Northwest regional profile

              Northwest
Regional Profi le
June 2 0 11
P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
Page
1
Texas Beaver Harper Woods
Dewey
Ellis Woodward
Blaine
Major
Grant
Garfield
Kingfisher
Alfalfa
Roger
Mills Custer
Beckham
Canadian
Cimarron
County Border
County Seat
Metropolitan Statistical Area
Cities with population over 5,000
Cities with population 3,000 - 5,000
Career Technology Centers
Higher Education
C
Guymon
Alva
Enid
Kingfisher
Oklahoma
City
Watonga
Clinton Weatherford
Woodward
Elk City
Sayre
C
C
C
C
Fairview
C
C
Omega
C
Sources:
Cities with population over 3,000 - U.S. Census Bureau - 2010 Census http://www.okcommerce.gov/data
Career Technology Centers - OK Dept. of Career and Technology Education http://www.okcareertech.org
Higher Education - OK State Regents For Higher Education http://www.okhighered.org
For a detailed interactive map showing lakes, roads, rail,
hospitals and more cities, go to:
http://stateok.zoomprospector.com/
Goodwell
OK Panhandle State University
Northern OK
College
Northwestern OK
State University
Northwestern
OK State
University
Northwestern OK
State University
High Plains
Tech Ctr.
Northwest
Tech Ctr.
Autry
Tech Ctr.
Northwest
Tech Ctr.
Chisholm Trail
Tech Ctr.
Western
Tech Ctr.
Western
Tech Ctr.
Mustang
Yukon
El Reno Piedmont
C
Canadian Valley
Tech Ctr.
Redlands
Community
College
Boise City
Beaver
Buffalo
Arnett
Cheyenne
Arapaho
Taloga
Cherokee
Medford
Policy, Research & Economic Analysis
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
2TexasBeaverHarperWoodsDeweyWoodwardEllisBlaineMajorGrantGarfieldKingfisherAlfalfaRogerMillsCusterBeckhamCanadianCimarronKEY200 Population (308,650 people in NW Region)2010 Population (344,385 people in NW Region)Change: -21.4%10002000300040005000Source: U.S. Census Bureau - 2000 Census and 2010 CensusChange: 6.1%10002000300040005000Change: 3.5%10002000300040005000Change: 1.9%10002000300040005000Change: -12.0%10002000300040005000Change: 1.4%10002000300040005000Change: -3.8%20003000400050006000Change: -7.6%20003000400050006000Change: -0.2%50006000700080009000Change: 11.7%22000240002600028000300001800019000200002100022000Change: 5.1%Change: -0.3%1000011000120001300014000Change: 8.0%1200013000140001500016000Change: 31.8%8200091000100000109000118000Change: 2.7%18000190002000021000220001700018000190002000021000Change: 8.6%Change: -2.3%600070008000900010000Change: 4.8%5300055000570005900061000
POPULATION GROWTH RATES: 1990 TO 2010
• In 2010, the population in this 18 county region totaled 344,385 people, representing 9.2% of the state’s total population
• The region’s population has grown at an average annual 1.8% rate over the last 5 years but growth has not been uniform
• Canadian and Beckham counties showed 3.5% annual growth rates between 2005 and 2010 while Alfalfa, Blaine, Cimarron and Grant counties all showed net population declines
• Overall, the region is forecast to experience increasing population growth over the next five years, led primarily by growth in Canadian CountyP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
3
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census and 2010 Census
• Between 2000 and 2010, 23 counties in Oklahoma had negative population growth rates; 7 of those counties were in this region
• Over the full decade, Canadian County had the highest average annual population growth rate (2.8%) in the state
• For more information on county level population growth since 1990, see Appendix 1
• Numeric growth was led by population increases in Canadian, Beckham and Garfield counties
o Canadian County added 27,844 people between 2000 and 2010
o Beckham County added 2,320 people during the same time period
o Garfield County added 2,767 people
o The growth in these three counties represents 92% of the region’s growth during the past decade
Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
4
AGE BY GENDER: 2010
• Some notable differences stand out when 2010 population data for the region is compared against the state as a whole
• The region showed a higher presence among males aged 25 to 59
• There was a higher presence of children aged 0 to 4
• There was a lower presence of females aged 15 to 69
• Texas and Custer counties both show a young median age
• The median age for 11 counties in the region exceeds the US median age
• For more information on county level population by age group, see Appendix 2
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.gov
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.gov
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
5
RACIAL MIX: 2000 AND 2010
• The standard race categories used for Census purposes are white, black, American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN), Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NHOPI), or some other race
• Hispanic is not considered a race but is instead an ethnicity – it is possible to be white and Hispanic, black and Hispanic, Asian and Hispanic, etc.
• Between 2000 and 2010, the region became slightly more racially diverse than it was in 2000
• The region remains less diverse than the state as a whole: 83.6% of the region was white alone in 2010, while 72.2% of the state’s population fit that category
• Over 90% of the population of Ellis, Grant and Major counties were categorized as “white alone”
• Much of the region’s net population growth was accounted for by increases among those reporting to be some other race alone or more than one race alone
• Some other race alone represented the largest minority by race in 11 of the region’s 18 counties (5.3% of the region as a whole)
• American Indians were the largest minority by race in 5 counties (3.7% of the region’s population)
• Blacks were the largest minority group by race in 2 counties (2.4% for the region)
• For more information on county level population by race, see Appendices 3 and 4
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Demographic Profiles www.factfinder2.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
6
HISPANIC ETHNICITY: 2000 AND 2010
• The region’s percentage of Hispanics grew closer to the national percentage moving from a 5.9% difference in 2000 to a 4.8% difference in 2010
• Half of the region’s 18 counties had Hispanic percentages in double digits, with four exceeding 20%: Beaver (20.1%), Blaine (24.1%), Cimarron (20.8%) and Texas (42.0%)
• Grant County had the region’s lowest Hispanic presence by number and percentage (3.5%, or 158 people)
• Between 2000 and 2010, the Hispanic growth rate for all but two counties in the region exceeded the national Hispanic growth rate
• For more information on county level population by Hispanic ethnicity, see Appendix 5
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census www.factfinder2.census.gov P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
7
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT: 2005-2009
• Woods County, home to North Western Oklahoma State University, was the only county that exceeded the national estimate for the percentage of the population with a bachelor’s degree or higher at 28.2% (+/- 3.5%)
• 13 of the 18 counties met or exceeded the national estimate for the percentage of the population with some college education but no degree
o Region: 24.2% (+/-0.6%)
o OK: 23.0% (+/-0.2%)
o US: 20.3% (+/-0.0%)
• Almost half of adults in the region have a high school diploma or less education
• The 2005-2009 American Community Survey is based on surveys collected during the full 5 year span and results are considered to be representative of the complete time period
• For more information on county level population by educational attainment, see Appendix 6
Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set
www.factfinder.census.gov
Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.govP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
8
PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME: 1990 TO 2009
• Per Capita Personal Income (PCPI) for the nation, state and region steadily climbed upward until 2009 when the impact of the global recession caused wages to decline
o 2009 PCPI:
 US: $39,635
 OK: $35,837
 Region: $33,640
• Collectively, the region’s PCPI has been below state and national figures
• Since 2000, Harper County is the only county in the region to exceed the state PCPI, last doing so in 2005
• In 2009, no counties matched the national PCPI, and only 4 counties exceeded the state’s PCPI:
o OK: $35,837
o Canadian: $36,325
o Garfield: $36,772
o Grant: $36,273
o Kingfisher: $35,924
• For more information on PCPI, see Appendix 7
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis
http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2 P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
9
ESTIMATED RETAIL SUBJECT TO SALES TAX: 2004-2010
2004-2010 Estimated Retail Subject to Sales Tax
For 20 Largest Communities Based on 2010 Population
(In Thousands of Dollars)
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
BEAVER
Beaver
12,178
13,550
16,964
15,558
15,550
13,515
16,043
BECKHAM
Elk City
195,678
218,947
251,434
271,652
309,137
253,945
274,442
Sayre
27,174
27,240
33,577
43,286
39,000
33,966
35,782
BLAINE
Watonga
29,763
31,416
31,154
31,731
33,297
33,395
31,004
CANADIAN
El Reno
142,103
149,651
160,868
168,469
183,692
179,763
194,348
Mustang
135,266
144,899
154,642
164,897
182,567
187,182
186,476
Piedmont
20,067
21,604
24,315
23,897
28,307
28,085
29,359
Union City
2,524
3,258
3,810
3,918
3,020
3,077
3,481
Yukon
296,393
320,755
329,651
348,386
371,032
386,186
391,651
CUSTER
Clinton
100,092
107,391
111,932
122,953
134,421
125,063
124,152
Weatherford
131,423
138,121
140,832
158,895
165,946
161,744
173,888
GARFIELD
Enid
567,494
600,554
625,709
665,316
724,749
687,785
686,234
KINGFISHER
Hennessey
18,110
20,055
22,497
22,054
26,832
22,171
23,098
Kingfisher
55,965
68,874
61,951
77,428
78,093
77,006
77,723
Piedmont
20,067
21,604
24,315
23,897
28,307
28,085
29,359
MAJOR
Fairview
27,141
28,735
31,829
36,179
39,172
36,173
34,362
TEXAS
Guymon
115,890
113,616
123,059
130,411
144,616
137,658
136,778
Hooker
7,101
7,018
6,901
7,554
8,474
10,030
9,920
WOODS
Alva
59,805
62,835
62,063
70,553
79,769
75,674
74,263
WOODWARD
Woodward
218,137
236,648
277,345
294,833
312,385
263,347
277,538
Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
10
• Retail sales figures used here are based on a summation of calendar month data as reported by the Oklahoma Tax Commission
• Because those data are subject to a reporting time lag, these figures are considered estimates
• Figures represent estimated sales subject to sales tax, thus sales to governments, non-profits, and other non-taxable entities are not included in these figures
• Changes in retail sales could be due to:
o The introduction or removal of a local sales tax
o The increase or reduction of an existing sales tax
o Sharp upswings or downturns in economic conditions
o The opening or closing of a significant retail establishment such as
 A big-box retailer
 A large shopping mall
• Collectively, retail sales trended upward until 2008, peaking at $3.24 billion for the region
• As the global recession spread in 2009, collective retail sales for the region dropped to $3.06 billion
• Retail sales rebounded somewhat in 2010, reaching $3.15 billion within the region
• In 2010, the largest volume of estimated retail sales occurred in Enid, Yukon, Woodward and Elk City. These four communities accounted for just over half of the region’s estimated retail sales volume in 2010
• For more information on local level sales tax collections and growth, see Appendices 8 and 9
Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
11
INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT, ESTABLISHMENTS, AND EARNINGS: 2010
• The following graphs use data from EMSI, which defines industry employment differently from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). BLS reports job counts only for establishments with an employer/employee relationship which excludes non-employer establishments like sole proprietorships and partnerships
• EMSI includes data from both employer AND non-employer establishments
• The Northwest region had 10,088 establishments operating in 2010
Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
12
• The region had a higher percentage of mining, quarrying and oil and gas establishments; government; transportation & warehousing; construction; agriculture; retail trade; and utilities establishments than did the state or nation
• Retail, construction and government combined to equal just under one third of all establishments in the region in 2010
• As a percentage, jobs in agriculture and mining are more prevalent in the region than is the case statewide or nationally
• Government jobs include federal, state, local and Tribal employment
• In 2010, Canadian County was home for 23.8% of all jobs in the region
Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.com
Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
13
Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.com
Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
14
• Industry Location Quotient (LQ) compares the following:
1. Changes in employment
2. For a given industry
3. During a given time period
4. In a given area, against another reference area
• A score of 1.0 or higher indicates competitive advantage
• The LQ chart compares industries at the 2 digit NAICS level for:
o Oklahoma and the 18 county region against the nation as a whole
o Based on 2010 data
• Every county in the region showed a national competitive advantage in:
o Mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction
o Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting
• Many had an advantage in:
o Utilities (all but Blaine, Cimarron, Dewey, Ellis, Grant, Roger Mills and Woods)
Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
15
Additional Competitive Advantages At The County Level
County
Construction
Manufacturing
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Transportation & Warehousing
Information
Finance & Insurance
Real Estate and Leasing
Management of Companies
Administrative Support
Health Care & Social Assistance
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation
Accommodation and Food Services
Other Services
Alfalfa
X
Beaver
X
Beckham
X
X
X
X
Blaine
X
X
Canadian
X
X
X
X
X
X
Cimarron
X
X
X
X
Custer
X
X
X
X
Dewey
X
X
Ellis
X
Garfield
X
X
Grant
X
X
X
X
Harper
X
Kingfisher
X
X
Major
X
Roger Mills
X
Texas
X
X
X
X
X
Woods
X
Woodward
X
X
X
Source: EMSI Complete Employment – 2nd Quarter 2011 www.economicmodeling.comP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
16
LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE: 1990 TO 2010
• The labor force participation rate is calculated by dividing the non-farm labor force by the total population
• The measure isn’t exact (because total population includes those unable to work due to age, health, or other issues while the labor force count doesn’t include farm labor) but inputs are consistent over time, thus the measure indicates trends
• The region’s non-farm labor force participation rate had been trending upwards, but dropped off in 2009 and again in 2010
• All but 4 counties in the region exceed the labor force participation rate for the state and nation
• Between 2000 and 2009, 5 counties in the region experienced a double digit increase in their labor force participation rates (Beaver: 12.4%, Beckham: 13.3%, Dewey: 13.9%, Ellis: 10.6%, and Grant 11.8%)
• Between 2000 and 2009, an across the board drop in participation occurred as 15 of 18 counties showed a decline in their labor force participation rates and those with an increase only grew marginally
Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division
www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and
US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tables
Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division
www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and
US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tables
Sources: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division
www.census.gov/popest/counties/counties.html and
US Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/lau/#tablesP o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
17
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 1990 TO 2010
• Over the last two decades, unemployment rates for the region have been below the state and national rates
• After the onset of the recent recession, unemployment rates rose sharply
• 2010 annualized unemployment rates:
o US: 9.6%
o OK: 7.1%
o Region: 5.4%
• Between 2008 and 2010, Blaine County had the largest increase in the unemployment rate for the region, climbing by 4.2 percentage points
• Blaine County is the only county in the region with an April 2011 unemployment rate that exceeds the state rate
• For more information on county level unemployment rates, see Appendix 10
Sources: US unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey
http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=ln
State and County unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics
http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=la
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics www.bls.gov/lau/#tables P o l i c y , R e s e a r c h & E c o n o m i c A n a l y s i s
NORTHWEST REGIONAL PROFILE
Page
18
COMMUTING PATTERNS: 2009
• A region is a net worker exporter when the number of residents living in the region who commute out for work exceeds the number of workers who live outside the region but commute into the region for employment
• Census data for 2009 indicates the region had a net outflow of over 27,000 workers
• Canadian County had the largest net outflow (net outflow of over 22,200 workers) followed by Blaine (net outflow of over 1,400 workers)
• 4 counties showed a net inflow of workers:
o Beckham: net inflow of over 700 – over 450 from outside the region
o Custer: net inflow of over 1,500 – almost 1,300 from outside the region
o Garfield: net inflow of over 300 – over 1,000 coming from inside the region offset by another almost 700 leaving the region
o Texas: net inflow of almost 900 – all from outside the region
• Almost 6,200 residents of the region commuted outside the state for employment
o Workers who commute just over the state line
o Long haul truck drivers
o Commercial pilots
o Petroleum workers
o Entertainers
• Over 1,000 residents of Texas and Beaver counties commuted to Seward County, KS for employment
• Just over 4,200 out of state residents commuted into the region for employment
• Over 500 residents of Seward County, KS commute into Texas County for work
Source: US Census Bureau, LEHD Program and OnTheMap http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/
Source: US Census Bureau, LEHD Program and OnTheMap http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/ APPENDIX 1 – Population Growth Trends
1990 to 2000
2000-2010
2005-2010
Total Population: 2010 Census Count
Pop Change
Avg. Annual Growth
Pop Change
Avg. Annual Growth
Pop Change
Avg. Annual Growth
United States
309,050,816
31,292,600
1.3%
27,626,216
1.0%
13,432,362
0.9%
Oklahoma
3,751,351
303,922
1.0%
300,697
0.9%
218,582
1.2%
Region
344,385
15,216
0.5%
35,735
1.1%
31,509
1.8%
Alfalfa
5,642
(272)
-0.4%
(463)
-0.8%
(14)
0.0%
Beaver
5,636
(126)
-0.2%
(221)
-0.3%
233
0.9%
Beckham
22,119
1,013
0.5%
2,320
1.2%
3,489
3.5%
Blaine
11,943
567
0.6%
(33)
0.1%
(805)
-1.3%
Canadian
115,541
13,028
1.6%
27,844
2.8%
18,394
3.5%
Cimarron
2,475
(138)
-0.4%
(673)
-2.4%
(233)
-1.8%
Custer
27,469
(649)
-0.2%
1,327
0.5%
1,968
1.5%
Dewey
4,810
(797)
-1.5%
67
0.2%
412
1.9%
Ellis
4,151
(396)
-0.9%
76
0.2%
281
1.4%
Garfield
60,580
1,164
0.2%
2,767
0.5%
3,640
1.3%
Grant
4,527
(535)
-1.0%
(617)
-1.2%
(129)
-0.5%
Harper
3,685
(489)
-1.3%
123
0.4%
384
2.3%
Kingfisher
15,034
760
0.6%
1,108
0.8%
958
1.3%
Major
7,527
(458)
-0.6%
(18)
0.0%
356
1.0%
Roger Mills
3,647
(680)
-1.8%
211
0.6%
386
2.3%
Texas
20,640
3,680
2.1%
533
0.3%
619
0.6%
Woods
8,878
6
0.1%
(211)
-0.2%
338
0.8%
Woodward
20,081
(462)
-0.2%
1,595
0.8%
1,232
1.3%
Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division
http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html
APPENDIX 2 - Age Groupings
Total Population 2010 Census Count
Age 0-19
Age 20-24
Age 25-54
Age 55-64
Age 65-84
Age 85 and over
United States
309,050,816
26.9%
7.0%
41.2%
11.8%
11.3%
1.8%
Oklahoma
3,751,351
27.8%
7.2%
39.8%
11.8%
11.7%
1.7%
Region
344,385
27.9%
6.6%
40.4%
11.5%
11.8%
1.8%
Alfalfa
5,642
19.4%
3.9%
43.2%
13.2%
17.6%
2.7%
Beaver
5,636
28.4%
4.4%
37.9%
13.8%
13.5%
2.0%
Beckham
22,119
26.7%
7.2%
42.5%
10.8%
10.9%
1.8%
Blaine
11,943
23.7%
7.0%
44.0%
11.0%
12.5%
2.0%
Canadian
115,541
29.3%
5.4%
43.0%
11.4%
9.7%
1.2%
Cimarron
2,475
27.3%
4.1%
32.4%
14.7%
18.1%
3.2%
Custer
27,469
28.1%
12.7%
35.4%
10.4%
11.2%
2.2%
Dewey
4,810
27.3%
3.6%
36.5%
12.7%
17.0%
2.9%
Ellis
4,151
26.7%
3.3%
35.5%
15.5%
16.0%
3.0%
Garfield
60,580
27.2%
6.5%
39.2%
11.8%
13.2%
2.3%
Grant
4,527
24.9%
4.0%
36.4%
13.5%
18.2%
3.0%
Harper
3,685
27.6%
4.1%
37.5%
12.2%
16.0%
2.7%
Kingfisher
15,034
29.1%
5.0%
39.2%
11.7%
13.1%
2.0%
Major
7,527
25.4%
4.8%
37.1%
13.4%
16.9%
2.4%
Roger Mills
3,647
27.3%
4.4%
37.0%
13.6%
15.6%
2.2%
Texas
20,640
32.3%
8.6%
39.2%
9.9%
9.0%
1.2%
Woods
8,878
23.8%
13.7%
34.4%
11.0%
14.5%
2.8%
Woodward
20,081
26.5%
6.3%
42.1%
10.9%
12.6%
1.6%
Note: Columns may not add exactly to 100.0% due to slight rounding error
Source: US Census Bureau 2010 Census Demographic Profiles
www.factfinder2.census.gov
APPENDIX 3 – 2000 Census Population By Race
Total Population 2000 Census Count
White Alone
Black Alone
American Indian & Alaska Native Alone
Asian Alone
Other Race Alone
More Than One Race
Oklahoma
3,450,654
76.2%
7.6%
7.9%
1.4%
2.5%
4.5%
Region
308,650
87.1%
2.4%
3.3%
1.1%
2.5%
3.5%
Alfalfa
6,105
89.4%
4.2%
2.7%
0.1%
2.1%
1.4%
Beaver
5,857
92.7%
0.3%
1.2%
0.1%
1.9%
3.8%
Beckham
19,799
87.1%
5.5%
2.6%
0.4%
2.2%
2.3%
Blaine
11,976
76.3%
6.7%
8.7%
0.7%
4.0%
3.7%
Canadian
87,697
87.0%
2.2%
4.3%
2.4%
2.7%
1.4%
Cimarron
3,148
85.8%
0.6%
1.0%
0.2%
2.5%
9.9%
Custer
26,142
81.4%
2.9%
5.8%
0.9%
3.2%
5.8%
Dewey
4,743
92.2%
0.1%
4.6%
0.1%
2.3%
0.7%
Ellis
4,075
96.3%
0.0%
1.2%
0.1%
1.6%
0.7%
Garfield
57,813
88.7%
3.3%
2.1%
0.8%
2.6%
2.5%
Grant
5,144
95.3%
0.1%
2.4%
0.1%
1.3%
0.7%
Harper
3,562
95.9%
0.0%
0.9%
0.1%
0.7%
2.4%
Kingfisher
13,926
88.1%
1.6%
3.0%
0.2%
2.7%
4.4%
Major
7,545
95.0%
0.2%
0.9%
0.1%
1.4%
2.4%
Roger Mills
3,436
91.8%
0.3%
5.5%
0.1%
1.9%
0.5%
Texas
20,107
76.7%
0.7%
1.2%
0.6%
2.6%
18.2%
Woods
9,089
93.4%
2.4%
1.6%
0.5%
1.5%
0.6%
Woodward
18,486
92.2%
1.1%
2.1%
0.5%
1.6%
2.5%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census
www.factfinder2.census.gov
APPENDIX 4 – 2010 Census Population By Race
Total Population 2010 Census Count
White Alone
Black Alone
American Indian & Alaska Native Alone
Asian Alone
Other Race Alone
More Than One Race
Oklahoma
3,751,351
72.2%
7.4%
8.6%
1.7%
4.2%
5.9%
Region
344,385
83.6%
2.4%
3.7%
1.5%
3.5%
5.3%
Alfalfa
5,642
89.4%
4.1%
2.9%
0.2%
2.1%
1.3%
Beaver
5,636
82.8%
0.8%
1.1%
0.1%
3.1%
12.2%
Beckham
22,119
85.0%
4.0%
2.8%
0.8%
2.8%
4.6%
Blaine
11,943
79.7%
2.6%
8.0%
0.2%
3.8%
5.7%
Canadian
115,541
83.1%
2.5%
4.8%
3.0%
4.1%
2.4%
Cimarron
2,475
84.7%
0.2%
0.8%
0.3%
1.8%
12.1%
Custer
27,469
78.1%
3.0%
6.3%
1.0%
3.9%
7.6%
Dewey
4,810
89.1%
0.3%
5.8%
0.7%
3.2%
1.0%
Ellis
4,151
94.4%
0.3%
1.6%
0.2%
1.6%
1.9%
Garfield
60,580
83.9%
3.0%
2.3%
1.0%
3.5%
6.4%
Grant
4,527
93.0%
0.8%
1.9%
0.2%
2.4%
1.7%
Harper
3,685
87.4%
0.1%
0.8%
0.2%
2.3%
9.4%
Kingfisher
15,034
84.5%
1.1%
3.1%
0.3%
3.2%
7.8%
Major
7,527
91.0%
0.4%
2.0%
0.3%
2.5%
3.8%
Roger Mills
3,647
89.8%
0.4%
5.8%
0.3%
2.3%
1.3%
Texas
20,640
75.7%
1.6%
1.3%
1.6%
2.8%
17.0%
Woods
8,878
88.4%
3.3%
2.4%
0.9%
2.7%
2.3%
Woodward
20,081
86.7%
1.6%
2.8%
0.6%
2.6%
5.7%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census
www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 5 – Population by Hispanic Ethnicity
2000
2010
Total
Hispanic
Not Hispanic
Total
Hispanic
Not Hispanic
United States
281,421,906
35,305,818
246,116,088
308,745,538
50,477,594
258,267,944
Oklahoma
3,450,654
179,304
3,271,350
3,751,351
332,007
3,419,344
Region
308,650
20,301
288,349
344,385
39,590
304,795
Alfalfa
6,105
177
5,928
5,642
224
5,418
Beaver
5,857
630
5,227
5,636
1,135
4,501
Beckham
19,799
1,079
18,720
22,119
2,619
19,500
Blaine
11,976
793
11,183
11,943
2,873
9,070
Canadian
87,697
3,386
84,311
115,541
7,794
107,747
Cimarron
3,148
485
2,663
2,475
514
1,961
Custer
26,142
2,361
23,781
27,469
3,830
23,639
Dewey
4,743
127
4,616
4,810
231
4,579
Ellis
4,075
106
3,969
4,151
251
3,900
Garfield
57,813
2,387
55,426
60,580
5,353
55,227
Grant
5,144
95
5,049
4,527
158
4,369
Harper
3,562
201
3,361
3,685
645
3,040
Kingfisher
13,926
961
12,965
15,034
2,022
13,012
Major
7,545
303
7,242
7,527
565
6,962
Roger Mills
3,436
91
3,345
3,647
165
3,482
Texas
20,107
6,003
14,104
20,640
8,659
11,981
Woods
9,089
220
8,869
8,878
424
8,454
Woodward
18,486
896
17,590
20,081
2,128
17,953
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census
www.factfinder2.census.gov APPENDIX 6 – Estimated Educational Attainment for Population 25 and Over (2005-2009)
Less than HS Diploma
HS graduate, GED, or alternative
Some College
Associate Degree
Bachelor Degree
Post
Bachelor Degree
United States
Estimate
15.4%
29.3%
20.3%
7.4%
17.4%
10.1%
MOE
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Oklahoma
Estimate
15.2%
32.7%
23.0%
6.7%
15.1%
7.3%
MOE
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
0.1%
0.2%
0.1%
Region
Estimate
14.7%
33.9%
24.2%
6.3%
14.8%
6.1%
MOE
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.3%
0.4%
0.3%
Alfalfa
Estimate
16.9%
38.5%
24.3%
3.3%
11.6%
5.4%
MOE
4.9%
3.0%
2.9%
1.2%
1.8%
3.9%
Beaver
Estimate
14.8%
38.0%
22.6%
5.4%
14.0%
5.2%
MOE
3.9%
3.2%
3.0%
1.4%
1.8%
3.3%
Beckham
Estimate
18.6%
37.1%
20.6%
7.6%
10.9%
5.2%
MOE
3.2%
3.2%
2.6%
1.5%
2.0%
1.7%
Blaine
Estimate
18.3%
39.5%
19.3%
6.9%
11.2%
5.0%
MOE
2.7%
2.9%
2.4%
1.6%
1.9%
1.8%
Canadian
Estimate
9.7%
30.3%
27.6%
8.1%
17.6%
6.7%
MOE
0.8%
1.2%
1.3%
0.7%
0.8%
0.5%
Cimarron
Estimate
20.9%
36.7%
19.6%
7.0%
13.6%
2.2%
MOE
4.4%
4.5%
3.6%
2.6%
2.8%
1.0%
Custer
Estimate
17.3%
29.2%
25.7%
5.0%
13.5%
9.2%
MOE
2.2%
2.3%
2.6%
1.1%
1.8%
1.5%
Dewey
Estimate
17.8%
45.2%
17.6%
4.2%
12.4%
2.8%
MOE
4.8%
4.6%
2.8%
1.4%
2.4%
5.9% Less than HS Diploma
HS graduate, GED, or alternative
Some College
Associate Degree
Bachelor Degree
Post
Bachelor Degree
Ellis
Estimate
13.2%
37.4%
23.9%
2.8%
15.4%
7.3%
MOE
4.6%
3.3%
3.1%
0.9%
2.5%
1.8%
Garfield
Estimate
14.1%
35.8%
21.9%
6.7%
15.1%
6.4%
MOE
1.3%
1.5%
1.6%
0.9%
1.2%
0.8%
Grant
Estimate
9.6%
36.6%
25.1%
5.8%
16.2%
6.8%
MOE
6.3%
3.4%
2.9%
1.4%
2.6%
1.7%
Harper
Estimate
17.2%
39.9%
19.7%
2.7%
15.4%
5.2%
MOE
8.4%
4.1%
3.9%
1.3%
3.8%
8.0%
Kingfisher
Estimate
17.2%
35.2%
24.3%
7.1%
10.5%
5.8%
MOE
2.7%
2.7%
2.8%
1.6%
1.8%
1.2%
Major
Estimate
14.6%
44.1%
23.5%
2.6%
10.9%
4.3%
MOE
3.2%
3.2%
3.0%
0.9%
1.9%
1.2%
Roger Mills
Estimate
12.2%
37.7%
27.1%
5.1%
11.1%
6.8%
MOE
7.2%
3.5%
3.7%
1.8%
1.9%
1.7%
Texas
Estimate
29.0%
28.8%
20.2%
4.0%
14.0%
4.0%
MOE
3.3%
2.7%
2.1%
1.2%
1.7%
0.9%
Woods
Estimate
11.5%
34.3%
23.3%
2.7%
19.3%
9.0%
MOE
3.7%
3.5%
3.1%
1.1%
2.8%
2.0%
Woodward
Estimate
19.3%
35.9%
24.9%
3.4%
12.5%
4.0%
MOE
2.6%
2.4%
2.2%
1.2%
1.6%
1.3%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5 Year Data Set www.factfinder.census.gov
MOE= Margin of ErrorAPPENDIX 7 – Per Capita Personal Income (PCPI)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
United States
$30,318
$31,145
$31,461
$32,271
$33,881
$35,424
$37,698
$39,461
$40,674
$39,635
Oklahoma
$24,605
$26,218
$26,218
$26,909
$28,790
$30,469
$33,223
$34,539
$36,911
$35,837
Region
$23,533
$24,641
$24,726
$26,112
$27,512
$28,924
$31,166
$32,743
$35,383
$33,640
Alfalfa
$21,257
$22,070
$21,117
$23,719
$23,210
$23,022
$23,426
$24,359
$28,597
$25,074
Beaver
$24,380
$26,313
$24,599
$26,149
$26,429
$28,690
$27,794
$30,317
$34,705
$32,774
Beckham
$18,417
$20,166
$20,329
$22,099
$24,938
$26,866
$29,317
$31,046
$32,999
$31,084
Blaine
$17,852
$18,094
$18,807
$20,384
$18,658
$20,101
$21,436
$21,310
$23,428
$22,134
Canadian
$25,564
$26,432
$26,815
$27,628
$29,153
$30,676
$32,983
$34,646
$36,838
$36,325
Cimarron
$22,056
$22,972
$24,251
$26,158
$26,340
$28,403
$26,247
$29,331
$35,834
$30,942
Custer
$20,919
$22,166
$22,089
$23,276
$24,809
$26,385
$28,440
$30,195
$32,899
$31,350
Dewey
$21,598
$23,252
$24,785
$27,572
$27,408
$28,611
$28,914
$31,583
$36,253
$31,790
Ellis
$22,241
$25,102
$24,454
$26,585
$28,062
$29,387
$30,698
$31,887
$34,881
$30,318
Garfield
$24,330
$25,229
$26,082
$27,558
$29,556
$30,509
$33,942
$36,060
$38,351
$36,772
Grant
$24,008
$24,977
$26,164
$28,381
$32,473
$29,809
$32,199
$33,742
$39,908
$36,273
Harper
$28,861
$32,493
$32,349
$34,647
$32,581
$35,556
$34,496
$33,050
$36,064
$33,917
Kingfisher
$23,939
$25,558
$26,755
$27,928
$28,835
$31,230
$34,036
$35,823
$39,610
$35,924
Major
$22,025
$23,137
$23,364
$25,500
$26,678
$28,070
$30,167
$30,937
$34,250
$31,295
Roger Mills
$21,142
$23,089
$23,585
$24,336
$26,226
$27,312
$29,344
$34,277
$37,182
$34,739
Texas
$29,259
$29,044
$24,952
$26,267
$27,196
$28,438
$29,169
$28,683
$30,170
$28,108
Woods
$21,042
$22,404
$22,369
$25,711
$25,651
$24,932
$27,249
$28,762
$32,630
$30,208
Woodward
$20,247
$22,396
$21,943
$22,934
$25,466
$28,266
$31,281
$33,148
$36,810
$32,383
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/default.cfm?selTable=CA1-3§ion=2APPENDIX 8 - Retail Sales Growth Rates: Communities Within The Region
2003
to 2004
2004
to 2005
2005
to 2006
2006
to 2007
2007
to 2008
2008
to 2009
2009
to 2010
Alfalfa County
Aline
5.8%
-14.4%
-6.4%
27.0%
11.5%
0.9%
-28.8%
Burlington
8.8%
8.5%
-4.3%
9.8%
15.3%
-4.4%
39.0%
Byron
19.3%
-31.3%
8.9%
52.7%
31.8%
-2.1%
57.5%
Carmen
0.7%
7.9%
11.6%
4.0%
12.7%
3.9%
-7.7%
Cherokee
2.0%
0.1%
5.4%
4.9%
45.8%
-13.6%
-3.0%
Goltry
-10.4%
20.3%
0.6%
1.8%
40.8%
-54.2%
110.5%
Helena
1.4%
-2.2%
15.7%
8.5%
33.4%
12.3%
-12.4%
Jet
-10.1%
1.9%
27.7%
-10.9%
31.1%
-4.3%
7.8%
Beaver County
Beaver
0.4%
11.3%
25.2%
-8.3%
-0.1%
-13.1%
18.7%
Forgan
-11.3%
2.9%
86.3%
22.7%
-0.8%
-18.2%
-2.6%
Knowles
53.9%
-43.6%
-21.2%
-5.4%
-46.1%
47.9%
-8.4%
Beckham County
Carter
33.0%
-17.2%
-1.0%
91.4%
-11.6%
-16.0%
-3.1%
Elk City
14.5%
11.9%
14.8%
8.0%
13.8%
-17.9%
8.1%
Erick
8.9%
-9.5%
15.5%
21.3%
0.4%
-12.7%
6.9%
Sayre
-3.2%
0.2%
23.3%
28.9%
-9.9%
-12.9%
5.3%
Blaine County
Canton
0.9%
-9.2%
15.4%
-3.3%
19.5%
12.5%
-7.2%
Geary
4.3%
-2.9%
1.2%
11.3%
-6.4%
13.7%
6.7%
Greenfield
-31.2%
38.9%
7.9%
28.9%
194.2%
65.8%
-83.2%
Hitchcock
31.9%
-1.3%
-14.5%
39.8%
14.6%
-3.5%
4.7%
Hydro
-2.8%
2.9%
22.7%
4.1%
7.4%
0.7%
7.8%
Longdale
9.9%
-12.0%
13.5%
15.7%
23.1%
1.2%
-11.3%
Okeene
9.1%
4.9%
4.0%
8.7%
3.1%
1.4%
-6.5%
Watonga
-0.5%
5.6%
-0.8%
1.8%
4.9%
0.3%
-7.2%
Watts
11.0%
-7.2%
-3.5%
13.7%
30.6%
-5.9%
14.8%
Canadian County
Calumet
3.9%
-13.8%
3.3%
8.6%
24.7%
66.4%
26.1%
El Reno
5.6%
5.3%
7.5%
4.7%
9.0%
-2.1%
8.1%
Geary
4.3%
-2.9%
1.2%
11.3%
-6.4%
13.7%
6.7% 2003
to 2004
2004
to 2005
2005
to 2006
2006
to 2007
2007
to 2008
2008
to 2009
2009
to 2010
Mustang
24.9%
7.1%
6.7%
6.6%
10.7%
2.5%
-0.4%
Okarche
13.4%
10.9%
-11.8%
31.3%
3.5%
3.7%
54.8%
Piedmont
26.6%
7.7%
12.5%
-1.7%
18.5%
-0.8%
4.5%
Union City
23.9%
29.1%
16.9%
2.8%
-22.9%
1.9%
13.1%
Yukon
4.9%
8.2%
2.8%
5.7%
6.5%
4.1%
1.4%
Cimarron County
Boise City
2.2%
2.2%
13.7%
-13.2%
4.9%
-2.5%
13.7%
Keyes
4.1%
-0.1%
9.2%
-42.7%
23.2%
-7.9%
-23.4%
Custer County
Arapaho
19.0%
-4.5%
2.7%
16.9%
40.7%
-48.6%
-18.6%
Butler
17.4%
5.9%
-5.4%
8.1%
138.6%
-34.5%
-19.3%
Clinton
8.9%
7.3%
4.2%
9.8%
9.3%
-7.0%
-0.7%
Custer City
10.9%
15.1%
-14.6%
24.3%
2.4%
-4.0%
15.7%
Hammon
-10.0%
-7.8%
-3.1%
-1.1%
58.2%
-55.7%
43.4%
Thomas
-4.5%
15.5%
-3.2%
12.9%
15.4%
-13.7%
10.8%
Weatherford
7.4%
5.1%
2.0%
12.8%
4.4%
-2.5%
7.5%
Dewey County
Camargo
15.4%
-21.1%
-5.5%
146.5%
-39.1%
16.1%
62.2%
Leedey
8.8%
16.8%
3.9%
6.3%
-3.1%
3.8%
10.4%
Seiling
5.0%
-4.6%
3.7%
12.9%
19.6%
-7.0%
16.9%
Taloga
6.0%
-3.2%
32.2%
-29.9%
-0.1%
-17.7%
183.0%
Vici
5.5%
1.3%
5.2%
19.4%
9.2%
-3.3%
16.4%
Ellis County
Arnett
5.0%
-0.8%
6.5%
40.0%
27.0%
-15.1%
37.2%
Fargo
9.7%
-18.1%
-11.7%
34.9%
108.2%
-16.1%
-30.0%
Gage
3.8%
-10.2%
41.0%
0.5%
10.8%
-2.1%
15.9%
Shattuck
5.7%
8.4%
9.1%
18.0%
9.8%
-8.1%
16.6%
Garfield County
Covington
1.8%
-13.8%
1.6%
9.2%
1.7%
-4.2%
7.7%
Douglas
8.5%
68.2%
-14.8%
3.8%
36.9%
-22.3%
2.0%
Drummond
7.5%
34.1%
5.4%
-9.1%
130.3%
-0.9%
-47.7%
Enid
4.5%
5.8%
4.2%
6.3%
8.9%
-5.1%
-0.2%
Fairmont
35.1%
-6.3%
15.4%
-4.5%
13.9%
2.6%
-10.5%
Garber
31.4%
-20.9%
-3.1%
9.2%
2.3%
8.8%
-1.7% 2003
to 2004
2004
to 2005
2005
to 2006
2006
to 2007
2007
to 2008
2008
to 2009
2009
to 2010
Hillsdale
67.7%
185.0%
-44.7%
8.3%
30.6%
-5.9%
0.4%
Hunter
1.5%
0.8%
-2.2%
15.0%
33.4%
15.7%
-15.5%
Kremlin
16.1%
-22.8%
32.9%
28.4%
7.0%
-5.2%
3.2%
Lahoma
-2.1%
-1.1%
1.2%
3.7%
9.3%
23.8%
-26.0%
North Enid
14.5%
5.6%
18.6%
-4.8%
12.2%
-4.0%
-4.8%
Waukomis
1.0%
7.5%
20.3%
-2.9%
24.4%
-8.4%
-8.1%
Grant County
Deer Creek
13.5%
-0.1%
-9.3%
26.9%
-7.1%
15.4%
-14.6%
Lamont
1.3%
9.3%
29.7%
-11.1%
17.5%
-1.6%
3.4%
Medford
3.3%
-1.5%
5.7%
1.3%
9.2%
0.9%
22.6%
Nash
2.2%
69.4%
-17.4%
-3.7%
4.6%
4.7%
-0.1%
Pond Creek
0.3%
5.9%
3.2%
2.1%
18.2%
8.7%
0.8%
Renfrow
80.9%
10.1%
45.2%
5.1%
26.5%
21.1%
26.2%
Wakita
4.3%
-0.1%
6.3%
-11.4%
17.0%
-7.2%
22.3%
Harper County
Buffalo
4.1%
-5.5%
18.4%
7.9%
22.7%
-5.6%
7.6%
Laverne
1.6%
5.5%
7.8%
7.7%
6.1%
2.7%
9.7%
May
77.0%
-42.3%
0.5%
134.1%
7.1%
0.9%
-22.5%
Kingfisher County
Cashion
-35.5%
21.7%
24.2%
14.6%
14.0%
-18.3%
4.5%
Dover
7.8%
-0.1%
16.0%
4.0%
-1.9%
6.5%
-5.3%
Hennessey
1.9%
10.7%
12.2%
-2.0%
21.7%
-17.4%
4.2%
Kingfisher
6.4%
23.1%
-10.1%
25.0%
0.9%
-1.4%
0.9%
Loyal
3.9%
7.0%
6.4%
-7.3%
-14.5%
14.2%
-1.0%
Okarche
13.4%
10.9%
-11.8%
31.3%
3.5%
3.7%
54.8%
Piedmont
26.6%
7.7%
12.5%
-1.7%
18.5%
-0.8%
4.5%
Major County
Ames
37.1%
-8.5%
21.4%
16.8%
4.5%
-19.3%
8.4%
Cleo Springs
-2.7%
6.1%
17.8%
-4.0%
13.4%
6.0%
-5.7%
Fairview
2.6%
5.9%
10.8%
13.7%
8.3%
-7.7%
-5.0%
Meno
-4.9%
8.1%
2.1%
7.4%
8.5%
-5.8%
0.5%
Ringwood
10.9%
14.6%
1.0%
15.2%
2.1%
-21.4%
-7.8%
Roger Mills County
Cheyenne
2.1%
8.3%
9.8%
-8.3%
-23.1%
-35.3%
36.3% 2003
to 2004
2004
to 2005
2005
to 2006
2006
to 2007
2007
to 2008
2008
to 2009
2009
to 2010
Hammon
-10.0%
-7.8%
-3.1%
-1.1%
58.2%
-55.7%
43.4%
Reydon
2.2%
-0.5%
21.6%
-31.5%
6.5%
61.8%
14.8%
Texas County
Goodwell
-1.8%
-8.3%
10.3%
-10.3%
-3.3%
7.3%
2.8%
Guymon
6.9%
-2.0%
8.3%
6.0%
10.9%
-4.8%
-0.6%
Hardesty
6.4%
14.1%
10.4%
-8.5%
22.6%
-21.1%
8.5%
Hooker
-6.4%
-1.2%
-1.7%
9.5%
12.2%
18.4%
-1.1%
Texhoma
-6.6%
6.3%
0.4%
-16.6%
6.2%
0.4%
11.3%
Tyrone
-22.3%
-9.5%
8.7%
11.2%
-10.3%
-27.4%
-4.9%
Woods County
Alva
2.4%
5.1%
-1.2%
13.7%
13.1%
-5.1%
-1.9%
Freedom
11.0%
21.8%
35.9%
52.2%
77.6%
-41.0%
-32.8%
Waynoka
6.7%
10.8%
8.0%
14.7%
7.0%
-12.1%
-4.3%
Woodward County
Fort Supply
5.5%
12.3%
8.2%
8.6%
21.3%
-14.3%
-16.9%
Mooreland
-1.1%
5.4%
32.1%
9.5%
10.9%
-13.6%
-9.2%
Woodward
8.5%
8.5%
17.2%
6.3%
6.0%
-15.7%
5.4%
APPENDIX 9 – Estimated Retail Sales Subject to Tax
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Alfalfa County
Aline
703,833
602,279
563,816
715,871
797,877
805,361
573,669
Burlington
743,492
806,624
772,119
847,554
976,835
933,962
1,297,956
Byron
97,078
66,741
72,710
111,042
146,348
143,225
225,637
Carmen
1,290,792
1,392,728
1,554,856
1,616,993
1,823,122
1,894,650
1,748,308
Cherokee
10,680,726
10,694,757
11,271,026
11,827,181
17,247,914
14,896,725
14,456,945
Goltry
525,220
631,902
635,855
647,021
911,090
417,525
879,026
Helena
2,532,807
2,477,479
2,867,495
3,112,058
4,150,366
4,662,661
4,083,360
Jet
941,954
959,604
1,225,232
1,091,188
1,430,286
1,368,267
1,474,515
Beaver County
Beaver
12,177,603
13,549,799
16,963,949
15,557,823
15,549,718
13,515,404
16,043,284
Forgan
1,045,391
1,075,232
2,003,217
2,458,282
2,438,117
1,993,650
1,941,924
Knowles
172,932
97,459
76,774
72,645
39,184
57,952
53,094
Beckham County
Carter
1,009,112
835,567
827,283
1,583,209
1,399,444
1,175,025
1,138,822
Elk City
195,677,772
218,946,775
251,434,278
271,651,517
309,136,966
253,944,662
274,441,983
Erick
6,630,305
5,997,552
6,925,989
8,401,047
8,438,511
7,370,969
7,883,027
Sayre
27,174,336
27,240,464
33,576,994
43,285,780
39,000,340
33,965,547
35,782,348
Blaine County
Canton
5,180,436
4,704,239
5,427,730
5,246,031
6,268,659
7,054,111
6,545,415
Geary
11,431,317
11,103,614
11,240,276
12,505,888
11,700,041
13,305,573
14,198,533
Greenfield
190,334
264,332
285,182
367,462
1,081,239
1,792,684
300,723
Hitchcock
236,541
233,392
199,536
278,995
319,865
308,624
323,174
Hydro
3,756,367
3,866,518
4,745,053
4,938,098
5,301,943
5,338,847
5,753,268
Longdale
1,272,706
1,119,492
1,270,374
1,469,355
1,809,238
1,831,200
1,624,820
Okeene
7,220,121
7,570,968
7,875,500
8,559,024
8,825,034
8,952,218
8,374,413
Watonga
29,763,111
31,415,720
31,154,224
31,730,515
33,296,866
33,395,088
31,003,790
Watts
746,795
692,697
668,468
760,306
992,945
934,125
1,072,546
Canadian County
Calumet
3,210,359
2,767,117
2,857,994
3,102,798
3,867,962
6,434,366
8,114,999
El Reno
142,103,030
149,650,833
160,867,718
168,469,349
183,691,609
179,762,812
194,348,305 2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Geary
11,431,317
11,103,614
11,240,276
12,505,888
11,700,041
13,305,573
14,198,533
Mustang
135,266,224
144,899,063
154,641,721
164,896,884
182,566,630
187,181,701
186,476,039
Okarche
9,489,077
10,527,751
9,287,327
12,194,378
12,624,674
13,087,902
20,255,050
Piedmont
20,067,280
21,603,834
24,315,011
23,897,319
28,307,096
28,085,341
29,359,335
Union City
2,524,490
3,258,406
3,810,336
3,918,088
3,020,215
3,077,141
3,480,830
Yukon
296,392,778
320,755,090
329,651,270
348,386,189
371,031,993
386,185,752
391,650,984
Cimarron County
Boise City
10,613,313
10,841,848
12,330,987
10,700,757
11,224,555
10,941,213
12,444,385
Keyes
1,227,268
1,226,079
1,338,972
767,135
945,166
870,187
666,871
Custer County
Arapaho
3,488,906
3,330,493
3,421,979
3,999,384
5,625,169
2,892,219
2,354,517
Butler
1,769,348
1,873,120
1,771,304
1,914,986
4,569,034
2,994,794
2,416,858
Clinton
100,091,926
107,391,285
111,931,715
122,952,776
134,421,083
125,062,602
124,151,861
Custer City
1,339,453
1,541,578
1,317,018
1,636,996
1,676,767
1,608,991
1,861,727
Hammon
3,716,114
3,425,382
3,318,031
3,280,721
5,189,058
2,297,827
3,294,615
Thomas
5,568,777
6,430,659
6,221,842
7,026,554
8,110,810
6,999,524
7,752,187
Weatherford
131,423,235
138,120,977
140,832,040
158,894,565
165,945,524
161,743,831
173,888,333
Dewey County
Camargo
648,726
512,068
483,794
1,192,374
725,683
842,666
1,366,410
Leedey
2,877,564
3,362,114
3,494,187
3,714,783
3,599,829
3,738,020
4,127,846
Seiling
9,083,775
8,664,367
8,987,964
10,149,143
12,137,793
11,284,479
13,193,190
Taloga
2,166,305
2,097,690
2,773,068
1,943,893
1,941,175
1,598,538
4,524,661
Vici
3,943,024
3,994,150
4,200,151
5,014,801
5,474,093
5,295,622
6,166,388
Ellis County
Arnett
3,462,629
3,433,771
3,656,888
5,121,036
6,503,176
5,524,098
7,578,392
Fargo
930,025
761,833
672,637
907,151
1,888,869
1,584,564
1,109,520
Gage
1,554,701
1,395,909
1,968,492
1,978,189
2,191,966
2,145,472
2,487,141
Shattuck
10,270,726
11,134,332
12,146,184
14,338,541
15,750,426
14,482,247
16,886,459
Garfield County
Covington
1,808,266
1,558,634
1,583,408
1,729,056
1,757,798
1,684,241
1,813,679
Douglas
111,630
187,739
160,005
166,098
227,313
176,612
180,108
Drummond
730,160
979,495
1,031,909
937,927
2,159,680
2,139,377
1,118,239
Enid
567,494,250
600,554,052
625,708,742
665,315,507
724,748,602
687,784,666
686,233,544
Fairmont
356,679
334,290
385,844
368,519
419,603
430,332
385,032 2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Garber
3,795,759
3,001,912
2,907,703
3,175,344
3,247,273
3,532,391
3,470,876
Hillsdale
121,085
345,037
190,847
206,780
270,063
254,194
255,191
Hunter
337,572
340,427
332,895
382,890
510,779
590,917
499,098
Kremlin
1,025,008
791,178
1,051,802
1,350,782
1,444,793
1,369,480
1,413,819
Lahoma
2,355,300
2,330,121
2,357,644
2,445,845
2,673,901
3,311,296
2,448,896
North Enid
2,241,526
2,365,933
2,805,392
2,669,673
2,995,870
2,876,540
2,739,110
Waukomis
2,930,614
3,150,628
3,789,338
3,681,265
4,578,220
4,192,300
3,851,799
Grant County
Deer Creek
446,787
446,121
404,470
513,439
476,928
550,346
469,738
Lamont
1,310,469
1,432,664
1,858,835
1,651,956
1,941,263
1,910,581
1,975,486
Medford
6,915,983
6,815,057
7,206,191
7,299,180
7,967,360
8,037,069
9,855,648
Nash
866,275
1,467,077
1,212,503
1,167,897
1,222,104
1,279,861
1,278,349
Pond Creek
3,429,448
3,632,153
3,747,610
3,825,572
4,522,589
4,914,197
4,953,508
Renfrow
61,775
68,018
98,738
103,797
131,319
158,972
200,631
Wakita
1,355,188
1,354,014
1,439,289
1,275,780
1,492,237
1,384,121
1,692,279
Harper County
Buffalo
5,917,194
5,591,769
6,622,830
7,146,243
8,766,641
8,278,346
8,910,486
Laverne
8,395,773
8,854,917
9,545,244
10,275,696
10,903,926
11,199,683
12,287,424
May
223,075
128,638
129,322
302,742
324,199
327,055
253,582
Kingfisher County
Cashion
1,914,883
2,330,243
2,894,774
3,318,141
3,782,131
3,091,619
3,232,020
Dover
1,839,943
1,838,382
2,131,662
2,217,731
2,174,698
2,316,560
2,193,956
Hennessey
18,109,577
20,055,124
22,496,862
22,054,021
26,832,124
22,170,778
23,098,066
Kingfisher
55,965,382
68,873,898
61,951,271
77,428,146
78,092,687
77,006,482
77,722,663
Loyal
333,545
356,840
379,567
351,741
300,802
343,424
339,978
Okarche
9,489,077
10,527,751
9,287,327
12,194,378
12,624,674
13,087,902
20,255,050
Piedmont
20,067,280
21,603,834
24,315,011
23,897,319
28,307,096
28,085,341
29,359,335
Major County
Ames
1,504,888
1,376,828
1,671,847
1,952,531
2,039,966
1,645,298
1,782,870
Cleo Springs
1,288,615
1,366,967
1,609,644
1,545,825
1,753,197
1,858,765
1,753,311
Fairview
27,140,956
28,734,738
31,828,586
36,178,912
39,171,762
36,173,365
34,361,891
Meno
1,390,430
1,503,246
1,534,374
1,648,467
1,788,029
1,685,102
1,693,653
Ringwood
4,140,032
4,743,114
4,788,840
5,518,420
5,635,806
4,428,014
4,081,667
Roger Mills
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
County
Cheyenne
16,380,430
17,739,051
19,470,629
17,853,356
13,721,112
8,884,219
12,105,501
Hammon
3,716,114
3,425,382
3,318,031
3,280,721
5,189,058
2,297,827
3,294,615
Reydon
802,478
798,851
971,293
665,532
709,038
1,147,089
1,316,552
Texas County
Goodwell
2,494,395
2,287,717
2,522,316
2,262,854
2,188,786
2,348,037
2,413,164
Guymon
115,890,099
113,616,186
123,058,550
130,411,073
144,615,869
137,657,646
136,778,305
Hardesty
410,879
468,617
517,192
473,439
580,342
458,174
497,086
Hooker
7,100,965
7,018,113
6,900,946
7,554,384
8,473,709
10,029,559
9,920,218
Texhoma
4,905,438
5,214,799
5,235,757
4,364,519
4,634,601
4,654,811
5,181,661
Tyrone
1,636,370
1,480,888
1,609,202
1,789,608
1,605,684
1,165,965
1,108,504
Woods County
Alva
59,805,452
62,834,588
62,062,797
70,552,933
79,769,323
75,673,724
74,263,280
Freedom
869,481
1,058,815
1,438,661
2,189,375
3,889,011
2,293,185
1,541,867
Waynoka
8,016,435
8,885,803
9,600,806
11,009,684
11,781,629
10,350,748
9,910,423
Woodward County
Fort Supply
893,793
1,003,704
1,085,583
1,178,859
1,429,966
1,225,818
1,019,012
Mooreland
4,821,186
5,079,595
6,707,809
7,344,207
8,146,967
7,040,864
6,394,514
Woodward
218,136,677
236,648,341
277,345,368
294,833,223
312,384,642
263,347,489
277,537,582
Source: Estimates Based on Oklahoma Tax Commission Data
http://www.tax.ok.gov/nwsrls.html
APPENDIX 10 – Annual County Unemployment Rates
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
United States
4.0%
4.7%
5.8%
6.0%
5.5%
5.1%
4.6%
4.6%
5.8%
9.3%
9.6%
Oklahoma
3.1%
3.7%
4.8%
5.6%
5.0%
4.5%
4.1%
4.1%
3.7%
6.6%
7.1%
Region
2.6%
3.0%
4.0%
4.4%
3.8%
3.6%
3.3%
3.2%
2.8%
5.2%
5.4%
Alfalfa
3.0%
3.0%
3.6%
4.1%
3.9%
4.4%
4.3%
4.4%
3.1%
5.0%
5.6%
Beaver
2.4%
2.6%
3.5%
3.9%
3.5%
3.3%
2.7%
2.6%
2.0%
3.6%
3.6%
Beckham
3.2%
3.2%
4.3%
3.8%
3.3%
3.1%
2.7%
2.4%
2.3%
6.1%
5.3%
Blaine
2.9%
4.4%
4.8%
5.0%
4.7%
4.9%
4.3%
4.2%
3.6%
5.8%
7.8%
Canadian
2.4%
3.1%
4.3%
4.8%
4.1%
3.7%
3.5%
3.8%
3.4%
5.8%
5.9%
Cimarron
2.2%
2.8%
3.8%
3.8%
3.1%
3.5%
3.4%
3.8%
3.0%
3.9%
4.1%
Custer
2.5%
3.1%
3.5%
3.7%
3.3%
3.2%
3.1%
3.0%
2.6%
4.8%
5.0%
Dewey
2.7%
2.8%
3.8%
3.7%
3.2%
3.4%
3.1%
3.0%
2.4%
4.5%
4.3%
Ellis
2.7%
2.7%
3.5%
3.0%
2.8%
3.0%
2.8%
2.4%
2.2%
4.7%
4.5%
Garfield
2.8%
3.1%
3.6%
4.2%
3.7%
3.6%
3.1%
2.9%
2.5%
4.5%
4.9%
Grant
2.5%
2.8%
3.5%
3.8%
3.6%
3.7%
3.8%
3.2%
2.5%
3.9%
4.3%
Harper
2.1%
2.9%
3.4%
3.7%
3.1%
3.0%
3.2%
2.8%
2.2%
4.1%
4.2%
Kingfisher
2.2%
2.4%
3.3%
3.4%
3.3%
3.3%
2.8%
2.6%
2.3%
4.6%
4.9%
Major
2.4%
2.8%
3.4%
3.6%
3.3%
3.3%
2.9%
2.8%
2.3%
4.6%
4.7%
Roger Mills
2.5%
2.4%
3.3%
2.8%
2.8%
2.8%
2.7%
2.7%
2.3%
4.7%
4.2%
Texas
2.6%
2.7%
3.4%
3.6%
3.4%
3.7%
3.4%
3.1%
2.7%
5.4%
5.8%
Woods
2.5%
2.7%
8.3%
9.7%
7.2%
6.9%
5.7%
5.9%
2.8%
4.4%
4.4%
Woodward
3.0%
2.9%
4.2%
4.5%
3.7%
3.4%
2.7%
2.6%
2.2%
6.4%
6.0%
Sources: US unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey
http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=ln
State and County unemployment data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics
http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=la