes 1,227,268 1,226,079 1,338,972 767,135 945,166 870,187 666,871 Custer County Arapaho 3,488,906 3,330,493 3,421,979 3,999,384 5,625,169 2,892,219 2,354,517 Butler 1,769,348 1,873,120 1,771,304 1,914,986 4,569,034 2,994,794 2,416,858 Clinton 100,091,926 107,391,285 111,931,715 122,952,776 134,421,083 125,062,602 124,151,861 Custer City 1,339,453 1,541,578 1,317,018 1,636,996 1,676,767 1,608,991 1,861,727 Hammon 3,716,114 3,425,382 3,318,031 3,280,721 5,189,058 2,297,827 3,294,615 Thomas 5,568,777 6,430,659 6,221,842 7,026,554 8,110,810 6,999,524 7,752,187 Weatherford 131,423,235 138,120,977 140,832,040 158,894,565 165,945,524 161,743,831 173,888,333 Dewey County Camargo 648,726 512,068 483,794 1,192,374 725,683 842,666 1,366,410 Leedey 2,877,564 3,362,114 3,494,187 3,714,783 3,599,829 3,738,020 4,127,846 Seiling 9,083,775 8,664,367 8,987,964 10,149,143 12,137,793 11,284,479 13,193,190 Taloga 2,166,305 2,097,690 2,773,068 1,943,893 1,941,175 1,598,538 4,524,661 Vici 3,943,024 3,994,150 4,200,151 5,014,801 5,474,093 5,295,622 6,166,388 Ellis County Arnett 3,462,629 3,433,771 3,656,888 5,121,036 6,503,176 5,524,098 7,578,392 Fargo 930,025 761,833 672,637 907,151 1,888,869 1,584,564 1,109,520 Gage 1,554,701 1,395,909 1,968,492 1,978,189 2,191,966 2,145,472 2,487,141 Shattuck 10,270,726 11,134,332 12,146,184 14,338,541 15,750,426 14,482,247 16,886,459 Garfield County Covington 1,808,266 1,558,634 1,583,408 1,729,056 1,757,798 1,684,241 1,813,679 Douglas 111,630 187,739 160,005 166,098 227,313 176,612 180,108 Drummond 730,160 979,495 1,031,909 937,927 2,159,680 2,139,377 1,118,239 Enid 567,494,250 600,554,052 625,708,742 665,315,507 724,748,602 687,784,666 686,233,544 Fairmont 356,679 334,290 385,844 368,519 419,603 430,332 385,032 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Garber 3,795,759 3,001,912 2,907,703 3,175,344 3,247,273 3,532,391 3,470,876 Hillsdale 121,085 345,037 190,847 206,780 270,063 254,194 255,191 Hunter 337,572 340,427 332,895 382,890 510,779 590,917 499,098 Kremlin 1,025,008 791,178 1,051,802 1,350,782 1,444,793 1,369,480 1,413,819 Lahoma 2,355,300 2,330,121 2,357,644 2,445,845 2,673,901 3,311,296 2,448,896 North Enid 2,241,526 2,365,933 2,805,392 2,669,673 2,995,870 2,876,540 2,739,110 Waukomis 2,930,614 3,150,628 3,789,338 3,681,265 4,578,220 4,192,300 3,851,799 Grant County Deer Creek 446,787 446,121 404,470 513,439 476,928 550,346 469,738 Lamont 1,310,469 1,432,664 1,858,835 1,651,956 1,941,263 1,910,581 1,975,486 Medford 6,915,983 6,815,057 7,206,191 7,299,180 7,967,360 8,037,069 9,855,648 Nash 866,275 1,467,077 1,212,503 1,167,897 1,222,104 1,279,861 1,278,349 Pond Creek 3,429,448 3,632,153 3,747,610 3,825,572 4,522,589 4,914,197 4,953,508 Renfrow 61,775 68,018 98,738 103,797 131,319 158,972 200,631 Wakita 1,355,188 1,354,014 1,439,289 1,275,780 1,492,237 1,384,121 1,692,279 Harper County Buffalo 5,917,194 5,591,769 6,622,830 7,146,243 8,766,641 8,278,346 8,910,486 Laverne 8,395,773 8,854,917 9,545,244 10,275,696 10,903,926 11,199,683 12,287,424 May 223,075 128,638 129,322 302,742 324,199 327,055 253,582 Kingfisher County Cashion 1,914,883 2,330,243 2,894,774 3,318,141 3,782,131 3,091,619 3,232,020 Dover 1,839,943 1,838,382 2,131,662 2,217,731 2,174,698 2,316,560 2,193,956 Hennessey 18,109,577 20,055,124 22,496,862 22,054,021 26,832,124 22,170,778 23,098,066 Kingfisher 55,965,382 68,873,898 61,951,271 77,428,146 78,092,687 77,006,482 77,722,663 Loyal 333,545 356,840 379,567 351,741 300,802 343,424 339,978 Okarche 9,489,077 10,527,751 9,287,327 12,194,378 12,624,674 13,087,902 20,255,050 Piedmont 20,067,280 21,603,834 24,315,011 23,897,319 28,307,096 28,085,341 29,359,335 Major County Ames 1,504,888 1,376,828 1,671,847 1,952,531 2,039,966 1,645,298 1,782,870 Cleo Springs 1,288,615 1,366,967 1,609,644 1,545,825 1,753,197 1,858,765 1,753,311 Fairview 27,140,956 28,734,738 31,828,586 36,178,912 39,171,762 36,173,365 34,361,891 Meno 1,390,430 1,503,246 1,534,374 1,648,467 1,788,029 1,685,102 1,693,653 Ringwood 4,140,032 4,743,114 4,788,840 5,518,420 5,635,806 4,428,014 4,081,667 Roger Mills 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 County Cheyenne 16,380,430 17,739,051 19,470,629 17,853,356 13,721,112 8,884,219 12,105,501 Hammon 3,716,114 3,425,382 3,318,031 3,280,721 5,189,058 2,297,827 3,294,615 Reydon 802,478 798,851 971,293 665,532 709,038 1,147,089 1,316,552 Texas County Goodwell 2,494,395 2,287,717 2,522,316 2,262,854 2,188,786 2,348,037 2,413,164 Guymon 115,890,099 113,616,186 123,058,550 130,411,073 144,615,869 137,657,646 136,778,305 Hardesty 410,879 468,617 517,192 473,439 580,342 458,174 497,086 Hooker 7,100,965 7,018,113 6,900,946 7,554,384 8,473,709 10,029,559 9,920,218 Texhoma 4,905,438 5,214,799 5,235,757 4,364,519 4,634,601 4,654,811 5,181,661 Tyrone 1,636,370 1,480,888 1,609,202 1,789,608 1,605,684 1,165,965 1,108,504 Woods County Alva 59,805,452 62,834,588 62,062,797 70,552,933 79,769,323 75,673,724 74,263,280 Freedom 869,481 1,058,815 1,438,661 2,189,375 3,889,011 2,293,185 1,541,867 Waynoka 8,016,435 8,885,803 9,600,806 11,009,684 11,781,629 10,350,748 9,910,423 Woodward County Fort Supply 893,793 1,003,704 1,085,583 1,178,859 1,429,966 1,225,818 1,019,012 Mooreland 4,821,186 5,079,595 6,707,809 7,344,207 8,146,967 7,040,864 6,394,514 Woodward 218,136,677 236,648,341 277,345,368 294,833,223 312,384,642 263,347,489 277,537,582 Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html APPENDIX 10 – Annual County Unemployment Rates 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 United States 4.0% 4.7% 5.8% 6.0% 5.5% 5.1% 4.6% 4.6% 5.8% 9.3% 9.6% Oklahoma 3.1% 3.7% 4.8% 5.6% 5.0% 4.5% 4.1% 4.1% 3.7% 6.6% 7.1% Region 2.6% 3.0% 4.0% 4.4% 3.8% 3.6% 3.3% 3.2% 2.8% 5.2% 5.4% Alfalfa 3.0% 3.0% 3.6% 4.1% 3.9% 4.4% 4.3% 4.4% 3.1% 5.0% 5.6% Beaver 2.4% 2.6% 3.5% 3.9% 3.5% 3.3% 2.7% 2.6% 2.0% 3.6% 3.6% Beckham 3.2% 3.2% 4.3% 3.8% 3.3% 3.1% 2.7% 2.4% 2.3% 6.1% 5.3% Blaine 2.9% 4.4% 4.8% 5.0% 4.7% 4.9% 4.3% 4.2% 3.6% 5.8% 7.8% Canadian 2.4% 3.1% 4.3% 4.8% 4.1% 3.7% 3.5% 3.8% 3.4% 5.8% 5.9% Cimarron 2.2% 2.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.1% 3.5% 3.4% 3.8% 3.0% 3.9% 4.1% Custer 2.5% 3.1% 3.5% 3.7% 3.3% 3.2% 3.1% 3.0% 2.6% 4.8% 5.0% Dewey 2.7% 2.8% 3.8% 3.7% 3.2% 3.4% 3.1% 3.0% 2.4% 4.5% 4.3% Ellis 2.7% 2.7% 3.5% 3.0% 2.8% 3.0% 2.8% 2.4% 2.2% 4.7% 4.5% Garfield 2.8% 3.1% 3.6% 4.2% 3.7% 3.6% 3.1% 2.9% 2.5% 4.5% 4.9% Grant 2.5% 2.8% 3.5% 3.8% 3.6% 3.7% 3.8% 3.2% 2.5% 3.9% 4.3% Harper 2.1% 2.9% 3.4% 3.7% 3.1% 3.0% 3.2% 2.8% 2.2% 4.1% 4.2% Kingfisher 2.2% 2.4% 3.3% 3.4% 3.3% 3.3% 2.8% 2.6% 2.3% 4.6% 4.9% Major 2.4% 2.8% 3.4% 3.6% 3.3% 3.3% 2.9% 2.8% 2.3% 4.6% 4.7% Roger Mills 2.5% 2.4% 3.3% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.7% 2.7% 2.3% 4.7% 4.2% Texas 2.6% 2.7% 3.4% 3.6% 3.4% 3.7% 3.4% 3.1% 2.7% 5.4% 5.8% Woods 2.5% 2.7% 8.3% 9.7% 7.2% 6.9% 5.7% 5.9% 2.8% 4.4% 4.4% Woodward 3.0% 2.9% 4.2% 4.5% 3.7% 3.4% 2.7% 2.6% 2.2% 6.4% 6.0% Sources: US unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=ln State and County unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=la |
Date created | 2011-09-09 |
Date modified | 2013-02-01 |
OCLC number | 819810495 |
|
|
|
A |
|
C |
|
D |
|
F |
|
I |
|
L |
|
O |
|
R |
|
S |
|
T |
|
|
|